Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Obama only get good press?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:04 PM
Original message
Why does Obama only get good press?
CNN was once again praising Obama. I'm tired of all the major media being mostly part of the Obama campaign machine.

Meanwhile, they diss Hillary every chance they get. This is bullshit.

Anyone can win when the media is in your corner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because he is so outstanding.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 08:34 PM by Prefer
There is just no way we can lose now.

It's a good thing the republicans just gave up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. LOL
maybe the republicans shouldn't vote in democratic primaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sloppyjoe25s Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Strange how winning over and over attracts the Media?
Who would have ever thought that winning over and over (and over and over) would help you with the media?

It must be some "Vast Media Conspiracy"

Oh wait... I guess she could have asked Gulianni
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Media wants Obama
Just like the media wanted Kerry. And the sheeple rush to obey. It's the first step in making sure the rethugs win the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But Obama's coverage rivals that of Bush's in 2000.
It is sickening and really makes him unpalatable for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Me too. If the Clintons had the Rezco house deal that the Obama's got
There'd be a major media campaign going on 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. For whatever reason, the MSM has always hated Clinton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
70. THe clintons have their
own shit to deal with..I don't listen to m$$m and haven't for 6 years. Whatever, could the m$$m being saying about those clintons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I've been with the Obama camp since Feb ... media didn't do anything for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. Jan. Jan 2005 that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. Yup, and Gore over Bradley in the 2000 primaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck the M$M.
Obama is his own man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. He gets good press because he is good (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. are you naive?
he's very inexperienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. How's Hillary's experience working out for her.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. Well, it's not like she's being treated with kid gloves...........
God Forbid that somebody ambushes Obama with a question and he can actually answer it without hemming and hawing. Or voting "present"

Yeah, what a leader. :rofl:

Why doesn't Obama win the big states? :rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. Why doesn't Obama win the big states?
Because the DLC strategy is to concentrate on the big states and ignore the rest. That's where Hillary has been putting ALL her money and attention. That's the way the Clinton machine is set up.

See how well that's working for them?

The failing strategy of a dying campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. Experience = ammunition; inexperience = no attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
63. If GW B*sh can be president, then no experience is required
If you had been paying attention you would notice that the job of the President is hardly even as difficult as being a small company CEO. They don't even do the work the CEO has to do. The job of the presidency has basically been transformed into Propaganda Minister for special interests. The trick is we need someone here with the moral fortitude to do what is right in that position, not what the special interests always want. Would Barack still do some of the things they want? Of course he would. But I do believe he will work to get as much of the peoples interests represented as the Office will allow. Moral fortitude does not require experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. He is kind, running a clean campaign and not trying
to put people down ~ perhaps Billary can learn from that lesson.

However, they have been playing dirty politics for so long, it's hard for them to campaign any other way.

America wants CHANGE not the SAME OLD TUNE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. The Beatification of Obama has started.......
Does he touch for the King's Evil in his spare time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
80. Don't kid yourself for one moment. If Obama is the Democratic
nominee the MSM and the RW smear machine will not hesitate to use anything they can dig up or fabricate against him. It's good for their circulation and insures them of a a viewing audience. His kindness and clean campaign that you refer to will not be any defense against it.

P.S. Name calling does not become you and is considered by many to be juvenile behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
82. Do you believe that he will continue this method..
if he has to go against Mc Cain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama's outstanding performance is probably the reason....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
49. Is that why the msm gave us Bush over Gore, Bush over Kerry?
Have you all forgotten 2000 and 2004? Obama supporters are in for a huge reality check...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...you mean like the race war the media gave us a few weeks ago
that hurt Obama's chances in Nevada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. Do you look at exit poll data? That gave Obama South Carolina
As well as several other states. Swiftboating the Clintons on race by Obama's campaign and the msm worked exactly as intended...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #52
69. So the Clintons brought race into it in the first place just so they could
lose, and thereby blame the loss on racial politics.

Verrry clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chicken or the egg?
Maybe the good press comes from winning. I remember more than a little bit of pro-Hillary sentiment after her win in New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. had the presstitutes on all day-Obama can do no wrong....
the msm has spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cause he's a good guy
that's why! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Parks son Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's because he's about change
Yes we can !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh For Sure. The Media Has Been Immensely Tilted In His Favor, And That's Been A Huge Help.
But I don't consider that being exaggerated on his behalf, because I think he is in fact really good. What I do consider it, is unfair on behalf of Hillary, since she's far better than they've been treating her.

The MSM is never a level playing field though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because he's honest. He's not manipulative. He doesn't get people FIRED..
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 08:11 PM by Kahuna
He's a nice man.

on edit: He's not divisive. He's not trying to pit the races or genders against each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. You be the bad press
What is it you want them to say??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Maybe Hillary will get press when she wins an election.
Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Just wait... If he is the nominee
They'll turn on him like a pack of sharks in a feeding frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Show Me the Mistakes the Obama camp has made that need to be aired? Dirty Politics gets bad air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. The hell it does. The swiftboating of the Clintons in SC didn't seem to
make a damn bit of difference to the MSM....WHO EGGED IT ALL ON DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. It was nothing but a pack of fucking filthy lies and the Obama camp got away with it all. Every bit of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Yup. The msm is playing us AGAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
66. Agreed, the three ring circus in SC was outrageous. Much ado about nothing.
Bill Clinton campaigning with Hillary was a gift to the MSM. They had a field day w/ him, no matter what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
68. Plenty of stuff. You don't think the Obama camp had nothing to do w/ the "racial" stuff, do you??!!
It all started there. No matter what anyone said, it was interpreted as racial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. they go with the winner
and i think the media may be at tad bit pissed at hillary`s jumping on msnbc while obama says nothing about them.

if hillary was winning they would treat obama the same way. bullshit-yes, because it`s all about ad rates -who is going to get the big checks from the advertisers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. He's running a great campaign so far, while Clinton's campaign has serious issues
Plus, he's winning, winning, winning. Do you want them to criticize him for beating her by too large of a margin? Clinton has fired her campaign manager, giving up on elections as of late, supposedly almost out of money recently, had to put a muzzle on her husband after SC, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Oh don't worry
The media will turn on Obama if he wins the nomination, as they do to all Democratic nominees. War Against Gore, anyone? Swiftboating, which the media enabled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. You hit the nail on the head. If Obama wins the WH, we will have another unaccountable President
for 4 years.

Obama already told the media to move on from the Rezko story. In other words...'nothing to see here...'

George Bush>>>>>>>Barack Obama

Meet the new boss....same as the old boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Yes - just like Bush and the cocaine story in 2000
Refuse to answer questions and the press leave you alone - unless your name is Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Exactly!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. They'll take care of him if he gets the nomination
They'll do a quick 180 and go after him with a vengeance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. And I'll be telling Obamanation, "I Told You So".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #41
61. I hope they do...I hope Obama gets his ass served like he deserves. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. Yes, but we don't deserve it
If Obama makes it to the GE and gets pummeled out of winning by the GOP and news media, we all suffer. The thought of 4 or 8 more years of this national nightmare is a daunting prospect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
71. Bullshit.
Rezko is currently facing the courts for his frauds, and Obama says nothing about it because he has nothing to do with it.

Your hatred of Obama verges on the maniacal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Because a lot of people like him. I mean, a LOT!
Of course, the media will try to build up someone who will bring them a lot of viewers. They only go where there is money to be made. That's why they built up Bush for so long. Whether we like it or not, Bush had a lot of followers. Same with Obama. It's not rocket science.

Now, will Obama live up to the ideals that make people like him so much? Time will tell. I think he will. But's because he's a Democrat and reflects a lot of my own thinking. He's not perfect, by any means, but neither is anyone else.

I'm betting that he'd do hell a lot better than Bush, if he gets the nomination and subsequently the White House, in terms of actually leading the country in a positive way. Bush failed miserably at that. That's why the media is down on Bush these days. They go were the public goes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. To set him up now to make his eventual destruction just that much more dramatic.
That's how the corporate media work -- they put people on high pedestals so that they can knock them down, and that goes double for Democrats.

If Obama gets the nomination, the corp media will go back to their usual function of GOP oppo researchers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. Because he's different and old politics don't seem to be popular these days
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. He is the media darling for the time being
They are going to have a real dilemma if Obama and McCain turn out to be the candidates. Both are the media darlings, I wonder who they will push then? The MSM is in love with Obama, even Air America, I have heard more positive press for Hillary from the Repugs lately. You would think AA would be attacking McCain but it's 24/7 beat down the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofeisty Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. This is same media who didn't ask questions about W's Iraq debacle...
They never learn.

The Obama folks need to realize that what the media builds up it will eventually tear down...

Thus, enjoy the lovefest while it lasts. I predict by the second year of an Obama presidency the media will have by and large flipped against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I would feel no sorrow if Air America went in the direction of ENRON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofeisty Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Sadly, it's not just Air America. It's like much of the left has surrendered to 'hope'
Like that will fix the mess this country is in. Oh well. Nothing can be as bad as the last 8 years. But a one term ineffectual president is not what we need right now and that what Obama has written all over him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. Because he gives good speeches!!!!!!!!! Haven't you heard???!!! *swoon*swoon*swoon*
They have garbage on him and want him to be the candidate. After he wins the nomination, they will open their cans and dump all their garbage on him and take him down. They can't WAIT! The repuke owned MSM wants a repuke President and they shall have one...again.

ENJOY people. You deserve what you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. Because he's winning? How do you spin these results in favor of Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
38. It's completely unfair, I turned American Idol on to get a dose of reality. CNN=airheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. CNN favors Hillary in most reports, but you can't goldplate this horse apple.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 08:39 PM by TexasObserver
She's getting badly beaten, and they can't sugarcoat it.

It's the truth that pains you. It's not CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. How do they "diss" Hillary???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
64. What rock have you been living under? Here:
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 08:54 PM by in_cog_ni_to
More from Media Matters on Chris Matthews

After vowing not to underestimate Clinton, Matthews asserted, "he reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around" -- January 9, 2008

http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090008

During MSNBC's coverage of the New Hampshire Democratic primary, Hardball host Chris Matthews stated, "I will never underestimate Hillary Clinton again." But Matthews asserted on MSNBC's Morning Joe the next day, "he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around."

Matthews on Clinton's performance: "good enough here for women who wanted to root for her anyway" -- January 9, 2008

http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090006

During MSNBC's coverage of the New Hampshire primary, Hardball host Chris Matthews said of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's performance during a January 5 Democratic presidential candidates debate: "I wasn't clear at all that she won it. But maybe she was good enough to seem good enough here for women who wanted to root for her anyway." He further stated that the 2008 presidential election is "a pioneer opportunity for women voting -- especially older women voting, who may figure this is their last chance to elect a woman president."

Matthews asked if Pelosi is "going to castrate Steny Hoyer" if he becomes majority leader -- November 14, 2006

http://mediamatters.org/items/200611140006

On the November 13 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews asked political and social commentator Mike Barnicle if Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the presumptive speaker-elect of the House of Representatives, was "going to castrate Steny Hoyer " if Hoyer is elected House majority leader in the 110th Congress.

MSNBC Democratic debate coverage rife with sexist stereotypes -- April 27, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200704280003

Sexist references abounded during MSNBC's April 26 coverage of the first Democratic presidential candidates debate in the context of discussions about the only female candidate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY). MSNBC host Chris Matthews focused obsessively on the appearances of Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) wife, Michelle, to the point that NBC News chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell reminded him that they are Yale and Harvard-educated lawyers, respectively. MSNBC host Tucker Carlson asked a Clinton campaign spokesman whether Clinton had an "unfair advantage because of her sex."

Matthews asserted that Clinton got Register endorsement "thanks to her husband's lobbying with its female editors and publisher" -- December 18, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200712180006

On the December 17 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews said of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), "She may have gotten The Des Moines Register's endorsement the other day, thanks to her husband's lobbying with its female editors and publisher, but voters have spotted the dagger, and they don't like what it looks like." Matthews went on to say, "Hillary's loyal lieutenants are ready to scratch the eyes out of the opposition right now."

Matthews asked about Clinton endorsers' "willingness" "to become castratos in the eunuch chorus" -- December 17, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200712180002

On the December 17 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews claimed: "Every day I pick up the paper and there's another quote out there from somebody who's a wannabe, saying whatever the Clinton people told them to say apparently." Moments later, Matthews asked Financial Times U.S. managing editor Chrystia Freeland: "ren't you appalled at the willingness of these people to become castratos in the eunuch chorus here or whatever they are?" Matthews made the comment in the context of discussing endorsements of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and specifically that of former Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-NE), who made reference following a December 16 campaign event to, among other things, Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) middle name.

Matthews and others on NBC networks have repeatedly linked Clinton to fictional Nurse Ratched -- December 7, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200712070003

On Hardball, Chris Matthews asked about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), "oes she look like Nurse Ratched here?" referencing a character in Ken Kesey's novel and the movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, who has been described as a "scheming, manipulative agent" who "asserts arbitrary control simply because she can." In fact, Matthews and others on programs on NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC have a long history of associating Clinton with Nurse Ratched.

Chris Matthews teased segment by asking whether Clinton is a "She Devil" -- November 19, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200711190004

On the November 18 edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, host Chris Matthews teased a discussion by asking, " 'She Devil?' Republicans are absolutely demonizing Hillary Clinton ." While he spoke, an image of Clinton appeared on screen with the words "She Devil?" below it. Later, an image of Clinton with devil horns appeared on screen while Matthews stated: "We did poll our people and asked 12 of our regular panelists, is it smart politics for Republicans to demonize Hillary Clinton, get real personal about it? Eleven say yes. Just one say, no, it's not smart."

Matthews and National Journal's Douglass on Clinton's "anti-male thing" -- November 2, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200711020012

During the November 1 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, while discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) speech at Wellesley College, her alma mater, in which she asserted, "In so many ways, this all-women's college prepared me to compete in the all-boys club of presidential politics," host Chris Matthews asked: "Is this pandering or playing to the Seven Sisters crowd up at these all-women's colleges, where there may be that sort of mood if you're -- and they all want dates. I assume a lot of them do, on weekends. But this anti-male thing, is that something that's particularly something you can sort of spruce up, you can play up, up there?" Matthews opened the segment by asking his guests -- National Journal contributing editor Linda Douglass and NBC News political director Chuck Todd -- "Don't you both agree, Linda, that she should just lighten up on this gender -- 'the boys are coming to get me' routine?" Douglass replied: "I think, in this case, she's making a really big mistake, because now she's ventured into feminist territory where the man is the enemy."

Matthews' hypothetical suburbanites: Wife wants woman president; husband cares about finances -- October 21, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200710210001

On the October 21 edition of the NBC-syndicated The Chris Matthews Show, while discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) proposal to roll back a portion of the Bush tax cuts to pay for her health insurance plan, host Chris Matthews stated: "I think it's time for me to get in trouble again. ... I'm thinking about a woman who lives in the suburbs; she may not work outside the home. They're talking around election time -- the husband and the wife." Matthews, speaking first in the voice of the hypothetical wife, said: " 'I sort of like this Hillary, the first woman president. She's pro-choice.' And the husband says, 'You know, dear, you know, this is going to kill our tax bracket. You know that tuition thing we pay every couple of years for the kids, every year, we can't do that if we get a higher tax bracket. We have to pay more money.' " Matthews then asked Washington Post Writers Group syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker: "So, could the tax issue -- Hillary's threat to raise taxes -- throw a lot of women and men from the suburbs back into the Republican column?"

Matthews' post-debate analysis: "Let me tell you how short Hillary's leash is" -- September 27, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270006

During MSNBC's analysis of the September 26 Democratic presidential debate at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, while discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), host Chris Matthews said to moderator Tim Russert, "Let me tell you how short Hillary's leash is. She was asked by you, sir, about whether we're going to get full disclosure of contributors to presidential libraries. And she did not feel that she had the latitude in her husband's absence to give you an answer." Matthews continued, "She said, 'You'll have to ask my husband.' As if you're a guy going door to door trying to sell something and says, 'You'll have to wait for my husband to get home.' " Matthews began to ask, "Do you think she's that much --" but then stopped and asserted, "ever mind, let's just drop this."

Matthews to CNBC's Burnett: "You're a knockout"; "It's all right getting bad news from you" -- August 12, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200708120002

On Hardball, Chris Matthews told CNBC anchor Erin Burnett: "ou're beautiful" and "ou're a knockout," before closing their interview by saying, "It's all right getting bad news from you."

Matthews on Clinton "being surrounded by women": "oes that make a case" for or against her as commander in chief? -- June 24, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200706240001

On the June 24 edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, during a discussion about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), host Chris Matthews asked Kathleen Parker, a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group, if "being surrounded by women" makes "a case for commander in chief -- or does it make a case against it?" Parker answered by referring to a June 21 front-page Washington Post article about the women working as senior advisers to Clinton's campaign: "It makes a case with a certain demographic, and I noticed the picture on the front of The Washington Post the other day showed her with all these women and her crew, and did you notice, there was only one blonde out of about 15 women, so it sort of -- I thought that was very telling." Parker never explained what was "telling" about the hair color of Clinton's top aides.

Matthews: "Do Americans want to return to the Hillary model of first lady, or do they like the Laura Bush model?" -- June 17, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200706170003

On the June 17 edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, host Chris Matthews, leading off the discussion topic "What are Americans looking for in their next first lady?" asked "The Matthews Meter" -- composed of 12 of his regular panelists, including June 17 panelists BBC Washington correspondent Katty Kay, Newsweek chief political correspondent Howard Fineman, and MSNBC host Tucker Carlson -- "Do Americans want to return to the Hillary model of first lady, or do they like the Laura Bush model?" All 12 panelists responded that Americans want "the Laura Bush model."

Ignoring his previous comments, Matthews claimed "men don't knock Hillary" -- March 27, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200703270007

On the March 26 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews asserted that "t's the women" who criticize Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and that the men he talks to "don't knock Hillary." Matthews added, "he crowd I hang out with don't want to be caught knocking her, because it's sexist." However, Media Matters for America has noted numerous examples of Matthews himself making remarks about Clinton that could be construed as sexist:

Matthews on Clinton: "How many times is she going to be confused by men?" -- February 16, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200702160009

On the February 15 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews, during a discussion with National Review Washington editor Kate O'Beirne and Democratic strategist Steve McMahon about whether Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) will say her vote for the 2002 resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq was a mistake, asked: "How come she still pretends that she didn't know was going to war? It's like she didn't know anything about Bill and his behavior. How many times is she going to be confused by men?"

Matthews on Sen. Clinton: "Is she Dukakis in a dress?" -- January 16, 2007

http://mediamatters.org/items/200701170003

On the January 15 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews compared Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) to former Massachusetts governor and 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis when he asked former White House adviser and frequent Hardball contributor Ron Christie: "Is she Dukakis in a dress?" Matthews, who has made this comparison before, has a history of leveling baseless smears against Clinton, as Media Matters for America has noted.

Matthews likened Sen. Clinton to a "strip-teaser," asked, "Is she a convincing mom?" -- December 20, 2006

http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200011

On the December 19 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews compared Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) to a "strip-teaser"; said she had "a nice, mellifluous voice" and "her hair looked ... great"; and wondered if Clinton is "a convincing mom."

Matthews: "Some men" say Sen. Clinton's voice sounds like "fingernails on a blackboard" -- November 8, 2006

http://mediamatters.org/items/200611090002

Discussing the victory speeches of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) during MSNBC's special election coverage on November 7, co-anchor Chris Matthews told Republican pollster Frank Luntz that Clinton gave a "barn-burner speech, which is harder to give for a woman; it can grate on some men when they listen to it -- fingernails on a blackboard." Matthews then noted that Pelosi, who will likely be elected House speaker now that the Democrats have gained control of the U.S. House of Representatives, will "have to do the good fight with the president over issues" such as the minimum wage and prescription drugs. He then asked: "How does she do it without screaming? How does she do it without becoming grating?" Matthews later returned to criticizing Clinton, when, during a conversation with co-anchor Keith Olbermann and with a clip of Clinton's victory event playing in the background, Matthews stated that Clinton's "clapping" was "not appealing" and that "it's Chinese or something," as Salon.com's weblog The War Room noted. Matthews added that former President Bill Clinton, who was standing behind Sen. Clinton at the podium, was a "gigantic guy behind her and he's just there," adding: "It's a strange sight."

Matthews asked: Is Hillary Clinton unable to "admit a mistake" on Iraq vote because she would be criticized as a "fickle woman"? -- March 17, 2006

http://mediamatters.org/items/200603170011

On two straight days, Chris Matthews cited hypothetical critics in saying that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is reluctant to admit she made a mistake in voting for the Iraq war resolution because she would be denigrated as a woman who is unable to make up her mind.

Matthews attacks Clinton: Criticism of Bush homeland security cuts after London bombings made her look "more witchy" -- July 13, 2005

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507130001

On MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) "looked more witchy" because she criticized the Bush administration's homeland security spending priorities on July 8, a day after the London bombings.

Matthews referred to Hillary Clinton as "sort of a Madame Defarge of the left" -- April 25, 2005

http://mediamatters.org/items/200504250004

MSNBC host Chris Matthews referred to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) as "sort of a Madame Defarge of the left" -- a slur previously advanced by conservative syndicated columnist and CNN host Robert Novak, MSNBC political analyst and former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, and MSNBC host Monica Crowley.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200801110010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. LOL!
So Chris Matthews IS the MSM. All by himself.

He isn't even the 'news'; he's a fucking commentator, no different from Coulter or Limbaugh.

Once upon a time Hillary said something unkind about Matthews and he's had a hard on for her ever since. That hardly supports your premise that ALL the MSM is out to get her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
50. I think you have cause-and-effect confused. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. Um, have you considered the possibility that they're instiutionally invested in hating her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
57. Ummmmmmm.....because he deserves it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
58. Because he's winning, if Hillary had pulled an upset in Virginia they'd be saying Obama's dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. I think because there's nothing really bad about him
and everybody who likes him Really likes him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
60. Because he is human perfection. Did you not get the memo?
He is a god among mere mortals, a saint among men and the closest thing to the second coming of Jesus Christ we are ever likely to see.

He has no imperfections, he has never mistepped, or made a wrong decision.


Get with it already.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
65. If it continues,
we're in good shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
73. Because he's likable, charismatic
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM by fujiyama
fresh and exciting.

Why was McCain so popular with the media in '00? Why was Romney unpopular this election season with them? Granted, Romney never got treated the way Hillary has by the media but I don't remember him getting particularly favorable press coverage either.

And other than Rezko, which they have spoken about, at least on Hardball, a few times, there isn't too much baggage on him. And there has been nothing indicating wrongdoing by him regarding the Rezko issue...though it may be in headlines a bit more once he's on trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
75. Snide comments aside...
I believe even the media is excited about the prospect of a new face and a new direction.
With all the excellent choices we had in the primary season I'm "anyone but the Repubs", not really leaning any particular way. But I would think the Obama appeal would be obvious enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
76. Um, perhaps because he kicked ass in the last 8 states?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:29 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
77. Perhaps if Hillary won the last eight states by large margins, she'd be getting good press
Hillary will get "good press", otherwise known as reporting on election results, when she starts winning...which may not be anytime soon.

Jus' sayin'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
78. He borrows policies from other candidates, avoids tough positions and vote present in controversial
votes. The media is so amazed by his ability to talk so flowery that even though they don't understand the meaning, it sounds good. Besides that the media is dominated by males who hate women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
79. Obama is being spared right now because the media still has
Hillary to flog and the RW really hates her. If Obama does win the nomination the RW smear machine will declare open season on him and will spare no effort to discredit him using lies, innuendos and exaggerations. We've seen it happen before.

I've seen remarks here and on other message boards that suggest that the Republicans would rather have Obama as the Democratic candidate because they feel he will be easier for McCain to beat. I don't necessarily think that they are right, but they may be holding back their attacks for now so as not to jeopardize his chances of securing the nomination. However, the honeymoon will be over if the Presidential race comes down to Obama vs. McCain.

Just my thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
81. Don't worry.
The minute after he wins the nomination (assuming he does) they will turn on him. The media loves playing these manipulative games, it's just that a lot of people don't understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC