Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumford, Dixfield, Mexico, and Byron caucuses go for Clinton -Maine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:36 PM
Original message
Rumford, Dixfield, Mexico, and Byron caucuses go for Clinton -Maine


http://www.politickerme.com/rumford-dixfield-mexico-and-byron-caucuses-go-clinton-823

February 10, 2008 - 3:21pm
Rumford, Dixfield, Mexico, and Byron caucuses go for Clinton
By Editor
Tags: Maine Democratic caucuses, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama

The reporting of PolitickerME.com’s Danny Reiter shows Hillary Clinton winning the support of a majority of delegates allotted in the Rumford, Dixfield, Mexico, and Byron caucuses.

90 voters showed up for the caucus in Rumford, with 52 voters breaking for Clinton and 37 voters breaking for Obama. 1 person was undecided. Clinton picked up 12 delegates and Obama picked up 8.

30 voters attended the Dixfield caucus. 16 voters went for Clinton and 14 voters went for Obama. Clinton and Obama picked up 3 delegates each.

In Hanover, 8 voters attended, with 6 going for Obama and 2 going for Clinton. Obama picked up 1 delegate and received none.

43 voters attended the caucus in the town of Mexico. 16 voters selected Obama and 27 voters chose Clinton. Clinton picked up 6 delegates and Obama picked up 4 delegates.

In the Byron caucus, Hillary Clinton received the support of the one voter that attended. She and Obama received no delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's a town called Mexico in Maine? I learn something every day.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. it's even mentioned in a trade book i'm doing with my reading students at work!
haha, i didn't realize it actually existed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. yeah, me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. very small population towns. some of the bigger precints are going a bit differently
but we'll see. This is a horserace in Maine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Caucus turnouts are complete shit, so low

I really think they need to do away with these caucuses fast, they are just not better than primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Most people don't have the time to..
go to caucus's.
The vast majority of the Democratic world uses ELECTIONS via secret ballots to decide these matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why would someone bother slogging through the snow if they're
"undecided?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They're committed to their indecision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. My guess
They are party officers or leaders of Tom Allen's senate campaign who want to be able to pick up the pieces after the nominating season is over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC