Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton ahead of Obama +21 points in Ohio, +18 points in Pennsylvania

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:49 AM
Original message
Clinton ahead of Obama +21 points in Ohio, +18 points in Pennsylvania
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iNxTApa2sQRu0Xx99P3jt2bEXw7gD8UQ6BSO0

Clinton ahead of Obama in Penn., Ohio

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is leading rival Barack Obama in Ohio and Pennsylvania, according to polls released Thursday by Quinnipiac University.

In Ohio, Clinton holds a 21-percentage-point lead over the Illinois senator; Clinton has 55 percent while Obama has 34 percent. The former first lady considers a victory in Ohio's March 4 contest pivotal to saving her candidacy, which has been rocked by a string of Obama victories from coast to coast. The poll shows she has more than a 2-to-1 lead in the state among whites, and almost as big an advantage with women and voters age 45 and over.

In Pennsylvania, Clinton is ahead of Obama, 52 percent compared with his 36 percent. For this April 22 contest, Clinton has a 20-percentage-point lead among women and an edge with men of half that number. Whites back her by about 2-to-1, while seven in 10 blacks are behind Obama.

Clinton leads among older and younger voters and those without college degrees, while Obama is on top with college graduates in Pennsylvania.

Both polls were conducted by telephone from Feb. 6-12 and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.1 percentage points. The Pennsylvania poll involved interviews with 577 likely Pennsylvania Democratic voters, while the Ohio poll involved interviews with 564 likely Ohio Democratic voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Two qualifiers: Feb. 6-12 field dates, and Independents can vote in Ohio.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the 4th time this poll has been posted.
And the 4th time that I'll point out that the OH poll is bogus considering they didn't sample independents, who can vote in that primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I am confused where you see that they dont poll independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I dug up their methodology.
They sample 560-some odd "Democratic likely voters". Meaning Democrats likely to vote. No mention of Independents in the breakdown.

However, they also conducted a poll about which candidate would beat McCain in the general election and there they made mention of Independents.

I guess they're just not aware of the Ohio primary rules.

Here's the link.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?ReleaseID=1142
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I wonder if that means people likely to vote Democratic
or Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Democrats likely to vote.
That's my interpretation.

Like I said, when they did the head-to-head poll they specifically noted sampling Independents. There was no such mention for the Clinton vs. Obama poll. That, and the "Democratic likely voters" language, leads me to believe Independents were NOT sampled for this poll.

I'm pretty sure they left out Independents in their CA polls as well. I have no idea why they're doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Nah, i think this poll includes Indies and Here's why
The Poll measures LIkely democratic Primary voters. That means anybody likely to vote in the dem primary. Indies are included. The only reason that they mention indies in the GE matchups is because they want to see where they as well as dems and reps would go in that matchup.

I think the date though discredits this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. why would the date discredit the poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Half of the poll is taken before Saturday's Priamries, and all of it before Potomac
Doesnt contain Obama's momentum at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. oh please, as if this primary affects that primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. You new to this game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. nope. I think momentum is mythical.
Hillary did badly where she didn't campaign, obviously. She expected to lose all the small ones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. This poll is from yesterday - shows a lead of only 14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Likely Democratic voters vs. Democratic Likely voters.
Likely Democratic voters = People likely to vote Democratic
Democratic Likely voters = Democrats likely to vote

This poll sampled "Democratic likely voters"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Read this, you will understand
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/docs/020408NYNJPRESBP.html

An earlier poll from Quinnipiac says the same exact thing, Democratic Likely voters, but mentions later that Obama has formed a coalition of black and independents in this NJ Poll.

The OH and PA polls include Indies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Lol. That's even worse. Independents were not able to vote in the NJ primary.
So it made no sense to sample them.

Hopefully they meant "unaffiliated voters", which is separate from Independents.

Sorry, but I'm still not sold on these Quinnipiac polls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. But you could declare at the poll and vote in the dem primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Not Independents. They're treated as "declared" already.
Only Unaffilliateds could participate. And a lot of the New Jersey polls left them out. And a lot of unaffiliateds thought they were "independents" and didn't know they could vote.

That's what cost Obama NJ, IMO. We canvassed and handed out literature with the correct information, but it was still a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. For the Third Time, These polls are meaningless because of their date
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pelosi considering endorsing Obama ... link
someone can post this as its own thread- my 3 posts are up. The Times Online earlier reported Pelosi was thinking of endorsing Obama, this is confirmation.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02142008/news/nationalnews/bubbas_92_elex_boss_backs_barack_97564.htm

Meanwhile, congressional aides said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is considering endorsing Obama. They say she's weighing whether a public endorsement would harm her ability to function in her job.

Wilhelm and Pelosi are both superdelegates and will vote in the nominating convention in August.

Also yesterday, several Obama supporters, including Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass), were scheduled to meet with Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, to plan their battle to collect more superdelegate votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. I support Obama,
but Pelosi won't help him. He should send her a thank you note and be as quiet about this as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cherish this, Hillary supporters
Her lead will go down into single digits as soon as Obama sets foot in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Exactly, Read VolcanoJen's account
of Obama's ground game. This thing is just heating up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. I think he will close the gap in PA as well - our primary is
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:40 PM by RamboLiberal
still 2+ months out - April 22nd. Once we get past the February contests and Obama can campaign in Ohio, then Pennsylvania I think we'll get a fairer representation of how it will go for him. Heck in my state voters still have time to register or change their party so they can vote Dem.

Obama may or may not win Pennsylvania but I have a feeling Hillary will not have a blow out. I'm looking forward to the campaigns of both candidates in neighboring Ohio then my state of Pennsylvania!

Not every one is the political junkies we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deja IowaVu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Is it fair to say that if Hillary loses Ohio, she should drop out of the race?
It will mean that Obama closed a huge gap, and that her support is very soft. A real achievement if Obama can pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. If she loses OH, then PA is in serious doubt.
They are neighbors and have similar demographics/economics. If she loses OH and TX, then I think it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hmm. a Challenge. Yummy.
Go Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wouldn't be getting too cocky with two weeks to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. And nowhere to go but down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yup, Hillary just got set up.
:nuke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Great logic n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. And not to mention she's ahead in Texas.
And the Obama supporters want to pretend this thing is over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Great. We eat 20-point leads for breakfast. Let's get crackin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You have a lot of eating to do. Lots and lots of eating.
Might be a rather large crow to eat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. We ate a 20-point lead in the 10 days before Super Tuesday. We've got over two weeks to do the same
again, this time in only two states. Can we do it? It'll be difficult, but yes, we can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. She is ALWAYS FAR AHEAD.....UNTIL Obama comes to town.
I predict Obama wins Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scotch22 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. These are 2 state Obama has never seemed to get any traction in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Thats because he hasnt campaigned there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
37. Don't trust Quinnipiac polls.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:44 PM by TexasObserver
I never trust them.

They create a bogus model, and use it to sample. They oversample the OLD, they oversample those with land lines, and they tweak their "Likely Voter" models in ways that fail to see the likely electorate for the primary.

Bottom line: it's more propaganda intended to help Hillary.

Hillary is likely ahead in both Ohio and Pennsylvania, but not much, and not for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. you like surveyusa? I like surveyusa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. Ok, lots of work to do, but hopefully a victory in WI for Obama will help keep momentum going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
42. Down to 14 point lead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I loved it when people started mixing polls in California to show a trend for Obama! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC