Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

States with Democratic Secretaries of State will block Nader from state ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:04 PM
Original message
States with Democratic Secretaries of State will block Nader from state ballots
We are fortunate that today, as compared to 2000, more states currently have a Democratic chief elections officer (usually the Secretary of State). They will use their powers to prevent the Communist candidate , Ralph Nader (I'm not pulling any punches here folks; deal with it) from getting on their ballots. Every last signature will be scrutinized down to each un-dotted "I" and un-crossed "T". Any signature that is illegible will be discounted. Every address will have to be verified, and every signatory's voter registration status will be scrutinized. We will tie Nader up in knots, forcing him to go to court to get on the ballot in every state, draining his campaign funds and his time.

If necessary, Democratic secretaries of state will use Katherine Harris or Ken Blackwell tactics to do what has to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say let him be on the ballot
Give Ol' Ralphie enough rope to hang himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this the "new politics" Obama talks about?
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:18 PM by Benhurst
It sounds like something straight out of Boss Tweed's playbook. New politics, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They did it in 04. Both party's are always desperate to keep any percieved threat off the
ballot.

Where have you been?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I was here, and I complained about it at the time.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 09:53 PM by Benhurst
And again, it's straight out of Boss Tweed's playbook. "New" politics, indeed. Same old crap in a different wrapper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I'm not getting how you are blaming Obama for what the OP predicts will happen
by SOSs in the states.

Can a presidential candidate order SOSs to let Ralph on the ballot?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. how is THIS obama's fault???
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. For the Democrats to do this--Republican Tactic--I say no
Interfering with Democracy is wrong no matter which party does it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This OPINE is coming from an Obamafolk (OP)--figures!
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:20 PM by rodeodance
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Feb-24-08 12:04 PM
Original message
States with Democratic Secretaries of State will block Nader from state ballots

We are fortunate that today, as compared to 2000, more states currently have a Democratic chief elections officer (usually the Secretary of State). They will use their powers to prevent the Communist candidate , Ralph Nader (I'm not pulling any punches here folks; deal with it) from getting on their ballots. Every last signature will be scrutinized down to each un-dotted "I" and un-crossed "T". Any signature that is illegible will be discounted. Every address will have to be verified, and every signatory's voter registration status will be scrutinized. We will tie Nader up in knots, forcing him to go to court to get on the ballot in every state, draining his campaign funds and his time.

If necessary, Democratic secretaries of state will use Katherine Harris or Ken Blackwell tactics to do what has to be done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. All of you acting so indignant should go tell the spouse of a parent of a dead soldier how upset you
are. I dont happen to agree with the tactics bluestateguy advocates, but I understand the anger that got him there. Hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed Iraqis and tens of thousands of dead/maimed/psychologically scarred military men and women because of this arse, and yes I do blame him for his stupid rhetoric and convincing just enough people that there was no difference between Bush and Gore. When you think about it that way AND factor in that Nader is so stupid and selfish that he refuses to learn from his mistake, all kinds of things come to mind to try and stop him. im not saying i would try them or advocate for them, but you cant stop thoughts from entering your mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why? What are they afraid of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. The ideal of government in the public interest
....is progressive, not communistic.

The problem with Nader is that he's running third-party instead of running for an office as a Democrat, not what he would do if he were elected to an office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDooRonRon Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. The "Communist candidate"
Honestly, if this doesn't tell you all you need to know about the "Nader haters."

What's next, the Green Party folks are all Marxists and we're all heading down the road to socialist hell if we don't straighten up and fly Dem???

:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nader is just in it for the matching fund. He'll collect fund to get on the ballot and then fall off
the radar screen. The Green Party has already selected their candidate, so he will have an even tougher time in many states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Why does Nader want the matching fund? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Joe McCarthy, is that you?
Labeling left-wingers like that, even those you hate, serves nobody but the reactionary right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Please if Nader is no fool....if he meets all the requirements they can't do jack shit...
your are talking nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nice to know you approve of katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let's not perpetuate the politics of fear. If his paperwork is legit, let Nader go on the ballot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not sure why they'd bother.
Ralph Nader isn't going to eat away at Obama's base. He's going to get the Gravel voters, and that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. If he legitimately qualifies, why should they block it?
What legal reason would they have?

What you're suggesting is done now in almost all states for all candidates. Signatures ARE checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC