Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Superdelegates breaking to Obama. Hillary leads by only 47 now. She lead by 105 last month.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:29 AM
Original message
NYT: Superdelegates breaking to Obama. Hillary leads by only 47 now. She lead by 105 last month.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 10:29 AM by jefferson_dem
Superdelegate Poll: Unsettled Ground
By Megan Thee

Despite Senator Barack Obama’s strong showing in recent primaries, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton continues to hold onto more support from superdelegates, the Democratic Party elites, according to a survey by The New York Times and CBS News.

The current count is 189.5 superdelegate votes for Mrs. Clinton and 142.5 for Mr. Obama. But in a similar survey conducted last month, Mrs. Clinton led Mr. Obama by 204 to 99. About 8 percent of the total 795 superdelegates changed their minds over the last few weeks, as many states held their primaries and caucuses. Few delegates switched allegiance from one candidate to the other; the main changes were among the undecided delegates. Among the previously undecided delegates who now are endorsing a candidate, Mr. Obama got more of their support. Some of Mrs. Clinton’s previous supporters are now undecided.

Efforts were made to contact all of the superdelegates identified by the Democratic National Committee. The telephone survey was conducted Feb. 11-15. Superdelegates from the Democrats abroad delegation get half a vote each, and those from Florida and Michigan were not included in the totals.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/superdelegate-poll-unsettled-ground/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. The avalanche has started......
....and it will continue.

The Democratic party WANTS to coalesce around a single candidate... and most of the superdelegates are beginning to realize they can't stomach four more years of the 50%+1 philosophy that the Clintons bring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. As the Clinton campaign continues with the politics of personal destruction
I anticipate many additional superdelegates with cast votes for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. You shouldn't write your own headline and put it after "NYT"
It's kind of misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. fraud...it's what Obama fans like!
...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. How is it fraud? Please elaborate...if you can.
Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. I think the GP is applying the LBN rules to GDP
In the LBN forum, you are forbidden from changing the original headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The "GP" is being a fool.
Is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. A cult of un-handshaking, plagiaristic fraudsters - that's us!
Feed it to the media. Okay, that's been done except for the fraud part. Get to work, slacker.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. deval patrick disagrees.....
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 11:21 AM by Tarheel_Dem
courtesy of Jake Tapper ABC News:

UPDATE: The Obama campaign has issued a statement from Gov. Patrick: “Sen. Obama and I are long-time friends and allies. We often share ideas about politics, policy and language. The argument in question, on the value of words in the public square, is one about which he and I have spoken frequently before. Given the recent attacks from Sen. Clinton, I applaud him responding in just the way he did.”

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/obama-echoes-de.html


I don't think this can be called "plagirism", but nice try. Patrick is a friend, supporter, and a political kindred spirit of Obama's. Had he ripped off Clinton, I could see your point, but it's clear to me that this was done with Patrick's blessing.

:edited for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. lol..
paaaleeezzze..REZKO: Obama and I are long time friends...we share everything...including..

just because you refuse to hold BHO accountable,does NOT mean when the MSM "decides" to go after BHO they will let ANYTHING go..his day is just around the corner..hold on to your panties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. i know you're hoping the M$M will make a big deal of this...
just like you were hoping they'd make a big deal of Rezko. Ain't gonna happen. Have you seen the rapid response from the Obama camp showing Hill's plagirism of Obama? LOL

You guys don't realize it, but you've opened yet another hornet's nest. This gives Clinton's opposition a chance to pore over every speech she and Bill have ever given, and you'll probably be astonished at what we'll find out. Everytime you guys come up with something new, you wind up suffering for it. Ironic, ain't it? :rofl:

Oh, and did you hear she's down another point in the latest Rass poll? Keep it up, we appreciate it.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. your right!!
ain't gonna happen til Barack Hussein Obama is the NOM! LOL!! hahaah!! I suppose that is a laughing matter to you!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Baloney. It's not a headline. It's a subject line.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 10:41 AM by jefferson_dem
There is no requirement in GD-P that they match exactly, as there is in LBN. My point was to let folks know it was a NYT survey of supers.

It's funny to me that you single this thread out and belly-ache about integrity when this practice is commonplace in this forum.

If you think the subject line is misleading...please, let's here how.

From the story --- "The current count is 189.5 superdelegate votes for Mrs. Clinton and 142.5 for Mr. Obama. But in a similar survey conducted last month, Mrs. Clinton led Mr. Obama by 204 to 99."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Not really. It's not in quotes. The information is factually correct, and is from the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Can I plagiarize this thread, I want to spread the good news!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. The superdelegates will come around, except the hardcore loyalists.
All the ones who jumped on the bandwagon will now jump off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
39. added one more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. I told the Obama supporters not to worry...
The Supers will go the way of "We The People". The vast majority have no
desire to thwart the will of the people, and they won't.

There are die-hard loyalists in both the Obama/Clinton Super Delegate
camps.

However, the majority are not there to usurp the citizens of this country, and
they will go with the candidate who has the highest pledged delegate count.

No worries people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. They're growing more disgusted with Hillary's tactics

and she was screaming 'Yes we will! Yes we will! Yes we will! at a rally
in Ohio. The audience looked confused.

She copies others all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mapatriot Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. We can't afford......
a back room, brokered convention. How our "super-delegates" vote will be very transparent. They MUST support whichever candidate wins their state. It's a fundamental component of what differentiates us from the republicans.

And how can ANYBODY argue for the inclusion of the Michigan and Florida delegates in the convention voting?? Of course those delegates should be seated and an important part of our convention. But having their VOTES bound to a primary in which all the candidates agreed not to participate (and then one did an 11th hour reversal and won), makes a mockery of our primary process and party structure. This will be a real test of our party leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurem2008 Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Obama is plagiarizing superdelegates!!!!
LOL!! Hillary is definitely in desperation mode. Little by little she is losing superdelegates. When she loses in Ohio it will be Al Gore's pleasure to show her the door. Barack will fight to a tie in Texas but she will lose Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania in spite ofr fast Eddie's support. By the way, in about a month Fast Eddie will be looking to throw Hillary overboard to save his own skin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. LOL!




Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wow. This is going to be a photo finish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. I don't expect that. Obama has broken away, and will continue to add to his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. hopefully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. What BS....so now you want the super delegates to decide? It's all up until the end folks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Even though I DO NOT want them to chose the nominee
I'm glad they are switching over to reflect where the voters are right now. I did not like how Clinton padded herself with super delegates to make herself seem inevitable. I'm glad some of them are not scared to change their mind as the state of this race has changed. I would prefer one one them would start breaking away (preferably Obama) so that they could be the clear winner. I don't want the party split because the super delegates trumped the will of the people. I don't want Obama to win that way and I don't want Clinton to win that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
41. They won't decide it. They'll confirm the decision of the voters /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Superdelegates should vote the same way as their precinct
regardless of who the candidate is. I do support Obama. But I believe in following the rules. So, if there are superdelegates that are pledged to Obama and their district went for Clinton, that superdelegate should vote for Clinton. Likewise, if a superdelegate is pledged to Clinton and their district voted for Obama, that superdelegate should vote for Obama. I think most of the superdelegates will do this anyway. They don't want to contribute to the destruction of the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
18. Unlike the Titatanic
There's a large S.S. Obama for them to escape to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. All aboard the S.S.S Hillary.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 11:28 AM by NJSecularist
:hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks, J.D. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Wonderful news, eventhough supers suck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now this from a Hillary surrogate - "Superdelegates are not second-class delegates..."
February 18, 2008
Read More: Delegates

"Second-class delegates"

A co-chairman of Hillary's Michigan campaign and has a line that's sure to drive a whole bunch of red state governor's up the wall:

"Superdelegates are not second-class delegates," says Joel Ferguson, who will be a superdelegate if Michigan is seated. "The real second-class delegates are the delegates that are picked in red-state caucuses that are never going to vo, te Democratic."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Secondclass_delegates.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurem2008 Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. violins in the SSS Hillary Titanic
and no life boats for Billary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. The trends and momentum of this election cycle are strikingly similar to Bush 2000
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 01:42 PM by publicatlarge
I feel a similar uneasiness with this one.

What's really going on?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. If this trend keeps going, there'll be NO way for Hillary to catch up to Obama
Obama, even if he loses Ohio AND Texas AND Pennsylvania (which is NOT a prediction here) will almost assuredly maintain his lead among pledged delegates (N Carolina, Wyoming, etc). So hopefully the worries about a stalemate won't come about.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. this is why the stupid plagarism crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
38. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. How can you have .5 of a superdelegate?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC