Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama gets 60 out of 87 Georgia delegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:24 PM
Original message
Obama gets 60 out of 87 Georgia delegates
Barack Obama won more than the popular vote in Georgia's Feb. 5 Democratic presidential primary. He also won 60 of the 87 delegates at play that day.

The Democratic Party of Georgia on Friday released results showing how the state's delegates were awarded. Obama won 66 percent of the popular vote, to 31 percent for Hillary Clinton. Clinton on Friday was awarded 27 delegates.

delegates, based on the overall statewide vote as well as the vote in each of the state's 13 congressional districts.

Also, there are 15 unpledged delegates still to be awarded. Thirteen of those are so-called superdelegates, made up of party leaders and elected officials who can vote for either candidate at the party's national convention in August in Denver. There are also two additional unpledged delegates the state party will choose from across Georgia.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/02/22/gadelegates_0223.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Georgia and Minnesota are the reasons why he tied Hillary on Super Tuesday
despite losing large states like Mass, NY and CA

Also, you can't forget Illinois, but that's a given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He picked up more delegates from Idaho then Hillary did from New Jersey.
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 05:35 PM by Pirate Smile
I'll find the specifics. She really made a mistake ignoring the caucuses.

edit to add - it was Idaho, not Utah.

"Here is a simple way to understand the consequences of that choice. Take two states that held Super Tuesday contests on Feb. 5: big New Jersey, with 107 pledged delegates at stake, and tiny Idaho, with 18 delegates up for grabs. Clinton won New Jersey's primary and made headlines for doing so early on that night, while Obama won Idaho's caucuses long after many of those watching had gone to bed. But because of the rules of proportionality, Clinton netted just 11 more delegates than Obama from her New Jersey victory, while he gained 12 more than her by winning Idaho.

That pattern held through other states on Feb. 5 and Feb. 9, as Obama rolled up substantial margins and, as a result, harvested delegates in numbers that belied the relatively small size of some of the states. Eight states held caucuses during that period -- Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and Washington -- and together awarded 305 pledged delegates. By the Obama team's calculations, the split out of those states is about 209 for him and 96 for Clinton -- an advantage of 113 delegates."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021403482_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC