Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama 2008 *IS* Bill Clinton 1992.... without the bimbo eruptions....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:46 AM
Original message
Barack Obama 2008 *IS* Bill Clinton 1992.... without the bimbo eruptions....
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 02:08 AM by scheming daemons
Both 46 years old

Both relatively unknown nationally at the time of their runs

Both got their "big break" giving the keynote address at the Dem convention four years earlier

Both with independent career women as spouses

Both with Ivy league educations

Both able to mesmerize a crowd with their speeches

Both basing their entire campaign on "Hope" and "Change"

Both claiming they have crossover appeal

Both with no personal military experience running against a military veteran

Both with a young, energetic campaign team that is playing by different rules than past Dem campaigns and answering attacks immediately

The biggest (non sex-related) "scandal" either of them has to deal with is a shady land deal that is much ado about absolutely nothing.




I bet, deep down, the Big Dawg sees a little of himself in Obama...and if anybody other than Hillary was running against Obama, Bubba would've been enthusiastically endorsing Barack a long time ago.


ON EDIT:

Both had to endure a "whispering" campaign that they were closet communists

Both came in second in New Hampshire

Both had/have an "Elvis-like" appeal to them... people WOULD pay to go to their events

Both had/have an initial love affair with the media

Both had to endure Democratic hand-wringing over their PERCEIVED inability to fight against the GOP smear machine (Lee Atwater-esque Willie Horton stuff back then, Swiftboating now)



ON SECOND EDIT:

Both never really knew their biological father

Both had a, more-or-less, 50-state strategy and not a silly 50%+1 strategy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Minus Monika though... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Secretly, and some pundits have said this, I think Big Dog wants
Hillary to lose. I don't know why he does, but he has done more damage than good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. I wonder if he would really want to go through it all again.
It seems like it would be kind of tiresome the second time around. And does he really want to be first hubby? It's an interesting thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Bimbo eruptions", how very right-wing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. We should be used to that by now
This whole place reeks of RW these days. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Not a big priority for me, but it's true, like it or not. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. That was the commonly used term back when Bill was running
I believe it originally came from his own campaign staff, back when Gennifer Flowers first went public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. The term came from Clinton's own staff
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. NO one, in the public arena, has used that term in the better part of a decade
EXCEPT for Rush Limbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:50 AM
Original message
I see the similarities.
And I think Bill knows it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Both are "New Democrats" who claimed they would be able to end gridlock in DC too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Governor of Arkansas defiantly had NO foreign policy experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He ran in 1992. Foreign policy was not a big issue given the collapse of the USSR the year before
In 2008 foreign policy experience will matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:25 AM
Original message
I honestly believe that foreign policy is ALWAYS a big issue, ounce of prevention....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. I'll second that. I believe Obama is pretty solid there, though...
partly because he's not carrying any baggage from the 60s. He doesn't have to fend off accusations of being a draft dodger and he's not perceived as anti-military - although few have remarked on it, he's staked out a strong position on rebuilding the armed forces which have been stretched thin by Bush's adventurism. Obama himself seems highly populated with the military, and has done well in campaign donations from service personnel - better than any other candidate, last time I saw it reported. Troops are not going to have a problem saluting him, and I think the Joint Chiefs would just love to have him.

In the meantime, he's got a very clear position on the Iraq war that the majority of the country agrees with, and it's easy to paint McCain as a dangerously loose cannon. See, for example, MoveOn's negative 'bomb bomb bomb Iran' ad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U39zae4IxUA&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Bush Sr. TRIED to make it an issue....
Remember the famous commercial... ominous music playing as a camera slowly zooms in on the President's empty chair in the oval office.

Deep voice-over says something to the effect, "When problems erupt around the world, it MATTERS who is sitting in this chair."


...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. And we are still trying to deal with the "loose nukes" that were not secured when USSR broke up
Maybe it was a big issue and Bill did a crappy job with foreign policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Self Delete
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 01:58 AM by scheming daemons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. The only question is
Can Nader 2008 be Ross Perot 1992? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nader 2008 can't even be Nader 2000......... Nader has become Lyndon Larouche.....
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. We have the youth vote.....and it appears that this baby boomlet
is quite large!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are also both left handed!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just waiting for MTV to ask Barack "boxers or briefs"......
....the Clinton "pop" phenomenon in 1992 drove the right wing bat-shit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I hope he answers "neither".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Thong, then?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Barack with a basketball is better than Bill with a saxophone, if you ask me!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Who's that guy playing "Washington Generals" to Barack's "Harlem Globetrotters" in the first pic?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Sport Illustrated's Senior Writer S.L. Price
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 03:03 AM by FrenchieCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. "Only Michelle can give you the answer to that, and she's not telling." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. How does an Ivy League education mean anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Doesn't mean anything other than it is a similarity......
...and neither of them got into their Ivy League schools by being a "legacy"... unlike Bush.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not entirely sure that Bill is silently rooting for Barack to win...
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 02:16 AM by casus belli
and for that matter, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Hillary is as well.

There is an air of destiny with Barack I just can't explain. The first time I saw him speak (as keynote speaker in 2004), I said out loud to my wife "I think we just saw the first black president of the United States". And she agreed. I've talked to alot of people who felt this way the first time they "met" Barack. He's destined for greatness.

Don't get me wrong, Bill Clinton wasn't without his charm. But, I honestly don't think there's any comparison other than mundane details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. I said exactly the same thing when I saw him speak at the 2004 convention
I said "I think I just saw the first black president of the US".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. Exactly - Besides, GHWBush WANTED to lose in 92, as he expected to be impeached
after the release of the final BCCI report in Dec 1992.

Fortunately for Poppy his partner in many BCCI dealings, Jackson Stephens, had groomed and bankrolled a young governor of Arkansas and underwrote his primary campaign - Poppy Bush could leave without worry that his many illegal operations of BCCI and the outstanding matters in IranContra and Iraqgate would be fully exposed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. This was nice to read over. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
33. Trouble is there's no Perot alongside to attack McCain- and receive attacks
and so (partially thanks to Clinton) both barrels of a much stronger far right corporate media and a much louder echo chamber will be bearing down on him if he gets the nomination....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
34. I hope his Presidency follows a different track--a liberal one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. slight fact error: Clinton DIDN'T deliver keynote in 88; he was an introducer & SPOKE for 45 mins
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 07:38 AM by cloudythescribbler
And the audience famously applauded when he said "and in conclusion ..."

Obama had a somewhat more auspicious entry into the national limelight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
36. Both are coming off scandal-ridden administrations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Clinton governed a state for 12 years. Obama sat in the Senate for 2.
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 09:55 AM by rug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Oh I guess his time in the Illinois senate was essentially
an internship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. Bill clinton was the "fairy tale" candidate...
He eeked out in a three way race and really shocked a lot of Americans when GHWB was defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC