Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary looks forward to Senator Kennedy and Senator Kerry support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:40 PM
Original message
Hillary looks forward to Senator Kennedy and Senator Kerry support
On the news Hillary just said that it goes against the way super delegates historically have endorsed and voted for candidates. And that if Barack Obama continues to push for them to vote as their state or precinct voted she would look forward to and welcome Senator Kennedy's and Senator Kerry's support.

Let the good times roll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad that isnt what he is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep, what he's saying is that they should go with whoever wins the most delegates
overal from the various primaries and caucuses.

In other words, the elections should decide the winner, not these superdelegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I agree, even if it is by a slim margin - but the other side will scream loud n long
but the democrat talking heads are already talking back room deals for super d's to end this early

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Yes, he's dictating how they should vote.
As a Presidential candidate he should do no such thing, even if that's how they're likely to vote anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Well, yes he is. Look here:
Political Punch
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/the-super-deleg.html

~snip~
Obama this week warned Super-delegates to vote the way their states have voted, "if this contest comes down to super-delegates, we are going to be able to say we have more pledged delegates, which means the Democratic voters have spoken. Those super-delegates, those party insiders would have to think long and hard how they would approach the nomination." Obama suggested "the argument we would be making to super-delegates is, if we come into the convention with more pledged delegates then I think we can make a very strong argument that our constituencies have spoken and I think that's going to be pretty important when it comes to the general election."

Does that mean his super-delegates in Massachusetts -- Sens. Kerry and Kennedy, Gov Patrick -- should defect to Clinton?

~snip~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Isn't Obama the candidate that promotes himself as being *Right, the 1st Time...
by all means, let the good times roll!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Indeed, Hillary is basically reversing what he said on him. :)
It's hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Indeed... Alert... we need signage.. Barack's 1st....boo-boo
may cost him the nomination...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I gotta see this quote
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 02:42 PM by bigtree
they're really mixing it up. Hell, they just might rival this *forum, after awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. rotsa ruck with that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would think most superdelegates would go along with the will of the voters in their state..
That is, if they want to get relected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Which is why the good Senators from MA are getting a fucking EARFUL from their constituents. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. tough shit.
what an annoying whiny bunch. I have no objection whatever to my Congress Critters endorsing whoever they fucking want. I didn't vote for them to follow orders. I voted for them because I thought they could do a good job and exercise independent thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Yes, of course. Never QUESTION the AUTHORITIES. They are your BOSSES.
Never mind that you pay their salary and give them their jobs with your vote.

They are SUPERIOR to you, and you are the dogshit beneath their heel.

Bow DOWN to your Senators, and OBEY. NEVER let your opinion be known to them, just in case they might get.... MAD ... at you, and you'll fall out of FAVOR.

What a chickenshit attitude you have about Democracy!

Hey, I thought you put me on IGNORE--you got all pissy and said you were going to DO that last night, because you didn't like my opinion....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. In NJ, the superdelegates that have identified what they will do it is
12 Clinton to 1 Obama. (There are 7 unknown) Obama got more that the about 8 % of vote that represents - should I badger Menendez and Corzine to shift to more adequately reflect NJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You have EVERY RIGHT to communicate with your elected representatives.
And if you see a disparity, you should point it out.

In fact, I URGE you to so do. Pick up the phone, write a letter, or send an email.

You know, the reason politicians aren't responsive is because not enough people fucking GRIPE when they don't like something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. I don't have a problem with him - I have a problem with the party
for giving the super delegates this power - and putting them into this dilemma. My point is that the winning candidate getting ALL the super delegates from a state is as bad as them all picking who they personally want.

I think it would be great if many leaders ON BOTH SIDES now state that they prefer either that the super delegates NOT vote or that they all agree to vote for the one that wins the pledged count. (This assumes that they find a way to get a new fair vote at least in MI where only HRC was on the ballot.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I don't think the electorate sees the choices in this fight in quite the stark terms
that many on this forum do. I doubt that a superdelegate's vote will be used against him or her in their own election to any significant extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Democracy wins again!
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 02:48 PM by Bright Eyes
Or...not.

If she wants my vote in November, she has to win the nomination fairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. OK, they can go to her, Obama will get the ones from the states
and districts that he wins. He will come out of it better than he is now! Of course, Ted and John would not campaign or work for Hillary, they'd still work for the candidate that they want to work for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Right on, Hill.
What's good for the gander is good for the goose.
Or something like that. ;-))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. SPIN SPIN SPIN
You getting dizzy yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. HRC should not get ALL the MA superdelegates' votes
just the proportion of the votes she got - From the list posted here a few weeks ago of the declared MA ones, she seemed to have about half even then.

What is obvious is that country wide, Clinton has a higher % of super delegates than pledged delegates.

I would prefer that the super delegates agree to all vote not to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Obama disagrees with you. See post#14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. That's right - he doesn't own me or my opinion
I disagree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. i won't name them all
But here are a few Clinton Super Delegates that would have to go to Obama if Hillary wants Kerry & Kennedy

Higgins - AK
Reed - AL
there's 4 from Colorado
Camhi from CT

oooh, 11 DNC members from DC, i'm pretty sure Obama will win DC

Oooh, another 5 from GA.

Uh oh, Walter Mondale, no Hillary for you.

See how this works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I count 27 uncommited supers just in CA. See how this works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is an odd statement for her to make considering Obama will win more states.
Meaning that he would edge her out in Superdelegates, if they are allocated as she is suggesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Do you think that all states have an equal number of superdelegates?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No. But they have the same # of Senators.
And governors. She's suggesting that both Senators should align with her because she received more votes. If that happened for every state, then Obama would have more Senator superdelegates, considering Obama has won more states.

That's what I was suggesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. California has 27 uncommitted superdelegates. Not sure how many committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. Recall when Bill, recovering from his heart surgery
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 04:38 PM by OzarkDem
went out on the campaign trail to help Kerry in 2004. Then Kerry showed him how much he appreciated Bill's support. It speaks volumes about Kerry, not good.


Thinner and frailer, the Comeback Kid puts heart into Kerry's campaign


Julian Borger in Philadelphia
Tuesday October 26, 2004
The Guardian


Bill Clinton, the perennial Comeback Kid of American politics, returned from his sick bed to centre stage yesterday, proving that his ailing, quadruply-bypassed heart is still in the fight.

But it was a much thinner, frailer man who took the stage alongside John Kerry in Philadelphia's Love Park than the vigorous leader who dominated the last American decade. He had come back from the brink of political death many times, but this has been an narrow escape of the real thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,,1336035,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. That is not the full story. The truth was Bill went out on a book tour
in the spring of '04 promoting his book. This was supposed to be the time when Kerry introduced himself to the American people. Instead, Bill hogged the airwaves (gee, Bill, couldn't you have released your book at a different time?), while PRAISING Bush and his conduct of the Iraq War and the war on terror. During an election for which the big issue was national security, how persuasive was Bill in getting undecided voters to vote for Kerry when the former president was saying Bush was doing a FINE job in the war on terror? Oh, and I saw that Philly appearance. Bill spent most of the time bragging about his domestic record and presidency. In October, he tried to talk Kerry into backing several anti-gay marriage measures in some battleground states which Kerry quickly said "no, I'll never do that".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. And how did Kerry return the favor?
After Bill went out on the campaign trail for him?



Knife in the back, as usual. Kerry and Kennedy are "one way street" politicians. Great if you help them out but don't ask for a favor in return.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You talk about a knife in the back??? After HILLARY screwed Kerry over in 2006?
Get f---ing real.

Do we need to post the link AGAIN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. That is what I love about her - she is so quick thinking.
lol - great one Hillary :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hillary is such a sociopath that she doesn't know what is funny and what isn't.
Typical spoiled, rich, out of touch DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. And, I am sure IF she becomes the nominee she will have there support AND
I hope they assist her just as much as she assisted and helped Senator Kerry in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. And, I am sure IF she becomes the nominee she will have there support AND
I hope they assist her just as much as she assisted and helped Senator Kerry in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. And, I am sure IF she becomes the nominee she will have their support AND
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 09:45 PM by wisteria
I hope they assist her just as much as she assisted and helped Senator Kerry in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC