|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:04 PM Original message |
States with Democratic Secretaries of State will block Nader from state ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. I say let him be on the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Is this the "new politics" Obama talks about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. They did it in 04. Both party's are always desperate to keep any percieved threat off the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I was here, and I complained about it at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I'm not getting how you are blaming Obama for what the OP predicts will happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. how is THIS obama's fault??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. For the Democrats to do this--Republican Tactic--I say no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. This OPINE is coming from an Obamafolk (OP)--figures! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. All of you acting so indignant should go tell the spouse of a parent of a dead soldier how upset you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why? What are they afraid of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. The ideal of government in the public interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDooRonRon (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. The "Communist candidate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. Nader is just in it for the matching fund. He'll collect fund to get on the ballot and then fall off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Why does Nader want the matching fund? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. Joe McCarthy, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. Please if Nader is no fool....if he meets all the requirements they can't do jack shit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nice to know you approve of katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. Let's not perpetuate the politics of fear. If his paperwork is legit, let Nader go on the ballot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. Not sure why they'd bother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
20. If he legitimately qualifies, why should they block it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC