Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question-Why did the republicans get to count there vote and seat there delegates but the democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:53 PM
Original message
Question-Why did the republicans get to count there vote and seat there delegates but the democrats
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 09:54 PM by UALRBSofL
didn't. It doesn't make sense to me. What is so different about the rules for the republicans then the democrats??? It seems like every voting cycle something happens in Florida and the republicans win the state. It seems like a conspiracy by the GOP to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. They lost half their delegates in FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Live from WPB....we try harder!!! we stay up late thinking of the next election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. The rules were made by the party
Independent of each other.
There are many differences in the way the Democrats and republicons select their candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:57 PM
Original message
It was a dumb decision of the DNC. Two states as important as FL and MI will be.
It was a dumb decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was a dumb decision by the folks in Florida who pushed up the election date (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was a dumb decision of the DNC. Two states as important as FL and MI will be.
It was a dumb decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. It is "their" vote and "their" delegates.
"There" is the same as "here" - in that they are both words indicating place, as in "here and there".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. They're going to vote their votes over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. This was a decision made by the Democratic Party
It's the Democratic Party that selects the nominee, so they control the process. This year four states were scheduled by the DNC to have early primaries. The FL & MI state Democratic parties decided they wanted to go early too. The national party said NO, and if you try it we'll invalidate your delegates and instruct the candidates not to participate. And that's exactly what happened. FL & MI went early anyway, defying the party. The candidates all pledged not to participate. The states were stripped of their delegates. Except that one desperate candidate is now trying to renege on the deal she agreed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. If that's the case then why didn't half of our votes and delegates count?
Seems to me Donna Brazille put a stop to that per the orders of Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That decision was made by the DNC
The RNC made a different decision about how to punish the FL & MI state parties. They chose to take away half the delegates, the DNC chose to take away all of them. They had to do something or half the states would decide to go early and we'd have dozens of primaries in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Does anyone know, what would be so bad about having all primaries on one day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well, what if we'd had them all in January, before we found out -
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 10:44 PM by Stephanie
that Clinton was not even competent to manage her own campaign funds and staff? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. think about what would happen
the candidates would completely ignore states with low delegate counts and ONLY concentrate on the big wins. The smaller states might as well not vote at all, if that were the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Apparently, Florida was found to be non-compliant under Committee regulations:
REGULATIONS
OF THE RULES & BYLAWS COMMITTEE
FOR THE 2008

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION

Issued by the Democratic Party of the United States
Governor Howard Dean, Chairman

Alexis M. Herman & James Roosevelt, Jr.
Co-Chairs, Rules & Bylaws Committee


As adopted by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee, December 2, 2006 and amended February 1, 2007.

*************************************************
REG. 5.2. ARTICLE II.A.

A. Delegates and alternates selected pursuant to a Plan found in non-compliance by the RBC
shall not be included on the list of delegates and alternates reported to the Secretary by
the RBC for inclusion on the Temporary Roll of the 2008 Democratic National
Convention.


B. Delegates and alternates shall not be placed on the Temporary Roll until after the period
during which a challenge may be brought pursuant to the Rules and Reg. 3.4 has expired
and until no challenges to a Plan are pending.

C. Pursuant to Rule 6.C.(2), a state’s at-large delegates and alternates may not be included
on the Temporary Roll until the RBC has determined that the state’s delegation complies
with the equal division requirements of the Rules.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/apache.3cdn.net/e824f455b24c778...

(I saw this meme crop up earlier and wondered, whaa?...so, fwiw, here's what I found. - pinto)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, the Republicans don't care about disenfranchising voters and stealing elections
and I think if a person feels the same way that's a pretty good sign they might be a republican.

The democrats however, feel strongly about fairness and voter's rights. Notice we award delegates proportionally while the Republicans have winner take all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. FL Pugs moved it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. ok nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Primary elections are for the benefit of the party- Dem, Rep, etc.
Each PARTY sets their specific rules. Democrat, Republican and even the Green Party. These primary rules are set by the national party. This applies only to the primary election. The rules for the GENERAL Presidential Election is under the FEC and run by the federal govt.

So, for example, when the Florida legislature set the date for that state's primary election too early and violated the national party rules each party had their own punishment - the Dems took away all the delegates and the Reps took away half the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe because they didn't and don't have two candidates as close as the Dem's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Didn't the Republican legislature set it all up this way to conflict?
Either way, those votes should count and those that didn't vote because of the confusion be allowed to cast theirs and have it funded by the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. They lost half of Florida, and Wyoming
A couple of things:

We have different rules (and a significantly more complex nominating process) than they do. Florida lost half of its GOP delegates for moving forward; I think Wyoming lost all of theirs. Also, in some states the two primaries are on different days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Political parties decide how to choose their own nominees
which is consistent with the way the court ruled when Bill Nelson tried to sue over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC