Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Misogyny lives on.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:23 PM
Original message
Misogyny lives on.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:43 PM by Auntie Bush
Anybody but a woman! White men won't vote for a Woman. Especially in the Conservative Christian South where woman are suppose to gracefully bow to their husbands wishes and opinion. White men won't hesitate to vote for a black man. Misogamy is more ingrained into our society than racism. That's a wonderful well deserved milestone for blacks...and I'm very happy for them...but it is so sad for woman. :cry: If Hillary doesn't win this primary there is absolutely no hope for a woman president for at least the next 30 plus years. She is such a strong woman and so suited and qualified to hold the office of president. She's dedicated her whole adult life fighting for our liberal causes. What other woman has done that? There is no real outstanding female raising star even in the pipeline. We will never reach that formidable glass ceiling...not in my lifetime or yours either. That's sad....

Sorry....ain't the best speller!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Misogyny? Monogamy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. Monotony? Morony? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #67
161. Pro-war Hillary? Fighting passionately for universal healthcare since 1992...
or was it 1892? Lot of head bobbing...results include war and more war and yeah and passionate about NAFTA, and playing golf with Poppy Bush...I hear the sounds of revolution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
190. You Obama supporters sure get your big words mixed up a lot.
Own it. If you practice it, at least fucking own up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. misogyny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
191. See post #190 for your answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are plenty of women who I and many others will vote for. People don't like Hillary, not ...
because she's a woman, but because she's Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I like Hillary
She's just not my first choice. I'm not voting for someone just because they are a woman, though I will vote for her in the GE if she is our candidate.

I just think it's time for the next generation to have a crack at leading our country. They have a lot at stake.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
162. I truly believe the next generation are engaged truthfully behind Obama
and the 'older generations' with thoughts like 'white people won't vote for a blck man' are witnessing the emergence of a generation that truly, for the first time in American history, are the least bias against race/gender in our nation's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
186. People don't like Obama not because he is a black man but just because he is a liar
and an opportunist and a flat out phony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sadly, I agree with you, and I'm only 30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Bradi Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
107. I think Hillary is an intellectual...
well suited to be a great legislator or a high ranking judiciary, even a great activist.

But I just don't see the fire in her, that great women leaders like Thatcher, Indira Gandhi & Goldameyer had.

She is at the right place at the right time, so many women want to see her win. But this is the presidency of the United States that we are talking about, good enough won't do we have to have the best we can get.

Especially with the unrest & mistrust around the globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, maybe Hillary shouldn't have gone around saying "I'm your girl!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Spelling DOESN'T live on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Original message
Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. The word is spelled perfectly, it just means something other than what the OP intended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another woman could and would easily win. And will. Just not this woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Agreed. This campaign made this clear. Hopefully the next woman pres...
candidate will not be relying on her husband to bring in the votes. This is really what started to do her in. She should have kept Bill in the background, working the phones for the superdelegates.

But clearly there are many woman governors - most of which could make a pretty good run at the nomination. Who knows - Barack may even pick one as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
178. My thinking, too! If we get an Obama/woman governor ticket and it
wins, the woman VP would be in a good place to run for President after 8 years, not 30. Governor Sibelius, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. That is a long time away if it's not Hillary now. She still can
win and perhaps she will. GOMAMA!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
51. Not for a very long time, not for a woman or a Democrat
If Obama wins the nom, he will lose the GE and it will be a very, very, very long time before Dems rebound again, even longer before another woman gets a chance to run.

I thought we would have had a woman president well before now. If Clinton doesn't win this time, it will be another 12 years or more before a Dem woman gets another chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. He'll lose the GE? Link please?
Hillary might, but I don't see Obama losing the GE - you apparently aren't watching the primaries very closely.

A woman could win the presidency - it's not about being a woman, it's the particular woman that's running. Anyone taking this as "a woman" can't win is mistaken, and even seems a bit sexist - was I supposed to vote for a woman I didn't like, just because I'm a woman? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lse7581011 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #51
163. Why Would You Say That?
I've heard many Republicans saying that they would cross over to vote if our candidate was Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
62. no way
that absolutely is not true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
82. That's the part they are not getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sorry Auntie, I respectfully disagree
I know a woman can win, just not Hillary. YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. Who?
I would love that...but I can't imagine who. Give me some hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
192. Can you name one, please? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hatred of marriage?
Yeah, marriage sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franks Wild Years Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Honestly...
Anyone who cannot see that Clinton's polling day catastrophes are because she has run an incredibly poor campaign is spectacularly deluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. We have no argument on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz cook Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
138. Oh really?
I'd say it's because she has to fight the media as well as Obama. Oh and the Clinton hating left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. We certainly won't reach it until we get educated.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM by anigbrowl
Misogyny - discrimination against women.
Monogamy - staying married to only one person.
Misogamy - er...not liking being married?

Edited because I got confused myself trying to decide what the definition ought to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its anybody but Hillary..
Its her personally, not a woman in general. I think if we ran another woman without so much baggage things would be different. I dont think it will be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's nonsense
Hillary is absolutely a strong woman, but that does not automatically entitle her to the presidency. Margaret Thatcher was a strong woman too, but I never would have voted for her to be PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. I respect what you've said.
I think Hillary Clinton's campaign this year has proven what is possible. To say it won't happen for another 30 years is conceding defeat. Clinton is probably the only woman who could have done it now, in 2008.

But, she has changed the game. And, I expect to see a strong woman contender in every Presidential race until we have a female President. I sincerely believe we will not have to wait 30 years for Madame President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
65. I agree with this, definitely.
Unfortunately, it does go in incremental steps. Shirley Chisholm paved a way for Geraldine Ferraro who paved a way for Hillary Clinton. I feel more hopeful about a Madame President in my lifetime now than I did a few years ago because of Hillary's run, win or lose. It may have been Obama's moment and not hers, but there is no doubt that she is perceived as a very credible presidential possiblity even by many of those who can't stand her.

Running for President is HARD, and there are so many factors that can change everything that are not under any candidate's control.

But it does bother me when people knock Hillary for being "calculating" and "ambitious" - hello, we need to be teaching our girls that there is NOTHING wrong with being either of those things. That's how things get done, and nobody succeeds in politics who isn't. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I would love to see a strong woman President but Hillary aint the one Im looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's not a WOMAN - It's HILLARY CLINTON. When will people 'get it'? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. so there could be no other reason but sexism.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. The sexism card is just about as tedious as the race card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz cook Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
139. Then stop playing them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Again, B&C, we agree. (See my response to OP)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ahem, can I talk to you for a minute?
I know a few have already pointed this out, but misogamy is the hatred of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. Oh Please!!! I'd vote for a woman in a heartbeat. I prefer women as leaders. I work for women at
the college where I teach (female president and female dean). I'm married to a strong, smart woman (who loves DU -- she's "Oregonian"). But both of us do not support HRC because of her political philosophy (and voting record) not because of her gender. I know a lot of people -- of both sexes -- who feel the same way.

So please, don't get too morose about this: There will be a woman president in the very near future. And if that candidate is a progressive woman, my wife and I will help her become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. You have hit the nail on the head! Don't let the elite spelling
police get to you either! MAMA may take this thing yet! GO HILLARY!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. It is no more mysogyny to vote against Hillary than it is racism to vote against Obama
Hillary lost in VA among women. Are women in VA mysogynistic?

Get. Friggin. Real.

And quit the victim role. Hillary lost. Period.

You know why?

It is not race. It is not sexism.

It is the people's will.

Remember that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Thats why Edwards supporters are racist/sexists.
Just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
74. Then why are so many white men voting for Obama all across the nation?
I personally think much of it is because those rich or poor white men wouldn't vote for any woman...no matter who she is. They just can't see a woman as CiC. This will probably never change and that's sad. This is a man's and world and I've lost all hope of ever seeing a woman president...if Hillary doesn't win this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #74
95. IMO, as a guy, women have to take a page from Obama and just go for it, by that I
mean women have to run. Women need to run for every race, especially at the local level. They have to quit waiting until they feel they are ready to do the job. Just run. Sure they will lose alot, at first.

Most local governments are run by women, as underpaid staff while the guys run for office and take credit for everything done for them.

We started this season with 7 and 1, next season I hope it will be 4 and 4.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #95
112. Now that's a good civil answer and perfect solution.
I'd give you a heart for that...but I gave them all away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #74
153. maybe because they like his message?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 06:44 AM by earthlover
you have not presented an ounce of evidence for mysogyny.

And I disagree totally with your thought that you will never see a woman president. As weak a candidate as Hillary is in many ways, in spite of her vote on the IWR and a poorly run campaign based on "inevitability" she got a lot of votes and she still is in the race, barely, but she can still win. This shows that people will vote for a woman. Get a better candidate and she will win!

This primary has shown that race and gender are both surmountable. This is a good thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
182. The inverse of that is that white women are NOT voting for him, what does that imply?
just asking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #182
194. We got smart. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #194
203. but if white-men voting for a particular candidate is prejudiced
isn't white women voting en masse for a particular candidate prejudiced as well?

How do you determine whether it is the prejudice of white men that draws them to Obama or the prejudice of white women that drives them away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #74
193. It's like this.
I don't know if you have ever watched any reality shows, but we are living in reality TV America now and I've watched a few of them. I have watched them enough to know that men will cozy up to and even feign a "thing" for a woman to use her to get her votes. Meanwhile, that same man goes and hides out with his "boys" and talks about the brotherhood of man all the way. What usually ends up happening? The girl gets screwed, lied to, and voted out, while the guys go all the way to the end.

In reality, men claim to love women, but men strongly tend to only love other men when push comes to shove. It's the war of the sexes.

Just look at all the white boys driving around listening to gangsta rap in their low riders for more evidence. Yeah, we are just bitches and hos to them. Back to my warm wet hole statement. That's the facts as I have lived them for 37 years of my life. There are exceptions. We just aren't seeing enough of them on here right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's not because she's a woman, it's because she's a bad candidate.
She's run a bad campaign, which has been mismanaged at just about every stage. Plus her war vote, and a dozen other positions that don't sit with the Dem base. And don't give me that about there being no hope. Five years ago, there was no prospect on the horizon for a black president. One year from today, we're damn likely to have one. You don't know that there's not some female Obama out there shuffling papers on her desk in some state legislature, just waiting for an entrance onto the national stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. It's because Republicans are fucking with our open primaries.
November will be very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
78. Yes, our victory in November is going to be sweet.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 11:32 PM by TheWraith
But if you believe that conspiracy-theory tripe about Republicans fixing our primaries... well, I can't help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. The majority of women are voting for Obama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. They are? I thought over 50 woman are Hillarys demographic n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Not tonight! 59% and women and a majority of seniors voted for Obama in Maryland! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
129. women have also resisited every advance in women's rights since day one. they know 'their place.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
166. well said
must be they don't know what's good for them...those damned mysoginist women!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. Damn, you mean my wife is supposed to bow to my wishes and demands?....
...Damn. I didn't know that....

Neither did she. And we're not Christian or conservative. Wow, we need to step it up, so we can fit your stereotypes...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. I just told me wife that...
and she smacked me in the head....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #33
130. well, you know what the official Southern Baptist position on that is, and they represent how many m
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 02:01 AM by VotesForWomen
millions of people? i'm sorry, misogyny is not just a product of fevered feminist imaginations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. MSNBC CABLE will show you what many in t he MSM t hink of women...
and it goes on and on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. Potentially being the first woman president
(or anything) doesn't mean you *should* be elected for that mere fact and not on your record, electibility, and credentials, it has nothing to do with misogyny. Case and point: Margarat Thatcher, first woman Prime Minister, utter fucking disaster.


Oh and Virginia Democrats are hardly what I would call the "Conservative Christian South".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. I find it odd that someone would post this, then just disappear. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I wouldn't, they are obviously upset and rightfully so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
64. I didn't disappear! I was busy reading another long post on this board and.
was listening to Hillary's speech. I had no idea so many people would respond. I checked back to see and was astounded at the response! Had I checked back sooner...I'd have corrected the spelling earlier. :blush:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #64
77. No harm meant. I just really wanted you to come back and correct your spelling! lol. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. Is that like Miso and Origami?
Folded paper cranes in soy soup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. A few years back, you might have said the same wrt pipelines
and rising African Americans. It's just not really true for women, either. And Hillary Clinton is most definitely a particular person with a particular history and family. I don't think you can put the fate of female presidential candidates all on her shoulders. She goes into this with very high negatives. Perhaps some because she's a woman, but I think far more for reasons peculiar to her as an individual.

I would love to see a woman in the WH. But right now, I think Obama is the better candidate. And I don't vote for or against anyone because of their gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well, this was productive.
Jesus Christ. It's not because she's a woman, it's because she's not a strong candidate nor is she that representative of progressive ideals.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/HughBeaumont/31
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/HughBeaumont/32

And it's kind of presumptuous to think that Hillary, who used to be a Goldwater Girl, is the only woman who's fought her whole life for liberal causes. I think some of the fine Code Pink women would have just more than a bit to say about that statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
44. Why...why...they'd even choose a Nigra over a woman-folk
How awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. As many in this thread have demonstrated, misogyny is considered "hip"
Thanks to the news media, men and women have lower opinions of women than anyone has seen since the 1950's.

Date rape, domestic violence, poverty among single women - all fodder for late night "laddie boy" shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
47. What's interesting
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:43 PM by woolldog
Is that HRC has ended up marginalizing herself as the female candidate, ironically in the way she tried to marinalize Obama as "the black candidate". Obama wouldn't allow her to marginalize him that way, but where she failed with Obama, she's succeded in painting herself into that corner.

She hasn't made any effort to woo male voters. And in her effort to connect with women voters, she's ended up alienating male voters.

For example, why did she pick the "Hallmark Channel" to air her townhall? This will alienate men.

Another example: her frequent crying episodes. This also alienates men who will either view it as insincere and an attempt at female manipulation or, if they view it as sincere, feel that she won't be strong enough to be president.

Her campaign rallies are usually filled with older white women, which doesn't convey an aura of inclusion and make men feel welcome--even men who are just watching on tv. They look like the local chapter of an Oprah book club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. Women are voting for Obama too.. INTELLIGENT WOMEN who think for themselves!
Please. This is getting ridiculous out of some of you. Down right offensive!!

Hillary's purely political vote on the war is what I believe is killing her in the primaries.
I've said it here numerous times. She voted to send our military men and women off to die so she wouldn't look weak to republicans in the general election she thought she had in the bag.

Ambition trumped what was right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
132. women have also resisited every advance in women's rights since day one. whether they vote for
obama or not has no bearing on whether gender is a factor in people not choosing the female candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
50. HILLARY Now, OR, Men for the Next 30 years?
So there is NO young woman this country that could/might win the presidency in the next 30 years? Need I remind you that the minimum age for a US President is 35? That means someone who is 15 now could be destined to rise above your glass ceiling on her own merit and be elected President of the United States?

How far down the "pipeline" can you see? All the way to sophomores currently in high school?

"She's dedicated her whole adult life fighting for our liberal causes. What other woman has done that?" As a man, I surely wouldn't deign to disagree with you in public about that statement, but in private I'd tell you that you were full of shit because sometimes people fight for causes WITHOUT hoping for any kind of reward or publicity.

Furthermore, the "South" isn't necessarily a place where "woman are suppose to gracefully bow to their husbands wishes and opinion". You assume much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Disingenousness lives ON!
You poor thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. 8 women currently serving as Governor
5 of them are Dems, If you remove Grandholm because she is from Canada you have at least 4 strong candidates for the first women president.


IMO all of these women have far more executive experience as Sen. Clinton.

Honestly, if the first women president was elected (in part) because her husband did it first then the chances of there ever being a second woman president goes way way down.

Hillary is a flawed candidate no matter the gender. The feminist movement would do better in the long run if she loses. She has proven that the country is ready to accept a woman as a serious contender for the presidency, it will be more productive if a woman is elected without ridding her husband's coat tails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #53
133. 8 out of 50? and as of the '90s we had 2 out of 100 female senators. nope, no bias against women the
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 02:07 AM by VotesForWomen
there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
54. Um, no. I don't vote base on race OR gender
I'm not voting for her because she's a woman and I'm not voting for Obama because he's a man. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. You really don't think too much of your fellow women, do you?
Hillary Clinton is hardly the only outstanding female politician out there. You're not saying much for your candidate, or women in general when you post things like that. Christine Gregoire, Kathleen Sebellius, and my own guv Janet Napolitano are three I can think of right off the top of my head.

Besides, it's not like it's over yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
56. In corporate America, my experience has been
the order goes, white women, black women, then black men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosetta627 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
57. You are so blind.
Hillary voted for war and thereby betrayed the people and lost their support.

It has nothing to do with gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
59. Bullshit.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. If Hillary were Shirley Chisholm, I'd vote for her IN A SECOND
But Hillary's DLC-friendly platform does not sit well with this white, male, heterosexual progressive Democrat.

I'm not supporting her because she's a woman. I'm not supporting her because she's not progressive enough on the issues that matter to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opiate69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
61. Here's a woman I would almost certainly vote for for POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
63. she is a strong woman when it comes to her personal
needs and desires.
she is weak when it comes to leading the way for positive change for most of the rest of us.

I will Never Ever forget how many women and children, and men and boys she had a hand in, in the suffering and death and misery in Iraq, for almost 16 YEARS.

I'm sorry you are feeling so bad about this, but if she is elected and continues the bloodshed and stripping of the constitution - she may be the very one to stunt any chance for another, decent more humane and feminist woman to take that office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. Hillary isn't responsible for all those deaths or the war in Iraq any more than
the large majority of the Senate or Kerry, Edwards, Biden and many others.
Hillary didn't start this War! Her vote one way or the other wouldn't have made a bit of difference. It was a drop in the bucket. Can't you see that?

What makes you think if Obama had been in the Senate at the time and wanted to run for the presidency and had access to the same intelligence as Hillary...wouldn't have voted the same as Hillary? I absolutely think he wouldn't have wanted to appear as soft on defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. where did I say 'all' those deaths?
her vote for it gives her a percentage of the responsibility.
why was it so hard for her to stand up to what was the right thing to do, to know what so many millions of us knew was a wrong wrong war, ono a people that had already suffered so miserably since Gulf war 1?. Even tho her one NO! vote may not have changed anything, it's the point of taking a stand, and being right.

and please don't give me a list of the other warmongers or stupidos who voted the same way. You are talking about Hillary here.

and I have no idea what Obama would have done, cystal ball is out at the shop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
68. There are a lot of Women I WOULD vote for...
Just not Hillary. She doesn't pass the smell test. Too phoney, too polarizing to ever win a GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
69. Obama is a better candidate than she is. That's why he's winning now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
71. PLEAAAAAASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
as a woman i will be sooooo happy when obama wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
72. A lot of women have voted against her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #72
135. women have also resisited every advance in women's rights since day one. whether they vote for
obama or not has no bearing on whether gender is a factor in people choosing to vote against the female candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #135
183. Their are more people voting for her because she's a woman than voting against her
because she's a woman. The DLC and centrism are on the downswing and if she were a man Obama certainly would have won this by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
73. Nonsense.
This old white woman would love to see a woman president, but not necessarily that woman. I'll be happy to vote for her if she's nominated, but my opinion about her has everything to do with her policies and positions as a candidate and nothing at all to do with her gender. Some other women (Barbara Boxer, for example) would probably do better and stir up more enthusiasm among progressives. I might also add that Clinton's campaign has been very flawed. Mark Penn sucks as a strategist, and Bill has done some damage as well. Who knows how much better she might have done with a more competent campaign organization?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
75. I don't even have to read the responses: "Just not HER."
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 10:30 PM by Sparkly
That's always been said! "Just not THAT one."

Edit: I mean said about other women, not just HRC, and other people in similar circumstances...

But I agree -- people, even "progressives" and "liberals," are NOT aware, much less sensitive, to sexism or misogyny. This has definitely been an eye-opening experience for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
79. Nonsense. It has nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
80. Um, Barbara Boxer, maybe? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
81. White WOMEN didn't vote for Hillary either...your basic premise is wrong.
If white WOMEN support Obama over Hillary then are THEY misogynists TOO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #81
137. women have also resisited every advance in women's rights since day one. whether they vote for
obama or not has no bearing on whether gender is a factor in people choosing to vote against the female candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
83. racism > misogyny right now in America
IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
84. If I vote Obama I'm a misogynist, and others say if I vote Clinton I'm a racist
As a southern white male I don't see how I can win this one :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
85. I just gave you a heart for truth telling
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
86. There are a lot of other women I'd vote for but not Hillary.
There are many reasons why Hillary is a bad candidate who doesn't attract voters that have nothing to do with her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #86
91. sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
87. or it could be that people just liked Obama more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
88. There's a lot of women I'd that I'd support for president,
but not Hillary. It has absolutely nothing to do with her being a woman, it's who she is in particular that I find objectionable (as a presidential candidate), and I would venture to suggest that I'm not the only voter in the country who feels that way.

I understand your feelings, but I think you are reading far, far too much into this in terms of how it relates to the electorate's support for female candidates.

I personally am very hopeful that we'll see a woman president sometime in the next 30 years, maybe alot sooner than that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
89. Black men got the vote decades before
women did. I think it was over 50 years in fact.

I remember reading that Frederick Douglas, after getting the vote, ridiculed Susan B. Anthony...after she had worked so hard. She never got to vote...legally, that is.

As John Lennon said, 'Woman is the n*gger of the world.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #89
104. Yeah, Blacks got to just waltz into polling stations right after the Civil War, didn't they?
Dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #104
115. There were a number of Black men elected
then...of course the white men then organized and put a stop to that.

And since you insulted me by calling me a dumbass...I'm gonna give you some damn good advice: there's a surgical procedure available in foreign countries that removes a couple of ribs from the male so he can suck his own penis. Maybe you should check that out. Just think if millions of men had the surgery...there would be WORLD PEACE!

Now...go run along, george.

Been nice talking to ya. This is the last time that will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #104
116. Well, until reconstruction ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #104
141. nice dodge. why didn't congress just include women in th 15th ammendment, if there was no bias
against women voting equally with blacks? and why did congress and many americans resist woman's right to vote for another 50 years if there was no bias against women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #89
185. White women in 1920 didn't have to worry about getting lynched for voting, either.
Your historical ignorance is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
90. And now all the
disavowals of how they really want a woman president but just not Hillary. And the next woman to run won't be quite perfect enough either. They can hold their noses and vote for someone if that someone has a penis but they have such lofty ideals that they just can't vote for Hillary. What a bunch of bullshit.

All power to the penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. So basically
not supporting Hillary automatically makes one a sexist in your eyes. That's incredibly unfair and frankly, sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #92
97. But true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #97
100. LOL
You've got to be kidding me. Is there any way to not support Hillary without being sexist?

What about the female radical feminists I know who don't support her? Do they hate women too?

Does the fact that I've spent many hours volunteering for women running for other offices still make me a sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #100
109. As I've said before....
if the high heel fits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #109
123. I think I know
where the high heel fits and its not on your foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #97
103. No, not true.
Stop being racist by not supporting Obama!

(See how ridiculous your argument is when turned around? YOU'RE WRONG.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #90
122. Here's to the penis
:toast: Long my it live! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #90
195. Ah, the almighty penis.
If only our clits were larger and our breasts smaller, we might be considered valid human beings with brains and abilities, but alas, we are just bitches and hos and mothers for them to fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
93. I beg to differ -- A woman CAN win the Presidency.
If Mrs. Clinton wins the Democratic nomination, then I will support her. But at the moment she is not the candidate I support in the primary. And I'd imagine there are other DUers who feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
94. Please... that is a pathetic argument. Really... It is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
96. Auntie Bush, I love ya, but what do you mean no other woman has
dedicated a lifetime to liberal causes?

That's just not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #96
118. I love ya too, but
:loveya: you misunderstood what I said. I meant that I don't think there are any other woman in the pipeline that are ready to successfully run for the presidency. You are right that hundreds have dedicated a lifetime to politics and liberal causes. But, I just don't see any of them running for president in the near or far future...and winning. I believe Hillary...like her or not...was our first and last opportunity for a female president in my/your lifetime...and that make me sad. Who knows...maybe someone will surprise me. I'm open to surprises. Like maybe Michele will run in 8 years as she'll have had enough "experience" by then...and I'm not kidding...she's quite a woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #118
171. Ah, then yes, I did misunderstand you. Sorry about that.
Well, I hear you that Sen. Clinton was an extremely high-profile female potential president, but agree with you that there can always be folks out there who surprise us with their potential.

More people than ever distrust conventional approaches to problem-solving in politics because they've seen it diluted and corrupted so much by now that they watch Jon Stewart and ignore the cable news heads. I think that's healthy because the cable news heads have a lot to answer for, and so far, we're not hearing any good answers.

Out of that shift in perceptions, there's likely to be some permanent changes. Either HClinton or Obama would herald a new age -- a first female or a first Afro American chief executive -- and so we're watching History set up shop here.

IMO, Sen. Clinton's slide in polling is not owed to her gender but to her husband's political chums. I wasn't terribly impressed with that bunch in the 90s and I don't like them any better now. She ought to have gone with all new people, because she's a far stronger candidate in her own set of references than she is as her husband's wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
98. I honestly feel that there are other, more qualified women who could
be President. But yes, I do agree that misogyny is more widely practiced in this country than racism. This primary season has made me realize just HOW MUCH contempt exists for me out there because of my gender. I've even seen some of the ugliest and most hateful statements right here on DU!It makes me feel pretty hopeless about the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
99. Clair Mccaskill, Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius
I'm 39, and there will certainly be a woman president in my lifetime. I don't believe it will be Clinton, because I don't believe she'd beat McCain. But there will be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
101. Complete bullshit, of course. Why don't you support Obama, you racist?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 12:23 AM by Zhade
(That's pointed sarcasm, btw.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
102. Not true AT ALL
Plenty of people want to vote for a woman for President...just not Hillary.

I'm talking about women who have told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #102
156. I agree with you
I'm a woman and I really don't want Hillary to be president. Although I WANT a Female president, just not her this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
105. Sick of the crying
I think it has little to do with Hill being a woman, and much more to do with the fact she is the wrong woman. People just don't like/trust her. Maybe the creepy smile and the cackle are starting to freak everyone out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #105
170. And here's a nother perfect example why some might suspect sexism
The language in your post is very revealing -- at least to those willing to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #105
197. I'm sick of trolls too, but I don't get my way either, now do I? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
106. Men have been voting for women Reps, Senators, Governors for some time now.
You don't think within another 30 years there will be more women candidates? And there will be no one as "strong" & "qualified" as Hillary?

And Hillary is not the only woman who has spent her life fighting for liberal causes. By suggesting so you dismiss those who have.

Good grief. I've been around for a while and know the changes I've seen just within my lifetime. Hillary's not necessarily the "last stand" for a woman President.

I wouldn't be surprised if we do have a woman President within the next few decades, if not next year. (I just hope she won't be a Republican.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #106
143. not quite in numbers equal to the male reps they've been voting for, and that is the point. no one i
is saying that in america in 2008 no one (especially no man) will vote for any female candidate. of course no one is saying that. that doesn't change the fact that there is still a degree of gender bias, and it may very well be enough to prevent a woman from being elected president for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
108. I know several Democrats very well who do not support Hillary
not one of them opposes her because she is a woman. They don't like her policies or her record.

not one of them could possibly be described as a misogynist.

this is BS. her strong showing so far is PROOF that a woman can succeed at any level of American politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
110. I think you sell women short.
If Hillary doesn't win this primary there is absolutely no hope for a woman president for at least the next 30 plus years.

She may or may not may not have what it takes (by today's ever shifting standards), but I can see a woman being President before you. :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
111. I'm afraid you are absolutely right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
113. With this logic people who didn't vote for Lieberman are antisemitic?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 12:59 AM by alphafemale
And I think you are being really demeaning to women to say that this is the last shot for a woman for a generation or better.

I'm mean :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
114. Another woman might get more votes. I don't like THIS woman's politics.
I feel very bad because I would love to have a woman in the white house as President, but not this one. That said, I am voting for whomever gets the Dem nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
117. Oh stop already!
Just because Mrs Clinton isn't making it does not mean a woman can't win (maybe even Mrs Clinton) in 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
119. Not for Hillary. For Boxer or Pelosi, in a heart beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #119
124. This thread is very insulting to all the women who have voted for Obama
Which is a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #124
136. I assume that was to the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #136
142. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
120. I'd trample grandma - sorry, grandpa - in my rush to vote for Jane Fonda.
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:29 AM by JackRiddler
So there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
121. How many times in this thread, "but not Hillary." Congratulations to the media.
Act I: george w. bush.

Act II: I'd vote for a woman (but not Hillary.)

Act III: A little hint of terrorism, a little saber-rattling with Iran, and hello President McCain

The media, GOP controlled, has villified Hillary Clinton for years. If they had treated her with the respect and decency she deserves for staying strong despite being insulted and smeared relentlessly by the right wing, things might be different.

The next woman who aspires to be president will be picked apart, too, and we'll be hearing, "Oh, I'd vote for a woman. Just. not. her." Unless it's a Republican. And then she'll be the greatest thing since sliced bread.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
125. "Misogamy is more ingrained into our society than racism."
Really the next time owmen are followed around in stores because they are assumed to be thieves lets talk about that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
126. Oh I hope that HRC isn't the only woman in the pipeline...
Look at the state level to see where the rising stars will be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
127. correct enough, in a world where rappers make millions there's always plain old misogyny...
some cultures feel it's part of their MO i.e. Bobby Cutts/Tom Sizemore, etc; for others 'white guilt' will take up the rest of the slack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #127
199. Yeah, we are just bitches and hos.
That's all we are to them no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
128. i'm afraid that you're right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
131. Just a questioN: Did you ever stop to consider it's more than Hillary being a woman?
Seriously, I'm a white woman and I cannot warm up to Hillary, no matter how hard I try. I think she will be a weak general election candidate, and I have plenty of other issues with her. Yes, I'm sure some of the dynamic at work is misogyny, but that explains only part of her lack of popularity. Part of it is plain old Clinton/Dynasty fatigue. Part of it is her IWR vote. Part of it is the perception that she's just a DLC hack. And so on. You know all the rest of the marks against her, just as I'm sure you know the marks against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #131
134. did you ever consider that more than one factor could be at work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #134
140. Well, yes. That's basically what I said in the post.
Yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people who won't vote for Hillary because she's a woman. But there are also many, many of us who don't want her as our candidate for a myriad of reasons that don't have anything to do with her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #140
144. okay, but a degree of gender bias could make the difference in a tight election. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
145. It's not misogyny if people genuinely feel Obama is the better choice.
Your post makes me feel bad because I'm empathetic. I get that your heart is invested in this campaign. I understand. Because I can tell you that if Obama loses I will truly be crushed and I don't know if I could recover and care about politics anymore. I really feel so strongly that our country would benefit from Obama, that my heart is invested in it too. I keep telling myself that if I want Obama to win I need to keep believing in myself because he truly stands up for what I believe in.

I want to be represented by a woman too. But this time I think Obama can do the best job of healing the anger and rage in this country and set our sights down the positive path and steer us away from the negative politics of hate and division. I'm desperate to have that kind of leadership right now. Clinton and all the hatred against her and the divisiveness is, in my mind, the WORST possible way to start off a woman in the high office. She brings out the worst in a lot of people. I'm tired of the obnoxiousness and childishness in government.

But besides all that. Some of us empathetic people are empathizing with the women in Iraq right now who have lost their husbands and children and for what? Seriously. For what?????? As an *American*, it's more high-minded, IMO, to vote for someone on our side who can't in any way be connected to giving George Bush the blank check to invade and destroy another country. If I lived in Iraq, I would feel like the Americans were sticking their middle finger at me if they chose Clinton over the man who cautioned *against* that god-awful horrific, unforgiveable invasion.

I've studied feminism. I nearly minored in it instead of sociology because I took so many classes on the topic of feminism. There are a ton of relevant and significant discussions to be had about women and women's issues in this country and the history of misogyny. Choosing Obama over Clinton doesn't count as misogyny. Particularly when Obama is truly a formidable opponent. That's the understatement of the century. Obama is truly one of the most remarkable politicians we've had on our side in my lifetime.

I am so proud to be an Obama supporter. Proud as a woman. Proud as a feminist. Proud as a Democrat. Proud as an American. I stand proudly with every man and woman who supports Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
146. Well, yes. However--
I don't want our first woman president to have voted in favor of Kyl/Lieberman and cluster bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
147. And the beating of the dead horse continues


Just because some people think Obama would be a better leader does not make them sexist. The vast majority of people who do not support Hillary are not sexist. In fact I think that you asserting that not voting for Hillary is sexist, is in itself sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
148. Yeah, that must be it...


"If Hillary doesn't win this primary there is absolutely no hope for a woman president for at least the next 30 plus years."

And if she wins the primary, and loses in the GE?

Will that flood the political landscape with women?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
149. I don't see the 30 years thing. That's a very large number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #149
150. The last reason HRC's campaign is failing is misogyny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #149
198. You must have blinders on.
I'd give it more like 50 to 75 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adabfree Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
151. oH Boy
Sorry, IMO

She isn't on top because people don't like her, not because she's a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
152. Get over it. "Your girl" is horribly flawed as a candidate.
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 06:39 AM by JTFrog
And you degrade women everywhere by claiming it's misogyny. I would love to see a woman president. In fact in 2006 I was in Hillary's camp.

But I didn't drink the kool-aid just because she was a woman. I don't appreciate her war votes on behalf of the mothers and women in this country. I don't appreciate her remaining silent against the telecoms while they spy on Americans, even the mothers and women. I don't appreciate her helping Mr. Bush gut the constitution and then remain silent about restoring our rights, not just the rights of women. I don't appreciate her using the woman victim card to try to manipulate women into voting for her.

"There is no real outstanding female raising star even in the pipeline." Yes there is and some that aren't even owned by the special interest groups yet. Are we willing to give them a shot or will we always put our eggs into the basket with the most money?

She shouldn't have run as the "first woman" to have a shot, she should have run as a great Senator from New York. She could have easily focused her campaign on more substance than that if there was any.

* on edit - and I would think that as close as she came, you would realize that people took her seriously as a woman and as a candidate. Now you are going to put more onus on women because Hillary isn't winning. Please stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
154.  You are asking what women dedicated her adult life to fight for progressive women? If you have to
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 06:44 AM by Mass
ask, it is the sign that you are the one who lives in a cult and is misogynistic. not us women who support Obama.

I feel sorry for you, if this is what you think. Because, sincerely, this is far from being the case, and I think that Hillary Clinton hurt their chance by seeming to say that a woman could only be elected on her husband record. And it may be the very thing that killed her. The fact that people did not want another 8 years of Clinton rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
155. Biggest pile I have seen here.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #155
157. A male co-worker stated yesterday he wouldn't vote for Hillary
because she probably wouldn't keep her pants on any better than Bill. He complains about Bill and the blow job.....me thinks jealousy rears it's ugly head.

He has a wife who is very passive....never worked..calls multiple times a day...and listening to him talk with her...it is easy to surmise that he is "The Man of the House!" So there was no surprise when he made derogatory comments about the female candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #157
160. If he speaks about the BJ, he is probably Republican in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
158. What? That is the stupidest thing I HAVE EVER HEARD.
She is losing because SHE ISN'T THE BEST CANDIDATE.

Being a strong woman gives her the keys to the white house?

What kind of bullshit is that? Its the best candidate - period.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
159. So, its bad for a democrat to vote against a woman candidate even
if her positions SUCK?

don't go away mad. just go away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
164. "a wonderful well deserved milestone for blacks" -
you answered your own post. It's as important for the black community as it is for women. Someday a woman will be president, it just might not be this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
165. I'd vote for Michelle Obama or several women out there
I won't vote for Hillary.

Not about sex, it's about Hillary and her DLC lifestyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
167. Did you see CNN's Virginia exit poll data?
Pretty much expresses your OP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
168. You are correct regarding the Conservative Christian South that demands women be subservient ...
and explains some of the reasons actual statistics point to the high divorce rate in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
169. Please don't be discouraged
There are lots of reasons that people would not vote for Hillary that have nothing to do with her being a woman, just as there are plenty of reasons for people not to vote for Obama that have nothing to do with his race.

One of the difficulties about being a woman or a minority in these situations is that we are held to a higher standard, not just in performance, but also in success. White men win and lose succeed and fail all of the time without it being extrapolated to mean something about their entire group. On the other hand, female and minority pioneers are not allowed to succeed or fail on their own, but if they succeed, it is seen as a success for the entire group, but if they fail, it is seen not only as a failure of the whole, but also can be used to taint everyone.

Please don't fall into that trap. Hillary is an amazing woman and is running a strong, inspirational race that anyone would be proud of. If she doesn't win, don't assume it's just because she's a woman - even if gender does have some role in it. It will immobilize and frustrate you. She's gone farther and higher than any woman has gone in politics, against tremendous odds. Be proud of that and keep your head up. If she doesn't win (and, of course, she still could!), cry for a bit and then pick yourself up and work your ass off to ensure that the next woman who comes along (in fact, first work your ass off to BRING her along) does even better. And she will, because Hillary laid the groundwork.

Hang in there. Don't give up. It gets better. Honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #169
177. very well said
yes --it is a trap --to extrapolate that because Hillary may fail in her bid then other women cannot succeed.

Many HRC supporters are voting economics rather than gender. They imagine a return to the 90's days of prosperity and Hillary riding on Bill's coattails appeals to them. The Billary Supporters, if you will.

I want to vote for a woman who does not have the shadow of her husband's previous presidency as either a negative OR a positive.

Agreed we should give Hillary much credit for her significant accomplishments in a turbulent and cutthroat political atmosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
172. Hillary is not a victim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #172
173. No, she just plays one on TV
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
174. Hillary's supporters continue to give feminism a bad name.
Screaming sexism because your candidate is losing is pathetic. When Obama was down after loses in Nevada and New Hampshire, did you hear his supporters screaming racism? NO because that isn't why he lost. Hillary didn't lose because she is a woman. She's been losing this week because Obama fought a better campaign than she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
175. my wife didn't vote for her either
It's not because she's a woman...it's because it's this woman, Hillary. I couldn't care less what the sex of the candidate is either. In my rosy world, Dennis would have become President. Reality is what you have at hand. Hillary is NOT a good example of how to get to the top. Quite a few of us disagree that she is wonderfully suited for the job. Just because she was married to the president...does NOT make her a President in training. Sheesh...that's like saying, I could be an engineer because my wife has been one for thirty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samurai_Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
176. It's not misogyny, it's about Hillary herself
I'm a staunch feminist, and I'm voting for Obama. Why am I not voting for Clinton? Because of Clinton's voting record on key issues, not apologizing for her IWR and Iran votes, her insurance industry lobbyist buddies, the fact that we don't need another family dynasty in the presidency, her no-show for the telecom immunity vote, among many other reasons. We need change in this country, not more of the same. And I see Clinton as more of the same. Also, in a general election, Clinton will polarize the voters even more than Obama. There are so many non-politically aware voters who would never vote for Clinton just because she's Hillary Clinton, and would vote for McCain if Clinton is the Dem nominee. Obama has a broader appeal and could win the GE over McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #176
179. Leaning Obama... but willing to acknowlede the misogyny
I am leaning Obama... but we have to acknowledge the misogyny in SOME of the attacks on Clinton. There is a lot of denial in American society about racism and misogyny. The classic defense is that I AM NOT RACIST OR MISOGYNIST, but that particular person is defective... and, yet, somehow, the next person is defective and the next and the next...

Why don't we start to acknowledge that there has been a lot of unfairness in the opposition to both our candidates? Right now Hillary is getting the worst. Many attacks on her are personally denigrating. Bush sr. crying over GW hosing Jeb's chances for the Presidency has received none of the attention that Hillary tearing up (but not crying) does.

However, there is a lot of closet hatred going on in the hinterland about Obama. I am hearing the N word being used... and stories about how in the old days, N------s were run out of town...what the speaker was implying is too terrible to think of. (BTW, I tried to start a thread about this but it got hijacked and the moderator rightfully closed it down). I am seriously getting concerned that the old nasty boys are going to be up to their dirty tricks in the rural areas. I am getting worried about more than just voter intimidation... and I am worried about safety of rural African American Americans. Yes, I am worried about the rise of the Klan.

The two are related and to think that those who have their guns trained on Hillary are not going to be turning them very quickly on Obama is very naive. After building up Obama so much, they will pick on him with a vengeance. Watch and see. We will see them crank up the meme that somehow Obama is very much less than competent.

After watching so much misogyny, I am getting very disheartened about the state of women in these United States. Outside of traditional female dominated professions (and law and health care), I just don't see senior women in any great numbers. I see the same tactics used against them -- shunning, name calling, blowing small things out of proportion, etc. My one critique about Obama is that I am not sure that he will do very much to change these things. Where are the women on his campaign (in senior positions) ? We are in need of radical reform to remedy the state of women in this country. No one is talking about this.

When can we come together and understand that the same tactics used on women are the same ones used by racists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
180. Sour grapes...too bad Hillary is losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
181. Sour grapes...too bad Hillary is losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
184. I voted *FOR* Obama, not *against* Hillary.
There are a lot of other people out there who did the same.

Who says it will be 30 years befor another chance for a woman president arrives? How preposterous.

Who says HRC won't be Obama's veep and successor?

And besides, why is it more important to elect a woman president than a black president?

Annd since when should we pick presidents based on race and gender anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
187. another logical fallacy
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 01:13 AM by Iktomiwicasa
man voting for Obama = misogynist.


Bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
188. And were people not voting for Elizabeth Dole in 2000 misogynist too?
Sorry but this argument is really tired.

If Condeleeza Rice were to run, would NOT voting for her make a person both Sexist and Racist?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
189. Yeah, we are just servants, bitches, hos, and objects to
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 04:34 AM by Jamastiene
fuck, slap around, deny shoes, and cook, cook, cook. We are worthless 'droids. Let's face the truth. We are nothing but a warm, wet hole to fuck and an object to be abused. That's the facts. Nobody can deny it with a straight face. Not if they want to keep any credibility with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
196. Flip flopper here
I voted for Hillary before voting against her.

Does that mean I hate women now but not before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #196
200. It's a troll infestation, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #200
201. winning any new voters to your side yet with this?
Didn't think so. Wait maybe that was your real intentions all along!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #201
202. I'm certainly not going to kiss any Republican hate mongers ass.
Hold your breath and wait for that, why don't you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC