Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Compromise actually works

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:41 PM
Original message
Compromise actually works
I am shocked to find that many on this board find that is impossible to compromise with the republicans so I will offer some insight into how it can be done.

I will use the universal health care debate to make my point

The pros: Well it will take me too long to list all the arguments for universal coverage, so I will assume you all know them.

Cons: The main arguments against it in a nutshell are taxes and long lines for treatment

Now we have a choice to make about approaching the issue:

A. Call the opposition idiots who don't know what they are talking about
B. Work with the opposition to find a way to enjoy the benefits universal coverage, while taking into the account of long line and taxes.

If you choose option A, you end up with a huge partisan battle which will accomplish nothing.

In option B, you get both parties working together to create an universal health care bill. The result is a compromised bill which would probably be better than the original since its weaknesses were addressed. In this case, the concerns were minimal so nothing was really compromised anyway.

To sum up the choices, A is going to war while B is using diplomacy (a foreign concept to our current government)

Reaching out is just about recognizing the concerns of your opposition while not demonizing them even when they are wrong or you disagree. Once they see that their views are taken into account, they are much more willing to work with you on the issues. Instead of arguing about the differences, you work for the common good and actually accomplish something positive.

If you ask most Americans, they want the same thing for their country. They all want good jobs, a strong economy, health care, good schools, freedom and security. Its really these partisan battles that are dividing are nation. The republican leaders remained in control so long because they are masters of using those tactics for their own political advantage. Playing those games is just letting the republicans get what they want, and will prevent the democrats for making real progress in this country.

I support Obama because he recognizes this fundamental problem with the Democratic party. Instead of playing the RW games, we need to call out the republicans against their divisive political tactics, and show the many disaffected republican voters that our interest are in the interest of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. It's the only way to get things done.
There is a difference between compromise and caving in. All the Dems do now is cave in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. What compromise will he make on Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Many republicans think that Iraq was a mistake
We don't need to convince them of that anymore.

The compromise will be the best way for America to withdraw its troops in Iraq while still having stability in the region. There isn't an easy solution to the problem so our leaders need to work together to do what's best for our country, Iraq, and the world. This isn't something that should be played for political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. What compromise will he make on torture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. None
You can make a million loaded questions about compromise if you want. I'm talking about a way to frame our policies respecting the concerns of the opposition, rather than caving into them.

The Geneva Convention covers torture, so there isn't really any compromise there. There was probably some compromise going on in the Geneva Convention in writing the laws about torture, but I think the pros outweighed the cons greatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC