Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm not clairvoyant, but if Clinton or her surrogates are responsible for the new plagiarism meme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:34 AM
Original message
I'm not clairvoyant, but if Clinton or her surrogates are responsible for the new plagiarism meme
she can pretty much count out black voters if she is the nominee.

It's one thing to win fairly, but to win by trying to utterly disgrace, shame, and embarrass your opponent is something entirely different. This "plagiarism" meme is disgusting and seeks not only to destroy Obama in this election cycle, but to render him forever unelectable because his strongest gift is his oratory abilities.

I always talk about supporting the nominee no matter what but everyone has a breaking point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG! The assumptions within this post are "low" in so many areas
:grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. ABC News is reporting on the television that the Clinton camp is spreading it.
But, they don't have that on the website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Of course they are (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. More threats? This "blacks will stay" home has been an Obama surrogate meme for months now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary Clinton is not responsible
for Obama's plagiarism. He brought this on himself. African American's are politically mature enough to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adabfree Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. She can count out this black voter..just based on her hubby's actions in SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Obama can count out this family of black voters in the GE for Obama's campaign against the Clinton's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adabfree Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good for you...and your family...my entire clan is OBAMA..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demonsweat Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. translation: waaaaaah!!!
You'd vote for Obama if he came out as a Nazi and you know it. Don't act as if Bill forced your hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adabfree Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Bill is bill..my vote is my vote..Obama a Nazi...hmmm..okay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Thanks for Godwining the thread.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 10:13 AM by backscatter712
Pretty much shows to what depths you'll stoop to shit on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's pretty pathetic that this is all they have
the other guy is a friend of his, both have stated they "trade lines" all the time and are frequent emailers to one another. It's a logical explanation and a viable one but the Clintonistas are utterly desperate at this point. This all tells me one thing---he's got a very clean background or they would have hauled a bimbo out of the closet or some other horribly lurid detail about him and they haven't because they can't. They got nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Then attribute
He didn't claim to have come up with, "We hold these truths to be self-evident," but he did claim to come up with the response, "Just words." That's not "public domain" enough that it doesn't require attribution. Were I teaching (and because of NCLB and the power-shift--we can talk about that some time--I quit teaching and no longer will attempt it in the current school system), I'd be going to the mat for plagiarism and academic dishonesty (and part of the reason I left--get told by administration to allow the students to pass).

With attribution, it's fine. Then I could argue that it's not the words that make the movement, it's the implied action behind the words that make the movement. TJ was ready to give his life and property. FDR was ready to accept the possible loss of political career. MLK, Jr. was facing mob action and risking life and limb. Barack isn't--or doesn't appear to. And a president of the Harvard Law Review really should know about attribution.

Without attribution, it's really plagiarism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. His only claim to fame is that he's a good speaker
and it's someone else's words....
Yep, gotta be Hillary's fault.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Are some beginning to see the emperor's new clothes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is pathetic. Obama alone is responsible for using the words of another.
I watched the videos.

It is plagarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. The NYT says "rival campaign"
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 09:46 AM by ProSense
“Don’t tell me words don’t matter,” Mr. Obama said, to applause. “ ‘I have a dream’ — just words? ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’ — just words? ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself’ — just words? Just speeches?”

Mr. Patrick employed similar language during his 2006 governor’s race when his Republican rival, Kerry Healey, criticized him as offering lofty rhetoric over specifics. Mr. Patrick has endorsed Mr. Obama, and the two men are close friends.

“ ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’ — just words? Just words?” Mr. Patrick said one month before his election. “ ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself’ — just words? ‘Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.’ Just words? ‘I have a dream’ — just words?”

In a telephone interview on Sunday, Mr. Patrick said that he and Mr. Obama first talked about the attacks from their respective rivals last summer, when Mrs. Clinton was raising questions about Mr. Obama’s experience, and that they discussed them again last week.

Both men had anticipated that Mr. Obama’s rhetorical strength would provide a point of criticism. Mr. Patrick said he told Mr. Obama that he should respond to the criticism, and he shared language from his campaign with Mr. Obama’s speechwriters.

Mr. Patrick said he did not believe Mr. Obama should give him credit.

“Who knows who I am? The point is more important than whose argument it is,” said Mr. Patrick, who telephoned The New York Times at the request of the Obama campaign. “It’s a transcendent argument.”

David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Mr. Obama who also advised Mr. Patrick, said Sunday that Mr. Obama adapted the words from Mr. Patrick. Mr. Axelrod said that he did not write the words for either candidate.

“They often riff off one another. They share a world view,” Mr. Axelrod said. “Both of them are effective speakers whose words tend to get requoted and arguments tend to be embraced widely.”

The similarities from a passage of Mr. Obama’s speech on Saturday and in remarks that Mr. Patrick delivered on Oct. 15, 2006, were highlighted by a rival campaign that did not want to be identified. Clips of both speeches are archived on the Web site YouTube.com.

link


A rival campaign? LOL! Run for the hills, the speeches sound similar!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Hmm... that settles it then! I'm sure it wasn't McCain
as his campaign manager says he doesn't want to attack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Of course the Clinton camp is behind it. MSM doesn't investigate. It repeats what it's fed.
Opposition research finds these things and each campaign has a team of opposition researchers who do nothing but look for things to exploit as issues, then feed them to friendly journalists or TV newsreaders, whom I refuse to call journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Investigate what?
The BO flock has been "bamboozled" by their messiah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Nonsense. Nothing gets covered that isn't spoon fed to the media.
Your first election, I take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. You missed the point....
what is there to investigate??

I realize that he can do no wrong to the KoolAid drinkers but maybe the
general public will finally start to see that he's an empty suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It isn't the public that lacks perception.
It's you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. My, my the flock is even more delicate today than usual
I'll try to find some nice Deval Patrick words to make you feel better.

:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Obama also ripped off Hillary's Economic Policy and was BUSTED doing so....
he has NEVER spoken an original word...all his words are JFK< MLK and Ted Sorensen's


OBAMA GOT WORDS?



White House hopeful Barack Obama's economic platform set off a three-way fight Wednesday as aides to Republican John McCain and Democrat Hillary Clinton accused Obama of stealing Clinton's ideas.

Obama fired back that McCain lacks economic know-how.

"Obama's plan today is the most shameless piece of potential plagiarism that I have ever seen," McCain economic advisor Kevin Hassett said. The Clinton campaign helpfully e-mailed his comments to reporters.

"He basically took Clinton's words and Clinton's policies and called them his own," Hassett said. "If I were a professor I'd give him an F and try to get him kicked out of school for something this terrible ... I remember Mrs. Clinton saying shared prosperity and I remember the bill that she introduced in August for infrastructure. The fact is these are things Obama has taken as his own without crediting the source of the ideas which was Mrs. Clinton."

Clinton herself said, "A plan that fails to provide universal health care, fails to address the housing crisis, and fails to immediately start creating good paying jobs in America again will not turn the economy around and provide the real relief that our people need. We need real results not more rhetoric."

The New York senator's campaign said she proposed a national infrastructure bank in August and that Obama's energy plan is a rehash of hers. The Obama campaign responded that his bank proposal is better than hers and that he introduced his energy plan before hers.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/794128,CST-NWS-campweb14.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Is that why Krugman has been attacking it? Hillary ripped off Edwards' healthcare plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
33.  New Clinton economic message has echoes of Edwards

New Clinton economic message has echoes of Edwards

By Caren Bohan Sun Feb 17, 2:05 PM ET

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin (Reuters) - White House hopeful Hillary Clinton has a message for hairdressers in Wisconsin, postal workers in Ohio and autoworkers across the United States who are struggling financially: She cares.

The former first lady and New York senator is hoping blue collar workers will provide her with a crucial base of support as she tries to erode the lead her rival Barack Obama has opened in the tight race to become the Democratic nominee in the November presidential election.

Clinton is courting working-class voters with a new message of economic populism similar to the theme of John Edwards, the former North Carolina senator who dropped out of the Democratic race in January.

Edwards never gained enough momentum to be competitive with Obama and Clinton, but the New York and Illinois senators are trying to woo his followers, many of whom were passionate about his pledge to take on "corporate greed" and bring change to a government he said had sold out the middle class.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. "but the New York and Illinois senators are trying to woo his followers, " ...nice try tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well, you knew she was going negative. So this sort of thing is to be expected.
I have to admit, I'm still left thinking "is this all you've got?"

When Clinton has tried to go against Obama on the issues like health care (mandates) and mortgage rate freezes, he's parried effectively and she hasn't been able to crack him.

When the Clinton campaign didn't make significant headway with the surrogates attacking other women with faux feminist reasons for voting Clinton, I figured it was coming.

When shouting "slum lord" in a debate, didn't carry much traction in the primaries that took place afterward, I braced myself.

But this latest attack (and they've become quite predictable) is breathtaking in its desperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yup, pointing out BO's speeches aren't original just smacks of racism!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I didn't say it was racism, but it's a dirty tactic that will
turn off many voters, particularly black voters who are excited about Obama's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Is there any criticism of Obama
that isn't a dirty tactic?

Is there any criticism of Clinton that isn't perfectly valid and justified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. dirty tactic?
The BO flock keeps making my point over and over and over.
These guys are not ready for prime time. If you think this is a
"dirty tactic", you ain't seen nothing yet.
I know you guys had to whine and pout and hide under the bed over
"fairytale."
It's clear - criticism of BO is not tolerable.
Now go run and hide behind Mommy's skirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. They Need to Grow Up
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 10:10 AM by Crisco
Obama has been engaging in dirty tactics all along. If he and his supporters can't stand being called on his shit, they should just pack it up and go home, anyway. You might be able to scare off the doves in the Democratic Party, but the Repukes are gonna laugh in your faces when you try this crap.

Obama said he wanted to be the Democratic answer to Ronald Reagan, but when you go around attacking those who put forward legitimate criticisms, he starts looking more and more like George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. Oh, I Get It Now! No Criticism of Obama Will Be Allowed!
Legitimate or otherwise.

Hello, Bushbots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
28. I read the NYT article and there is no substance here. The old throwing mud in
hopes that something sticks. The article says clearly that the two of them discussed these very lines, and Patrick advised Obama to respond in this way and not attribute him.

It might stick a little and it might not, but it hammers home to me that the HRC supporters playing this up are being disingenuous. That is, if the situation were reversed, they would appropriately defend HRC with the facts.

Plagiarism, ah that worked once, remember Biden? Keep trying, maybe rumors of sexual dalliances and a love child would stick...just some ideas for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
37. The personal attacks from the Clinton camp have got to stop.
Calling Obama a cult leader, calling him a sexist, calling him a plagiarist, calling him an empty suit with no solutions, trotting out the race card against him, whispering about his self admitted drug use when he was a youth, calling him "Barack Hussein Obama" in an attempt to make people think he is a Muslim (not that there is anything wrong with being a Muslim but Barack is a Christian,) falsely accusing him of attending a Wahhabist school, alleging that he refuses to cite the Pledge of Allegiance, and on and on and on. This crap has got to stop.

There are legitimate issues to discuss, but this dirty crap that is bing hurled at Obama has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
38. I hope the personal attacks backfire...The heart of Obama's
appeal is that the old politics needs to end. Hillary is a prime example of it as she goes negative. I hope the voters realize that FEAR is behind all of the attacks. She knows she is losing and has to destroy Obama to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. and Obama chanels dead guys..."raygun and the GOP the party of ideas"
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 10:49 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
OBAMA GOT WORDS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Except he's playing politics dirtier than anybody. Is this Bushworld? Up is down.
I say this as a non-supporter of either of the remaining candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Holy shit! What universe do you live in? Look at these shameless smear Obama threads?!?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC