With Bush "endorsing" Hillary Clinton it makes we wonder if the two families have a deal worked out

[Bread and Circus]

First, Bill covers for GHW Bush's scandals then GW Bush covered for Clinton. So now I'm wondering if Bush "endorsing" Clinton vs. Obama isn't a matter of quid pro quo. He knows McCain will cover him and I think he thinks Clinton would too. On the other hand, he might be a little worried about Obama

BFEE and the Clinton family are just a little too close for my comfort and it's really, really weird for Bush to get into the Clintons' corner.

[TexasObserver]

1. Birds of a feather, flock together.

[UALRBSofL]

2. They do, did you not get the memo?

:)

[Bicoastal]

3. Well, he didn't endorse HRC so much as he attacked Obama and defended Bill.

But it got me thinking...

Would anyone like to find a video or transcript of Bush's interview of Fox? I know, I know....

[AtomicKitten]

4. It's this Clinton's turn to let another Bush off the hook.

It will be business as usual.

[NastyRiffraff]

5. Bush endorsed McCain. Period

What he said about Bill didn't come close to "endorsing" Hillary. He didn't even address policies; he only said that Bill wasn't a racist and he had a right to campaign for his wife; both true. (Even a stopped clock...)

[Schema Thing]

15. No, he "endorsed" party unity. Didn't even say his name.

[whistle]

6. Post the link where Bush actually said he endorses Hillary?

[bunnies]

7. one-world government. Love it or leave it. nt

[paulk]

8. absurd

more shit smearing from the fuckwits.

[Fresh_Start]

9. Saying that he doesn't believe Bill is a racist, is endorsing HRC?

you must be reading minds.
BTW, how do you account for him rallying the GOP to support their candidate

[blm]

10. Bill protected Bush1, Hillary was set up to protect Bush2. Bushes TRUST Clintons

to protect their secrecy and privilege.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

That protection throughout the 90s led directly to Bush2, 9-11 and this Iraq war.

[hill08]

11. does it mean

They will let Hillary win in November? Maybe that's another reason to nominate her?

[K Gardner]

12. B&C, I made the mistake of jokingly using the word "endorse" with relation to

Shrub to Clinton when I first got here to DU and was pillaried in the town square. Maybe you'll have better luck.

:hide:

[gulliver]

13. Yeah, Bush is talking nice about Clinton cuz he wants to help her.

And Rove was repeating Hil talking points against Obama too. Cuz Rove is trying to help Hillary win the primary.

And the comet is on it's way, so get your sneakers on. Clap if you believe in fairies.

[blues90]

14. I look at it differently , I think this is a ploy

Bush sides with Clinton and I'm not even certain this is true but say it is . With most of the country hating bush and he backs Hillary which may send votes to Obama . If this happens they may feel Obama my be torn apart by McCain and then McCain could win. You know damn well bush does not want a Dem to win .

[Maddy McCall]

16. Bush didn't endorse Clinton.

[Control-Z]

17. Isn't it against DU rules

to post this kind of shit?

[Bread and Circus]

18. Not that I know of.

Bush went to bat for Clinton, it makes me wonder why.

We don't have a nominee yet. Both candidates are fair game for fair criticism until we have a nominee.

[golddigger]

19. Rezko trial in two weeks...eom!

:evilgrin:

[Unsane]

20. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss!

[OneBlueSky]

21. to me, what this means is that Hillary and Bush have an understanding . . .

that should she win, she will not pursue Bush and Cheney for the myriad of crimes they committed against the Constitution, U.S. law, and international law . . . and since Obama has said that Bush has done nothing impeachable, the sad fact is that the Democratic candidate, if elected, is willing to ignore the crimes of the most criminal administration in our nation's history . . .

actually, it's more than a sad fact -- it's a complete disgrace that SHOULD disqualify either of them from consideration for president . . .

and if neither is willing to pursue Bush for his many crimes and misdemeanors, whichever one of them is elected will feel free to act just as illegally, just as unethically, and just as immorally as Bush . . . ya think either of them will void Bush's signing statements? . . . or his directives on illegal spying and on torture? . . . why aren't the candidates talking about this? . . .

because they don't intend to do anything about it . . . because they're all part of the same club -- and they watch each other's back . . .