Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IT'S MY PARTY AND I'LL CRY IF I WANT TO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HopeforChange Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:56 PM
Original message
IT'S MY PARTY AND I'LL CRY IF I WANT TO
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:36 PM by HopeforChange
In the Michigan Primary Hillary Is the only one who got Votes.

Obama and Edwards did not put their names from the Ballot in line with party rules.
Hillary somehow had her name on the ballot and did not get it taken off.
So of the three the only candidate the voters could vote for was Hillary.

So the only candidate who got votes was Hillary.

The people in that State were not allowed to have a say on the other candidates.

I predict Hillary will Cry Cry Cry to get her way after all her MOTTO for this party is

"IT'S MY PARTY AND I'LL CRY IF I WANT TO"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsYJyVEUaC4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's simply untrue
The candidates did NOT agree to remove their names, nor was it part of the pledge they made.

But don't let the facts get in the way of making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The "Distract the Media from Pimpgate" email was received, I see
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeforChange Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Okay I did some research. I heard the former on the news.

It seems that Obama and Edwards did not put their names on in line with party rules.

I think maybe Hillary did not get her's taken off the ballot. In any event she doesn't get these votes.

They should split the delagates for Michigan.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/09/voters_face_confusion_in_michi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Wrong again
all of them had their names on the ballot. Some of them CHOSE to remove their names, not because of any party rule, but as a way to suck up to the voters of Iowa and New Hampshire. There was never any agreement or requirement that they do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like it's YOU that's crying. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lying doesn't help matters any
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
"All the candidates agreed to remove their names from the Ballots"


A lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. However, as I recall the exact wording was that
they all agreed not to paricipate. Leaving your name on the ballot could reasonably be construed as participation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "participate" in this context is not clear
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:19 PM by HughMoran
Please do the research and some back with more specifics so we can have a real discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Nope. I just don't care that much.
I don't have any strong objection to her having left her name on the ballot. And I'm fine with however Howard Dean works things out. It's unlikely in any event that MI could put her over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. He will not let her get the delegates
If anything, they may revote or caucus as has been suggested. Florida, I'm not so sure about - but it seems unlikely that an uncontested state will be allowed to put one or the other over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Depends on ones' idea of 'reasonable'
The name-removal followed the realization that Clinton was going to win the beauty contest easily. Effect doesn't prove cause, but it's suggestive.

These candidates are going to do what benefits them electorally... if Obama had been up 30% in Michigan polling I doubt Clinton would have remained on the ballot, or that he would have been off it.

Most importantly, though, is that the point of rules is so that people can run right up against the rules. It's like corporate regulation. Corporations have an obligation to their shareholders to run right up to the edge of the law, and the law has an obligation to the citizens to draw the line in the right place.

No campaign should be expected to, or even applauded for, failing to take full advantage of the rules in place, whatever those rules are.

If it's a problem, then we need different rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I had forgotten about the "not participating" part of the agreement, but
I have heard that was part of it. Does anyone know where to find the text of the actual agreement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Then why didn't anybody take their names off the Florida ballot?
The only candidates who violated the pledge were Kucinich, by campaigning in Michigan, and arguably Obama, who ran commercials in Florida.


You're losing what little bit of credibility you had left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I heard that they all tried to get their names taken off the Florida ballot, but the deadline
had already passed there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. You can't take your name off the ballot in Florida
without dropping out of the race completely.

"Can a presidential candidate remove their name from the ballot in Florida?

Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Thurman, Senator Geller and Representative Gelber submitted to Florida’s Secretary of State the names of our Party’s presidential candidates for placement on the January 29, 2008 Democratic Presidential Preference Primary ballot. State law allows candidates who wish to withdraw from the Florida primary to do so by filing an affidavit stating that he or she is not a candidate for President of the United States of America. In other words: to get off the ballot in Florida, a candidate has to swear that he or she isn’t running for President."

Educate yourself before you pontificate about credibility. Now you know why they couldn't take their names off the ballot in FL/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Your credibility
was lost awhile ago. You at least pretended to be fair and above-board, but now you're resorting to the same slime and innuendo that so many others here do.

Clinton broke no pledge or agreement in MI. Only Kucinich did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. oh stop with the endless bullshit
I don't believe Clinton broke any agreement. I didn't say she did and I don't slime Clinton. Day in and day out I defend her here, and I'll continue to do condemn bullshit attacks against her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. and yesterday
you "pretended" to be concerned about what the Clintons are hiding in their tax returns, even though you KNEW she said she'll release them if she's the nominee.

Then you lied and said it was customary for candidates to release their tax returns, when that's just not true. It's customary for NOMINEES to release their returns.

You've gotten as bad as everybody else here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. you've lost it. You can no longer tell the difference between
a legitimate issue and bullshit sliming. I didn't pretend to be anything. I don't like that they won't release their tax return. I don't like that they won't release their library donor list. I don't like that they operate with a long standing secrecy that encompasses many things.

You haven't any special psychic powers, cupcake, so your claim that you know what I'm really thinking, is just silly. You're being petulant and whiny. Suck it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. And it's been explained to you
that she WILL release her tax return if she's the nominee. That's the standard way it's done. John Kerry released HIS returns only after he secured the nomination.

And you also know that the library donor list is confidential. Non-profits aren't - and shouldn't be - obligated to release their donor lists. When you donate to a charity, it's nobody else's business. But you know that, and keep kicking that little smear around.

You're dishonest and disingenuous, in addition to being utterly obnoxious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Excuses excuses.

Secrecy is part and parcel of how the Clintons operate. They damn well should release that library donor list. Other presidents have done so.

As for obnoxious, you certainly fit the bill. Plain out ugly in fact. I suggest you put down the bottle.

Oh, and welcome to my ignore list, pookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Sorry
just more lies and smears from you.

I'm proud to be ignored by the likes of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Must be fun being an idiot. You do it so well
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:04 PM by durrrty libby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jkshaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is is lies or just stupidity?
"All the candidates agreed to remove their names from the Ballots."

No they did not.

"Edwards and Obama did just that."

Yes following Biden & Richardson;s leads.

"Hillary did not."

Neither did Dodd, 1st signer of the 4 states pledge, nor Gravel. Kucinich attempted to remove his name but messed up the paperwork.

"So the only candidate was Hillary."

There were 4 Democrats on the ballot.

"The Democratic votes went to her."

I think she got around 60% with 40% voting uncommitted in a campaign undertaken by Obama surrogates.

"The people in that State were not allowed to have a say on the other candidates."

And whose fault is that? The Iowa ass kissing Democrats who removed their name from the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I guess lying out loud isn't an issue during campaign season
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. And whose little sock puppet are YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You have to wonder
...about these "slogan" people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Since you typed in ALL CAPS it must be true.
Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC