Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Liberal was Bill Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:35 PM
Original message
Poll question: How Liberal was Bill Clinton?

Just curious where DUers come down on his policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who cares!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obviously you do or you wouldn't be posting here and checking it out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was a Conservative Democrat. He got caught sleeping with a woman.
If he were a Conservative Republican, he would have been caught cruising the mens' room.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. To the left on most social issues, conservative on many economic ones
Which is not to say that he was conservative like the Club for Growthers but he was no socialist either. He was judged to be to the right of Richard Nixon on the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thats a pretty good assessment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. agreed, but Nixon had to deal with strong unions and a Democratic Congress
Ah, the good old days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Free" Trade, Outsourced Torture, Super-Low Taxes On The Rich...
He did raise taxes on the Rich a little. But then he apologized for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Conservative Dem
And per Alan Greenspan "the best Republican President we've had in a while".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Trick question. Economically or Culturally?
Clinton is liberal on social issues like abortion and gun control, but rather conservative on the issue of controlling corporate greed.

People are still judging Clinton in comparison to the Bush bookends that surrounded him.

He certainly was less liberal than Kerry, Mondale, Dukakis, or even for that matter, Gary Hart.

None of these candidates ever hired Republican consultants like the Clinton's have, e.g., David Gergen, Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

Bill Clinton made "Republican Lite" his personal brand name.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. And even on social issues, he was horrible with gay issues...
DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell...

Of course he showed that he cared more about political opportunism than principles when he tried to tell Kerry to come out against Gay Marriage to win the 2004 election even though he didn't agree with it.

The sex scandal is really low on my totem pole of reasons why I dislike Bill.

Include NAFTA, Welfare Reform and Media Consolidation to the list above and no thanks to another Clinton Administration. It was nothing more than an extension of Reagan-Bush I. This line of thinking has now had 30 years in office. We need to end this run now.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He was an opportunist. He executed a retarded man in the middle of the '92 campaign...
Went back to Arkansas to make a big show of how he was pro-death penalty.

The Supreme Court has since ruled that executing these people is unconstitutional.

Has anyone ever asked Hillary what she did to stop him from ordering that man's death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's a DLC centrist
I suspect Hillary, who's also DLC and promising a "centrist" coalition, will be the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Which translates to a corporate right-winger
It's sad how our political compass has been perverted since Raygun. In truth, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel are centrists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I don't know about that
Centrist means someone trying to find the center or middle ground of political opinion, which tends to put them far on the conservative side of most issues.

Kucinich and Gravel are not "centrist" by this definition. I think "moderate" would be the better term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Kucinich doesn't seem "moderate" by American standards. He's far left in American parlance.
Most folks don't seem to take kindly or are unsure about Kucinich's proposal of government health insurance in the form of single-payer health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes, by current American standards
But by global or historical standards, he's a moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Exactly what "folks" are you referring to?
Most polls show overwhelming support for single payer. You even get a majority if you ask people if they're willing to tolerate a tax hike for single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. No, I saw those polls. Most folks support universal health care, not single-payer health care.
True single-payer health care is supported by like 40 percent the last time I looked at those polls. Requiring everybody to purchase private health insurance with subsidies for poor people is not single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Y'know, you'd almost think Google didn't exist.
http://blog.sustainablemiddleclass.com/?p=143

55% Support SINGLE PAYER health care.

There are many more where that came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Pardon me for using polls older than 6 months.
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:26 PM by Selatius
I concede that in light of that Kucinich is a moderate, but as you are obviously aware, there's an institutional drag between what the people's views are and what the establishment's views are in terms of economic policy.

Also, give me the reference terms you used in google. Did you use google news or simply the regular portal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I won't pardon you, but I'm considering commuting your sentence.
:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Point taken. They are moderates.
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:15 PM by jgraz
I tend to use those words interchangeably, but I shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Neoliberal, favoring NAFTA, media deregulation (Telecom Act 1996), foreign adventurism, and...
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 12:51 PM by Selatius
welfare reform (replacing Aid to Families with Dependent Children with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families). Maximum lifetime benefits under TANF are now limited to a maximum of 60 months only.

On economic issues, he's right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. it depends on what the definition of 'liberal' is
:P

Siriusly though, Bill Clinton was a split. On social issues, or identity politics, he was very liberal. That's what the conservatives saw and what made them so angry. On economic issues, or working class issues, or anti-corporatism, he was very conservative.

That defies the whole "What's the matter with Kansas" analysis which says that middle income Republicans are voting against their economic interests by voting against Democrats. Under Clinton (DLC) 'leadership', Democrats don't really work for the working class interests. DLC vs. Republican is not a choice between working class party and business class party. It's a choice between a socially liberal corporate party and a socially conservative corporate party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's a choice between a socially liberal corporate party and a socially conservative corporate party
Exactly!

Very well said!

:yourock:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. as liberal as he could politically be in the 90's
off the heals of the Reagan Revolution, with a DINO party his only thing closest to his support. he had to end welfare as we knew to make it a second chance, not a way of life, and he had to do so to save the party. He could not get health care because of the big industry commercials and the strengthened GOP after Reagan and Bush 3 successive huge landslides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I didn't know welfare was a way of life. Who says he had to end it?
Welfare cadillacs and steak dinners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. the american voters said so
there really WERE people who used welfare as a free ride as there are people who go to the hospital today to get healthcare with no insurance. and some did drive pink cadillacs. solving that problem was not liberal or conservative, it was american. many people on welfare did cheat the system, and he ended the stigma against the party in that sense that existed since nixon racially polarized peeps against the democratic party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. He was a great president
who accomplished more than any Dem since FDR to turn the country around.

Obama is definitely not the same caliber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. What??!? How can you say that about Obama before he has even had a chance?
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 01:26 PM by high density
That's ridiculous! It's like going back to 1992 and saying that Bill Clinton can't amount to anything because he's only been Governor of Arkansas!

Another question, why do you spend so much time on this forum taking shits on Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Political Opportunist??
Depended on the wind in a few circumstances...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. He was a conservative democrat,
and much of what he did was what was needed at the time. He gets high marks as a president, in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. Best Republican President of our lifetime
Better than Reagan, Nixon, or either Bush, but certainly no JFK or FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. He supported that school uniform shit
That makes him conservative just by litmus.

I will not vote for anyone known to support public school uniforms, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Clinton
The Clintons are not Liberals desperate what some In the media would have us believe.They are centists.Gore,and Dean were true Moderates.Kerry Is a true Liberal(Kerry opposses using the death
Penality except In cases of Terrorists.And Kerry Is a former Prosucater)While the Media will call Obama the most Liberal Senator I call him a Moderate but closer to the left Center than the Clintons.Dukasis was really a Moderate but was very Liberal on some social Issues.If the media hadn't caught gary Hart he probally would have won the nomination In 1988(and possibly keep Bush Senior out of the white House)Even Michael Moore has called Nixon more of a Liberal than Clinton(or Carter who was really a moderate)

There Is a big difference between Moderates and Centists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcellobarrios Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. Whatever he was, it was DAMNED GOOD for the economy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC