Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton gets caught again on NAFTA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:51 PM
Original message
Clinton gets caught again on NAFTA
http://action.credomobile.com/sirota/2008/02/clinton_gets_caught_again_on_n.html


Barack Obama is today criticizing Hillary Clinton on her efforts to pretend she never supported NAFTA. Just as a follow-up to my post on Friday, I want to remind folks who claim Hillary Clinton never praised NAFTA that, in fact, she did praise NAFTA - repeatedly.

According to NBC's Meet the Press, in 2004, Clinton said, "I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New York and America."

In her memoir, Clinton trumpeted her husband's "successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA."

And in 1998, Bloomberg News reports that she praised corporations for mounting "a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA." Another direct quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary is and was pro NAFTA, up until she set foot in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton said, "I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New York and America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love how Barry...attacks on things that happened when he couldn't
possibly have been responsible for any part in it..Nafta, Iraq...ah the safety of innocence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Your point?
If he HAD taken part of them, how would his criticisms be any more or less valid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because he only knows what positionhe MIGHT have taken in RETROSPECT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. pity, you all have never read any history
obama's position on nafta is the same as hillary's

and it was bush senior,mulroney and salinas authored nafta, not clinton

clinton passed it only with side agreements on labor and envir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Trying to lie out of it like she's doing
with the IWR and her supporters are lapping it up like kittys with milk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC