|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:14 PM Original message |
Clinton and Obama tied in my precinct.--WA state. 2 delegates each |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ooh, where were you in the state? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Olympia (the state capital) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. So you get to go to the state party right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Not necessarily. We go to the legislative district caucuses and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Jeez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Next are legislative districts, then county conventions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. That's a lot of BS to deal with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
38. It is, but as long as it is on Saturday, I can do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. And you were sure to correct her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Of course not. Much more in line with Clinton Camp to further a lie to get a vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I would ask you to stop calling me a liar. I have researched the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. My remark was generalized and not addressed or aimed at/to you. If you researched, you knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
45. "Of course not. Much more in line with OBAMA Camp to further a lie to get a vote." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I had heard that on DU, are you suggesting that she did not say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. She said she wouldn't *necessarily* campaign/support the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Right. That is what the woman said. Everyone there said they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:24 PM Original message |
For god's sakes, cut it out. You're twisting again ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. And "campaign for" is NOT the same as "vote" for. She was never asked if she would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. your duplicity is really stunning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Cali: Michelle Obama said that she would not necessarily vote for the democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. She did NOT say that. Please provide the exact quote where she said that she would not VOTE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. really, that is just not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Neat, can I ask what co this was in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Upthread she said Olympia, so it was Thurston |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Was yours a closed caucus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. In WA, caucuses are semi-open |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. And of course you, as a good dem corrected the woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. The person may be misinformed, please don't attack them. They gave a nice overview of their caucus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Ummm....Michelle did say that...she did not say she would support the democratic nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. That doesn't mean she wouldn't vote for them, big big difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. And since Michelle Obama never said she wouldn't vote for the nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. actually, she did say that she would not necessarily vote for the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thevoiceofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Wring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. It seems you're confusing "support" for "vote," and basically it changes the more you post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. No, your context is off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Here is what MO said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. It's a good snip, but the reality is in the context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. doublespeak first she say she will have to meditate on it then on yeah she will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. No, I won't give you a break, because accuracy actually matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. The fact is she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. Thanks for the report Evergreen!! sounds great! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mchill (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
28. Got a phone call from a friend in Seattle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
39. My precinct was 3 Obama - 2 Clinton. I am a delegate for the former. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Michelle's comment was discussed at length on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
43. My precinct was 8 Obama, 3 Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
44. Nice you could go with your daughter for first time voting experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I know! She is a delegate too. I was very proud of her. she spoke her mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-09-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. my neice will vote first time in WI next few weeks. talked to last week--i was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC