Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What was the WEAKEST point of the debate for each candidate tonight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:53 PM
Original message
What was the WEAKEST point of the debate for each candidate tonight?
In your opinion - what point (or points) were weakest for each candidate. My post, so my rules.. if you choose to reply - you have to post a negative for EACH candidate.. not just the one you don't support!

Also, at the end simply state who you support, and who you genuinely thought won the debate

*****************************************************************************************************

I'll go First:

Obama: Weakest - His answer about Campaign finance vs. McCain.. he fumbled, didn't commit.. looked a bit flip-flopish. I understand his reasoning, he doesn't want to box himself into a corner.. but to an undecided voter, that probably didn't look great.

Clinton: Weakest - Her unwillingness to release her tax records. The fact that one of her biggest Ohio backers used this against his opponent was telling - and Hillary's answer that "she'll get around to it, but she's busy" sounded very hollow and political.

I support Obama

I think Obama won the debate over all

YOUR TURN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama--Farrakhan (sp?) question, Hillary--Pillow comment.
The problem, I realize, is that if Obama is in the running against, say, John McCain--EVERY SINGLE White supremacist group in the country will say "Vote for McCain--He's WHITE!" But McCain would never get asked to denounce said groups on the stump. Who did people THINK Farrakhan would support, anyway?

Still, he could have answered it better. A lot of black people in this country still take Louis seriously, unfortunately, so it's definitely a balancing act.

But Hillary--man, would somebody PLEASE tell her that she has no ear for comedy? At all? It was all (mostly) downhill for HRC from there, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Look.
Blacks aren't going to start voting for Hillary or stay home because Obama denounces Farakahn. Ok? Just stop it. A lot of blacks don't take Farakahn seriously. Not sure where you got that? I don't and no one I know does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Jewish People Are More Concerned About Farrakhan
And with good reason. Clinton was asking him to repudiate Farrakhan, his pastor (who supports Farrakhan), and anyone who comes to support him as the result of a Farrakhan endorsement. Obama declined to do that, at least not as sweepingly as Clinton demanded. Since the entire point of this discussion was anti-Semitism, I'm not sure which debate you watched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. What in the hell are you talking about?
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 08:53 AM by casus belli
He conceded her point. He said he didn't see a difference between denouncing or rejecting because in this case, there wasn't any component for him to "reject". But, he conceded, if she feels that reject is a stronger word, then I both denounce and reject.

What the hell is it exactly that you want him to do? Burn a picture of Farrakhan on stage and eat something kosher as a sign of solidarity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. the pillow comment was definitely awkward
and she was complaining about always getting the first question--iirc from previous debates, they usually say that order is decided by a coin flip, right? Is she saying that the coins are an example of media bias? It all sounded very forced.

I'm watching the debate for the first time now on the replay, so I haven't gotten to Obama's Farrakhan moment yet ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama= Health Care Clinton= Everything else, especially her "zings" like the pillow jab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton - First question, pillows for Obama, Obama - Farrakhan and his pastor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'll agree about Obama's weakest - but Hillary has so
many weak points to chose from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'll agree with you on Obama. For Clinton, it was the begging for money.
I was watching this with over 25 people, but I couldn't keep myself from groaning after that. It came off as very desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. I forgot about the money begging part...
Especially since she was saying it as she dodged the real question for the first 5 minutes.. yup, great point - that was sad to watch too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary: Tax statements. Obama: Putin's successor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I didn't think the Putin comment was as bad for Obama as it was for Clinton..
He may not have added a lot, but her fumbling the new leaders name (and admitedly, I didn't know what it was either) softened the blow for that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Really?
Fluffing a difficult-to-pronounce name was as bad as Obama deferring to Clinton on that and I think two other major policy questions, because he had nothing unique to add to what she said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought they both got their points across.
I could find no real weak points on either side.
I lean towards Obama. I already voted for Edwards amd believe that the debate had no definitive winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary using SNL for her attack.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:09 AM by TexasObserver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. nt
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:13 AM by woolldog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Weak...
I think he was slightly weak on the Russian question.

For Hillary, weak bringing up SNL and how she's always asked questions first; she also looked weak trying to press the Farakahn issue and he ended up making a fool of her. On these two issues the crowd was laughing at her a little bit. She was also hit pretty hard on the economy and her flip-flopping on NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. just some of obama's weak spot..
that obama heads a committee on foreign countries which includes NATO but has not held one single meeting ...he shouldnt of wasted so much time on Farrakhan, should of kept it short and to the point...and honestly, i dont think either of them knew the name to the new leader in russia, Medevde.

i thought the pillow comment was funny only because i just saw the snl skit.....but i dont think it helped her with the viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. I thought overall the debate was a draw but I saw some weak points ...
Hillary - The statement about Barack bombing Pakistan ...


Obama - When answered, "what Hillary said" and then proceeded to agree with her ... this actually happened a couple of times


Otherwise, I thought it was a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Obama - When answered, "what Hillary said"
I guess my question on this is what DO you say when you & your opponent do agree on an issue? With them both having nearly identicle records.. contrary to Hillary complaining about going first, it's really an advantage sometimes to come out and make your point.

Just not sure what else they're suppose to say.. aside from re-hash the same comments for another 10 minutes?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. I Agree Completely With Your Two Weakest Points
I support Clinton.

And both made a number of mistakes.

On the up side, Obama is gaining ground in his presentation skills but continues to need work on his poker face; he twitches, grimaces and squirms. And Hillary managed not to dissolve in to tears or fisticuffs, contrary to all gleeful predictions.

Overall, I will give her the slight edge, chiefly because of Obama's lack of policy comprehension (both foreign and domestic) and OTHER flip-flopping mistakes outbalancing the SNL remarks, weak (Muslim garb) photo repudiation, the highly inappropriate extemporaneous fundraising commercial, and other missteps in sheer seriousness speaking to the final question, which...if anyone noticed...neither candidate really answered directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama letting Hillary roll him on the reject Farrakhan debate
He conceded it to her and fell flatter than a pancake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I disagree with that..
I think Hillary would have been better off not saying anything on that point. When she tried to point out that there was a huge difference between reject & denounce, I thought she came across as petty and silly. Just my opinion though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC