Video Proof That Clinton Supports Foreign Workers Taking American Jobs - Defeat Her in Ohio!

[Dems Will Win]

http://bp2.blogger.com/_d9PxlbCXrxA/RuyouHU0hII/AAAAAAAAAAc/eB1_hnP758g/s200/Hillary-Tata+Smooch.jpg

She really is on the wrong side of this issue...

Found by antigop, thanks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhLBSLLIhUs
Hillary pushes for more h1-b visas and outsourcing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLNOSGM2jK4
Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy (part 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgdrh2Bc95M
Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy (part 2)

WAKE UP, OHIO!

PLEASE RECOMMEND IF YOU ARE AGAINST THE WAY H1-B VISAS HAVE BEEN ABUSED BY HILLARY CLINTON AND THE CORPORATOCRACY

[rinsd]

1. And what is Obama's position on h1Bs? He seeks to continue them

And what is Hillary's position on outsourcing?

She seeks to remove tax breaks from companies that outsource (Obama does as well)

[Dems Will Win]

6. Obama is against the increase if they are against the intent of the law

Hillary is for an increase in H1-Bs. Period. As the videos show.

THe simple question is do you want corporate-funded Hillary to remove the tax breaks and outsourcing or do you trust non-corporate funded Barack to do a better job (or do the job at all). Don;t forget Hillary got over $3 million from the American Indian community on the strength of her support for TATA and outsourcing in general to India. She even went there to tout outsourcing!

[rinsd]

7. IOW, Obama is also for the increase.

Both seek to improve educational standards so as to remove the necessity of h1bs.

Non corporate funded Obama?



Goldman Sachs $474,428
Ubs Ag $298,180
JP Morgan Chase & Co $282,387
Lehman Brothers $274,147
National Amusements Inc $265,750
Sidley Austin LLP $251,657
Citigroup Inc $247,436
University of California $239,944
Skadden, Arps et al $228,520
Exelon Corp $226,661
Harvard University $225,891
Jones Day $213,825
Google Inc $192,808
Time Warner $190,091
Morgan Stanley $190,026
Citadel Investment Group $173,950
Kirkland & Ellis $163,126
Latham & Watkins $160,842
WilmerHale LLP $155,788
Jenner & Block $151,447

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.asp?id=N00009638&cycle=2008

1


Lawyers/Law Firms


$11,246,596

2


Retired


$6,988,363

3


Misc Business


$6,256,928

4


Securities & Investment


$6,026,529

5


Education


$3,880,197

6


Real Estate


$3,038,325

7


TV/Movies/Music


$2,688,889

8


Business Services


$2,659,374

9


Misc Finance


$2,016,099

10


Health Professionals


$1,947,527

11


Computers/Internet


$1,686,155

12


Civil Servants/Public Officials


$1,290,131

13


Printing & Publishing


$1,222,098

14


Commercial Banks


$1,175,885

15


Non-Profit Institutions


$706,862

16


Other


$606,684

17


Insurance


$594,760

18


Hospitals/Nursing Homes


$513,124

19


Retail Sales


$509,930

20


Construction Services


$497,983

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/indus.asp?id=N00009638&cycle=2008

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/sectors.asp?sec=B

"Don;t forget Hillary got over $3 million from the American Indian community on the strength of her support for TATA and outsourcing in general to India."

Wow that's quite the assumption.

[Levgreee]

9. Umm, you have no idea what those numbers actually are. They include individual contributions

They are simply individual contributions from people, including low-level workers, in those industries
Here is a breakdown of in what form Obama gets his contributions

Source of Funds How to read this chart

Individual contributions
$137,431,938
99%
PAC contributions
$25
0%
Candidate self-financing
$0
0%
Federal Funds
$0
0%
Other
$799,632
1%


Here is Hillary

Individual contributions
$117,313,786
87%
PAC contributions
$1,045,419
1%
Candidate self-financing
$5,000,000
4%
Other
$11,177,284
8%


PAC Contribution Breakdown
Business
$304,408
56%
Labor
$58,600
11%
Ideological/Single Issue
$181,484


33%



http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.asp?id=N00009638&cycle=2008

[rinsd]

14. So Hillary is the "corporate" candidate based on less than 1/4 of a percentage point of her funds?

[cascadiance]

12. I would expect Obama to go after the "body shops"... Would Hillary?

Not from the sounds of her campaigning to Indian folk here.

The intent of the law as originally put in place was to provide an avenue for American corporations to be able to quickly hire those living overseas possessing unique qualifications (language skills combinations with certain technological skills, etc.) that can't be found here. Unfortunately, this has been warped into getting people that will do work that Americans are able to do, but WON'T do for gutter wages. This is what body shops are all about and have been for the last decade or two. They JUST hire H-1B visa people, so that they have no American workers to compare to to offer a "comparable prevailing wage" as the intent of the law states they should. Therefore they basically pay them what they want, and with the conditions of the VISA have them locked in as "indentured servants" as long as they stay here, with no rights to vote, benefits, and no rights to negotiate salary increases, etc., especially if these body shops offer "services" instead of "contract employees" to contracting companies, which is the typical loophole they've used over the years not to treat them as they would American employees here.

[Name removed]

2. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[rinsd]

3. Please the guilt by assoc crap with Farrakan is bogus.

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Lerkfish]

13. and now you throw in Islam. why is this racist garbage here at DU?

I mean, c'mon, really.

[rinsd]

15. Go back to FR.

[democrattotheend]

4. Is this trash official Clinton campaign material?

Or did a supporter post this on the website? I really hope it is the latter.

[Dems Will Win]

8. kick

[Lerkfish]

11. well, you managed to bring up slavery and farrakan in the same obama smear post

good job!

and it didn't sound bigoted at all, not one bit!

:sarcasm:

[rndmprsn]

10. proud to be reccommend #5

on to the greatest page...clintons untruthiness AGAIN!

"he's as bad as me" is not a good defense clinton shills

[Dems Will Win]

16. thanks

[OhioChick]

17. Ohio is Awakening!

K&R
:kick:

[ChromeFoundry]

18. Another recommend! n/t

[OhioChick]

19. Another Video

Courtesy of "antigop" :hi:

Presidential Candidates and H-1B
http://blog.noslaves.com/presidential-candidates-and-h-1b

[KoKo]

20. "Neo-Gore!" .....He is THE ONE!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4779988

[BootinUp]

21. Do you ever post stuff you really believe? Or is it all

political poop spun upside down?

[Nexus7]

22. What H1-B opponents don't get

So the H1-Bs are coming, right? Yeah, so lets take them away. No more H1-Bs!!! All the Americans will get those jobs, right?

Wrong.

Apart from the fact that companies have repeatedly documented they can't fill certain positions without the H1-Bs, understand that if there aren't any of those visas, the jobs themselves will go abroad.

So, people living here, working here, paying taxes, contributing to the economy via their skills, and ideas. Or money going abroad to pay for overseas workers? If the H1s go away, these jobs are not going to go to Americans living here. They are going to go away.

[OhioChick]

24. "companies have repeatedly documented they can't fill certain positions "

If Corporations "Can't Fill Certain Positions" it's Due to Their Slave Labor Wages.

There is No Shortage in the US of Highly Qualified Workers.

Study: There Is No Shortage of U.S. Engineers

A new study argues that the offshoring of U.S. jobs is caused by cost savings and not a shortage of U.S. engineers or better education in China. However, the study warns that the United States is losing its global edge.

A commonly heard defense in the arguments that surround U.S. companies that offshore high-tech and engineering jobs is that the U.S. math and science education system is not producing a sufficient number of engineers to fill a corporations needs.

However, a new study from Duke University calls this argument bunk, stating that there is no shortage of engineers in the United States, and that offshoring is all about cost savings.

This report, entitled "Issues in Science and Technology" and published in the latest National Academy of Sciences magazine further explores the topic of engineering graduation rates of India, China and the United States, the subject of a 2005 Duke study.

In the report, concerns are raised that China is racing ahead of both the United States and India in its ability to perform basic research. It also asserts that the United States is risking losing its global edge by outsourcing critical R&D and India is falling behind by playing politics with education. Meanwhile, it considers China well-positioned for the future.

Dukes 2005 study corrected a long-heard myth about India and China graduating 12 times as many engineers as the United States, finding instead that the United States graduates a comparable number.


http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Careers/Study-There-Is-No-Shortage-of-US-Engineers/

[Dems Will Win]

23. kick

[OhioChick]

25. Informative Site:

Since 1985, over 17 million visas have been issued to allow aliens to work in the United States. These nonimmigrant visas, or NIV, are company sponsored visas that use a variety of different names including H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, J-1, L-1, and TN.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the year 2001, 9 out of every 10 new job openings for computer/IT were taken by H-1Bs, and despite record unemployment the INS issued 312,000 visas in 2002.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the year 2003 the total number of H-1B visas for high-tech workers issued was greater than the total number of high-tech jobs eliminated. Negative job growth in Computer/IT for U.S. citizens can be directly correlated with the huge influx of H-1B visa holders. If it wasn't for H-1B the unemployment rate for Computer/IT workers would be 0%.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H-1B is used to import workers for jobs that American employers claim can't be filled in the "tight American labor market". Their claim is a lie because there are more than enough Americans to fill these jobs. L-1 visas have no yearly quota and may one day surpass H-1B as a means of importing skilled workers.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NIVs such as H-2A and H-2B are being used to import blue collar and agricultural workers and J-1 visas are used by educational and governmental institutions to import foreign workers. TN (NAFTA) visas are used import Canadian and Mexican citizens to work in the United States.

http://www.jobdestruction.com/shameh1b/

[Dems Will Win]

26. kick

[OhioChick]

27. India plans social security pact with US (H1B's-No SS)

India plans social security pact with US (H1B's-No SS)

November 18, 2006 12:15 IST

Overseas Indian Affairs Minister Vayalar Ravi said in New York on Friday that New Delhi is trying to negotiate for an agreement with the Bush Administration under which temporary Indian workers in the US would not have to pay social security taxes.

Talking to a small group of Indian journalists Ravi said during the visit of Belgium prime minister Guy Verhofstadt to India earlier this month an agreement, called social security agreement, was signed with Belgian Foreign Minister under which Indians who would work there for less than five years would have the option of paying their social security taxes in India rather than in Belgium.

'We are also negotiating with the United States for a similar kind of agreement,' Ravi said in response to a question. He said such agreements would also be signed with other European Union countries as well following conclusion of negotiations.

For hundreds of thousands of Indian H1B workers in the US, the mandatory payment of social security tax has been an issue since workers who go back to India after six years of temporary employment in the US either voluntarily or due to lack of sponsorship for permanent residency cannot claim the money they had paid from their earnings. For the permanent residents and citizens, social security acts something like a social insurance program at old age.

http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/nov/18india.htm

[Dems Will Win]

28. kick

[Dems Will Win]

29. kick

[Dems Will Win]

30. kick

[sueragingroz]

31. been watching too much Lou Dobbs?

[Dems Will Win]

32. kick