Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's proposed policies are the most liberal of any presidential candidate in US history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:26 PM
Original message
Hillary's proposed policies are the most liberal of any presidential candidate in US history
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:26 PM by _Wayne_
Hillary proposes the most liberal health care plan (so does Obama, they are virtually mirrors of each other, with minor differences) in US history. It will cost more than any previous proposed health care plan per year.

Hillary will eliminate Bush's tax cuts, and thereby institute the largest tax increase in US History. She will also cut taxes on the middle and lower class, just like Bill Clinton did, with tremendous success.

Hillary will increase public school funding, which will increase teacher's salaries and lower class sizes.

Hillary will appoint very liberal judges, who will uphold Roe v Wade, and ban constitutional amendments that define marriage as a man and woman, thereby legalizing gay marriage, giving benefits to couples through civil unions.

Hillary will slice the military budget, just like Bill did.

The examples continue ad infinitum. Obama is also very liberal, but nobody questions that. His supporters need to be reminded, Hillary's biggest enemies are the conservatives, the AM radio loudmouths, the racist evangelicals. THEY invented Hillary hating.

It's disgusting to see so many in the progressive community join this choir, to sing the Hillary hate, to spread the venom, and call it "support" for Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Hillary will slice the military budget, just like Bill did." No, she won't.
She wants to expand it some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree that consevatives created the HIllary hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. They sure eat it with a spoon here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Migrant Republicans
Have moved here to DU and are fanning the Hillary Hate embers.

Guaranteed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. BINGO...what the RW machine couldn't do in 16 years to the Clintons they did in this Primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. You shoulda been her campaign manager.
Perhaps she woulda already had this wrapped up, instead of making a fool of herself getting booed at a televised Democratic debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Those "boos" were from Obama's side; and most people agree Hillary WON last night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Those boos were from democrats.
Who, thanks to Clinton, are now on Obama's side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. No, those boos were from Obama supporters
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:45 PM by BeatleBoot
And I don't know who is on his side anymore.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I've been a Democrat for 20 years and I'm also an Obama supporter, and I booed Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I've been a Democrat all of my life and I didn't boo her.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:33 PM
Original message
The people meter tanked to zero...
I've never seen it go that low before.

Plus, Hillary gets jerks to speak before she goes on at rallies that end up getting booed for silly attacks. (Like that shit head Buffenbarger)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. "Most people"? Are you on her campaign staff or something?
Because every objective gauge of that debate said that she lost. Badly. Because of her stupid Xerox comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Those weren't boos. Someone spotted Mr Burns in the crowd and
started chanting Boooerns! Boooerns!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reality will come back around
To consider the possibility: -- The single most qualified person in this country for President -- lost for a freaking Obama fad. What an unmitigated embarrassment to the Democrats. What a loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Reminds me of McGovern










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The single most qualified person?
On what basis?

If you're just talking about experience and record, I can name a dozen people offhand who are more qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. John F. Kerry for Example
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:41 PM by BeatleBoot
"Sorry I let you all down in 2004, but I gave it my best shot."















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. It's like being able to vote for Will Smith or Michael Jordan. What are the comparable women? None
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Compared to Al Gore?
Give me a freakin' break. I'll agree with the poster below that there are several people out there considerably more qualified by than HRC to be president. But we rarely if ever get the most qualified person. Just look at 2000 or 2004. Or for that matter 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not True. Dennis Kucinich proposals were far more liberal. You are confusing liberal with
being left of bush.

Not many years ago Hills proposals would have been the Republican platform. - See Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Correct. You win the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
45. Yeah, But He's Like, Really Kinda Silly And Stuff.
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 07:26 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
I think the OP was talking about people who actually have any chance of getting something they want done, or were considered real presidential candidates (ya know, more than 1% or so).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. Edwards was more liberal. Either one could run a better campaign than Hill if they had that money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. it's more a personality contest, I like both of them and
I do think that Hillary is and would be more progressive, however, we have been beat up by the bushco for so long 'change', whatever that will be? - seems to be the ultimate winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
57. about this change thing...
it is really the ultimate no-brainer, isn't it? 8 years of the worse president in history, who now has a mere 19% approval rate...a failing economy...a failed and illegal war...rape of the constitution...rw activist judges...republicans defecting from the party, etc, etc, etc. it's clear to me that people want all of that to change, and it was clear before obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. The most liberal of any presidential candidate?
That's an historically ignorant statement; you've apparently never heard of Henry Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. checkmate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. I've heard of William Wallace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. no kidding; the OP needs to look up Eugene Debs
or Al Smith, or William Jennings Bryan, or LBJ, or Nixon, or...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cluster bombs, Kyl Lieberman, extension of Bush tax cuts, yeah, real liberal!
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Well, you know, the OP is about "proposed policies" not "actual voting record" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Hillary was the one who
accused Obama of being too far left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. I liked your OP
Started off positive

Didn't attack the other candidate

Ask people to be aware of the damage they are doing

Nicely done.

But what do you get? Hillary bake.

What are they so afraid of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. I would say that title goes to FDR, and republicans have hated him ever since....
He went where no other President would have ever possibly gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. And he pulled our nation out of seriously bleak times.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hillary is running on a platform of fiscal responsibility
Second, to allow tax cuts which never should have been passed to expire, is not really proposing anything liberal. Calling it "the largest tax increase in history" is also not a good way to promote it.

Advertising yourself as a tax-cutter is also not very liberal. It's Reaganesque.

You also keep saying "just like Bill" without seeming to understand that Bill was not a very liberal President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Bill was as liberal as he could be with the Republican Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. nice that he has that excuse, but he ran like a centrist from the start
Promising middle class tax cuts and economic growth. Not exactly like FDR, Johnson, Mondale, or Dukakis. He didn't come in with a Republican congress, and he fought with his own party about NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. it wasn't a Republican Congress when Bill was elected....
That was one of his legacies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is a hilarious post
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. !
:spray:

:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Wow, what a disgusting post
Do you have any idea how many DUers (not to mention the rest of the world) who have retarded family members (and I'm using your term) that you just shat on? I don't know who you are, but you should know that what you just posted was despicable.

I also alerted, but I hope I wasn't the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. What a bunch of crap, GHWB started the downsizing of our Army
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 07:02 PM by surfermaw
Bill Clinton is a centrist, not a liberal, but what is wrong with a Liberal, nothing except the right wing conservative party with the media has tried to make Liberal a bad thing, in my mind I would say Thank God for Liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. your post confuses me, and I read it three times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. She is for mental health parity - that is good
She supports the drug war - that is bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. As long as she's for mental health parity, maybe she can start by helping _Wayne_
The OP is delusional. Obama supporters don't all hate Clinton. She's really just a normal candidate who, as you point out, is either principled or a panderer on a wide number of issues and who would, overall, do a pretty decent job if inaugurated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Strawman, Bucky. I never said ALL Obama fans hate Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bill ran as a Liberal and governed as a moderate Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Boy are you going to be in for a shock if Obama wins...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Yeah, what a shock...will it be the Obama who associates with radical liberal
folk from the 60s like Ayers that the Hillary folks are scaring us about, or the Obama who will be too conservative that the Hillary folks are scaring us about, or the Obama who won't make any difference that the Hillary folks are scaring us about? Sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. The Obama who will be Bill Clinton 2.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
44. Attention all Obama "supporters": You do not support Obama. You hate the Clintons.
Perhaps you're unaware of this. Let me wake you up to reality. You hate Hillary. You cringe when you hear her name. You stick straight pins into a voodoo doll you made of her. You can't sit through any Rebecca De Mornay movies because of her physical resemblance to Hillary Clinton. If you were stranded on a dessert island with Clinton, you would gouge your own eyes out with cocoanut shells.

You do not support Obama. This is your own delusion--a figment invented to hide your blinding hatred of her moderately liberal policy stances. You don't even know Obama. You're probably unaware of the fact that he's a Muslim sleeper agent trained by the Weathermen.


Hey, Wayne! Did I get that about right?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. desert, not dessert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
49. Don't worry, by the time this is over, the conservative media will
have expended every ounce of energy they possess in telling the whole world how liberal they both are. Rove already kicked it off with Obama in the WSJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
51. The point is, some people don't believe that she'll do what she says she'll do
or that she can make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
53. John Kerry was the most liberal candidate we ever had, and probably will ever have
in my lifetime. And a lot of us have a big problem with Hillary's lack of character, not that she can churn out policy papers. She also not only voted for the Iraq War, she actively supported it, never opposed it, only criticizing tactics. Then suddenly, in about, oh, January 2007, she suddenly wanted to bring the troops home. Some of us pay attention to what our senators do. They ALL make mistakes, but Hillary showed that she didn't seem to have much of a problem with Bush invading Iraq nor did she lead the effort to argue for a new Iraq policy of withdrawal of troops. That is why people are unimpressed by her position papers. Actions are INDEED louder than words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. John Kerry didn't have a universal health care plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Where do you think Hillary got her ideas from to put together her heath care plan?
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/clinton-evokes-kerry-quotes-roosevelt/

Purposely or not, Hillary Rodham Clinton evokes memories of the 2004 presidential nominee, John Kerry, from time to time.

A centerpiece of her health care plan was allowing Americans to buy into the federal insurance program that is available for members of Congress. Mr. Kerry proposed the same thing in 2004. “If it’s good enough for members of Congress, it’s good enough for all Americans,” Mr. Kerry liked to say; Mrs. Clinton has made the same point over and over the last few weeks.

...

Clinton advisers say they were not mining the Kerry playbook for tips or rhetoric; rather, they say, Mr. Kerry had some good, mainstream Democratic ideas (like on the congressional health plan) that fit into Mrs. Clinton’s agenda.



Um, it was John Kerry's healthcare plan, and it is the basis of Edwards's, Clinton's, and Obama's plans. Kerry's plan got the ball rolling in 2004. That ground needed to be laid. Check the link, and you will see Clinton evoking Kerry quite a bit, as has Obama ("We need to set a date to withdraw from Iraq"). The reason why Obama and Hillary don't differ a lot on policy is because they both basically agree with Kerry's ideas from 2004 (and he has since come up with even more ideas on Iraq and combatting global climate change, which they also have adopted). But on the environment (which is the sleeper issue so vitally important), nobody this side of Gore is as good as Kerry. And Kerry, along with Feingold, was a pioneer in putting together the now Democratic Iraq plan -- timetable for withdrawal -- that also sparks little controversy in the Dem primaries, other than the fact that Obama's position is closer to Kerry's than Hillary is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. I know. It's too bad she cast herself as a centrist hawk
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 09:49 PM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
and ran a general election instead of a primary election. Bad advice.

She should have been herself instead of the usual DLC triangulation BS. She lost the nomination because of it.

She could have/should have been a Progressive, Liberal Democrat (like she really is) from the getgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC