Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary will never accept her share in the War that Maimed and Burned those Soldiers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:56 PM
Original message
Hillary will never accept her share in the War that Maimed and Burned those Soldiers
Yet she is happy to use them as imagery in her little closing stump.

I hope she knows what the true cost of Iraq has been and will be.

I fear she cannot comprehend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. What your saying is she is phoney... I think, and I agree... Everything with her is me, me... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Neither will Obama
funny how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. There is a difference between starting a War and supporting your soldiers once they are there
I hope you realize this.

One is an error of Colossal Proportion, the other is a necessary Evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do any of them comprehend what it has meant to FUND the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. No. They happily support Obama as he has voted to keep the war going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Splinter Cell Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. The thing is...
As long as Dubya is in office, the troops are going to be there. That's not in question. If they cut funding for the troops, then the troops will just be there without the equipment they need.

A vote to fund the troops is not a vote in support of the war. We have an obligation to our soldiers to give them what they need, even if we're 100% against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gerrilea Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Her share?
Please don't blame HRC for the war or the abuse of our armed forces...she is not "Commander in Chief"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, but she voted for it and refuses to admit her mistake... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. You know,, you need to wise up, this tired and worn out argument is useless
John Kerry voted for it too and the Dem party supported him. The repub's will not give a damn that she did and neither will the indep. so long as she is good for her word about pulling out. Its a worthless argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. But she did vote for it.. that contributed to the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gerrilea Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. You know...you are right and wrong
She did not send them there...Bush did...he is responsible...and back then, 911 was held over every thing persons head in Washington...they had no choice, had they voted against it..they would have been destroyed as against the troops...remember the tone in the country then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. To say nothing of the billions they have ALL paid out for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. To play devil's advocate here...
Just what in the FUCK has Obama done to get us out of this shit? NOTHING. The same as Hillary. His only redemption is that he was not put in the position that would have him voting with the Senate Herd. I don't doubt that he would have voted for this war. Not for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Duh.. So how is that playing Devils advocate? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Then why did he publicly oppose it when 70% of America was for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. he has run for President to get us out of Iraq
He opposed it from the start all while he was running for office. A time when most Pols lay low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. She already has accepted her responsibility, so stop.
You accept responsibility by taking the consequesnces and moving forward to do what you can to make up for your actions, not by saying "sorry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. No, she said "if I knew then what I know now" not " I never should have done that"
there is clearly a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Can't someone be sorry without actually verbalizing the word sorry?
Come on! She's sorry and you know it. I'm sick of the fake copycat outrage. Proof of that is she didn't vote to go war. She voted to give bush* the power to have better negotiating ability to get the inspectors back in which would have prevented a war. But evil bush* never tried to get the inspectors back in and never went back to the UN. He deceived, lied and betrayed the American people. It's surly his fault we're in this war. It is NOT Hillary's fault! Why can't you understand that? Maybe it's because you don't want to. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Iraq belongs to George W. Bush and the Republicans
period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. And everyone who voted for the IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. that's such bullshit
you stupid fucks go ahead and keep pimping this crap for the Republicans...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. She has no conscience when it stands between her and the power she seeks.
Hillary will NEVER be President because there are MILLIONS of Repukes who will come out to vote against her and MILLIONS of Democrats who will not stand up for her (because she's a faux DINO/DLC dem with no redeeming value).

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama won on this Issue. IWR = bad Judgement.
And he said that without going completely negative on her personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not sure that's fair
I strongly disagree with her war vote, but to say that she is to blame for soldiers being maimed is not fair. She didn't get us into war - Bush did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. yup, she needs to apologize
and exit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Excellent OP, and right on point. K & R.
:thumbsup: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. That's because Bush chose to ignore what that Iraq resolution mandated
pulled the inspectors the resolution had enabled back into Iraq, and preemptively invaded. Just because the resolution referenced his assumed authority to commit troops under the War Powers Act, didn't 'authorize' Bush to jump the will of Congress, expressed in the resolution, that he exhaust all 'peaceful means' and return to the UN Security Council before invading. Bush initiated the invasion and completely ignored every expression of Congress which was original to the Iraq resolution. It mandated restraint. Bush pushed past that and mobilized and deployed troops under assumed authority under the War Powers Act which was opportunistically inserted into the resolution as 'authority'.

In fact, the first opportunity the Congress had to ratify (or oppose) his pulling out of the inspectors and his mobilization and invasion was in their first funding vote. That's the actual 'authority' which Congress exerts. Modern presidents will never rely on resolutions from Congress as 'authority' to commit troops. The rely on Congress' timidity in actually asserting their own power to check that assumed ability to commit troops without prior congressional approval, as legislators are always loath to pull the rug out from under a military engagement after it's already initiated by refusing funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. you'll stick with that til the bitter end...Hillary can do no wrong in your eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'll stick with the facts of that vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. It is up to us to remind her.
And to all the people if not now appalled still remember being appalled at the Iraq War Resolution and all that it opened up like a horrific Pandora's box: torture, rendition, shock and awe, suspension of habeas corpus, illegal wiretaps, etc., etc., all with zero oversight ...

Now is the time to step up and say HELL NO to the candidate that voted yes on a blank check for war for the very worst of reasons, her own political aspirations and plans. She didn't even bother to read the NIE. And when the neocons tried to tee up Iran, she signed up with another yes vote.

Now is the time to make your voices heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. And Obama fed the war machine. He fed it with dollars. That is a fact.
When he knew it was wrong...he still kept it going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. The Goddess of War gave Junior a blank check for this bullshit war.
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 01:43 AM by AtomicKitten
Obama and Hillary funded the troops because it was the right thing to do. You simply cannot make the connection between actually starting the war and taking care of the soldiers regardless of how hard you try.

Hillary voted YES on war (and more war). That's also a fact. A deadly, hard cold fact. A fact that resonates regardless of how hard you try to muddy it. Conversely Obama opposed this war from the start. That is also a fact.

I think you are feeling guilty for supporting the Goddess of War and are trying to assuage that guilt by your bogus accusations.

You support the Goddess of War. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. Obama kept funding this war. That fact will not go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. She can comprehend it. The entire Congress was duped (as were the American people).
Bu$h wasn't given the right to start a preemptive war unless national security was at stake. He and his staff lied to Congress and the American people.

Both Senators from New York had to vote to protect their constituents, who had been ground zero on 9/11.

Obama wasn't even in the Senate. It was nice of him to make a speech, but he should have come to Washington and confronted Congress and the President if he knew more than the U.S. Congress knew.

Read this article for more information.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-wilson/the-real-hillary-i-know-_b_77878.html



"A number of us, like then Illinois state senator Obama, opposed the second Gulf War. My own opposition from the beginning has been well documented. I fought the fight in the arena itself, Washington DC, against a ruthless administration and its supporters while the senator's opposition came from a far distance and carried no risk, given that he represented in Springfield, Illinois the district encompassing the University of Chicago. As an obscure but safe provincial political figure, he never was granted access to the distorted intelligence that was used to drive the Congress and the media. When I looked to the left or to the right for support, I never saw the state senator. In fact, I never heard of Barack Obama until he announced his intention to run for the Senate in the 2006 election.

After he came to Washington, Obama's views were thoroughly conventional and even timid. In 2004, he said about the 2002 congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force: "I'm not privy to Senate intelligence reports. What would I have done? I don't know." On Iraq-related votes in the Senate, Obama's record identically matches Senator Clinton's--with the exception that Senator Clinton voted against the confirmation of General George Casey as Army chief of staff. Obama's vote was typically passive.

In the run up to the war and thereafter, I was in frequent discussions with senior Democrats in Washington, including Senator Clinton, and I was keenly aware of her demand for the full exercise of international diplomacy and allowing the weapons inspectors to complete their mission. Many of the most prominent early opponents of the war, including former General Wes Clark and former ambassador to the United National Richard Holbrooke support Senator Clinton for President, as do I. We do so because we know that she has the experience and the judgment that comes from having been in the arena for her entire adult life--and from close personal participation with her in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. And we have trust in her to end the war in Iraq in the most responsible way, consistent with our national security interests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC