Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the word PRESIDENTIAL inherently sexist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is the word PRESIDENTIAL inherently sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would you care to explain?
I have never heard this before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Being that all U.S. presidents have been men,
is there an expectation that one must be like a man (like those men) in order to be presidential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I guess I see your point.
I guess it depends on what an individual sees in their mind when they think about what makes one presidential.

All U.S. presidents have also been white. So, perhaps for some people the there is an expectation that one must be white to be presidential.

I suspect that come January 2009, the definition of "presidential" will have broadened a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. That's for sure.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM by BuyingThyme
Maybe breast feeding will someday be presidential. Like cutting the brush.

ON EDIT AFTERTHOUGHT: Can cutting the brush be presidential for a man (or Chimp) but not so presidential for a woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. When Kathleen Sebelius Gave The SOTU Response, I Was Amazingly Impressed With How Presidential I
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 07:09 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
thought she came off. The reason I thought that was because of her intellect, tone, vibe of leadership, and all around presentation. But none of that was due to my thinking she was being like a man somehow. I just thought she came off as extremely presidential. So based on that, I'd have to say the answer to your OP is no. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. From where does that vibe of leadership originate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Leaders? Not Sure How To Answer That Question.
Are you implying that leadership is sexist too? Are you implying that you don't know the qualities of what makes one a leader? Have you not been aware of any strong women leaders? Are you trying to now portray a mindset that no matter how someone responds to your poll or questions, that you're going to hold onto your position that it IS inherently sexist?

I know a ton of women leaders and had a female boss who was the best boss I've ever had. There are women leaders all over the place and I find your question to be seriously flawed in intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. How can a question be flawed in intent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. When A Question Is Asked With A Tone Of Sincerity, But In Fact Is Being Asked With A Tone Of
stubbornness, then the intent is flawed.

Meaning in this case, you aren't really interested in others opinions as it relates to whether or not there is inherent sexism. You're already convinced there is. You're already convinced that any of the qualities that make someone 'presidential' are also inherently sexist, so even using them as defense would be irrelevant to you since you would still hold firm to your flawed ideal.

Now granted, I'm not saying for certain that's what you're doing here. I'm just saying that based on the way you've responded, that I no longer consider your intent to be one of genuine disposition, but instead one of "I don't care what you say, people regard 'presidential' as being inherently male". Well if that's truly the way you feel, I can't stop ya. But you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Then we find your responses were flawed in intent because
I truly wonder what people are talking about when they speak in presidential terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Who The Fuck Is We?
And you have exposed yourself now as being the originator of an impossible equation. You don't have the slightest bit of sincere intention here, and you only desire to ask a gazillion questions to any response you get until finally the poster gives up and you pat yourself on the shoulder smugly as if to falsely convince yourself that you won somehow, and that it IS in fact inherently sexist. But I have no desire to go down that petty overanalyzed circle jerk with you, because I already see exactly what your true intentions are. No matter how someone responds, no matter what kind of explanation one gives, no matter how many follow up questions of yours they need to answer to go even deeper in detail as to what each quality represents, they will get no where with you. You are convinced in your own little bubble that presidential is inherently sexist and male, and there isn't a part of your mind open to the reality that it could be otherwise, or open to the opinions of others as to why.

You've made that clear to me now, and I have no desire to pretend we could have a sincere or genuine discussion, when it's clear that your only purpose is to try and convince others of a point that truly doesn't exist. Total waste of time. Bye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Lay off the crazy sauce.
I'm asking questions to find out what people perceive as presidential.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. You Ain't Foolin Anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I fooled you without even trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Whatever Makes You Feel Self Important!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Do me a favor.
Read what you've written in this thread and attempt to explain your motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. My Motivation Had Been To Sincerely Answer Your Question, Until It Became Clear That You Had No
interest in a real conversation. I think it's beyond evident that you're firmly standing behind a point that doesn't truly exist except for within your own mind.

You came in asking if the term was inherently sexist. Several have replied with reasons stating know and far more voted no. But none of that is good enough, since I'd wager you still believe 100% that it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. So, because you drank all that crazy sauce,
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 08:33 PM by BuyingThyme
you decided that (1) my opinion does not count and (2) that I think that my opinion is the only one that counts and (3) that's what counts the most.

Has it occurred to you that you're just projecting your thought processes on me because you hate yourself and are looking for a way to express how you feel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Oh. And Speaking Of Crazy Sauce, You Never Answered Who The Fuck 'We' Was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. We are you and me and anybody else who wants to participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why can't I vote "WTF"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Same question I'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unless you think the qualities that make a good President
are inherently male, then no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Does one have to be a good president to be presidential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. No. But if you said Clinton is running to be "presidentess" it would be
It is sexist to feminize words that don't need to be feminized, like calling a female pilot a "pilotess" (or, a "female pilot" for that matter). There is no reason that I know of that "presidential" is sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. Aviatrix. Murderess. etc. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Off to dictionary.com... I'm back and laughing at my next thought (about "dictionary")
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 07:09 PM by uppityperson
I don't see what you are getting at, but started to wonder: Is "dictionary" inherently sexist? Why isn't there a clitionary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. LOL
"clitionary" :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. ROFL!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. ROFL!!!! Well,
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 08:14 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
:rofl:

I'm thinkin cause a dictionary doesn't mind being touched by anyone, whereas the clitionary would demand dinner first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can't spell presidential without "Penis."
That and "rat deli." :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Can't Spell It Without Dental Either. Teeth: We All Have Them, Except For Freepers.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 08:17 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Therefore, the word isn't sexist, it just means that freepers shouldn't be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I lay bricks. In my 35 years in the trade, I have never seen a female
bricklayer. Is that sexist? Some jobs are better suited for some sexes. Still, I believe the woman to be the stronger sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Are You Saying Being President Is Better Suited For Males?
Yeah, that's pretty sexist. In fact, so is saying that some jobs are better suited for some sexes. Depending on different factors, anyone from either sex can be capable of doing any job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am offended that you even brought it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Are you the president of something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Yes. The President of being offended. Now stop it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. You?
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 07:12 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, But It Is Definitely Racist
The times they are a'changin'. Only the GOP has an old white man running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. no, i think Hillary looks Presidential
as do many other women such as Barbara Boxer, Sebelius, Napolitano, etc. so no, i dno't view the word as sexist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Only if you believe that presidential qualities are exclusively male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. To this point, they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. There's a difference between "all presidents have been male" and "all qualities that make
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM by Occam Bandage
a good president have been exclusive to males." Think of any quality that you believe makes a good President, and I guarantee you can think of five women who possess that quality as quickly as you can five men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I don't think the word s connotes good or effective qualities
as much as stereotypical posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Then this poll is begging the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. No, just asking the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'd say it's been answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. No, but this post is pretty Ameri-centric.
Just because you guys have never had a female president doesn't make that true of the rest of us. (Not that Canada has a president at all, but you know what I mean.)

Anyway, President doesn't just refer to national leaders. There are plenty of female presidents - gardening clubs, knitting bees and whatnot must have them, I'm sure.


(That last bit is a joke, btw!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. This is a U.S. presidential primary forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Doesn't mean it can be used to ascribe nonexistant meanings to widely-used words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. For instance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Well, the word "presidential," for instance, doesn't have a gender bias
inherent to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Then you should vote "NO."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. Consider it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. List of Female Presidents here:
http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/Presidents.htm

No offense, kind of a silly question. Don't see gender bias in the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Even though JFK said women didn't have what it takes to be prez, he did admit Eleanor R had 'it'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC