Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama in 1995 when he first ran for office: Does this sound familiar?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:41 PM
Original message
Obama in 1995 when he first ran for office: Does this sound familiar?
=="It's time for politicians and other leaders to take the next step and to see voters, residents or citizens as producers of this change," Obama told Hank De Zutter of the Chicago Reporter. "What if a politician were to see his job as that of an organizer, as part teacher and part advocate, one who does not sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices before them?"==

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/24/AR2007032401152.html





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll never get anywhere in politics with that philosophy!
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was that Before he started giving back Rezko's Campaign Contributions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. If you keep acting like this, I Will NEVER Support your Candidate!
AAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGHHH!!!!


lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It is to laugh.
"In winning Tuesday's primary in the key swing state of Wisconsin, Sen. Barack Obama drew support from tens of thousands of Republicans and independents."

- The Washington Post


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022302180.html?nav%3Dhcmodule&sub=AR






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. So, did Clinton carry the Democratic vote in Wisconsin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Ha, Beatlespam's shift has started. Hope you punched in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. No Shift -Work here. Just finished Sunday Dinner.

"In winning Tuesday's primary in the key swing state of Wisconsin, Sen. Barack Obama drew support from tens of thousands of Republicans and independents"

-- The Washington Post, February 24, 2008


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022302180.html?nav%3Dhcmodule&sub=AR





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. And yet Clinton still failed to win the Democratic vote.
So she can't even win Democrats now.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey..how is that trial going..I understand they didn't grant him bail.(Rezko)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is doing as fine as all of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You mean this trial?
Sen. Clinton, Husband to be called in Financial Fraud Trial

"...The first law suit in American history to bring a President and a Senator to court for defrauding the Senator’s largest campaign donor and his public company will be set for trial and discovery at the Case Management Conference before Judge Munoz. Discovery and depositions of key witnesses, including the Clinton family, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Terry McAuliffe, Harold Ickes, Howard Wolfson, Kelly Craighead, Barbara Streisand, Brad Pitt, Larry King, Mike Wallace among an array of political and entertainment leaders, will present an inside look at a culture of corruption that will shock the public

Because the expenses of discovery and trial preparation will be extraordinary as the efforts to expose wrongdoing by the Clinton hierarchy of the Democratic is fought desperately by the Clinton Washington pit bull legal team, they require the continued support of the tens of thousands of concerned citizens around the nation that have supported it since 2001 and all those Americans who are newly introduced to the biggest political scandal since Watergate.

Paul vs. Clinton has become and will be the first civil lawsuit to produce sworn testimony and evidence of the systemic corruption that the Clintons have infused into the Democratic Party and all branches of the federal government. Given the necessary resources and legal talent to use the legal tools now available, the illegalities directed by Hillary Clinton to win and keep her Senate seat will be irrefutable"

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50718


-------------------------


UH OH!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. naw..I mean Barry's buddy, silly you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Oh, I thought you meant the brewing Clinton/Paul scandal trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I was talking about Syrian born Antoin "Tony" Rezko and his donations to Barack Hussein Obama
sorry for the confusion.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. This Rezko?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It hasn't started
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 10:14 PM by tammywammy
And Obama's not subpoenaed, so much ado about nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Opening Arguments March 3rd - TX, OH, PA Primary March 4th
Lol!

"In winning Tuesday's primary in the key swing state of Wisconsin, Sen. Barack Obama drew support from tens of thousands of Republicans and independents."

- The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/23/AR2008022302180.html?nav%3Dhcmodule&sub=AR



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. Thank you for proving the worst kind of lie is a half truth..
Had only democrats voted in WI obama Still would have won the state... He won almost every demographic..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. SSDD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. um....
what's SSDD?

(sorry)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. same shit, different day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. ha ha...
I like that, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. "one who does not sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices"
That's not Obama, sorry.

Edwards and Hillary, for all their shortcomings, did spend a lot of time and energy making sure the voters understand the policies. They both gave detailed talk about health care and Edwards talked in depth about Iraq.

Obama's campaigners were formally trained NOT to speak about the issues. They were trained to talk only about their personal stories of coming to the Obama campaign. That isn't educating the voters.

Regarding health care, anyone who has listened to Obama's take on mandates has been deceived. He has likened health-care mandates to car insurance mandates, in an attempt to discredit them. Only problem is, the analogy isn't necessarily true; social security and unemployment are also mandated, and they're nothing like car-insurance mandates. So people who learn from Obama's speeches come out knowing less than they did before.

Barack Obama has many good qualities, and I hope he'll be a good president, but he is clearly NOT "one who does not sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices before them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Here, Obama will explain the whole thing to you
even why the ineffectiveness of car insurance mandates proves his point:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjsRcIfMj-E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Notes taken while watching --
So far he is falsely conflating the Massachusetts plan with all possible mandated plans. This is deliberate deception. Mandated plans could just as easily follow the social security or unemployment systems.

Then he told a story about his mother, aiming to manipulate emotion. No educating the voter is taking place.

Now he's talking about helping poor people afford health care. He's presenting this in a way that implies Hillarycare doesn't do this. Except his plan has set aside thirty billion fewer dollars for helping the poor than her plan.

He just said that the plans now will look very different from the plans that actually go before congress. Good for him, that was honest. And it's what he should have said at the start of this whole debate, rather than start spreading lies about mandated health care.

And now he has returned to his argument against mandates, and he's not being honest. He talked about turning people into "outlaws" -- as though the other plans include something like that. They don't. He continued to make the false claim that all mandated care will be the same as Massachusetts' mandated care. People who believe him on this, will be less educated about the choices in front of them. This is total spin, containing no truth or relevance.

And here he is, going honest again. "I'll call in all kinds of health care experts and economists" (paraphrased).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Only a European-style, single-payer plan would emulate SS or unemployment insurance
Pushing mandates up-front is an awful political strategy which, even if it succeeded, offers no guarantees of universal care. And, yes, Massachausetts and its underfunded plan is indeed proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I don't disagree with your points here --
I would also prefer to see single-payer, but it would put about half a million people out of work all at once -- trained professionals in a field that would no longer exist. There would be ten people with Master's Degrees fighting over every job in a shoe store. Single payer is something we have to work towards gradually.

I also see that mandates are a bad strategy politically. But they do not have to follow the car-insurance method; Massachusetts did, but there are other ways. Obama, attempting to smear his opponents' plans, likened them to the car-insurance/Massachusetts plans, and that was not educational; it was political spin. So I disagree with the central premise of the OP, which was that Obama has been educating people about their choices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. An organizer as president...I like that. A real public servant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. welcome to chicago movement politics. washington, alynski
harold washington, saul alinsky. this is where obama learned it. this is the face of the modern democratic "machine". we grew up here. we do great things here. welcome aboard. you will like it.
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC