Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow, you hearing Begala on CNN?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:02 PM
Original message
Wow, you hearing Begala on CNN?
Talking about how supporters and donors wanted change in the campaign - that they'd be happy if she were winning. He also points out that Obama won every demographic group, including lower-income. wow! He's really laying it out about Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. He also admitted it looks like he's the only Hillary supporter.
he was joking, but it was an insight into where his thoughts are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. And he is saying Hilllary should adopt Edward's populism
Funny how much importance the msm is giving Edwards and his message now that he is gone while the ignored him for a year when he was running. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Another reinvention - to the message of a candidate who dropped out?
I understand what he's saying, and all respect to John, but I don't think she can do a better job with that message than Edwards did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But John could've, if they'd given him more air time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree with that. But Hillary? No hope for her on that score. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This is still a very uncertain outcome, but you are right on about Edwards
I am an Obama supporter, but part of the problem is that everyone wanted to move their primaries up

Personally, I believe it didn't give enough chance to know the candidates, and also caused some to drop out earlier than might have been necessary


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think you're right - a less front-loaded primary season would give us more choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It seems we always rush things without thinking them out
After the 2000 election we were pushing voting machines, so they gave us touch screens with no accountability

when the real issue was making sure ever vote counted, NOT the machines

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Every state wants to be first - if a few had laid back a bit, they'd have more impact at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree with you...
The MSM talks about how the campaign has gone one for a full year already, but most people don't really pay any attentioin until the primaries start. Having 22 primaries all on the same day that early in February was really a bad idea, INMHO. It was horribly hard on the candidates and unfair to the voters who didn't have a chance to see or get to know the candidates. It was terrifically exciting for the media, I would say though, and other political spectators.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damn! Now the nuclear bill - which she co-sponsored! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC