Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Whining about the order of questions presidential?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:42 PM
Original message
Is Whining about the order of questions presidential?
I don't think it is. If Hillary truly felt she was up to the task, then she would have sucked it up and answered the questions regardless of order. The media was in the tank for her two months ago when she was the frontrunner and in the late nineties, and she now wants to play the victim? Bullshit. Step up or shut up, Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. She was right to speak up.
As much as we speak up against the press, Wrong or right she showed her guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. You have a great future as a Democratic campaign consultant
I bet Hillary would pay you 5 million a month for that kind of advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thanks, but I would screw up her order for an assorted box of donuts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You mean those $1600 donuts?
I'd like to try them as well. I bet they're EXTRA yummy.

Mmmmm... you can taste the defeat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. how was the order determined?
anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Last night, I don't know, but the previous one in Austin, it was decided by
coin flip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. well that begs the question
Why are coins against Hillary Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Coins are Sexist!
I mean, the only people we put on our coins are men...must be sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. she's getting unfair treatment. a WHOLE segment from Jim Lehrer
where she got to spout her talking points tonight. Boo hoo, Hillary. It's not handed to you--you have to earn it. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. She has become a caricature.
Most of all, she comes off as un-presidential and has the misfortune of standing next to someone who owns presidential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. yup. Obama needs to wipe her out in Texas
then all the "comeback" talk is over. Onto Mccain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I agree.
He needs to bring it and shut her down.

We've got work to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was a dumb move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Compared to confusing television comedy with reality like Dan Qualye did
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 11:05 PM by rocknation
Yes.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's not the issue. Matthews had to make the point; she has received far & away...
the majority of opening questions. Perhaps everyone was deferring to the lady. Perhaps everyone was letting her take what's called 'point' in combat. But when you're asked to take point night after night after night, I'd think you'd pretty soon get the impression that someone wasn't just being nice. But habitually tossing you out front to get shot first.

Why not spread it around? What's wrong with being fair? Draw straws or something, sheesh! Doesn't mean you're not ready to be president. After 20 debates, it just indicates she understands not only the game, but knows from where this stuff emanates. And she finally called them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama Has Come Into His Own
I think Sen. Clinton has maintained a fairly high level of debating, but the Obama of the first debate is vastly different than the Presidential presence he now commands on the stage. He went from a cub to a lion.

I don't think it is so much that Clinton is doing a bad job as he is doing a much more effective job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. You are whining.
She was complaining and why not? This is a campaign.

The even delivery of questions in a debate can be crucial.

It was a debate and the M$M isn't fair to many issue's,

and they haven't been objective in these primaries either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. lol. and not running for president.
EVERYONE is laughing at that dumb approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, it was definitely presidential.
It's exactly what the shrub would have done right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. When same party candidates debate, they often agree on issues.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 11:41 PM by Divernan
It is therefore a significant advantage to answer first. You get to show off your knowledge of the issue and present your solution/approach to dealing with it. The later candidates, who often are largely in agreement on at least several issues, are reduced to stating they on the whole agree with you. If candidates disagree on an issue, there is also an advantage to going first because if the listening audience finds your answer persuasive, it is harder for subsequent speakers to get them to change their minds.

I heard/read many commentators today who thought it was a tactical error on her part to complain about the order of questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. depends on what you want to be president of I suppose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. I thought it was a childish tantrum
In a debate, if you know what you're doing, it doesn't really matter if you go first or second. You can frame the answer to your own way if you answer first and if you are second, you can actually be at a disadvantage due to the argument being framed.

Despite all that, if the other person says something you want to counter, you can respond no matter whether you went first or second.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. What I find funny, having been on debate clubs and teams
Is that the first position is the one that is always considered advantageous. You get to set the tone, tenor, and to some extent the agenda of the debate. This is a pretty important advantage since you're putting your opponent at a disadvantage right out of the box. Yet Hillary whines and complains about it:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Look At This
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Whining or not - it didn't work for her. Someone told her to get that in there - and it backfired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlotta Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. Dan Abrams's pointed out that....
Hillary gets the first question 75% of the time. And that is NOT an advantage. The person who goes second gets to either rebut her points or to add to them.

Most of the time, she makes a great first answer and Obama merely says he agrees with her. He repeats everything she says and adds a little dash of this or that to make it seem like his own answer.

I would have given anything to hear him answer the question about Putin's successor and hear his original thoughts (if he had any)....and to come up with the guy's name. Instead, as usual, he said "I agree with Hillary" and parroted everything she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC