Nader is irrelevant

[gravity]

In 2000, the premise of his campaign was the democrats were no different from republicans. Well 8 years of Bush proved him wrong.

Nader got only 0.38% of the vote in 2004, and did not spoil any of the results. He was no different than every other irrelevant 3rd party candidate and will probably get even less support in 2008.

[Taverner]

1. Yup

Don't let the fear kick in - ignore Nader the Traitor

[dtotire]

2. This is Discouraging

And a waste of time.

[OHdem10]

3. At least he gives some the opportunity for something different.

[doc03]

4. Maybe so, but if the Democratic party

keeps giving us Republican lite candidates that at least gives us a vote in protest. I have been hoping for a viable third party candidate practically all my adult life, neither party is for the working person except on election year.