Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama losing Democratic vote nationally (as well as the white and Latino vote)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:42 PM
Original message
Obama losing Democratic vote nationally (as well as the white and Latino vote)
This thread sets the record straight about who is winning the Democratic vote in Democratic primaries. While I was looking at the exit polls I figured I would debunk two other Obama claims. He does well in the voting booth but it is bull that he is winning the Democratic vote, bull that he is winning the white vote, and the record needs to be put on the table about Latinos. Obamites cherry pick a few states where he won the Latino vote to claim he is doing well with Latinos while ignoring the national picture or the results in states where there is a big Latino population.

Keep in mind the white and Latino numbers are for the overall vote. They look better for Obama because rethugs from both groups as well as "independents" (90% of "independents" consistently vote for one party...) prefer him more than Democrats from both groups. We all know rethugs look for the most progressive candidate. Remember all the rethug and "independent" votes for Dean in 2004? Thought so...

If there aren't enough members of a specific group for there to be any exit poll data that explains why they aren't listed for a given state.

Use some common sense and factor in the size of states listed. A 17 point win in New York is not the same as a 28 point win in Idaho.

No entrance poll data available for caucuses except for the two big ones, Iowa and Nevada.

Iowa

Rethugs: O 44, H 10
Democrats: O 32, H 31
Ind: O 41, H 17

New Hampshire

Democrats: H 45, O 34
Ind: O 41, H 31
Whites: H 39, O 36
Overall: H 39, O 37
(rethugs 3% of the vote but not enough to show)


Nevada

Overall: H 51, O 45
Democrats: H 51, O 39
Ind: O 47, H 33

Whites: H 52, O 34
Latinos: H 64, O 26
(rethugs 4% of the vote)

South Carolina

Overall: O 55, H 27
Democrats: O 57, H 28
Rethugs (4%): O 37, H 20
Ind: O 42, H 26

Whites: H 36, O 24 (Edwards 40)
Blacks: O 78, H 19 (Edwards 1)

Alabama

Overall: O 56, H 42
Whites: H 72, O 25
Democrats: O 58, H 40
Rethugs (5%): H 52, O 45
Ind: H 48, O 48

Arizona

Overall: H 51, O 42
Democrats: H 52, O 42
(rethugs 2%)
Ind: O 47, H 37

White: H 53, O 38
Latino: H 55, O 41

Arkansas

Overall: H 70, O 26
Dem: H 74, O 25
Ind: H 56, O 32
(rethugs 4%)

Whites: H 79, O 16

California

Overall: H 52, O 43
Democrats: H 57, O 38
Ind: O 58, H 34
(rethugs 3%)

Latinos: H 67, O 32
Whites: H 46, O 45
Asian: H 71, O 25

Connecticut

Overall: o 51, H 47
Democrats: H 50, O 48
Ind: O 62, H 32
(rethugs 2%)

Whites: H 49, O 48
Latinos: O 53. H 43

Delaware

Overall: O 53, H 43
Democrats: O 54, H 42
Ind: O 50, H 44
(rethugs 1%)

Whites: H 56, O 40

Florida

Overall: H 50, O 33
Democrats: H 52, O 36
Rethugs (4%): O 27, H 23
Ind: H 40, O 30

Whites: H 53, O 23
Latinos: H 59, O 30

Georgia

Overall: O 67, H 31
Dems: O 67, H 32
Inds: O 63, H 33
(rethugs 4%)

Whites: H 53, O 43

Illinois

Overall: O 65, H 33
Dems: O 63, H 36
Ind: O 72, H 22
Rethugs (6%): O 60, H 36

White: O 57, H 41
Latino: O 50, H 49

Louisiana

Overall: O 57, H 36
Democrats: O 57, H 38
Rethugs: O 57, H 17
Ind: O 53, H 36

White: H 53, O 30

Maryland

Overall" O 60, H 37
Dems: 0 59, H 40
Ind: O 62, H 27
(rethugs 3%)

White: H 52, O 42
Latino: H 55, O 45

Massachusetts

Overall: H 56, O 41
Democrats: h 58, O 41
Ind: H 54, O 42
rethugs 2%

White: H 59, O 40
Latino: H 56, O 36

Missouri

Overall: O 49, H 48
Democrats: H 50, O 47
Rethugs (6%): O 75, H 21 Rethugs flip the "Democratic" primary to Obama...
Ind: O 67, H 30

Whites: h 57, O 39

New Jersey

Overall: H 54, O 44
Dems: H 56, O 42
Ind: O 49, H 43
rethugs 3%

White: H 66, O 31
Latino: H 68, O 30

New Mexico

Overall: H 49, O 48 (flip of Missouri. I guess not even rethugs showed up for Obama in this state)
Democrats: H 51, O 47
Ind: O 65, H 29
rethugs 2%

White: O 55, H 43
Latino: H 62, O 36

New York

Overall: H 57, O 40
Democrats: H 60, O 37
Ind: O 55, H 40
rethugs 1%

White: H 59, 0 37
Latino: H 73, 0 26

Oklahoma

Overall: H 55, O 31
Democrats: H 58, O 30
Ind: H 41, O 38
rethugs 7%

White: H 56, 0 29

Tennessee

Overall: H 54, 0 41
Democrats: h 57, O 39
Ind: O 47, H 43

White: H 67, O 26

Utah

Overall: O 57, H 39
Democrats: O 49, H 47
Ind: O 68, H 26
rethugs 5%

Whites: O 55, H 40

Virginia

Overall: O 64, H 35
Democrats: O 62, H 38
Rethugs (7%): O 72, H 23
Ind: O 69, H 30

Whites: O 52, H 47
Latinos: O 54, H 46

Tallies

Overall wins in the states above: H 12, O 12 (with one state we know being flipped for Obama by rethugs. Rethugs, not "independents". RETHUGS)
Democratic wins for the Democratic candidates for the Democratic nominations: H 14, O 10 (four states flipped for Obama by rethugs or "independents")

Whites (including giving Iowa to Obama due to common sense): H 18 (versus Obama. Edwards won this group in SC), O 5
Latinos: H 9, O 3 (includes Illinois for Obama)

To be fair to Obama he won the black vote in every state. His low was 78% in South Carolina. He consistently gets into the 80's, sometimes the high 80's (he reached 97% among black independents in one state). This cannot be ignored since African-Americans are a vital part of our party. However, in the general the black share of the vote will be cut in half. He won't be able to rely on the black vote to flip a 9-3 deficit with Latinos and 18-5 deficit with whites to a 12-12 draw.

Wake up! Why are rethugs and "independents" voting for the allegedly most progressive candidate? If they are so progressive why don't they become Democrats? They are voting for the one who is the most palatable to their centrist, whether center-left or center-RIGHT or right-wing views in the case of rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are we the Democratic Party?
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM by jackson_dem
Or are we going to let rethugs and "independents" decide our nominee? Why don't we just disband and join Lieberman's "Independent Democrat" party?

If all of this is irrelevant why the carefully cultivated myths from the Obama camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. boo fucking hoo. stop grasping at straws.
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 10:49 PM by loveangelc
If it only took democrats to elect a person into office then your point may have had a slight HINT of significance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Do you eat with that mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'm not one to scream sexist, but I doubt you would be asking that to a guy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I most certainly would, gratuitous vulgarity shows low class, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Um, people curse all over this forum. If you're particularly sensitive to it
you probably shouldn't be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Um, you're not chasing me out of here, I pay my rent & you don't. Ciao.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. ooooooooh... you sure got me there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Schoolmarm Hillary would NOT approve!!!
of course, ashtray throwing, cussing-like-a-sailor-at-alley-cat Bill Hillary (circa 1998) likes the colorful language!

I don't know, maybe it's that geriatric vote of Hillary's that's so easily offended by the "naughty" words. Gee, if they knew a little more about their dear sweet little Hillary they might want to wash her mouth out with soap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
112. 'geriatric vote' - alittle agist, aren't you? is this more "hope" from Obama Nation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #112
164. try living in Florida ...
and being run into by folks who have no business driving a vehicle. I have a good friend whose 4 year old daughter was killed by a 92 year old snowbird who "never saw the little girl".

I'm no spring chicken, but I'm still too young to be a core Hillary supporter. I think a lot of old white Democrats have trouble pulling the lever for a black man, to be perfectly honest. The Democrat party of the 1950s & 1960s wasn't exactly welcoming to blacks in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #164
167. "Democrat party"
Didn't your puppeteer warn you that that's a "tell?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #167
168. ----
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #167
177. busted by the spelling nazis...
gee, I guess you disagree with the Clintonites on DU, and you're a republikan.

Jesus H. Fucking Christ some of you need to get outside more often. The tin hats combined with the radon emanating from your mom's basement is doing a number on your pea-brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #164
175. Seems like your playing the race card.
No? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Just put him on ignore
I have him on my ignore list too. He contributes nothing worthwhile to this forum. The sooner you put him on your ignore list, the better. My enjoyment of this forum has increased 100% after putting him on my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
44. so does assumption of corrective station
so welcome to the ranks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. Yeah. It's just you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
174. Gratuitous vulgarity - I hate it
The few people I have on ignore are usually there for that reason. This is a discussion forum, not a gutter. I'm not a prude but some of these people go so far over the line that even a drunken sailor would blush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buddyblazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
163. Dead heads....
telling people how to act.

That's irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
95. Clinton trailing among Democratic Delegates
News just in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. dp
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 10:50 PM by NJSecularist
double post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Exactly. I understood your post.
I just walked in from watching Bill Maher's show.

Frank Luntz (Republican nut-job) is just dripping for Odinga's Cousin . Oh, how he loves him.

It made me so sick to my stomach that I decided to move to the PC.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Where's the beef?
Republicans only make a maximum showing of 7% in one primary - gerneatlly the level is about 4%. Also, a good number of them are voting for Clinton as well as Obama.

I don't call them 'Rethuglicans' for the same reason I don't like right-wingers referring to 'Dimocrats'. I find this grade schoolish, and frankly feel the same is true of your 'analysis'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Typical Obame supporter. Ignore the evidence of overwhelming Republican support for Obama
How is Obama leading among the overall popular vote but losing among Democrats? His big margins among Republicans everywhere and him running much better among, and usually winning convincingly, independents is the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. Obama will win over the majority of Democrats that are going to Hillary
You can't say the same thing about Hillary. McCain will win over the majority of independents that leave Obama's camp.

Ask all those independents in 2000 who didn't want to vote for Gore and instead voted for Nader. I guess you want another repug presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. Are we going to WIN?
Seems like your willing to alienate the undecideds, indies, disaffected pukes, and anyone else not loyalty bound to Clinton.

Obama's unity message is a winning message.

All the Democratic purity in the world does not mean shit if we get McLame and Iraq for 100 years.

In the end, thank goodness - the people will elect our nominee not the f'ing pollsters.

And yes, I spin em as much as the next person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
92. Is there an idiotic thread of the year?
You are actually complaining because he gets people to vote for him? I study presidential elections, so Im going to drop a bomb on you, people in a general can vote for anyone they want to. Also other people vote besides Democrats in Presidential elections. There are several other "facts" that I can tell you about Presidential Elections. But I know you wouldn't want the truth to stand in the way of a good antcedote. If you want to extrapolate facts I could prove that I could run walmart because I do my mail route really well. Kirk out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
97. Hellooooo! I'm one of those Independents you discount
And as a former Missourian I noticed you said it was the R's who flipped it to Obama, completely ignoring the Indy vote that went 67 to 30 for Obama. I'll have you know that even though I'm an Independent, in 2006 I went door to door for Claire McCaskill and did phone banking to help her get elected, so I'm really having a little trouble with this particular line of tripe that says indys shouldn't be allowed to participate. In fact, if you read up a litle bit on Independents, you'll find out that many are even more progressive than the average Democrat, and that we make up about 30% of voters in this country.

Too bad you don't like it that some states have open primaries. Too bad you don't like it that Independents get to choose to vote on either ballot in a primary. That's why some folks are Independents. That's the way it is. Deal with it and quit whining, for goshsake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
129. do we need republicans and indies to win in november? or are we just gonna throw away another GE
and let McCain and his 100 year war win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
157. LOL!




Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama's Losing The National Democratic Vote?
How do you figure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Did you know over 30 states have voted?
The total tally has Obama trailing among Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Can You Point To A Tally? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. Hillary is up 700,000 Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. Do You Have A Link? (nt)
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 PM by MannyGoldstein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
147. He is extrapolating the numbers
by using exit polls and eliminating all independents and republicans. (Well it wasn't even him, he is just lifting it from another thread) JackDem is just grasping at straws and
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Winning so far... Like Frank Luntz said...
with the help of cross over Republicans.

Just watched Bill Maher's re-broadcast from Friday night on HBO.


Frank Lutz is a Republican pollster.

But I state the obvious.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good points. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ummmm. Gallup had Obama up by 7% nationally yesterday...
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 10:49 PM by RiverStone
So whatever poll numbers your spinning --- I'll second that and spin this one back: :hi:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/104383/Gallup-Daily-Tracking-Election-2008.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. There is a national Gallup primary held on Obama's best day at the end of February?
All of the states above had one unified election? Obamites stop at nothing to spin the truth. The data for each primary is listed above. Obama has lost the Democratic vote in the 34 or so states that have voted so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. would you rather lose and get all democratic votes or win and get a lot of independent votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Your making too much sense!
And I have no clue why some in the Clinton camp fail to acknowledge the importance of the indie vote. :shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. You support choosing Joe Lieberman at the convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
85. See post #77
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miceelf Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
171. that's even sillier
Joe Lieberman's name is dirt among most americans, independent or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. False choice.
kind of like "Heads I win , Tails you lose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. i'll assume you'd choose to lose...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. All Aboard!!!
"All Aboard the Obama Train...the Edge of the Cliff is Right Around the Next Bend"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Obama's train is on a cliff when Hillary's now down in the polls and
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 PM by loveangelc
backed into a must-win strategy for march 4th? oooook...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. June 7th
Puerto Rico.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. You seriously think leaders will allow this to go until Puerto Rico??????
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #62
122. For the 100,000th time - PR is NOT winner-take-all
All states and territories are proportioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. So we should nominate Lieberman then? We can do that after merging parties
Lieberman would get more independent and rethugs votes than anyone who ran this year. So we should choose him at the convention? That is the logical conclusion of your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
57. You seem to forget -Loserman is a REPUBLICAN!
He endorsed McLame remember.

And there are many rethugs willing to consider Obama because they see the reckless and arrogant path Shrub and Loserman and McLame will take us on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Lieberman is an "Independent Democrat" who caucuses with the Democrats
Why not nominate the person who will best get crossover votes? That is the argument you and a few other Obamites just made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. Your trying to make a ridiculous arguement....
Come on jackson - yea - your a passionate Hil defender but this time your seeming desperate.

Trying to compare that bottom dweller Lieberman and the flies he attracts to the indies that want to vote for Obama is plain damn stupid.

Different people entirely. And you know it.

Loserman has lost credibility with EVERYONE except John McCain himself.

Obama has gained credibility with indies in astronomical proportions comparatively.

See ya in the next round :hi:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #65
79. DINO and not one person on DU thinks this prick is a DEM anymore...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. And the logical conclusion to your argument is that Independent votes wont matter in the GE.
Lieberman is old, crusty and a loser. He could never win a GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. He can't win? Then that means Obama can't
Lieberman is the most popular left-of-center guy with rethugs. He would draw the most crossover votes. Why don't we nominate him since Democratic voters shouldn't pick the Democratic nominee anyway, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. Hmmmm, the Independent vote didnt seem to help him too much in 04 now did it?
Obviously Obama is getting enough Democratic and independent votes to actually win all of the states he has won. Comparing Obama to Lieberman is like comparing Marc Jacobs to Walmart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. He was not viable in 04 because he had no Democratic support
You aren't answering this question: which left-of-center politician do the rethugs like the most?

Obama isn't getting enough Democrat votes. Rethugs alone flipped a neighboring state for him and he needed the rethugs/indies to flip a total of four states. In the overall Democratic vote he is losing badly because he lost all of the big Democratic states except for Illinois. Winning Idaho is not the same as winning California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #80
87. He's getting enough to win, and that's what matters, and that's what will matter in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. I don't think these are polls,
I think they are the statistics from previous primaries and caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
121. Just ignore jackson_dem - all fluff and no substance with nothing to back it up.
As usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Umm..
You need Independents to win the general election.

Obama's ability to get independents to vote for him will be a valuable asset in the general election.

If Hillary wins, she won't get any independents to come to our side. Instead they'll vote for McCain, Nader or somebody else and another Rethug will win the presidency.

Are you happy with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
70. she won't get ANY independents? No disgruntled Republicans either?
How can you be so sure?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Newsflash: the general election will go to whoever wins the most independents and crossovers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
54. Ding, Ding, Ding,.....and that ain't Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
68. Another Obamite for nominating Lieberman on the 2nd ballot
Wow, I never knew Joe had so much support here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. What other states have closed primary's like Arizona does? Love that about my state.
No funny business allowed in Arizona, you had to register as either a Republican or Democrat prior to January 5th or no vote for you.

We don't allow switch hitters to vote here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
73. Florida has a closed primary and the GE
But then again our votes didn't count. But Hillary got 53% of the vote and Obama got 37% of the vote, or it was something along those numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #73
104. She kicked ass in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry_M Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Since you're analyzing...
Is Clinton's lead statistically significant if you do base it on democratic votes only from exit polls. Or is it within the 5% or whatever margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Exit polls don't have margin of errors
Exit polls are also used to collect demographic data about voters and to find out why they voted as they did. Since actual votes are cast anonymously, polling is the only way of collecting this information.

Exit polls have historically and throughout the world been used as a check against and rough indicator of the degree of election fraud. Some examples of this include the Venezuelan recall referendum, 2004, the Ukrainian presidential election, 2004, and the U.S. presidential election, 2004.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit_poll

Maybe the trends evident in 90% of states are wrong? Only in a few states does Obama do better with Democrats than rethugs and independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry_M Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
64. What do you mean they have no margins of error
It's still a poll, and in this case you are depending on 2 things being accurate. That a) your sample is an accurate representation of party affiliation b) your sample is an accurate representation of the way people voted. Unless you poll everyone exiting, you will have a margin of error.
Also, you tried to turn the issue sideways. It's not whether independents or republicans support Obama. My actual question was is it safe to say that democrats have so far preferred Clinton, or are the results so close that there is no statistically significant difference. Again, see paragraph above for why the data MUST still have a margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hillbots: always changing the ground rules when it suits them
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 10:58 PM by NJSecularist
Hillary knew the ground rules in all these primaries. She knew that independents were eligible to vote.

If she can't court independents, boo fucking hoo. That's her fault.

She'll likely lose the nomination because of that fact.

And Obama will be better off in the General election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
139. Karma's due to kick them in their shameless Clintonian a**es. How twisted and deceptive = SMARMY!
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. The point of an election is to win a majority of the American populace. That a solid Democrat
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:07 PM by cryingshame
such as Obama is capable of attracting not only Democrats, but independants and moderates, should be seen as desirable by anyone wishing to see the political center of this country move to the Left, a Democrat in the White House and more of them in Congress.

Especially since Obama is not only liberal, he makes no bones about it and, in fact, speaks of it as well as the import of winning with a mandate.

But I can see where all this would be lost on those supporting those regressive Democrats who believe that it's all well and good to win by the slimmest of margins and with not even a hint of a mandate.

And it seems to me that you have created a straw man in using the word "progressive" since neither Obama nor Clinton label themselves as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. So we should nominate Lieberman then because he would get the most crossover votes?
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:02 PM by jackson_dem
And Lamont should have quit because Lieberman was stronger in the general?

The left-of-center guy most loved by the rethugs is Joe Lieberman, not St. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Comparing Obama to Lieberman is absurd
I hope you know that.

And how come you keep ignoring my questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #52
128. Because he can't, and has nothing to back it up.
I've challenged jackson_dem a few days ago with the same questions, and he gives me the runaround, ignoring my questions and telling me bullshit stories. I've been alerting him for the last few days. I don't know what is going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #128
142. Conviently, he ignores my questions also
Odd, because I keep pointing out all his bullshit and he refuses to reply to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. He is winning a much larger general election coalition ! GOOD !
First, you must remember Obama is the new guy on the block without the long standing Clinton establishment machine and has had to introduce himself to MUCH of the country. Over time, he is winning more and more of Hillary's base of traditional party voters. Overall right now, he has won more overall votes and is polling higher nationally than Hillary among Dems. Remember, it takes TIME to get known. As he gets known, he wins more and more of the traditional party base. Also, you should be jubilant that he is winning more Independents and crossover R's. This is the kind of coalition we need to win the general election. Half the country dislikes Hillary, and she would be a gift from heaven to the R's since a Hillary nomination would unify their tattered party BIGTIME !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. Why don't we go for a much larger coalition with Joseph Lieberman then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. Damn straight. He should just concede now
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. What does the truth have to do with him quitting?
Another nonsensical reply from an Obamite that has no relation to the post in question. Rethugs and indies can vote. We can choose their candidate if we wish. It is fair and square.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. sounds like a good game plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
37. "We all know rethugs look for the most progressive candidate. "
Well that's a good enough evaluation for me to determine Hillary is NOT the most progressive, nor the best choice.

Don't 'cha just hate being pegged with your own words? ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
55. Which state did Hillary win the rethug vote in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #55
113. She didn't, so she must not be the most progressive. I want the most progressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bump... Just because this is the most pathetic post of the day.
I can not believe you spent time on this op... I just hope you cut and pasted this from some other source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
61. What is so pathetic? The truth is pathetic to kool aid drinkers. I forgot
It took 30 minutes to search for the truth, something cultists are not interested in. I know cultists hate data. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #61
82. subject "...losing Democratic votes Nationally" show where he had it and losing it.
. To be losing it you must have had it.
. Considering half the states have not even voted.
. Polls Nationally are going UP for Obama.
. Show me the last election where Inds didn't matter.
. Bonus for you: Bill arguably didn't have the democratic vote.


This OP is the most pathetic post of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. No one "has" any votes so you believe no one ever loses votes and hence an election?
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:24 PM by jackson_dem
That is pathetically...

1) Most states have voted
2) And? Let's see what happens when the other states have their primaries. If Obama wins the Democratic vote by June 7 the current Marsh inspired debate will become moot.
3) So you also believe we should nominate Lieberman because he would get the most crossover votes?
4) Where is your data? What does Bill have to do with any of this anyway? Was he mentioned anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #89
108. you said losing, i did not... You are right, it is pathetic
I have one word for you "transitivity" apply that to your OP... I guarantee it is not valid.

data on bill... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992

and more on that election http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Perot#1992_presidential_candidacy

"A detailed analysis of the voting demographics revealed that Perot's support drew heavily from across the political spectrum, with 20% of his votes coming from self-described liberals, 27% from self-described conservatives, and 53% coming from self-described moderates. Economically, however, the majority of Perot voters (57%) were middle class, earning between $15,000 and $49,000 annually, with the bulk of the remainder drawing from the upper middle class (29% earning over $50,000 annually).<8>"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
132. Most of jackson_dem's posts are pathetic.
and ignores people and bullshits - sounds like a Hillbot/Bushbot mix.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #132
155. didn't know that, Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
148. he lifted the core from another thread
We would hope he would at least have the courtesy of giving the other person credit.

Done with JackDem, need to save my 1000 post for the night Obama clinches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #148
156. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. it is to late to save these people from the error of their ways
you should direct this to people in those states that have`t voted. your mission now is to save all the people who have`t voted yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. General election polls.
If you like polls so much, can you look at the ones that show Obama doing better against McCain than Hillary. He gives us a much better chance of winning the general. Here's what I think: Either Clinton or Obama would make a great president, but Obama has a much better chance of becoming president and preventing a President McCain.

http://pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
69. Who won the general election? When was the vote? I missed it!
The above are from elections that have already occurred.

The other Obama myth has been addressed elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
76. I don't think
that the OP realizes that indies make up almost a third of the electorate....the other two-thirds are split fairly evenly between dems and repubs.

The last I heard, it's fairly dif...no, it's impossible to win a general election with a slight majority of a third.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. So you are for nominating Lieberman too?
He would get more crossover votes than anyone in the Senate Democratic caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #83
94. Don't change the subject.
Or, was the subject suppose to be about how to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miceelf Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #83
172. Against McCain?
Not likely.

Why would someone choose McCain Lite (whether it's Lieberman or Clinton) over McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
60. I want to point out that McCain hasn't chosen his running mate yet.
Let me rephrase that: The running mate for McCain has not been chosen for him yet.

The GOP is plotting. They might look at Obama and say, "Oh, we need someone nice-looking, charismatic, appealing to Indies and moderate Repubs, youthful enough but heavy on governing experience."

McCain's got one foot in the grave, so I can imagine a scenario where voters look at a war hero McCain with an appealing Repub veep vs. an ingratiating Dem like Obama, who goes after Repubs like a Labrador chases a tennis ball. Bada-bing-bada-boom, there goes Obama's ephemeral Republican voting block.

Hillary's got the rock-solid, do-or-die Democrats in her corner, the pragmatic ones who want to get to work and fix this mess. If only we could entice Wes Clark to become her running mate. He is charismatic, so good-looking it ought to be a crime, he has unparalleled military experience, he speaks well, he would make a great president in 8 years, and Wes has a remarkable chemistry with Hillary. A Hillary/Wes combination would be winner take all for the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #60
71. You do know that in the GE, the p candidates don't debate the vp candidates, right?
The matchups are Candidate vs Candidate and VP Candidate vs VP Candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. McCain-Crist takes all of Obama's "special" issues off the table
He is left with Democratic boilerplate and no experience. McCain-Crist would kill Obama. Our only hope if Obama is the nominee is that the rethugs demand a right-wing fanatic like Huckabee be on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. Charlie Crist will get "outed" if he is VP...
http://www.blogactive.com/2006/09/matt-gets-it.html

The Repubs will be in a tizzy for sure. Fundies will DEFINITELY stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #71
91. You'd think Jackson dem would love McCain to win if Obama is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #91
96. Seems rather hyped up about the possibility! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #91
99. "You are either for Obama (in the primaries) or against us"
Another similarity between Obamabots and Bushbots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
110. Jackson - will you vote for Obama if he is the nominee?
I sure as hell hope that's who I will see on the ballot, but if it's Hillary - she has my vote.

Does Obama have yours?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. Of course
And I'll do more than just vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #111
119. Good to hear...
I'll end my debate with you on an agreeable note.

Have a goodnight :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #119
127. You too
We will all be on the same page pretty soon, perhaps even in two weeks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #71
102. I'm just looking at potential tickets
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:29 PM by Straight Shooter
I've heard a couple names mentioned for McCain, but cannot remember now.

It's the overall ticket, though, and the impression which registers on voters that I'm suggesting with a Hillary/Wes ticket. IOW,the whole being greater than the sum of its parts.

ETA, yes, I see your point about debates, but I'm looking at it from the perspective of the "average" voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #60
72. Charlie Crist fits the bill. He is also the most popular governor, "post-partisan"
And swung the nomination to McCain in Florida. Had Romney won Florida he would have won Super Tuesday, or at least split it and then likely beaten McCain in the rest of the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. Do you want a republican or democrat to win? Just checking, you're pulling out plenty of positives
for Charlie Crist/MCCain. It makes me wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #90
101. Democrats. That is why I am supporting Hillary Clinton
I don't decide to vote based on emotion or slogans. I look at the facts and the strengths and weaknesses of candidates and those on the other side. McCain-Crist basically take Obama's big draw off the table. Crist has a record of doing things under the post-partisan banner, Obama doesn't (renaming post offices doesn't count).

Against Romney Obama would probably be a better candidate. Against McCain Hillary is the only one who can neutralize McCain's strengths and beat him domestically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
86. I really don't think so, honestly
If Clinton wins the nom, Obama will be the VP, bank on it, bookmark this post if you need to. It will happen. All those young people/AA's/college educated liberals who are solidly in Obama's corner will not be enthused to vote for a Clinton/Clark ticket. If Obama is the nom, then it will be someone like Webb/Biden/Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #86
123. I agree with your perspective, but McCain is still perceived as a strong military figure.
How is Obama as an anti-war Veep going to help counter that? Although I do think it would pretty well guarantee a 16-year hold on the Oval Office. :)

I think there are some votes by Webb that might run counter-intuitive to an Obama/Webb ticket, but I can't think of them off the top of my head. Dodd would be great; he was the first candidate I supported, after a lot of consideration. Biden is another good one, but I still see him as Sec. of State in either an Obama or Clinton administration instead of a veep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #123
137. Yes but Hillary will be able to go toe to toe with McCain on national security issues
They are about even on that issue. I don't see that as a problem if Obama were VP. McCain knows little if nothing about domestic issues and thats where its going to hurt him. America right now is more focused on the economy. And if Iraq comes up then all we've have to do is repeat over and over "100 years in Iraq". I agree that Clinton and Obama on the same ticket will be unbeatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #60
106. And folks thought Benson would help Dukakis
Sorry - the VP slot does little but help out (sometimes) in select geographic regions.

I really like Wes Clark and think he would be a great VP - for Obama. And it would do Wes no good to be Hillary's VP, because she is too polarizing for him to ever enjoy the slot.

With Obama - he would not only GET elected, but would be a fantastic choice for 2016. He would be a tad younger then McCain is now --- I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #106
109. Benson did help Dukakis. Unfortunately, Dukakis couldn't help Dukakis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #109
116. Alas --- if only it was Benson/Dukakis...
Now that would have changed history. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #116
130. Benson and anybody who doesn't look silly in a combat helmet
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
63. March 5th can't come soon enogh !
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
93. Damn right!
Lets hope March 5th makes all the Hillary arguments irrelevant.

Then we can agree to focus on Obama's puke competition - that war mongering lying sack of shit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
78. OK - everyone add the black vote to the people that "don't count".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #78
88. LOL.... LOL... LOL...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #78
103. Did Obamites ever lie about the black vote?
The OP noted the black vote has went to him in each state. The thread was to debunk Obamite myths. What debunking is there of what is factually true? Obamites sometimes do use facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
81. This is what is known as "moving the goalposts"
You don't like the results of the actual election, so you fudge them to meet a different standard that is completely irrelevant.

In open primaries, they don't just count the Democratic votes.

If you don't like open primaries, then don't have open primaries.

Don't try to change the game in the middle of it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #81
100. I got yer goalposts
SDs should be decided not on the actual vote, but the exit polls: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4635425

(Likely the nonsense that inspired this thread)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #100
143. My opinion
is that superdelegates get to decide who superdelegates should vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #81
105. So you believe superdelegates should be allowed to vote as they wish?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #105
114. they should as Obama has stated... But he said it will be hard for them to go against the will...
of the people. But lets take his words out of context and put words in his mouth. He didn't say they had to, he said if it came down to it, it would be hard to go against the will of the people. He has never said that they MUST go with the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #114
117. InsultComicDog is Barack?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #117
124. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #124
126. I wasn't talking about Barack's words but Insult's words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #126
135. My bad, i just see that argument on this site a lot and it is BS
but my bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #105
141. yes
I think superdelegates should be able to vote as they wish.

I also think there are too many superdelegates, but that's a problem to resolve for the next election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
98. aw really? for why?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #98
107. No wonder
Indies don't go for Hillary.

Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #107
150. Lol what? I'm an Obama supporter by the way,
I switched a week or two ago! I even wrote a post about it,

now what are we talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
115. THANK YOU!
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 11:36 PM by smalll
I've been pissed about this recently: in delegates, Obama's slightly ahead. In popular vote, he is too. But if these primaries/caucuses were limited to DEMOCRATS, Hillary would be running away with it.

Barack Obama is being foisted upon the Democratic Party by Republicans, "independents" and kids who've never voted before. If Hillary wins, when she does win, the Democratic Party has a nominee. If Obama wins, when he does win, the Democratic Party has nothing: instead, Obama has a nomination. If he wins, he has a ticket to take him to the general election. Nothing more, nothing less.

Before June's over, I suspect the SuperDs and late primary voters will come to their senses and won't let a hopped-up little crypto-Caesarist Axelrod puppet turn our proud Democratic donkey into nothing more than a rented beast of burden hired to be ridden to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #115
118. Yup and how many Democrats will stay at home if the rethug hero Obama is the nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #118
131. When i went door to door for Obama last week...
I would say 95% of the people who said they were voting for Clinton VOLUNTARILY said that they would vote for Obama if he wins.

It was surprising how many openly said it.

It wasn't the same way on the other side... I'll just leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #115
140. "Kids" when has 18 been kids... or 21 been a kid? is the whole age group 18 - 29 "KIDS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miceelf Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #115
173. LOL at the scooby doo reference
"I would have gotten away with the nomination if it weren't for you meddling kids!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
120. It is great he is getting independents. That could win the general.
Why are you so upset? That is the goal...to win independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #120
133. Because they don't count
Florida and Michigan count. Independents don't count.

We need to base the SD allocation on the exit polls, not the votes: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4635425
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #120
138. umm.. some Indies are Repugs--really think they will vote Dem in the GE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
125. Reaganomics.
No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
134. What a load of crap.
Doctored numbers without perspective, yet another mindless broadside from a predictable minion of the Entitlement candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #134
144. Doctored numbers? Alert the Obama campaign the exit polls are doctored!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #144
153. You've pulled this crap on several threads. We're not impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
136. Great post. K & R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #136
145. Thank you and the others who read the facts instead of automatically whining
One can look at facts without agreeing with them but for some "passionate" folks that is not possible. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #136
146. IMO, only if you live in the bitter political world known as "Clintonian Fantasyland"
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
149. Among the three most recent primaries, and Obama won 57% to 62% of the Dem vote. He surpassed her.
Hillary is in trouble!

It's that simple!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #149
151. She must be in trouble. Dean drew indys, greens, and Republicans
But that is one thing they never went after him for. Much of our DFA group is indy and green and a few Republicans.

I posted above that a candidate must appeal to the all, and I was not agreed with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #151
154. mad. The argument made against Hill is exactly what was used against Dean
"Dean is unelectable. He can't get crossover votes and is to polarizing. Look at the polls. He does worst against Bush than Kerry, Edwards, and Clark."

Dean's base was similar to Hillary's, except much smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #149
152. In three primaries. What about the aggregation of them and the other 30?
He may very well pass her when the primaries are over but right now he is behind and that is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
158. Awesome post!!! Who woulda thought Obamites could get their facts wrong?
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 07:49 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adabfree Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
159. Right Now...he's winning...and that's that...
When Hillary takes the lead come back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
160. Yeah, but... Obama steals wicked good speeches! Rock! Star! Go! Fire! Up!
Facts? No!! Please don't Fact!! Cheerlead! Slogan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
161. I appreciate good number crunching.
I appreciate good number crunching, even if I disagree with your unstated premise that Hillary is more progressive than Obama.

Thanks for the enlightening data and clear presentation.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
162. Where's Washington State? Maine? DC?
Looks like you intentionally left out some states to pad your numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
165. Another Hillary plant, all that info and not one freegin link? getoutahere!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catagory5 Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #165
166. Trial of the century soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
169. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miceelf Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
170. that's silly
You're assuming that everyone who voted against Obama in the primary will vote against him in the general.

If that's the case, then the prospects for Hillary are just as bad, as you can't win without winning among independents, which she loses handily.


Furthermore, you are claiming that republicans flipped that state for Obama. Well, you're attributing it to republicans, but it could just as easily be attributed to independents. As well, you're making some kind of weird assumption that the nominee should refuse any republican votes they receive.

Your exclusion of the caucuses is also telling, as most of those are NOT open and hence cannot include republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
176. Newsflash: The General Election is open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
178. Obama wins the Democratic vote tonight, 51 to 49
What's going to be the next excuse for the Hillbots? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC