|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:41 PM Original message |
If I were running the Obama campaign, I would have leaked that photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. Anything's possible........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. And WTF is wrong with the photo anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Do you disagree that *some* people will see it an recoil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. People will *recoil* because we allow the media to set the tone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I'm not disagreeing with you on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Their reasoning is totally relevant, sheese. It's the same reasoning that has caused DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:07 PM Original message |
We agree that some people will recoil at the photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. And the earth is flat. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. That's in line with your reasoning. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. here is what is wrong....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. But Melinda says people just shouldn't think like that. So...they won't! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Don't deliberately distort my words; it's unbecoming to a supposed democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. And yet you are the one posting it here (& stealing bandwidth to boot) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Again... How do you "LEAK" a published online magazine article that has been online since 2006? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Drudge says he has an email from the Clinton campaign commenting on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. and you believe even though he has not produced the email: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. That denial is mediocre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. I do not care what you think--but the OP has been trolling that Clinton camp did not deny it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Don't bother. Rodeodance believes Hillary can do no wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Do you have a link to that article? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Semantics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. One thing if they leaked it, another to try to blame it on Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, I'm glad you aren't then- and have to ask how you would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Why would you condemn the leak, IF it hapened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. for many of the reasons I am NOT a republican- because I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Ah, idealism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. nobody needed to leak it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. It's not about the photo and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Maybe, but why not leak it after he just won the nomination? Why take the chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. That's a good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Levgreee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. It would be much smarter then, to leak it after they have sealed the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwenu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. That sounds pretty stupid as a strategy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. So you'd rather wait and see if the opposition springs it on you in October? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrantDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Good point. However... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrantDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. You're absolutely right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Sure. Leak it, point the finger at Clinton, then play victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
persistant (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
29. I am convinced it was leaked by Obama radicals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. How did they get it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. I'm not "convinced" of it, but if it turns out to be the case, they deserve credit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
34. You have a point..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freida5 (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
40. I have been thinking that all day. I believe BO campaign leaked pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. We disagree on the motive. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
46. They should had photoshop to have the robe a purple color |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC