Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:32 PM
Original message
Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 01:38 PM by kennetha
Jake Tapper stays on the case over at ABC. Maybe there's more to this budding plagiarism scandal than meets the eye.

Check it out here: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/">Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality

Would love to see some memo leaked from some disgruntled member of Axelrod's posse -- who seems to be the common master puppeteer, pulling both Patrick's and Obama's strings.

Drip! Drip! Drip! Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

on edit: link repaired
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. try this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. What, exactly, do you expect to find behind the curtain?
Axelrod was the mastermind who planted the bombs in building 7?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. I thought he was in the grassy knoll? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a working link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. no, that doesn't work either
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. wow, what a crushing blow
I guess it's curtains for Obama. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Drip! Drip! Drip!
Don't call yourself names that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. For some reason the permalink doesn't work.
But I put up the current link which will be good until a new blog entry is added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. I found it here......
http://www.blogs.abcnews.com/

Deval Patrick's Timeline Doesn't Mesh with Reality

February 19, 2008 11:42 AM

Speaking to the New York Times Sunday, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick attempted to excuse his friend Sen. Barack Obama's lifting of part of his October 2006 "Just words" speech.

“In a telephone interview on Sunday, Mr. Patrick said that he and Mr. Obama first talked about the attacks from their respective rivals last summer, when Mrs. Clinton was raising questions about Mr. Obama’s experience, and that they discussed them again last week," the Times' Jeff Zeleny wrote. "Patrick said he told Mr. Obama that he should respond to the criticism, and he shared language from his campaign with Mr. Obama's speechwriters.”

But Obama was quoted using Patrick's language before the Summer of 2007.

"'We hold these truths to be self-evident, all men are created equal.’ Those are just words," Obama was quoted as saying in a March 19, 2007 New Republic story. " ‘I have a dream.’ Just words.”

So....the claim that Patrick an Obama "first" discussed this last Summer does not make sense.

It should also be noted that in addition to the "Yes We Can" slogan that Obama used in 2004, Patrick used in 2006, and Obama uses today, other language from the two clients of political guru David Axelrod has come from both men's mouths.

To wit:

Patrick in June 2006, at the Massachusetts Democratic party convention: "I am not asking anybody to take a chance on me. I am asking you to take a chance on your own aspirations."

Obama one year later, as quoted in USA Today: "I am not asking anyone to take a chance on me. I am asking you to take a chance on your own aspirations."

Just words?


Very famous authors have been embarrassed if not seriously damaged for not acknowledging quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. OMFG! You are beating a dead horse. They are "TEAM MATES" ... can you understand
that it's only plagiarism, when the person CLAIMS to have been USED/OFFENDED?!?

Damn, is there anything TOO LOW for you folks? :grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Nope. That's not true
Permission isn't an absolute defense against plagiarism.

If my brother gives me permission to copy parts of term paper as my own, it's still plagiarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. We're talking POLITICS not acadamia. This is sick stuff because if HRC is outed, she'll lose.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Nonetheless
your claim that permission excludes a charge of plagiarism is false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wasn't this yesterday's news? I thought this story died!
Good grief--I'm so sick of reading these posts that are just "beating a dead horse". I apologize in advance for plagiarizing that cliche.

Please stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. You can show Obama used a speech word for word....
Patrick gave last week...unless Patrick shows outrage it means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, heaven forbid we'd take the word of the writer about his own work
This is nothing but a dead horse being beaten beyond recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. A tempest in a teapot. But it would be nice to know who is
playing Edgar Bergin to Charlie McCarthy and Mortimer Snerd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
algol Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Just an observation,
but if you have a supposed "outrage", which requires a multitude of follow-up threads to explain exactly how it outrages, the word outrage simply doesn't apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. obama stands not on his own two legs ..
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 02:02 PM by flordehinojos
it takes a village to prop him up ...

from oprah, to caroline, to ted, to the plagiarizing of the words of his friend deval patrick who is now covering for obama's *ss, to the skirts of michelle obama, who should now be "given" a pass because she is no career politician... to joe scar seeing no sin in either stolen words or michelle's faux pas yesterday ...

come on, at some point the bridge has to buckle ... one has to hope it hopes before it is too late to see obama has no legs of his own on which to stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Hillary doesn't even stand. She just sits atop Bill's shoulders and commands the machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Yeah, Master-Blaster runs Barter Town!
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 02:43 PM by ShortnFiery
Starring Hillary as "Master" and husband Bill as "Blaster."

Master-Blaster runs *all* of the pig shit businesses in Barter Town. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. IMHO Tapper is a RW tool
Pfft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. Seems to get linked to a lot
Whenever there's a post on the latest 'Obama scandal' like this, seems there's always a link to this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Obama's complete and utter inauthenticity finally coming to light
Looks like Axelrod's got a little formula he uses over and over again to manufacture "movement" candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Exactly
When will the pundits pick up on this. They are still missing, by a long shot, what's really being revealed here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. GIVE IT UP LOSERS!
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 02:20 PM by Obamaniac
Do you honestly think this is going to derail anything? I mean you idiots are spending all this time going over Obama's words. How about some free advice, why not put that same energy into organization and getting your supporters out to vote. That way, maybe Hillary wouldn't lose every fucking election she competes in.

It's not plagerism if 1) he has the permission of the person who made the original statement, which he does; or 2) because he quoted someone quoting someone else, and used two FUCKING SIMILAR WORDS after that.

Get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. And, as for the state of our nation and the world
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrRobotsHolyOrders Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. True story of Obama voter collapse
Enthusiastic Obama supporter: Did you hear that THE INTERNET says Obama and Deval Patrick used similar rhetoric in a stump speech?!

Enthusiastic Obama supporter 2: I did! I'm no longer inspired! Let's just not vote, and devote our lives to hard drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. It's not the true believers
that will leave him. It's the "lookie-loos" who are intrigued and take a look and maybe are tempted to join up. But a negative drumbeat of any kind in the press will give them pause and make them ask themselves where the there is there. That's Obama's problem. He's definitely not going to lose his hardcore supporters. Ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrRobotsHolyOrders Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I don't know if you noticed the dismissive way I replied to your post
But the implication was I thought it was dumb, and I don't care. Just so we're on the same page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. You know, I support Clinton but wish that her campaign did not make much of this
It appears petty and desperate.

I'd rather have the media pick on this as Tapper has. Not on borrowing the words - how many of us have often used the "we're not in Kansas anymore" - but on the confusion about such timelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oh noes! My dreams are crushed!
Whatever will I do? Please save us Superman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. is this the BEST the Hillary camp can do?
I care about this as much as Bill's blowjob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. BUSTED! I read Jake's take on this yesterday and am so glad to see him sticking with it. FINALLY
the fraud is being exposed. Thanks for the post!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. Wow -- and theres' more: "we are the ones we have been waiting for.”
Found this in the comments section of the same article:

Here is another one more from Super Tuesday.

Sen. Obama: “We are the ones we've been waiting for. (Cheers, applause.)”

June Jordan’s “Poem for South African Women”:
“And who will join this standing up
and the ones who stood without sweet company
will sing and sing
back into the mountains and
if necessary
even under the sea:
we are the ones we have been waiting for.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Maria Shriver used that line in her speech for Sen Obama
and she attributed it to a Hopi poem. Perhaps Ms Jordon didn't attribute it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC