Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is exactly why I've been telling people to not be so cocky

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:21 PM
Original message
This is exactly why I've been telling people to not be so cocky
about having the White House in the bag.

It's why I've been telling certain Obama supporters that instead of gloating and shitting all over certain people and spending all of their time trying to act provocative, they should be reaching out to court votes from the Hillary camp and the gay camp.

The same would hold true on Hillary's side if she was in Obama's position.

Sorry, but told you.

I had a feeling this asshole would jump into the race. You just NEVER, ever know what's going to happen. That's why you don't talk shit before the big game, because it can come back to haunt you.

It'll be interesting now to see how many people will be adjusting their unacceptably divisive behaviors in wake of what happened today.

Because damn, you don't think Obama needs Hillary supporters and teh gays now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. News flash: this Nader idiot...
...passed "irrelevant" by many moons ago. I'm not particularly worried.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The New England Patriot fans weren't particularly worried
either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, a football game is EXACTLY like a presidential election
I really hope Obama has beefed up his offensive line. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You don't get the analogy? Shocking
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It's a poor analogy. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL. I'm in such a good mood.
Nothing like humble pie on a Sunday.

(Something else you probably don't understand jgraz).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. I understand it perfectly well
I also understand that this Nader panic is completely overblown. The person we need to be worrying about is Hillary and her determination to take every Democrat down with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. ....
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Get The Feeling You Don't Like Ralph?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bu-whahahahahahahahaha.....
Maybe we'll start seeing how gracious some of these obnoxious Obama supporters can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. "We" have been making an honest effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I seriously doubt it
and it would be a miracle if some of them changed their hateful ways this late in the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Such attitudes are probably why it would be so difficult.
You don't sound as though you would even care if they wanted to.

That is the real shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. For the record, Obama himself has done NOTHING to discourage Hillary supporters
from voting for him.

It's a deception created by too much time spent on this site, this belief that Obama hates Hillary and her supporters, or that even the majority of Obama's supporters hate Hillary and her supporters....

A lot of people need to learn to tell the difference between the Internet and real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The only thing
Nader would hurt would be a Hillary nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Except for hiring a gay bashing clown in order to pander for some votes.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 03:32 PM by Beausoir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. I'm not just talking about Hillary supporters Bicoastal.
Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nader was a non-factor in 2004, he'll be even less in 2008. Not worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I understand what you're saying, cboy4.
But I think he'll have even less of an impact this election than he did in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Obama people here sure seem freaked out about Nader.
Nader's a tool. I seriously doubt he'll have any impact on the race.

But, your post is spot-on when it comes to being arrogant before you get the game won.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. What? Why would people support Clinton now that Nader is in?
I don't get your logic behind that at all.

How is Nader going to affect these primaries at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I'm saying that if Obama gets the nomination, which it
looks like he probably will, he's going to need every single vote he can get to beat McCain.

I've been saying it won't be a cakewalk even before Nader jumped in because you can't underestimate the dirty tricks machine known as the Republican partt

Yet, I've read posts that Obama will be stomping McCain.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Agree...I bet there are plenty of repugs crossing for BO
That won't be with us in November... the numbers tend to support it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nader got 0.3% in 2004
We better beat McCain by more than that.
Anyone voting Nader over Obama or Clinton is never going to vote Democratic.
They are irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. that's confusing to me
Nader is well to the left of Obama. Hillary is to the right of Obama, or, at best, just a teeny tiny bit to the left of Obama. So why would Hillary supporters goto Nader?

Also, I sorta figure that anybody with two brain cells to rub together can follow the logic from 2000.
+ for Nader = - for Obama ----> President McCain.

Also, presumably the Clintons, once they have spent a few weeks consoling themselves, will endorse and work for the Dem nominee, unless they decide to go totally Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Great point ... lets see if this changes the tone any.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm not worried about Ralph Nader
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree. It doesn't do any good to win the nomination if they antagonize
the people they need on their side. That is the problem with having supporters that are new blood. They are so gun ho that they do things that shouldn't be done because of their inexperience. And there are others that are not willing to try new methods or ideas in a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. I am not afraid of Nader as much as Obama being lambasted by the right wing.
On everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think Nader is irrelevant, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaman2008 Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. If Obama has to spend time wooing Gays, Blacks, and Liberals, He doesn't stand a
chance in the general election anyway. So I don't think you have a point. I am sure the Republicans will try and paint Obama as the biggest Hillary, Gay, leftest on the planet anyway. Obama needs to be running to the center to sure up all the moderate and independent votes he can before McCain raises the money and resources to do it.

I think if a person wants to NOT vote for a candidate and abandon their values based on something that one of his many millions of supporters said about their candidate, they probably are not rational enough to be allowed into a voting booth anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Maybe the Obama Borg will assimilate him.
He can be the Veep.

;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. You people need to "woo" every human being who has
a pulse.

You may not comprehend, but I bet Obama's campaign people realize this as more and more Republics begin to rally around McCain in order to keep the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Rather than "you people" need to woo everyone, I would say WE DEMOCRATS need to do this.
I agree totally with your premise, and have tried to do the same thing to supporters of both candidates.
What unites us is more crucial than what divides us.
This is why saying "candidate X is NOT READY to be president" is EXTREMELY divisive. And THAT is done by one of the campaigns itself.
so they need to search their own souls, and pass that to their constituents.

For the country, indeed the entire biosphere, we need to pull together - and the change starts in each individual's conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Yup. Agree with you again....division won't get us the
White House.

Tragically, not everyone comprehends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. I guess you're right in a way. If only Hillary supporters could rise
above the ranting and mockery of their candidate. Sadly, they can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. Nader ran in 2004 and he was a non-factor. People have thankfully wised up to his game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. The asshole said he would jump in if it looked like Edwards wouldn't get the nom.
I assume you are talking about Nader, right? He warned and followed up with his threat. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. It's just not Nader....my point has been anything can
happen in politics, so people shouldn't act as though they have the White House in the bag.

I've read posts saying, "I guarantee we're going to win it," or "Obama is going to stomp McCain in November," etc., etc.

And I've said WRONG.

The election in November will be close, if only because the Republicans will cheat.

So people should be doing less talking smack and more reaching out to those who are saying they'll leave their ballot blank if Obama is the nominee.

There's so much more work to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Cocky isn't a good place too be while campaigning , ever.
Anything can happen, look what happened to all but two of our Dem candidates, very early on.

Agree, there is much work to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC