|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:12 AM Original message |
"If you fund it -- you support it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Ahh, the no nuance approach. By that logic Hillary is a war criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I find it interesting that his supporters want to blame Hillary for everything Bush did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I agree that many of our senators may have voted for the IWR, not just for political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. but, in the case of these candidates, you gotta wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I thought they both voted consistently to fund the troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. did you read 'they' in my post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisainmilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. John Edwards called them on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I find the "political reasons" argument interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. It's that "leadership" vs "do what your constituents want" conundrum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. That is precisely the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. LOL! By that logic, the half of the country that voted for and re-elected Bush are war criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. wasn't it up to about 75%?? that would be war criminals? I forget-the % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. you've got to wonder what Obama actually did about Iraq after the speech he gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. think about it--most obamababies based their support on a NONexistant vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. I know and I've decided to start calling them on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
67. HARD==over and over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
3. ". Some of you are supporting Obama because he was opposed to the war in Iraq. Yes, Hillary voted to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. They're all nuts when not better than us anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
7. Do you have a loved one serving in Baghdad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. I did have one in Baghdad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I spend a lot of time at icasualties.org. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Don't pick on Kentuck. He's not saying that we should leave the soldiers without supplies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
11. Ha. Is this the best you can come up with? I was against the IW, but I can't argue w/funding it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. so I guess you disagree his refusal to fund it now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 09:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. The soldiers who were serving in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
22. Ah, we start with "blame the candidate for some bloggers." That always bodes well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. If you build it . . . . . . . . . they will come . . . . . . . . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. I agree that Obama and Hillary are virtually identical in their votes over the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. National Journal: Obama Most Liberal Senator 2007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Centrists. No support for impeachment. No support for investigating machines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. so say you -- a preponderance of the data says otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Show it to me. Show me vote by Obama that differ from Clinton's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Here's the bigee -- She voted YES on the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Honey, Obama didn't vote on that. He wasn't in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Obama was against THIS war from the get-go. That matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Show me the difference in the votes between Obama and Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. They aren't the same on THAT vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Obama didn't vote on that vote! You're living in a fantasy world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. Purposeful blindness is no excuse for repeating bullshit, but you go right ahead anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
64. He was NOT in the Senate at that time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Hillary was and she voted YES on the IWR, a blank check that Junior promptly cashed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
107. How did Obama vote on Kyl-Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #107 |
108. and again you can't seem to discern the difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. I know she did. I don't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:01 PM Original message |
YOU base your support on a NON-EXistant vote?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
73. Better than giving her a high-five for her YES vote for war and worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. ha ha--so you admit your support is based on a NON-existant vote. COOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. You admit you are perfectly fine with her BS vote for war made entirely for political reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #78 |
97. Make your own ASSumptions. I admit no such thing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #97 |
105. self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
49. HA! They called him "insurgent." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. false argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Oh Wise one--come lay your hands on us and Enlighten us (vs hit and run) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Don't bother with that one. Snort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Obama said if you fund it you support it. Swore he wouldn't fund it during his campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Obama-the FLIP-FLOPPER-IN-CHIEF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
30. K & R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. Obama Gaffe on War Funding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. This comment is what Obamababies use all the time: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. But but... Obama is the anti-war candidate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Obama talks but does he walk the walk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. His only proven strategy to win is to SWOON em!-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. I don't agree with votes to fund the war BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. To equate campaign rhetoric with an actual vote is also dishonest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Obama even admitted he doesn't know how he would have voted on the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Had he been privy to the arm-twisting and all-out threats that Congress was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. So your argument is Clinton wasn't strong enough to withstand some arm-twisting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. That's right. That's one reason she was my 4th choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. I think you and I are in closer agreement than we realize... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. Well, there you go! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:06 PM Original message |
Well, give me a good example where Obama stands up for a controversial issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. And you are merely repeating false rhetoric. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. They seem more comfortable passing on false information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. Indeed. It's pretty thin soup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Thin? It's anorexic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:08 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Zing! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #69 |
84. So now it's false? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. It's that darn pesky next sentence you are ignoring that puts a monkeywrench in your case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Parse away .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Nah, you're doing a fine job of that already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Obama was right about Iraq from the onset -- Clinton and Edwards dead wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. So now, we deflect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. PRESENT--SAME as sitting on the fence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. No it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. You can parse language til the cows come home but the facts prevail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. "I will not reward any of those that abdicated their Constitutionally mandated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #60 |
70. He says right there he doesn't know what he would have done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. perhaps you missed this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
82. Right, from his vantage point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. He said the case was not made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. Oh, I don't have any problem admitting that she fucked up with that vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Provide the proper context for that quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. it has been posted several times--do your own research! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Huh? I don't need to do the research - I already know the context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Based on his record ever since, I feel that he would have voted for IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. Understood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #68 |
86. How can it be an issue when McCain still supports the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. Agreed. Against McCain, all of this is a non-issue. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. The same way it was an issue for Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Nah, it's old news now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
returnable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. "It's really a no-brainer." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
52. Damn right-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
53. Kentuck...I don't know who I'm supporting...yet...but thanks for your post.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
106. I haven't yet decided... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
71. Good column |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
89. 2. Partially correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC