Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama and "The Fierce Urgency Of Now"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:28 AM
Original message
Barack Obama and "The Fierce Urgency Of Now"
I was impressed and intrigued with Barack Obama at first. His speech in 2004 at the convention was a barn raiser, a clarion call to reach past the politics that the Republicans had perfected so well over the last quarter century and find something more substantial and more sustaining in both our political process and in the American spirit.

I eagerly anticipated his announcement speech in Springfield last year and watched him speak on a cold day, announcing his candidacy for President. I was a little surpised that I was not as taken with this speech, as I was looking for something a bit deeper and clarifying, a glimpse into who this man really is and in what he really believes. It was, again, a finely crafted speech full of poetry and inspiration. But it left me somehow unsatisfied and hungry. I knew now that Barack Obama believed in hope, but I didn't know why or to what end. I didn't yet know the man beneath the flowery prose.

The first alarm bell for me went off at the Logo debate. Again, nothing specific, but he seemed, somehow, uncomfortable and out of his element discussing issues of importance to gays and lesbians. He went through the motions, as if a student preparing for an exam, and gave many of the right answers. But I saw no there there. I didn't see a man who deeply felt and understood the struggles that gay people face on a daily basis. John Edwards was trying to get it, it was very easy to see he had agonized and thought deeply about the issues facing gay families. Hillary Clinton gets it on a very deep level, she understands the nuances of our concerns and her respect and commitment shine through. But Senator Obama was off key and removed. I remember registering an almost dissonant moment of disconnection. This man does not understand who we are.

Then came McClurkin. At first I gave him the benefit of the doubt and waited patiently for him to cancel the offensive tour or change the lineup. His campaign, obviously flustered, took a couple of days to come to a decision. Senator Obama decided to keep a man who seriously harms gay youth and who represents a movement that wants to destroy gays and lesbians, as a headliner at his concert. The motive was all too apparent and cynical. He was making a naked appeal to the black evangelical community at the expense of gays and lesbians, black, brown and white, everywhere. It was a breathtaking moment of betrayal, and for many people it brought into sharp focus the value system and priorities of this man who would lead us. This time I did get a glimpse into his soul.

Recently, Willie Brown made it public that he and Gavin Newsom had thrown a fundraiser for Barack Obama during his Illinois senate run in '04. This was shortly after Mayor Newsom had shocked the nation with perhaps the most electrifying act of civil disobedience in a generation. He sat through George Bush's state of the union speech that year, listened to Bush's call for a consitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, came home to San Francisco and decided, in a moment of sheer courage, to unilaterally declare same sex marriage legal in his city. His constituents, overjoyed and living as if in a dream, actually started getting married, and it was all carried live on national television. Couples who had been living under Jim Crow heterosexist laws for their entire adult lives together, couples of twenty, thirty, fifty years could actually walk down the marble steps of City Hall, having made their union legally equal to those of their straight friends, neighbors and family.

Senator Obama came to this fundraiser in San Francisco after Gavin Newsom had confronted the nation's homophobia dead on and what did he do?

He told Willie Brown that he wanted to make sure he did not take a picture with Mayor Newsom. He did not want to be publicly associated with the man who just did for gays and lesbians what Martin Luther King had done for African Americans fifty years ago.

Senator Obama is fond of quoting Dr. King and speaks regularly of the "fierce urgency of now." Gay people know this concept far too well. We have been told for many, many years that this is not the time, this is not the moment, keep quiet and we will take care of you later, don't make a ruckus this election cycle and your demands will be addressed next time. We know what the "fierce urgency of now" means, because we have lived through decades of being told it's not our turn.

If Senator Obama understood what he was uttering, if he really understood what the phrase meant and believed it in his heart and soul, he could never have refused to take a picture with Mayor Newsom. On the contrary, he would have been eager to be identified with a man who not only understood the "fierce urgency of now" but had just put it into practice, jolting an entire nation in the process.

I can't listen to Barack Obama's poetry now without wincing. "The fierce urgency of now" rings hollow, as for him it is a selective urgency, apparently excluding an entire population.

When will you address us, Senator? When will we become not only a part of the litany of your ritual poetry, but part of the fabric of your soul?

We're over here watching you, still hoping that you will lift us up too. Not just in words delivered in a sermon, but in actions and deeds.

We're your chance to prove that the "fierce urgency of now" is more than a revarnished political slogan, but something you actually feel deep in your heart.

We're still waiting for you to reach out to us.

We're still waiting for you to demonstrate that you understand who we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DontFret Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. With all due respect
Look, I don't know what Obama believes in his heart about gay rights. But the fact of the matter is there are like 6 (exaggeration) gay people in the US. They are just not a big and loud enough demographic to pay special attention to. It's the cruel reality of politics.

What matters is whether Obama supports gay rights or not. Why is what he actually feels relevant if he still supports the rights you clamor for? If he indeed has a problem with gays, it is the sign of a true leader that he realizes his beliefs aren't fair and works against those beliefs for equal rights.

I have no problems with gays. I argue for gay rights at every step of the way. But this is not just a deal breaker for me or for most mainstream (see: apathetic, greedy, and self-interested). He supports your rights, so what he actually feels is irrelevant, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. At first I was flabbergasted by your post.
But then I started laughing and can not stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. OMG, it's another one of those "numbers" people
Lemme guess, you're in one of the privileged majority groups so you just don't give a flying fuck, is that right?


Nice attitude asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. With no respect whatsoever to you:
You do indeed have a very big "problem with gays."

Worse yet, you don't know the first thing about democracy. You should be ashamed to call yourself an American -- but your lack of shame is quite clear.

You disgust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Fortunately, there's only one of you. IGNORE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Welcome to DU
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 04:29 AM by Yuugal
I'm poor and I have to trust people in politics who I'm pretty sure don't want me living on their block. Over the years I have grown very cynical watching pols talk about helping me and then helping themselves while pretending my issues are just too hard to fight for. So now I need a little bit more from them before they can have my vote. I actually need to believe that in their hearts they do care. When it comes to class issues there is some give and take because money is alot more important to that group than it ever will be for me.

When it comes to civil rights, the basic notion that we are all equal, there can be NO negotiation. You can't be a little bit pregnant on gay rights or any civil right. You need to lead by example and show you believe and aren't just going through the motions and then say whoops maybe next time folks. Obama screwed up big time with Donnie M and has earned some of the GLBT community's scorn for it. To show he has heart, he is going to have to do some serious fence mending. Serves him right for that.

I voted for Obama in the NY primary because he seems to be trying to do just that but if he fails then he can't have my vote in the general. I'm hetero, white, male........and a progressive activist, union activist, poor, and disabled. I have heart on the issue because its the right way to be but even if I didn't, history shows me that ten seconds after they come for the gays, they round up the disableds and activists anyway. Actually, in Germany us disabled might have been first, but no matter, we all ended up in the same boat.

My whole adult life I've been waiting for the constitution to be enforced by Dems, otherwise I might as well use it to wipe my ass with like Bushit does. We are either all equal, or this party can kiss my ass. No more delay of game, no more shhhhhhh wait until after the election crap, no more broken promises. Equal rights, or eat this. Obama needs to get out there and show which kind of dem he is. Otherwise civil rights end up "off the table".

I'll make my final decision in nov if he gets the nom, but he really needs to show miles and miles and miles of heart on this one. It is a deal-breaker for me. He still has time, lets hope he uses it wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doyourealize1 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Basically you just told the OP to "just deal with it"
You DontFret, you sound like a real jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Welcome to DU
I hope your stay here works out well for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. That was a very well thought out post
You expressed your perceptions very civilly and I can understand how you feel. I think Obama should not evade the issue as it is hurting so many people who deserve better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just as I am not in his heart - he is not in mine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I find no images of Newsom and Clinton between the time Newsom
was campaigning and the time he endorsed Hillary.

You are singling out Obama for the default, if reprehensible, position of mainstream Democrats. That's not fair.

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=Clinton+Newsom&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&ni=20&fr=yfp-t-501&b=41
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is totally fair if she knows a better candidate for the job.
You are suggesting that her position needs to be judgment free. How does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No. The point is no mainstream Democrat wanted to be photographed
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:53 AM by sfexpat2000
with Newsom at that time. If you have an image of Hillary with Gavin, I'd like to see it. I've searched and can't find one.

So, no. It's not fair to single Obama out for the default position the party took, no matter how wrong. Is he responsible for this wretched position? Yes, he is. But please don't pretend to me that Hillary did any better because she did not. Unless I'm wrong and someone can show me a photograph of Hillary supporting Newsom during that time. If you can, I will gladly apologize. I looked and couldn't find a thing.

/grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Interesting -
you are picking on one flea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No. I am pointing to something that can be objectively measured.
Did Hillary support Newsom or did she not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. there was a photo of Hillary and Gavin posted on DU a day or two ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. You're missing the forest for the trees.
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 04:00 AM by Harvey Korman
Perhaps deliberately--I can't tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Not at all. I have supported this community since I was adult enough
to understand the stakes.

And the attacks on Obama are misplaced just as the trust in Clinton is misplaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. It took me 0.07 seconds on Google to find these




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Do you have dates? I found several when Gavin endorsed her
but none around the time he was marrying people. When I check the properties of these, I get 2007. Maybe you should check behind me.

My deal isn't so much to support Obama or to diss Clinton. I don't care about them very much. It's more to remind us to be careful where we place our trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Here are the pics in their original sources
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 05:39 AM by BuffyTheFundieSlayer
SF Sentinel: http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=3999


SF Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/09/MNQRTM37Q.DTL


It appears they're both related to Newsom's endorsement of HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Do you see what I mean? That was three years later.
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 06:10 AM by sfexpat2000
When it was safe and when she was gearing up for this run. There's nothing wrong with that unless you're trying to measure commitment v. political expediency.

I have the same worry about both of them because they are politicians. And because any of our concerns are just chips to them.

The flap about Obama not wanting to be photographed with Gavin is a red herring because no Democrat who had to defend their seat would be seen with him. (Neither did Feinstein or Kerry.) And, that story in the Chronicle ahead of our primary didn't prevent Obama from winning SF County although that is what it was meant to do.

I don't care about them. I care about us and about being real about these politicians so we can invest wisely.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VarnettaTuckpocket Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. No, we don't see what you mean, Newsom isn't safe, everyone remembers what he did
How many other mayors did Hillary not happen to be photographed with 3 yrs ago? It's a coincidence. Newsom will always be radioactive, he said he committed political suicide by marrying gays, but it was the right thing to do. What he was referring to is it will be very difficult for him to run for higher office, even if marrying gays didn't hurt his popularity as mayor of San Francisco. Hillary is not afraid to be photographed with him, that's what it comes down to. She wouldn't insult her gay supporters by treating the pro-gay hunk like leper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. So, in Obama's case it was a purposeful avoidance,
as it was for so many others, but in Hillary's case it was a co-incidence. Gotcha.

And Newsom will be fine. He got in at the beginning of a trend. He paid for it for a couple of years, but he'll be fine. That's a good thing for those of you who wish him success.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. I guess I would ask you, sf
can you find me instances of where she deliberately refused to take a picture with him during that time period?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. Exactly
And I could do the same thing with respect to Hillary with regards to the Mexican community by pointing out that there were only two people who are Senators that marched in the 2006 May 1st rallies throughout the nation. Senator Kennedy and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama wants to "embrace" gays.
Just as long as he doesn't have to actually, you know, like touch them or be seen with them or anything that might be construed as constructive activism on their behalf, certainly not in an election year, and most definitely not when he's trying to appeal to Republicans.

McClurkin and Caldwell were two dog whistles heard round the world.

Personally, I think Barack's political mantra is WWRD. "What would Reagan do?" I am becoming increasingly concerned about what kind of people he will nominate for the Supreme Court in his never-ending quest to be Mr. Popularity with the Republicans.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. I only wish I could recommend this post more than once.
It certainly deserves it.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. Beautiful post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. ty
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Amazing.
Articulates so well what many of us have felt, and why we bristle at Obama's rhetoric of "hope" and "transformation." You cannot use the rallying cries of leaders past, leaders who took real risks to make life better for politically vulnerable populations, as mere window-dressing for a campaign. Not when you cower from the ridicule of those who hate. Not when you fail to stand up for the last population it is still acceptable to persecute in the courts, in the Congress and on the street.

K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. What concerns me
is that he undoubtedly knows that many people feel this way. Our sentiment is no secret. He seeks to lead us, yet, he willfully refuses to address us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Don't Bet On Barack" by the Reverend Irene Monroe
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 04:15 AM by 94114_San_Francisco
Obama’s The Audacity of Hope is not a must-read for LGBT voters because he fails to fully comprehend or sincerely commit to the issue of social justice for all Americans. He does not tackle head-on how the religious rhetoric of this political era has played an audacious role in discrimination against LGBT people, leaving us with little to no hope, his rhetoric included.

“In years hence, I may be seen as someone who was on the wrong side of history. I don’t believe such doubts make me a bad Christian, ” Obama writes.

As LGBT voters, our job is neither to judge nor vote for Obama on whether he is a good Christian. It is, however, for us to judge and vote on whether he is a good statesman.

If he should run for president, he wouldn’t get my vote.


From The Advocate; November 21, 2006.


More from Reverend Irene Monroe here.

edit: I forgot to say how much I appreciate your post ruggerson -- well said! k&r :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. Kick and recommend. great post.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. k & r.
thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Worth reading.
Today an 11th hour story is being circulated that in 2002 Barack Obama refused to be photographed with SF Mayor Newsom, allegedly because he didn't want flak associated with Newsom's stand for gay marriage. If the implication was Obama lacked the political courage to be associated with support for LGBT issues in 2002, it is obviously false. Consider this interview Obama did with the Windy City Times, an Chicago LGBT weekly, in February 2002, while running in Chicago.

(I would appreciate it if Obama supporters would pass this around.)

* SUBLIMINABILITY's diary :: ::
*

WCT: What are the boundaries of your district?

Obama: It’s entirely in the city. It stretches from 99th Street south all the way up through the Gold Coast, along the lakefront. Which means that I’ve got some of the wealthiest zip codes in the state, as well as some of the poorest. The district changed since the most recent re-map. It used to run east-west, Hyde Park, South Shore, and then it would run west, through some very poor areas like Englewood. Most of my representation, historically, has been on the South Side.

WCT: I remember seeing you at gay and lesbian events, if not before you were elected, certainly after you were elected.

Obama: Before and after.

WCT: And yet, your district at the time, stereotypically, people would not consider having a large gay presence.

Obama: That probably dates back to my college days. My favorite professor my first year in college was one of the first openly gay people that I knew. This was back in 1979. He was a terrific guy, though we’ve lost touch. He was a political science professor. ... Because of my friendship with him, I became, early on, attuned to some of the issues and struggles that were facing the gay and lesbian communities. I think, because of those personal relationships with people like him, friends of mine I’ve known and worked with in various capacities, I’ve always been concerned and interested in how we promote social justice for all people.

WCT: Have you ever experienced any backlash, in terms of your re-election, when you supported gay issues?

Obama: I have not. I’m really pleased with the cultural shift that’s taken place just in the last decade in our society. I think that Chicago, and Illinois, in a lot of ways have been leaders in the country, particularly in the Democratic Party, where I think there has been a lot of progress made. We don’t have a lot of gay-bashing taking place within the Democratic Party, from any camp.

WCT: One of the things that supporters of the state gay-rights bill have been saying is that some of the supporters of certain Senate candidates, yourself included, were not coming out full force for the Senate bill this time. Do you feel there’s a litmus test for people whose supporters aren’t fully 100%?

Obama: You raise an important point. Although your initial question was whether there’s been a backlash against me, I see none of that within the Democratic Party. I think there are still geographical differences in terms of attitude toward gay and lesbian issues. I think downstate, there is a difference. On the Southwest Side, the Northwest Side of Chicago, where the Catholic Church is still a significant institution, there is a difference. And, to a certain extent, within the African-American community, because of the strong affiliation with the church, there is still some resistance.

My attitude is that candidates for office, persons in elected office, are ultimately responsible for what they say and what they do. I think the question is, are they forceful, clear, strong advocates on behalf of these issues. Are they doing everything that they can to lobby on behalf of these issues. They’re not always going to be successful, even within the Democratic Party. And there are going to be people in this U.S. Senate race who support me who may not feel the same way I do on gay and lesbian issues. That’s going to be true of the other candidates as well. The important thing is, what do people see me saying publicly, how am I acting publicly, how am I voting publicly. Because what I do think is unacceptable is saying one thing in one forum, and saying something else in another. What you do have to expect is consistency, and not playing to a particular audience.

WCT: Can you talk about the supporters of you who do not support the gay-rights bill . Is it your sense that the choice they are making is a moral choice for them, or is it a political choice?

Obama: The overwhelming majority of my supporters not only support SB 101 but are co-sponsors. There are going to be some of my supporters who may not have voted for it yet ... . I think it probably varies. I think there are some downstate Democrats who are just making a political calculation, that this is really a tough one. That they will experience significant political backlash in districts that are closely aligned, and in which the Republican Party is very much using this as a wedge issue. I think there may be other supporters of mine who are still asking questions about the contents of the bill. I’m confident that if we can get this to the floor, and get close, that I can change some minds.

WCT: You have done a lot on HIV and AIDS funding.

Obama: That’s been a top priority for me, partly because I’m in charge of the Health and Human Services Committee in the Senate. I try to work very actively with the AIDS Foundation and other advocacy groups to improve our response here in Illinois. This year, a lot of our focus was on testing pregnant women ... . It involves not just testing, but more importantly, counseling of pregnant women. So that was a significant victory. I’ve been a strong advocate, consistently, for increasing AIDS funding throughout my tenure in the state Senate. We still do not provide enough resources for the kinds of community-based prevention programs that are necessary, and I think as a consequence we’ve seen AIDS rates creep back up, particularly among young people. One of the things I’m constantly interested in is making sure that we’re fighting complacency on this issue, because we’re a long way from being out of the woods on the AIDS crisis.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/5/105742/0714
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. wow....
just wow. Very well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxsf Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
41. You are not alone
I was forced by my church as a 17 year old to go through similar "counseling". It forever changed my relationship with both the church and God. It took years to rid myself of those vile ideas. When I learned of McClurkin, I emailed Senator Obama looking for some explanation, something. All I got was signed up for campaign requests for money.

Now is the only thing that is real. The fierce urgency is a fundamental part of every now, woven into the fabric. It is what drives life. It has always been.

The compelling urge to do what is right, to improve ourselves and the lives of those around us, is not issued from congress or the army or even the Lord. It is a choice we all make for ourselves for each and every now, it is the liberty of the mind.

I've spent many hours contemplating this dilemma. The question for me: Do I really feel so bad about these people that I can't forgive them? They haven't asked for it, and they continue to harm more children. Would my act of compassion mean anything to them, or would they simply use it as an opportunity to spread the word? The truth is, that in fact I have forgiven them long ago, and yes I would overlook my misgivings and invite them to my "tent". But I do not believe I could put them on my stage.

And as it plays out further, it's interesting that the boundary for the rhetoric of hope seems to end at the tent. Or in other words, the inspiration is justified so long as you get it your way. Which I believe in politico-lingo translates to politics as usual. Outside the tent, well, it just makes me sad the vitriol that is spilt like a great slick of contaminated goo. Yuck what a mess.

Hope and inspiration come from within. If we're really going to change things, then it will happen with or without the President. When you feel the need to make good happen, to grow and to learn, go and do it now! Tell them time sent you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC