Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Larry Sinclair (Obama's lying stalker wierdo) Fails Polygraph Test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:19 PM
Original message
Larry Sinclair (Obama's lying stalker wierdo) Fails Polygraph Test
Dr. Ed Gelb, Former President of the American Polygraph Association was the Polygraph expert selected by Whitehouse.com. He has done over 30,000 polygraph examinations over his long career. There were two polygraph tests administered by Dr. Gelb on Friday. the first polygraph asked Mr. Sinclair on his sex claims. The second polygraph test asked Mr. Sinclair on the drug use claims. There was deception indicated in both tests.
As mentioned yesterday Mr. Sinclair did pass his drug screen so there were no drugs in his system which could have interfered with the test. We have asked Mr. Sinclair on several occasions to put us in contact with the Limousine driver that he named for other news organizations earlier and for us on Friday that was supposed to corroborate his story. As of today he has still not put us in contact with the limousine driver whom he told us he stays in constant contact with.

It was our intention to get to the truth in this serious matter rather than have these allegations that were made almost a month ago drag on to election day. Due to the seriousness of this issue we made the results public today rather than waiting until Monday when we would have received the second expert's conclusions. When we receive the second expert's conclusions we will post those results as well.

We will have all of the written results posted on the site in the next week including video taken of the Polygraph testing so there will be full disclosure and transparency on our part and eliminate any suspicion of any wrongdoing or manipulations of the testing or the results by Whitehouse.com or the polygraph experts. Later this afternoon we will post the actual report by Dr. Gelb.

http://www.whitehouse.com/index.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not surprising. I hope this will put this to rest
I don't like Obama, but I never believed this. Luckily, the story never got much traction anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow he wasn't even a HALF good provocateur!
Didn't anybody ever tell him about the ol' tack in the shoe trick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is like the alleged police report of Hillary in California when
She was a attorney for the Black Panthers. I won't repeat what the so-called police reports states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. SHeesh ......What did you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope the Secret Service keeps an eye on this guy.
He is so delusional, that I can't help but be reminded of Mark David Chapman. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Larry Sinclair may be a lying stalker wierdo, but
polygraph tests are pretty much completely subjective and the outcome is usually determined by the examiner's personal, non-standardized reading of the results. That's why they are inadmissible as evidence in court.

No I am not defending Larry Sinclair, nor do I believe him, I am just saying polygraph tests are bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC