Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A compromise between HC and BO on health ins. No mandates, no one left out.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:18 PM
Original message
A compromise between HC and BO on health ins. No mandates, no one left out.
X-post from General Discussion

I wonder what it would cost for the government to provide everyone with 10k deductable health insurance?

I know one or both of the current candidates has a catastrophic provision built into their plan to limit what insurance companies would have to pay out on an catastrophic accident or illness. Perhaps people could buy in, or the government could just provide this coverage for everyone. It would probably be pretty cheap... particularly if it was renewable by competitive bidding.

Then, on top of that, private insurance could be purchased optionally if you wanted items like prescription drug reimbursement, gap insurance for a lower deductable, etc.

The catastrophic component should reduce current health insurance costs two ways: It limits the liablility of the insurer to the catastrophic cap, and at least the "hidden tax" for covering the uninsured would be limited as well.

There are lots of other ideas, such as modernization, etc. to further reduce the cost, and regulations will be needed to allow people to freely switch between plans, have pre-existing conditions covered, etc.

I fear having to talk about mandates in the general election, even for just parents.


What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are a lot of options, including a fairly simple one
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:25 PM by Armstead
Use the existing Medicare System and expand it to cover everyone for basic and catastrophic care, with a slight tax surcharge on existing Medicare taxes.

This could be offset for individual families by tax cuts in other areas, and/or subsidies or exemptions for low income. It could be sold to the public if the case is made that it would cost them significantly less than private insurance.

It could also be accompanies by other changes to improve Medicare generally.

It could also leave open the market for private coverage that people could choose to buy for supplemental care.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Insurance = Legalized gambling
"We bet you're going to stay healthy and live" vs. "No, I bet I'm going to get sick and die soon"

What a twisted system of health care.

Here in Massachusetts we are battling the mandated health insurance scam. The mandaters penalize us on our tax form. I can't afford the $10K/yr the mandate scam requires, so now the mandate cockroaches are with holding my personal state tax deduction.

No MANDATES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Hopefully, the larger nationwide pool will drop that some...
as well as regulation and standardization/modernization of the system. They do have some forms standardized, but not all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. The problem is a key cost savings element in both plans is preventative care.
And preventative care depends upon regular medical treatment/checkups which people with insurance coverage are more likely to get.

Though your idea is intriguing on many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This would provide that, if you choose to purchase it (Obama's plan)
but at an even lower cost since everyone is covered (Hillary's plan) and no one would ever be personally stuck with a catastrophic bill, even if one of the 15 million (estimated) "uninsured" gets severely hurt oa ill where normally that big bill would be absorbed by higher prices for services for people with insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ok...I am buying it.
I prefer single payer but I really see both plans and their expansion of public health and allowing it to compete on the market not just for the individual but companies as well as a door to single payer.

BTW thanks for starting a policy discussion flamefree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The chances of either getting their health care plans
implemented as stated is about zero percent. It's fine for the candidates to talk about what they would like to see happen but only congress can implement changes and you can be absolutely sure that it will go through many changes before becoming law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree. But it has to start somewhere. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think we have to bolster congress
...with more dems - so that we can force a REAL healthcare (single-payer) onto President Obama's desk. He won't veto it if we push him.

Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It would be nice to get to that.. but in the meantime,
we should take whatever steps toward that that we can. We will have to see how things shape up after November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC