Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton "has the only health care plan that covers every American."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:08 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton "has the only health care plan that covers every American."
Hillary Clinton "has the only health care plan that covers every American."
Congressional Quarterly and the St Petersburg Times have investigated this claim, and have ruled it "True"

Obama has said he wants to cover every American, but experts say it's unlikely he will without a mandate as part of his plan. Earlier in the campaign, Obama said his plan did provide universal coverage, but we found that claim Barely True; read our ruling here.

Because Clinton does include a mandate in her plan, she is correct in saying that she is the only candidate for president with a plan that mandates health care for all Americans. We find her statement True.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mandate - Forced coverage will never pass.
Good luck with that one. Tax Credits are BS and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The mentality has changed. Citizens are ready for health care for ALL. Your meme
may have been relevant 5 years ago. but not anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. If so then why not real Universal Health Care?
Both Obama and Clinton are ducking the real need for something more basic that more of the same Health For Profit.

If neither are going to fight for that, at least Obama's removes the major political obstacle that is claimed as a reason against REAL single-payer universal health coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #60
80. we need a government funded healthcare system
if we can borrow billions for war we should have done it for healthcare years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. BULLSHIT....
Obama mandates his plan for parents. Mandates are mandates.

And tax credits aren't BS....duh..do you think those who get earned income credits think it's BS? Or those who get credits for their IRA think it's BS. Have you ever FILED taxes? Tax credits are far superior to health care deductions which have to be more than 7% of gross income.

Good grief, educate yourself.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. Tax credits come too late (after the fact), and are subjected to those earning.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:30 PM by Kittycat
And I don't want the government telling me what I can afford, when I live in an area with high cost of living, due to the job market.

ETA: And it's so wonderful that the ignore feature is blocking the person above you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. And I don't want to pay for your health care because you think
you don't have to have insurance.

Tax credits aren't after the fact. You figure out your tax credit and increase your exemptions accordingly.....putting extra money in each paycheck. Seriously, you need to find out how taxes, credits, exemptions, etc work.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. But the government does this already! You can't tell your employer "Don't take the Medicare payroll
tax out of my paycheck because I can't afford it."

Similarly, when you do go on to Medicare it will inform you that you must sign up for Medicare Part B (drs visits)and a certain amount will be deducted from your Social Security check each month (unless you have alternate coverage). If you decline to pay Part B and have no alternate coverage, you will pay a PENALTY later when you do sign up, in the form of a higher monthly fee.

If you cannot afford health care, that is what Medicaid is for. I believe HRC talks about the expansion of Medicaid to cover higher incomes levels than it currently does. So if you are truly too poor to pay for your health insurance you will go onto Medicaid.

Universal health care, even in the most generous European countries, is not free. People have to pay for it through taxes, but it is worth it because it is much less per person than what we now have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. And unfortunately, no matter what she proposes, Republicans will call it "Hillarycare"
and vote against it to score points with their base. The odds of getting her plan approved by Congress are far less than Obama's, and that's what matters to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. My father hates mandates--but he told me he thought a healthcare mandates the only way.
Americans are coming around, and realizing the healthcare system is screwed.

Mandates are the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who ho==Great line. She Cares about ALL americans: Obama seems not to care
as he OMITS millions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is a big BUT there.
If people won't buy into it, the money will be taken out of their paychecks whether they can afford it or not. That's a definited drop in income for people living on the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. No, not "whether they can afford it or not" - only if they *can* afford it, but *refuse* to buy it.
Right now there's a mandate (taxes) that we all pay to cover for those without insurance. Sould we pay for those who need help and can't pay? Yes! Should we pay for the deadbeat who can afford it, but refuses to pay? No!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
73. Who decides who can afford it and doesn't have it?
Who decides who a deadbeat is? Our taxes should cover health care for ever single American in this country. Anything less is not acceptable. Close down the war(s), bring the boys home and put that toward our health care. Tax the super rich, the corporations that get tax breaks galore, close loopholes that allow them to put their money offshore, tax the oil companies on their obscene profits and we just might have the money to pay for health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. I agree with many of your points.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Presidential Plans are irrelevant
Anything that passes will be a product of Congress, not the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're a brave soul....
thanks for the post.

Hillary's plan offers to every American the choice of the FEHBP....the plan which all federal employees can choose from. Over 14 million people have access to this plan and thus the infrastructure is in place. That's something people aren't thinking about....
you have to have the structure to put any plan into effect. Obama's would start from scratch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Excellent point you make re the FEHBP
Thanks for reminding us all of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. You're welcome.
I have more info in my journal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. You mean Health INSURANCE plan
Shoveling millions of dollars to health insurance companies is not "health care."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Well, Einstein....
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:17 PM by BlackVelvet04
that's what Obama offers. Tell those who don't have any health insurance now that getting health insurance is worse than no health care plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. So how is Hillary's Insurance Giveaway Plan better than Obama's?
If both candidates are pushing health in$urance over single payer, what Einstein would be dumb enough to bring up either one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Why is hers better?
I'll tell you. Every American will be able to choose a plan for the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program. The government oversees these plans and the insurers must meet government requirements in order to be offered. These are the best plans available at reasonable prices....prices which will be reduced as the number of insured rises.

I had FEHBP insurance for over 20 years and it is FAR superior to any other plans I've had available to me. PLUS the infrastructure for supporting millions of insured is in place and ready to go ON DAY ONE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Well, I'm glad to know my wages will be garnished for such a good plan
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Grow up....
part of being a grown up is providing for the contingencies life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Hey! Maybe we should pay for police and fire protection too
A couple other nasty little contingencies.
It's not like those services are "rights" or anything.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. And you don't pay for fire and police protection now?
I don't think you can just pick and choose which taxes you will pay. It should be the same way with health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Health care paid out of taxes is called: ta-da! Single Payer
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. True. Also true is that if you "can't afford" health insurance how do you somehow
manage to pay taxes as well?

I like single payer too, but I think it will have to evolve by showing people that health care is a better bargain when it is done thru a government plan. People now have misgivings about single payer; they fear getting something inferior to the plan they now have. I really think we should go with a program called "Medicare for everybody" because people like Medicare. But as we start out we have to show people they won't "lose" what they now have. It's great to have the government plans compete against private health insurance (with the caveat that private companies may NOT refuse coverage or jack up prices on people with health problems as they do now). Then, when the private companies can't make any money they will have to go out of the health care business. And ta-da, we've let the "market" decide, right? That was John Edwards' idea all along. The republicans are furious because they know where this will be heading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
65. Duh - What do you think comes out of your taxes(or your mommy's) now?
Get a fucking clue kids....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Use my taxes for Bandaids, not Bombs!
What part of Americans Want Single Payer don't you apologists understand?

Oh wait...you do understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. I Like That - Band-Aids, Not Bombs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
63. And it is very "saleable" to the American public!
It will be sold as the same health care plan that members of Congress get. It's hard to argue that they don't have excellent health care,that it is somehow "bad" because after all, have you heard ONE Republican come out and say they want to do away with their health care plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. This is a good point that deserves to be repeated.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:25 PM by calmblueocean
No one is offering a plan that guarantees health care as a right. Health insurance will never match up to the standards of care people in the UK or Canada get under socialized medicine or single-payer. Both plans are inferior and inadequate from that perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. There's nothing wrong with us coming up with a plan that is
uniquely ours. Americans are used to the health insurance system, and in and of itself there is nothing wrong with that as long as their is government oversight. The FEHBP has government oversight. The government has the bargaining power because of the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good luck getting that passed through Congress, Hillary
Can we look forward to the same midterm takeover by the Repugs that we saw in Bill's first term if you are elected, Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yeah, let's just not try at all and leave 49 million
Americans with no health insurance and no hope for any. I guess hope only counts if it is Obama's plan. He mandates insurance for a portion of the population as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Obama's healthcare plan covers a large majority of the population
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:22 PM by NJSecularist
especially the ones who are in dire need on health insurance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Well, that's not everybody now, is it?
Do you want to volunteer to be the one left out?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. and it is structured for transition into a single payer system at no cost to tax payers..SMART LADY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Very well thought out proposal.
Hard to see how anyone could object to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. She's includes a mandate, but doesn't tell people how much they will be forced to pay.
How can people make a decision about her plan without that information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Neither does Obama.....
it will be a percentage of income. There will be public plans as well as the FEHBP plans and Medicare will be expanded. Tax credits will help those who can't afford it as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. But he won't force people to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Parents will have to......
I guess they are just naturally more irresponsible or maybe Obama is pandering to the younger voters. Experts say if it isn't mandated it won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Oh, right - that big pool of parents who don't want health care for their children.
I forgot about that.

So my question was, what will people have to pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Children should have health care. Adults are old enough to decide for themselves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
66. Then What Happens When You Get Sick? You Expect Everyone Else To Pay for You?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
59. no Obama just heaps on an extra "fine"on the poor if they don't have it...nice plan he has there eh?
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 01:56 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. The republicans have already sent Hillary back to the White House with her tail between her legs.
So why wouldn't they do it again? We can't get any votes from republicasn when it comes to defending the Constitution. Recent votes on health care show that republicans don't care if children have health care. Hillary expects them to give it to everyone.Which of her many versions of health care will she actually run with? I don't think I've heard the same system from her twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. LIAR.....
her plan is well documented....educate yourself and quit spouting crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'd rather not be forced to pay for something I can't afford as it is.
Thanks but no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:28 PM
Original message
So if you get hit by a bus
and get taken to the emergency room I get to pay for it? If you think you can't afford a nominal amount for insurance how will you pay for a catastrophic illness? You won't, everyone else will. I'm sure you would rather we pick up the tab for you but NO THANKS. Grow up and take some responsibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. You should be on the one that grows up
You shouldn't be speaking on how my money should be spent. It's bad enough it's being forcefully spent on a war that was voted in favor of by Hillary. I enjoy what little economic freedom I have and I elect to pay off my debt because unlike the government I just can't blow off paying what I owe to the credit card companies, the bank for my car loan and mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #50
67. Then Go Ahead And F@#$ing Die If You Get Sick, Don't Put It On the Rest of Us
Stop buying shit on credit if you can't afford to pay for your health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Thanks, MP. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. Mandating coverage is not the same thing as providing it
Neither plan provides coverage to everyone, so neither plan is universal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. No plan is going to give it to people without cost....
there is always cost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. gee--Obama is using the word Universal in his stump speeches--best tell him that is a no no!



Mandating coverage is not the same thing as providing it
Posted by democrattotheend


Neither plan provides coverage to everyone, so neither plan is universal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Who is sitting around waiting for someone to force them to go buy it?
The problem is affordability. Making it affordable makes it available to anyone. Obama mandates coverage for all children, as he should. Everyone who wants it has the opportunity to buy into one of the affordable plans. But if some adults choose not to purchase it, then it's their own problem. They shouldn't be forced to pay for insurance if they don't want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. If you can afford it, but refuse to buy it, why should we pay your bills?
Maybe there should be a "don't ever help me or my kids, just let us die" option? Would that make it OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. What bills exactly?
Emergencies? The patient would get the bill after their life-saving treatment. They would feel the burn from that one. They would pay full cost instead of copay.

But if they want checkups or lab tests or other procedures they will have to pay for it themselves, full cost, up front. Why in the world would the rest of us have to pay for their health care? We don't do that now! It's dishonest to say anything other than single-payer would require us to pay for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. They can be fined for back premiums that went unpaid. How will you pay to enforce her mandate?
They like the "15 million" number for people who will chose to not buy into Obama's health care plan.


Exactly how are you planning on enforcing the mandate if 15 million people don't want her plan? (the plans are very similar, it is reasonable to use the same number)



How much tax money will you spend to punish these people?


Hard numbers please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. WEll, if you refuse to pay your taxes because you say you can't afford it, how
does the government punish you? Nothing is free, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. The IRS will "go after people's wages"?? That's HUGH!1!!1!!!11!!!!!
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 01:48 PM by MethuenProgressive
Morans!!1!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. If a mandate is enforced, what will be the additional cost -
will there be an additional government agency, staffed by more government employees, all eligible for retirement someday with the accompanying cost. Are these numbers figured into either candidate's plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. True? Mandates failed in Mass. Is Hillary still plan on "going after people's wages"?
The necessary outreach will not be easy, and it will be fruitless unless health insurance is made affordable and accessible to all. Some believe that an individual mandate to buy health insurance should be part of this effort; others hold that a mandate would be paternalistic or too onerous for families at the margins of affordability. Regardless of our feelings on this issue, what is clear from the evidence is that mandates alone, without strong incentives to comply and harsh punishments for violation, will have little impact on the number of uninsured Americans.1 Indeed, as the Massachusetts experience illustrates, non-compliance with mandates is a large problem, absent harsh sanctions. There is simply no factual basis for the assertion that an individual mandate, by itself, would result in coverage for 15 million more Americans than would robust efforts to make health care more affordable and accessible.

The inaccurate claim that an individual mandate alone would reduce the ranks of the uninsured by 15 million draws attention away from the challenges we must surmount to make good medical care available to all. These challenges include adequate public subsidies, insurance market reform, outreach to people at the margins of American life, and long-term control of medical costs. Individual mandates may have a role in health care reform, but there is risk of a specious "Mission Accomplished" moment. It is a time for rolling up our sleeves and addressing the hard work required to get everyone care. The central challenge is to make health insurance affordable and accessible, and to reach out to all Americans to help them obtain coverage. Voters should insist that candidates for president address these very real issues.

link


A Message to Sen. Clinton -- Forcing People to Buy Insurance is Not Universal Healthcare

Video: Going after people's wages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Pro spams the thread trying to "beat" the three threads-a-day rule.
Disrepectful to the DU admins and mods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I see you have no response to the facts in the post! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Donate, then do a search on the first dozen times you spammed that horseshit.
You've been debunked more often than a sideshow mermaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. It's such a delight to see Hillary hate threads cut down. Have a good day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
69. health insurance is not health care
most Hillarites do not seem to have the brain capacity to grasp this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
70. Bullshit. Only HR 676/1200 covers every American, that is--
--without forcing people to subsidise private insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. Heh. Nice qualifier.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
71. One more time -
Kucinich has universal health CARE. Clinton and Obama have universal health INSURANCE. The only difference between the 2 is that Hillary is gift wrapping us for big insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
74. I want CARE, not "coverage"
"Coverage" is what all the stars of SiCKO thought they had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Life is not a movie, eridani.
Her plan covers all. His does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. "Coverage" is bullshit, period.
The private entities who provide the "coverage" are the same ones that deny actual care on a regular basis. People who never get expensively sick, of course, will never know the difference between care and "coverage."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
79. All I hear about is "garnishing wages" -- what about the UNEMPLOYED?
No wages to garnish, and they already have severe stresses on their budget and are probably either hitting their savings or borrowing from their available credit just to pay the bills. I speak from experience on this -- a mandate to buy health insurance would have forced me into bankruptcy.

At age 23.

Credit ruined for life.

These plans SUCK. Nationalized care is the only acceptable solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC