Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My **theory** : HRC's slide is the result of WJC's greatest success ......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:29 PM
Original message
My **theory** : HRC's slide is the result of WJC's greatest success ......
This clicked for me today when I heard John Lewis's statement about why he is switching from Clinton to Obama. And it wasn't anything substantive to that decision. It was when he said, so tenderly and passionately, how much he loved and respected the Clintons.



It occurred to me at that moment. While Lincoln was the emancipator and Johnson make being black "legal", Bill Clinton was the first president to work actively to truly empower black people.

Barack Obama is the natural next step of that empowerment in 21st century America.

Please note ...... this is a personal theory that came as a shot to me just this afternoon. I'm sure, as some of you read this, you'll find ways to parse my words and interject into your impressions and comments what you think I was thinking when I wrote this. Please take it at face value with no second agenda. If I have somehow disrespected anyone, please know that was not my intent. I am a white guy who can only guess at this sort of thing.

I welcome comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. I have a different theory regarding WJC and SC, but I'll
keep it to myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I didn't really see this connected to SC ..... or any other specific primary event
My thought was on a more esoteric level and it includes recent history all the back to the early Clinton years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw Lewis interviewed on tv today
It was just the end of the interview. He said something about what was happening in the country and how it was massive and historic. Definitely my paraphrase. But it was definitely something monumental in his opinion. And that was why he switched sides.

This would support your assessment which strikes me as entirely plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm going to give this a kick because its a serious post and I'd like to see some discussion of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Personally
I'd give Dean more credit. When he dropped out, Obama was among the first of the 'Dean Dozens,' DFA endorsed, publicized, and raised money for, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think there's some merit to your theory.
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 09:22 AM by sparosnare
Bill Clinton did do his part to advance the cause of minorities in this country; so it would stand to reason that in some way, Barack Obama's success and acceptance are related to that.

I would also like to think as a society, we are advancing as each new generation matures; young people are exposed to a global world where other cultures and behaviors are easily accepted.

Barack Obama represents the global world view IMHO and that's one reason why young people are so drawn to him. He is a forward-thinking, tolerant man who - instead of fighting those we disagree with, is willing to discuss the differences. This country is ready for that now after the last 7 1/2 years of bullying the entire world.

Obama happens to be the right man at the right time; with many different reasons why supporting that statement. He has the opportunity to lead our country and the world forward and I believe he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I saw an interview with Lewis, and it's clear this was a very difficult decision for him
I believe he said something (I don't have the exact words) to the effect of this being more difficult for him than leading the march on Selma, where he was brutally beaten by police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yep, never argued myself personally that WJC was racial just mis-spoke, but yeah Obama is next level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't really see a connection between Bill's policy's and
Obama's career. Could you give some examples for all of us to poor over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Husb2 I follow your train of thought
And can see your idea of why he changed his support. But, there have been things that John Lewis has done that I'm confused about. He initially supported Clinton, then switched to Obama and then back to Clinton, then back to Obama. He's been waffling for quite some time. He's a super delegate and I understand they can switch but am curious why he has waffled so much. This isn't an attacking question, but, just trying to figure out what he's thinking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Competition For His Seat
80% of his district voted for Obama. He is facing stiff competition for his seat for the first time in a long time from a younger candidate who supports Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I think Lewis is really conflicted ......
...... at first by his obvious fondness and respect for the Clintons, then by the trend of the party, then by his loyalty, then by the political realities.

But I wasn't actually talking about Lewis. His statement on teevee was really just the catalyst that sparked this idea in my brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Please explain how BO is the natural next step? I believe this race is about the best candidate,
not the most historically significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I don't think this race is about **any** one thing.
If I were idealistic and completely naive, I might find it to be about one honorable issue. But it isn't.

As to how Obama is the next logical step (assuming my theory is at all valid .... and I'm not sure it is since it is only a theory), he is a black man running on a lot of things, but race simply isn't one of them. However, I hasten to add that, for many of his supporters, I would wager damn near anything that his race **does** matter to them. That can be good or bad, depending on one's view of black people. My theory would hold, then, that for most people for whom race matters, it matters positively.

And some of that credit has to go back to Bill Clinton's actively working to empower black people.

When one discusses this, one can easily magnify this out of proportion to its importance. Even is my theory is valid, it is but one small part of the far, far larger story that we're witnessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Should be, never is - look who is now in the WH. MSM always manipulates the
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 03:19 PM by robbedvoter
electorate - up to a point - then Diebold takes the slack. It's pretty much cooked now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. I wish I had bookmarked the article which addressed this very issue
Something I was reading last week which explained the dynamics of this election re Hillary and Barack. In effect, the author noted in a wry manner that, in regard to the Clintons and their history of dedication to helping minorities overcome obstacles, they invoked the universal law that "no good deed shall go unpunished."

The article was much more in-depth than what I cited, analyzing 4 factors altogether, but he was in agreement with your perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. I partially agree with you, but.....
I don't think Bill Clinton was the first president to actively support empowerment.

In different ways, Eienhower, Kennedy and Johnson all took impoirtant steps to advance civil rights, based on conditions of their times. Johnson especially took the biggest step at perhaps the biggest political cost.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I acknowledge that in my OP
Each step was incremental. Clinton's was the biggest and the smallest. The least and most important. He could not have accomplished what he did were it not for (mostly) Johnson's work. Clinton didn't actually do much, at least not legislatively. Instead, he simply practiced real, tangible empowerment.

And it stuck, even in spite of the intervening years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Armstead, not trying to go off topic but
I just don't see Johnson as being the civil rights advocate. I will agree he signed the civil rights bill but I think JFK had pretty much started things in motion but unfortunately was murdered. I think Johnson was politically pressured to sign the bill than JFK had pretty much ironed out. If you know of things Johnson did for civil rights that were pertinent I'd love to read them. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Here's a reasonablyobjective and balanced overview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. I thought it was because Hillary hired cronies to run her campaign and pissed away all the money
That and assuming she would win by super tuesday and she didn't plan on continuing beyond it.


Ready on day none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks for playing ......
.... and pissing in this thread with some waaaaay off topic candidate shit.

Here, you win the home version of the game ..... go play with yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Lewis has always had my respect
As for your personal note, it is something to realize that what is happening in daily incremental steps in this campaign is someday going to be as significant as Dred Scot, Appomattox, Brown v Board of Education. And with any mass movement that has spontaneous ignition people come to it by different routes. I appreciated you telling us yours. Your kindness in your penultimate sentence in the 4th paragraph is endearing and very rare here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think * gets some credit for Obama being so successful in his run.
The evil one, and his crony in the WH, have turned so many people off in such a major way that the people want a complete break from anything that can remotely be tied to a bush or cheny. Unfortunately for Hillary, the clinton name will always be tied to the bush name, and many people want to avoid the constant stream of scandals that happened in the 90s. It doesn't matter who's fault they were, but what matters is people are sick of them and don't want a repeat history.

IMO, Obama represents a MAJOR break from the past. It is icing on the cake that not only is he qualified to be a president, but that he will also make an excellent president.


Texas is Obama country! VIVA OBAMA!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-MVU4vtU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm not so sure that accrues solely to Obama .....
I suspect the Bush animosity would have benefited almost anyone we could have run pretty much equally. No doubt Obama's being helped by Bush, but that's not the only reason he's doing so well. (And neither is my theory, if correct, the only reason.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bushie media, bushie money and bushie voters in open primaries - that's my theory
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 03:15 PM by robbedvoter
It'll probably get confirmed in GE - as this was just phase one of get rid of Dems plan.

As for disloyalty/ peer pressure - I let the individuals involved wrestle with their own conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC