Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama won the Utah *primary* 57%-39% ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:20 PM
Original message
Obama won the Utah *primary* 57%-39% ...
just wanted to point that out to those who say that he can only win big in states with caucuses or large numbers of black voters. Utah has a large hispanic population as well, so it's a safe bet he won the non-hispanic vote by margins similar to those we saw in the other Western caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bring on texas y'all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. that is true and Harry Reid doesn't control things there like he does in Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Red State! Red State! Doesn't Count! Doesn't Count!
Don't you get it? Every single contest he's won thus far is somehow inferior in the face of Hillary winning California and New York.

There's more to the country than that, folks! And those are the two states I call home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Billary is History
Or at least she should be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think when people are talking about that they are forecasting the GE
the problem with Utah is
120K voted in the Democratic primary
285K voted in the GOP primary

so they are suggesting that Utah isn't important because the democratic candidate will not win Utah period.
Utah exit polls showed only 7% hispanic voters. I'm not sure that a large population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The hispanic population there is much larger than 7% ...
I guess many of them are undocumented or otherwise don't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. exit poll 7% Latino voting Dem primary and 2% voting GOP primary
so I guess the rest don't vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Now that Mormon Mitt is out
The percentages will change, but I agree the state stays red. But again, the presidential nominee is also in the race for the down-ticket candidates. That's where Barack's ability to Barack the vote helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Utah is an open primary, just so ya know.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Delegates are delegates. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But most voted in the GOP Primary for they could cast their vote for Mitt Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. No, it's semi-open. Independents could vote, not Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's what I meant. Just did some numbers going by CNN. Turnout in Utah was 12%.
That's pretty low given our current election season (12% of eligible independents and Democrats).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. But how was it on the Democratic side?
Remember, Democrats only make up about 300,000 in Utah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Utah.. there's lots of desert in Utah, right? That's probably why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. SAND DOESN'T VOTE!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Damn.. I thought I was onto something !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. I didn't know there were any democrats in Utah? Who would have thunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. It isn't surprising. Obama's best states are the most DLC
I'll go out on a limb and say he'll romp in Montana and South Dakota too. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. NY and CA aren't DLC at all? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not nearly as much as Idaho, Kansas, Utah, North Dakota, and Nebraska
I am talking about the proportion of "conservative" Democrats in those states, not whether elected officials in those states signed up for the DLC. Do you think Democrats in Idaho are more progressive than Democrats in California or Massachusetts? Even the rethugs in those states are more liberal than rethugs elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I think the reason he does well is
that he actually GOES to those states.

He went to Boise, ID, and to Omaha, NE, and I think Topeka, KS, IIRC.

Just showing up means a lot to people from those states. It shows that he cares about them and is not ignoring them like Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's a big part of it
But remember how Hillary led the polls in basically every state in 2007? Idaho was for Obama at a time when he led nowhere except Illinois. He always had strength there. Kansas too had a three-way tie between Hillary, Obama, and Edwards at a time when Hillary was hovering in the 40's in the national polls. I don't know about the other states but I believe he always had more inherent strength there than he did in places like Massachusetts and California.

I see what you are saying and experienced it firsthand. In my state the lone 2008 poll had them tied (2007 polling had Hillary way ahead) but Obama won by 10 points because he visited here two days before Super Tuesday (20,000 folks, including me, showed up setting what is reportedly a state record for a political rally). It was a big deal here because no presidential candidate comes to Delaware!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well actually the argument is about to be incenerated in 48 hours.
The problem on super Tuesday was not that he lost the big states it was that there were so many big primaries at one time he was not able to break thru and get personal like he is now. He will be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC