Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama and Hillary are so good, then why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:36 AM
Original message
If Obama and Hillary are so good, then why
are we still voting on Republican machines? Why haven't either of them done something about this? Why didn't they stand up for voter verified paper ballots?

Excuse me, but there isn't a person with half a brain that doesn't know 2004 GE was fixed... so why hasn't the system been changed by now?

Why don't they use the press they are gaining now to speak out on the topic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Amen! Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ask the states and cities this question since they are the ones who decide how it is done. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Congress was the element that passed HAVA which
was Republicans and corrupt Dems used as an excuse for the states using vote eating machines!

So, our Democratic Congress has had time now to correct the error, but they haven't...why? Explain why they haven't. Explain why they are satisfied with an election system owned by Republicans with no way to verify the counts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because the public for the most part wouldn't believe
the Goberment would tamper with their right to vote. From dealing with forums on this subject most of the public think voting machines are dependable and tamper proof, never mind facts we are dealing with people that if they realized voting was "fixed" they would sit home instead of doing anything about it and who ever tries to burst their bubbles will end up going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I believe this is why we are having record turnout AMERICANS
are not as dumb as Congress thinks they are and they believe Obama is going to fix the system. People know, anyone with a half a brain knows.

But why hasn't he and why hasn't Hillary fixed it already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Not here in Michigan the numb nuts I been reading all think McCain will bring change
and Hillery would be a mistake, more sex in the WH and BO is just another Jessie Jackson running which means more power to blacks at whites expense. Theres only 5 counties that are liberal in the state, thank fully they have the biggest cities. I found it very amusing that one forum I visit saw no hypocricy in the fact that first they ran the BO is muslim E mail then 24 hours later the E mail stating that BO belonged to a radical black chirstian church. One bright boy said that BO was related to Saddam because of BO's middle name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. McBush's change will be worse than any we have seen yet...YIKES........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because voting procedures are decided by state and local governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. And when some big corporation comes in saying
"We can put you in compliance with HAVA, and we know you don't have a lot of money to meet that expense, so we will let you have the machines at 3% over cost, and supply the technicians to get them up and running, and provide maintenance so it WON'T COST YOU A CENT MORE THAN YOU ARE NOW PAYING ---"

HAVA was a mandate for election boards across the country to switch from what worked, to what works for the Republicans.

The republicans gut the country's finances, then drop an unfunded mandate to comply with 'voting reform' - so when ES&S or Diebold come along offering to save the state or county a bundle of money, even a Democratic SoS will look at the bottom line. Who to believe? The ranting of some conspiracy theorists, or a 10 million dollar saving to the state budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. LOL 4 years later some still believe it wasn't stolen...glad the
folks who are racing to the polls don't think so... just hope the votes are counted accurately this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. How should we know? Attend their events and ask them the question.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. I vote on a big piece of paper and stick it in
a big shabby cardboard box with a raggedy slit. Yeah, yeah, I know. That didn't answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Do you want them to be elected and then fix the problem or not get elected
and sound like partisan hacks trying to prove misconduct without sufficient facts to make the case. Most of America does not believe 2004 was fixed - eventhough it may have been. Many know they voted against Kerry in favor of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ah hem... they have both been in the position to fix it...
and how do they get elected with a broken system? And, yes, there is sufficient data, ask John Conyers. Why haven't our Democratic members of Congress worked on this issue more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. True! If They Were So Good They'd Be Able To Snap Their Fingers And Make The World Perfect For You!
I mean, the world's not perfect yet? Every single thing that every voter could want has not yet been accomplished yet? HOW DARE THEY!!! DOWN WITH BARACK AND HILLARY!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. If Barack is so great - why isn't he already president?
Same goes for hillary,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Can anyone cite either candidates position on the equipment? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. It seems to me
The Democrats won a majority in '06 using this same equipment. Are you insinuating THOSE results are bad if the machines haven't been fixed yet? Or are you saying they were broken in '04, fixed in '06, now they're broken again?

I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. 06 was only successful for us because they knew we were watching closely nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. There was MORE voting machine fraud in 06 than in 04.
The repukes just didn't figure the margins correctly.

They thought that a 3-5% flipping of votes (this number is verified by the differences in multiple exit polls vs actual votes) would be sufficient again for a repuke victory, but it actually only cushioned their losses. Without the cheating that DID happen we'd have had an unassailable majority in the house, and at least a couple more senate seats - we would not need to depend on Turncoat Joe.

And since 06, even MORE election boards have moved to touchscreen voting, despite the few that have moved away from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. pshaw
I acknowledge your faith in exit polls, but there isn't much warrant for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. That's what I've always thought
and I'm sure they are prepared to do it again in '08. If they do, I hope enough people finally pay attention....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. I blame Feinstein
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070720/news_1n20voting.html
Overhauling voting systems before next year's presidential election had once been a top Democratic priority, primarily to allow greater accountability and be certain that all votes registered on computerized touch-screen systems were counted. But state and local elections officials told Congress they could not make the changes in time for the balloting in November 2008, particularly in light of the extra workload involved in preparing for next year's much-earlier presidential primary season.

Confronted by similar concerns, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, said she had already decided against seeking any major changes in voting equipment before 2010.

“My sense is there's no way to get this thing in place by the election of 2008,” Feinstein said. “Without adequate time, we could cause real problems in the election."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Papers and pens can cause "real problems", eh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
20. The answer is simple
Because the majority of the American people have not demanded it or protested the last two rigged elections. Why are the American people uninformed that their vote is compromised? Because the mainstream media will not report the truth.

Politicians never lead, they follow if there is enough public sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh but now they have an ear ...the media is listening....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's the monster in the closet no one wants to face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. Guess you haven't heard of the Diebold Dems???
Here's just one, but check it out, a really big one!

The Democratic Party | DieboldIn August, O'Dell hired former DNC chair Joe Andrew--a guy who is convinced Bush "stole" the 2000 election--for a pro-Diebold PR blitz. In fact, Dems have ...
www.democrats.org/a/2005/12/diebold.php

I have another list somewhere, but some include MD's Elections Chief Linda Lamone,
Cathy Cox former SOS of Georgia, and there are more.

Get the idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Diebold is one bad company for sure...didn't I hear they changed
the name of the company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes. Premier Election Solutions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC