Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton in Cincinnati: Obama untested, just like Bush was

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:05 PM
Original message
Clinton in Cincinnati: Obama untested, just like Bush was

Hillary Clinton reacts while campaigning at Cincinnati State Technical and Community College in Cincinnati, Ohio, Saturday, Feb. 23


CINCINNATI — Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton today sought to draw parallels to President Bush and her current rival, Barack Obama, saying Bush was an untested commodity as a Republican candidate for the White House who promised voters change and “the American people got shafted.”

“So, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” Clinton, facing a difficult task in trying to stall Obama’s momentum, told a crowd at Cincinnati State Technical and Community College this morning as she tried to woo voters in a March 4 primary that is critical to the fate of her candidacy.

“Do you think people voting in 2000 knew what they were getting?” she said, referring to Bush’s first-term bid for the presidency as a governor of Texas. “People thought they were getting a compassionate conservative. It turned out he was neither. We’ve been living with the consequences of those mistakes.”

“He promised change as a compassionate conservative and the American people got shafted and we’re going to have to make up for it,” she said.

Without mentioning Obama’s name, Clinton contended her rival has sought to portray having experience as “a disadvantage” and something “that doesn’t count for much anymore.” But she said, if a person needs a serious operation, they don’t ask for a surgeon who’s never performed the procedure.

Clinton also harkened back to one of her early Iowa campaign criticisms of Obama on the issue of their differing plans to expand access to health care. Her plan mandates that everyone get insurance, while Obama’s only mandates coverage for children. Obama maintains his plan would make insurance more affordable but Clinton contends it would leave 15 million people uninsured and not accomplish the goal of universal health care.

“Why would we give up on what has been one of the most important goals, which I believe is a moral imperative,” she said. “It is a right to have access to health care, not a privilege. Why would we have a Democrat undercut that?”

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/clinton_obama_is_untested_just.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Point, cackle, clap. That's our Hill!!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL!

You forgot- and nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. But you can't really see the nod in the picture....or the "clown eyes" that
surely proceeded the clap. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. 'hope and unity'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
57. meow.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
75. Excellent point, Hillary! Glad she brought it up
Truer words were never spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #75
88. Then why did Bill spend 3 weeks DEFENDING Bush and supporting his decisions
on terrorism and Iraq war and 'repeatedly defend Bush from critisms of the left' instead of siding with John Kerry who was Bush's biggest critic on the left at the time of Bill's 3 week defense of Bush tour in 2004?

Hillary and Bill stayed on the same page supporting Bush as Joe Lieberman from 2001-2006 and only after Joe lost his primary race did Clintons adjust their rhetoric leftward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
87. Repeat after me. Obama 11, Vlinton 8
That's how many years each has served in elected office. So let's cut this bullshit about Clinton's superior experience. They both have plenty of life experience, and if the argument comes down to government experience, then Obama wins that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. and Hillary is absolutely right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And you know it! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:26 PM
Original message
There is something oxymoronic about associating your posts with a picture of Albert Einstein. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
69. fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. How pathetic. Comparing Obama to Bush?

This shows how unreasonable Clinton is...and how desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Obama called Clinton 'Bush-Cheney Light'
“I’m not afraid to lose the P.R. war to dictators,” Obama said in a speech in Concord, New Hampshire, where he picked up an early Granite State endorsement from first-term Democratic Congressman Paul Hodes. “I’m happy to look them in the eyes and say what needs to be said… I don't want Bush-Cheney Light.”

In a later conference call with the press, Obama continued on the topic: “Part of the Bush doctrine has been to say ‘no.’ You'll have to ask Senator Clinton what differentiates her position from theirs.”
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/26/obama-calls-clinton-like-diplomacy-stance-bush-cheney-light/


“You know, I have been called a lot of things in my life, but I have never been called George Bush or Dick Cheney certainly,” Clinton told CNN’s John King.

“You know you have to ask whatever has happened to the politics of hope,” Clinton added, in reference to the Illinois Democrat's familiar campaign theme.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/27/clinton-calls-bush-cheney-comparison-silly/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Vote In Pittsburgh Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. He's calling McCain bush light n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. read the article and the quotes. Just bullshitting about what he said won't change it.
This was in July of last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. For good reason

She has been too kind to big corporations to the detriment of american
workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. So, you think that 'tactic' works for him?
So transparently duplicitous of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
76. How accurate - face the truth, kids
Your guy has no more experience than Bush, in fact, he has a lot less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
82. Obama has been elected more times than Clinton
Being First Lady does not count as executive experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. This "experience" platform really baffles me...
and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Did I miss the years when she was Commander-in-chief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. she accomplished some stuff besides her present Senate service
Along with Senator Ted Kennedy, she was the major force behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997, a federal effort that provided state support for children whose parents were unable to provide them with health coverage. She promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses and encouraged older women to seek a mammogram to detect breast cancer, with coverage provided by Medicare. She successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health. The First Lady worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War, which became known as the Gulf War syndrome. Together with Attorney General Janet Reno, Clinton helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice. In 1997, she initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which she regarded as her greatest accomplishment as First Lady. As First Lady, Clinton hosted numerous White House Conferences, including ones on Child Care (1997), Early Childhood Development and Learning (1997), and Children and Adolescents (2000), and the first-ever White House Conferences on Teenagers (2000) and Philanthropy (1999).

Hillary Clinton traveled to 79 countries during this time, breaking the mark for most-travelled First Lady held by Pat Nixon. In a September 1995 speech before the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, Clinton argued very forcefully against practices that abused women around the world and in China itself, declaring "that it is no longer acceptable to discuss women's rights as separate from human rights" and resisting Chinese pressure to soften her remarks. She was one of the most prominent international figures at the time to speak out against the treatment of Afghan women by the Islamist fundamentalist Taliban that had seized control of Afghanistan. She helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative sponsored by the United States to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. That shows experience at being an exceptional first lady...
and a competent Senator. Look, I have nothing against Senator Clinton and will definitely be voting for her should she get the nomination. But when I hear the charge "Well, I have experience and Obama doesn't", I immediately think about the fact that she wasn't the President, Bill was. He's the one with the experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. They don't ask for the surgeon's wife either.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. but she's worked the night shift.
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 12:12 PM by GarbagemanLB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Excellent point! Brilliant! (wish I had come up with it! :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. good one!
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. they would, if she was an accomplished apprentice
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. HAHHAHAHAHAHA
:rofl::rofl::rofl:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
83. i'm sorry; being a surgeon isn't quite like being president. you know that don't you? and if
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 02:56 PM by VotesForWomen
said surgeon's wife had been a resident, watching and assisting on surgeries, that would indeed be some very good training for practicing surgery herself, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama has more legislative experience than Hillary.
He was in the IL state senate from 1997 to 2004, then in the U.S. Senate since then.

Hillary's first term started in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
71. Shhhh people might yell at you because that makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Well, Illinois is a state that "doesn't count."
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. this is not a winning tactic for her
it's likely to cause blowback instead of positive momentum. I don't get how politically tone deaf this campaign has been, and continues to be. She's certainly free to go after him any way she wishes, but this is not a winner for Camp Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. time and again, it has been shown that going negative does NOT work for her.
look at New Hampshire and Super Tuesday...she does best when she REFRAINS from attacks.
but now she's backed into a corner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Right.
It is not a good tactic -- neither of the democratic candidates has an hour's experience at being president, while George W. Bush has had seven years' worth. A great surgeon, that George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Point A: Hillary has not been president before.
Her 'surgeon' bit is moot.

Point B: Comparing Obama to Bush? Keep reaching!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. You are fast.
I was posting this same basic message in a response to cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. She's demonstrated just how incompetent she is to lead
by this campaign that she's been running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. She's telling you the truth
Of course all you can do is point and smear with your tired refrain of "desperate." Obama's inexperience will be a huge factor if he is nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Neither one of them have experience at being President....
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 12:20 PM by Kaylee
or governor, or mayor, etc. They are both Senators...that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, her campaign is doing a
heckuva job emulating Repub smear tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wrong. * was a gov. for 6 years and had far more experience than Hillary, and
he has been a MAJOR disaster for us and the world.

This experience mantra is a stupid argument to make for her.

But, whatever she can do or say to help Obama get the nomination is fine by me.


Texas is Obama country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. huh? She's been a Senator for 7 years
and has had far more gov't experience than bush had. I support Obama, but that's just horse shit. And yes, some of the time that Hillary spent as First Lady damn welll is experience. She ran a major policy initiative, despite it's failing. You either believe we can learn from our failures or you don't. Both Obama and Clinton have greater experience than bush had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. We'll just have to disagree, 7 years as a state gov. beats 7 years as a senator.
The experience is a stupid argument. * beats both of them since he had far more executive experience.
Neither of them have had that.

For me experience means squat since i think the person themselves is more important than experience.

I would vote for Hillary if she were the nominee, but I believe we would lose major time with her.
I support Obama because I believe we will win.


Texas is Obama country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. part time governor, but, you go ahead and tell us how much experience he had
how much he had traveled outside of America. Tell us how George Bush's experience as a part-time governor was anything comparable to Hillary Clinton's life experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. Part time gov? Sorry, Texas only has full time gov. And if traveling
outside of the US is grounds for being president, then my cousin should go for it since he has guided tours in Europe, and Asia. As a bonus he currently lives full time in Thailand and gives exclusive tours in China.


Texas is Obama country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. "I hope the calendar will prove it to you," Bush said.
Daily appointment calendars offer a fresh view of Bush's only full term in public office. Though such documents are usually kept private until a politician leaves office, The Times obtained the governor's schedules through the Texas Open Records Act. Revealing patterns emerge from 3,125 pages of appointments covering 1995 through 1998--along with interviews with Bush, top aides and others who saw him.

Blessed by a humming economy and a tenure free of major crisis, Bush fashioned both a brisk pace and an amiable, nonconfrontational atmosphere. He focused on a few issues, preferred short meetings and insisted on a two-hour midday break centered on a rejuvenating run.

Bush, 54, said in an interview that it is important for voters to judge "whether or not I could make the decisions given the degree of pressure that the president is going to have to face. . . . Are you able to maintain a pace and make sound decisions?"

The governor's typical work schedule during his first term consisted of "two hard half days," in chief of staff Clay Johnson's words. Bush usually arrived at the Capitol about 7:30 a.m.

His scheduled appointments began about 8:30 a.m. and usually continued in 15- or 30-minute increments.

"I hope the calendar will prove it to you," Bush said. "I don't like long meetings."

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/02/latimes.bush.detail/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. As i said, Texas only has gov, not 1/2 gov last time I saw the ballot.
I never said he was a good gov. I was very depressed and angry when beat Ann Richards for Texas gov. And Ann was the incumbent and * had no political experience at all!

And then the US votes for him not only once, but twice!! And we get stuck with * jr., perry.

* sucked as a gov and sucks as a president. I never claimed otherwise. But, he still had more experience than either Obama or Hillary when he ran for president the 1st time.


Texas is Obama country!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. I think it was Molly Ivins who described him as one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlotta Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes!!!! That's the argument I have been hoping for
Looks like she found her voice, again. Sadly, I think it's too late. It is a very valid argument, however. After Bill Clinton, people were fed up with all the animosity, scandals (even though they were manufactured ones, except for Lewinsky) and along came GWB, who other than having a familiar last name, was unknown to the electorate. The media gave him the same kid glove treatment that they gave Obama. He was hailed as being "a uniter, not a divider", someone who would bring integrity back to the White House, someone who would have a "humble foreign policy" and someone who would reach across the aisle to Democrats. Those who bought into this really believed it--it was again "change" from what they had been seeing for the eight preceding years.

If that didn't teach Americans that campaign rhetoric is meaningless, well, I guess they deserve what they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. she's been trying this for a while now- linking Obama to
bush and it hasn't worked. It certainly is not a valid argument and that's why it screws her when she uses it.

In addition, perhaps you should do some reading. Our greatest and most effective presidents were the best orators. Being an effective president is commonly linked with being an effective commicator. The historian Douglas Brinkley has written about this. Of course, that doesn't mean that Obama will be a good or effective president, but oratorial skills and the deft use of rhetoric can be very important tools in a presidential toolbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Obama associated Clinton with Bush in July
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. here's what I said
"She's certainly free to go after him any way she wishes, but this is not a winner for Camp Clinton."

I know it's hardball. I did not say it wasn't "fair" or that she was being a "meanie". I said it doesn't work for her, thus your response to me is.... unresponsive. Clinton going negative has been counter-productive for her. That's not hard to figure out. When she comes across as more positive and sympathetic, she does better, and that's why I noted that it seems tone deaf of her campaign to pursue this strategy. Perhaps you'd care to address my actual points. Or perhaps you wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Clinton is "tested" like Rudy Giuliani is "tested"
Just saying it repeatedly doesn't make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. I was born and raised in cincinnati. Hillary has no chance there
and unfortunately, neither does Obama.

I'm just curious. Was Paul Hackett or Sherod Brown at the rally for Mrs. C?

I wonder if they will be there when Obama comes to town. The could help him immensely!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm Sorry - Didn't She Just Complement Him The Other Night At The Debate?......
Wasn't that part of her big close the other night. How can she say one thing at the debate and then go 180 on the campaign trail. Doesn't she think people watched the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. she's saying he's good, but, she's better
not a difficult concept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. Wow! Just 2 days ago, she was saying how honored she was to be
on the same stage with Obama. Now, she is comparing him to *? Does this means she's honored when she is together with *?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. she's comparing what she says is his unknown ability and intent to Bush's unknowns when he ran.
She's already said he's more than competent and otherwise in opposition to the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. C'mon Mr. Tree. Accept the fact that she's trying to drag Obama down.
Whether rightly or wrongly, she continues to do everything possible to make Obama seem as unelectable and unqualified as she can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. do I have to post the criticisms Barack has made of his rival on the campaign trail?
Can we just agree here that these 'unelectable' charges have gone back and forth from both candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Yes. I can agree on that.
But it is a contrast to the tone of her highly touted conciliatory closing statement in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bush was tested
He managed to run every company he was in charge of into the ground prior to succeeding in politics. THAT should have been writing on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. Great. Now Hillary is comparing Obama to Bush.
Can she be more self-destructive? It's embarrassing already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. was it 'embarassing' when Obama did the same in July of last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Yes, it was. But clearly the Clinton campaign takes the
Shoot Yourself In The Foot Award this cycle. Instead of sniping at Obama, there's a hundred positive things they could be pointing to. The acrimony is a signal turn off and both of them should know that. Really, it's like they have a death wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. we'll see. I like the positive stuff. It's easier to defend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #63
74. If the Clintons just graciously talked about the stuff they've done
and are doing, they'd be in the lead right now. I'm sure of it. Whoever is pushing the campaign in this direction is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
56. Bush has actually been pretty successful
at getting his agenda passed. IMO, his policies have been incredibly destructive, but he has been effective at getting things done, even if they are bad things. His inexperience hasn't prevented him from successfully stewarding his agenda.

If Obama has as much success passing his agenda as Bush has had pushing his, I'll be pretty satisfied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
58. Point point clap clap...lie lie dodge dodge...
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 01:04 PM by jenmito
Why, at the debate, wouldn't she defend her accusations of Obama not being ready to lead from day one or that he's not experienced enough to be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. because she's never said that. She has said that she thinks she's more qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. They quoted her. Her exact words. She refused to stand by them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
59. It lifts me up to see how she positively promotes her attributes for office.
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 01:07 PM by cooolandrew


















maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
62. Too bad Hillary has failed many tests
IWR being a big one. She is also running a tremendously shitty campaign for someone who fancies herself so "experienced."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Besides that one speech (which he's really good at) Obama failed the test on Iraq
I don't happen to think a speech made from the safe position of a state legislator seat in a liberal district is any match for having the actual responsibility for that vote. Obama's blurring of that distinction between having the responsibility and making an opportunistic speech is dishonest and self-serving.

He pulled his punches for Kerry, at the 2004 convention, who had cast the identical Iraq resolution vote as Clinton. "What would I have done?" he responded when asked about that vote. "I don't know," Obama told the New York Times.

Obama never spoke out in any overt way against the occupation when he got in to the Senate. In June of 2006, Obama voted against a proposal by Sen. John Kerry to remove most troops from Iraq within a year, calling it an "arbitrary deadline" that could "compound" previous US missteps there.

Obama gave his first major speech about Iraq as a member of the Senate in November 2005, 11 months into his term. He didn't introduce legislation to end the war until last January, when he was exploring a run for president.

He first voted against funding for the war in May 2007, after he had declared his candidacy for president.

Not exactly the opposition he pretends in this campaign..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. If he "failed" on Iraq by speaking out against it, what do you call what Hillary did? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #65
78. oh, but Obama claims superiority on this issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
66. Tested
And just like she is, and just like her husband was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
68. A Bucket of Truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
70. I think this campaign has tested Sen. Obama
and he has passed with flying colors, unlike the "ready on day one" candidate who is heading up a failing, flailing campaign.

“He promised change as a compassionate conservative and the American people got shafted and we’re going to have to make up for it,” she said.

Sen. Clinton believes that this kind of bush* nonsense from his campaign is bunk but still voted to authorize his foolish, unnecessary war on Iraq, believing that he wouldn't screw that up:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
72. What BS - Isn't every NEW president untested as president? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
73. He has many similiarities to Bush
Glad she brought this up. Obama has the same arrogance, thin skin, petulance and inferiority complex as the chimp.

He doesn't get along well with others, particularly those who disagree with him.

He's a delegator

He's incurious, only interested in things that affect him personally

He's easily manipulated by those who have more money and power than him

He's willing to lie to anyone, anytime about anything to help himself

He has no serious commitment to any policy or ideals except those that advance his personal interests

He is different in one respect - he's a shapeshifter, he's willing to try to deceive people in order to get what he wants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #73
80. That's BS - complete and total BS.
There is no comparison between Obama and Bush. You guys are really, really bad losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. Its true and Obama knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
79. This was answered in the debate., You believe every newspaper that endorsed him has been "Duped"
I don't think so either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
81. it's true; most people never even heard of this guy a year ago, and now they're positive he
belongs in the most powerful position on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
84. exactly how is Clinton so much more tested?
her elective career isn't longer than Obama's if you include state elections. So what she was First Lady. Does that qualify Pickles to be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
85. Hillary's just pissed that Obama ripped off the Clinton '92 campaign
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
89. Obama is similar to Bush
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 06:59 PM by JoFerret
...in that respect it's true. Although he's a whole load smarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
90. I have NEVER posted a negative against Hillary.....
this will be the first time.....FU for comparing Obama to a fucking war criminal. Democrats dont compare each other to FUCKING war criminals. FU...you will fucking NEVER get my vote now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC