Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Clinton adviser David Gergen confirms Hillary's opposition to NAFTA on CNN.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:22 PM
Original message
Former Clinton adviser David Gergen confirms Hillary's opposition to NAFTA on CNN.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:22 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQJxtzLQ51Q

"I was there in the White House during the NAFTA fight and I must tell you Hillary Clinton was externally unenthusiastic about NAFTA and I think that's putting it mildly.....she was very unhappy about it and wanted to move on to Universal Health Care....She's NEVER been a backer of NAFTA"


saw this on CNN last night!! I clapped when I heard this! It is so true. The media has been making her look bad while covering up everything Obama does that may seem sneaky. Then he acts all calm when all he does at his speeches is talk bad about Hillary and being tied to NAFTA or how she gets mad over something HE STARTED. It's sad to see how sexist this country is. It's nice to know we are not racist but so sad to see how females still don't get the respect we deserve.







HILLARY 08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is a SNEAKY SEXIST !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No.. I think it says sexiest sneak.
I'm a straight male but I can see how some see him as sexy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Obama has multiple quotes of her praising it.
The problem is Hillary.
Why write (where it can be retrieved) one thing, while actually thinking another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. but Obama was NOT there in the WH....David Gergen was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. So why did she not come out and say she lobbied against it?
I believe her that she was against it and lobbied against it behind the scenes, as she did with the first two versions of welfare reform (and probably the one that Bill eventually signed). But she should come out and say that she had argued against it and thinks Bill made a mistake in signing it. Otherwise, she is trying to have it both ways - campaign on her record in the Clinton Administration but run from one of his big achievements as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. This is part of the problem with a spous of a former President running
Per this, everything she ever said in public favorable about something that didn't work can be considered not true. If she didn't believe in it - she could have said nothing in public on it.

The public statements count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. And Gergen specifically says she "kept her mouth shut" to try to preserve her chances on health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. She had reservations about it UNTIL she thought it was politically popular, then she
changed her tune.. now she's changed it back again. Who can keep up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yes he is.
Have you not seen his condescending down his nose look at Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Yes ! That was AWFUL ! Have you seen Hillary Shaming and Mocking him? Cuz
I thought that was real classy !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
70. He does that a lot. WHY? Someone should tell him to
watch his body language. It's off-putting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too bad that statement
contradicts what she wrote in her book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. yes
see my post #20 on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. "I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New York and America" - Hillary Clinton 04
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:38 PM by skipos
I am glad she has decided it is in her own best poltical interest to change her position here, but it doesn't make me like her one iota more.

edited: meant 04 not 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Well first of all one has to ask the question, was she for it before she was...
against it? She does more flip flopping than any politician in both parties in this race. They talked about Romney and his flip flopping.... Hillary seems to be the magician of them all when it comes to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for the link!
I have always admired David Gergen for his objectivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I disagree that it's sad to see how sexiest this country is.
I think it's great that we're the sexiest country. B-)



(Sorry, but that was a hilarious typo. :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Original message
Never underestimate how Media Hatred of Clintons affected
Public Opinion.

I cannot believe it is all sexism. of course, the Boys Club at MSNBC
cannot be overlooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. "I think, on Balance, NAFTA has been good for New York and America"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. He actually referred to her being ambivalent to it, not opposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. So she lied in her book? ....or was that her GHOSTWRITER lying.....
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Whow --thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe she was opposed to NAFTA being front and center rather than
her health care issue. Thus she wasn't against the agreement, but against it being pushed before health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary claims NAFTA as one of Bill's successes in her book "LIving History".
I can't provide a quote but it's on page 291.

It's fairly clear she has done an about-face on NAFTA and I have bigger questions about her man Mark Penn's anti-union activities.

Obama can't make her look bad unless there's something to the story. If Hillary wants to use Bill's presidency as part of her experience, then she needs to be accountable for what she's said in the past related to that.

And Gergen? He's hardly a credible source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Here you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. I thought this are referred to as FLIP FLOP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. written AFTER he was out of office - so telling her true position
wouldn't hurt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bill is calling in favors to refute Hillarys past support
This isnt news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. What's wrong with being sexy and racy?
That's what I love about America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm not sure this is a strong point
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:34 PM by Bad Thoughts
Gergen doesn't confirm Clinton as an opponent of NAFTA, merely unimpressed and uninvolved in the debate. Indeed, Gergen suggests that her attitude toward NAFTA was framed by her own eagerness to promote health care reform. If she remained outside that debate, it is questionable that she really learned anything about trade policy.

If Clinton wishes to claim some credit for the 1990s economy, she needs to embrace her husband's trade policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. That's consistent
with what other members of Clinton Ad. say, and what her own biographers say - Hillary opposed NAFTA while Bill Clinton was President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. So she was for it before she was against it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
56. No, she was against it before she was for it, and is now against it again
So, 2/3rds of the time she's against it. Got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Actually, I saw that last night too. And what the video cuts off
is that Hillary became a big supporter of NAFTA once she thought it had become politically popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. LOL!
It's the deception, stupid!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Stop Trying To Confuse Them With The Facts nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:44 PM
Original message
how about some proof please.....link?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:45 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. You seem to live by link, can't you do your
own homework, always looking for link, what makes you think links are always genuine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
53. Do you have proof of what you just said..
link???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. no he doesn't....just cicadas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Gleeing over a 3 second comment
I watched it and he wasn't even sure of what HE was saying, because
he was asked the question again and he side step the question.

Stop fooling the people all the time.

Get over it, you candidate sucks, we have no idea
what her ranges are anymore, because she has so many
that she might turned up DERANGED.....:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. I don't think gleeing is actually a word
Anyhow Gergen is a rightwing turdball. Why the Clintons invited him into their inner circle remains one of the mysteries that make me very wary of another Clinton presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yup!!! I know, I made it up,
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:15 PM by spokane
what happens to originality....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. AHAHAHA that's rich coming from a supporter of the man who channels The Gipper loves Repuke voters
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:25 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Reuke?
"a supporter of the man who channels Raygun and loves Reuke voters"?

Your derangement over the demise of your candidate is getting to you. How many Republican consultants does Obama have on staff? The Clintons invited Gergen and Morris into their inner circle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. So her "opposition" to NAFTA consisted of
being "externally unenthusiastic", "very unhappy about it" and wanting to move on to something else (Universal Health Care).

Yep, she's a real fighter, that one is. This is what we need in a candidate! Not just someone who SAYS they oppose something, but when given the opportunity to speak up DURING the decision making process, someone who fights against things she opposes by being unenthusiastic, unhappy and wanting to move on to something else. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. There wasn't much she could do
she was not the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. It seems to me that she's been touting her influence within
her husband's administration for quite some time now. If Gergen said she was a big opponent of it, she argued strongly against it, and in the end, she was overruled, that would have meant something to me. I don't consider wanting to move on to something else the same as being opposed to it. Unlike most of us, she had an opportunity at the time to be a vocal opponent of it (at least internally at the WH, if not in the press) and it sounds like she let it pass, now people are trying to paint what can best be described as ambivalence as opposition. I'm not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. She was the First Lady NOT the President....there was nothing else she could do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. Hillary on NAFTA: "All I Remember is a Bunch of Charts"..
Watch the video and see triangulation extraordinaire..

http://www.errachidia.org/sport/video-NAFTA-1-LRvJ-o30Sk8.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
36. She was against it because she didn't want to piss off labor unions, etc. before her health care
proposal came out. That's what he meant by, she wanted to move on to health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. Apparently Mr. Gergen hasn't read Hillary's book... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. Mr. Gergen was present when in the WH during the NAFTA thing... he doesn't need to read anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. So....once again I ask.... was Hillary lying in her book?
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
73. What exactly did she say in her book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bullshit! I'll believe it when Bill comes out and takes the blame for NAFTA...
but don't expect that to ever happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. So we shouldn't listen to her all the times she is on record supporting NAFTA
we should listen to her closest advisers who say she was just bullshitting us and really opposed NAFTA.

Awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. Gergen was on MSNBC this morn and said the same thing, essentially
I'm looking forward to tonights debate, maybe both sides will totally nail this one down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
68. Gergen's truth out seems to have a bunch of Obamanite panties in a wad
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 09:00 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
51. I saw that too....
I was so happy to see truthful reporting about Hillary for a change.

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
55. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KLee Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. Her own words say otherwise....
2003: Hillary Clinton Expounded on Benefits of NAFTA, Calling it An Important Legislative Goal. "Creating a free trade zone in North America—the largest free trade zone in the world—would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that our economy was reaping the benefits, not the burdens, of globalization. Although unpopular with labor unions, expanding trade opportunities was an important administration goal. The question was whether the White House could focus its energies on two legislative campaigns at once . I argued that we could and that postponing health care would further weaken its chances."

2003: Clinton Called NAFTA a "Victory" For President Clinton. In her memoir, published in 2003, Clinton wrote, "Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for President in 1996. He couldn't hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill's successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA."

1998: Clinton Praised Corporations for Their Efforts On Behalf of NAFTA. The Buffalo News reported, "As first lady, Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with either trade move. Nor has she repudiated them. In a 1998 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, she praised corporations for mounting "a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA."

1996: Clinton Said "I Think Everybody Is In Favor Of Free And Fair Trade. I Think NAFTA Is Proving Its Worth." A questioner pointed out that UNITE opposes the North American Free Trade Agreement, backed by the Clinton administration, on grounds it sends American jobs to Mexico. In March 1996, three years after President Clinton signed NAFTA into law, Hillary Clinton said, "I think everybody is in favor of free and fair trade. I think NAFTA is proving its worth," she said, adding that if American workers can compete fairly, they can match any competition. "That's what a free and fair trade agreement like NAFTA is all about," she said.

1996: Clinton "Vowed That Her Husband Would Continue To Support Economic Growth In South Texas Through Initiatives Such As The North American Free Trade Agreement." AP wrote, "Mrs. Clinton vowed that her husband would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Rio Grande Valley empowerment zone, which allows tax breaks to businesses that relocate to the border."

1996: Hillary Clinton "Touted" President Clinton's Support for NAFTA, Saying it Would Reap Widespread Benefit. On a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton "touted the president's support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. 2 out of context passages from her book i...that's what you got?...fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. Nice work.
And welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
60. You can't run on your husbands record...then turn around and pick
and choose what not celebrate and what not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
63. So what you're saying is: Hillary is a liar. Noted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
washingdem Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
67. Crying sexism because she's losing... pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
69. It's hypocritical. The guy in the Clinton WH aside from BC who gave us NAFTA is DU's biggest saint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
71. shameless self kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. I would have helped out, Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC