|
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:12 PM by Benhurst
Clinton nor Obama. The rules, which they both agreed to, set up the requirement for a majority needed to secure the nomination. The contest was not set up as The Biggest Loser, but rather The Majority Rules.
If the calculations I have seen are correct, neither Clinton nor Obama will recieve the majority of votes by the time this is over.
I wish they had included a provision for a runoff between the top two candidates, but they didn't. And neither Clinton nor Obama objected.
No matter which of the top two candidates is selected, he or she will have been voted against by the majority of those Democrats who bothered to participate and will win only because of additional votes from Democratic functionaries known as super delegates.
Will the supporters of the candidate not selected feel cheated? Probably. Is the system a good one? I don't think so. But the DNC would never have listened to my long-held objections. They would have given a U.S. Senator a hearing. Neither candidate objected nor suggested alternatives, though. And neither, if not selected, has a leg to stand on when it comes to raising so-called moral objections.
The objections should have been raised last year, as I wish they had been done. As Oliver Hardy might have said, "It's a fine mess they've gotten us into."
|