Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe Spin, Maybe Not, Axelrod lowers expectations, Clinton leading in internal TX and OH polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:19 PM
Original message
Maybe Spin, Maybe Not, Axelrod lowers expectations, Clinton leading in internal TX and OH polls
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/02/27/ST2008022703658.html?sid=ST2008022703658

Inside the Obama team, the mood Wednesday was a mixture of relief that the last scheduled debate with Clinton was over, believing their candidate delivered a solid performance, and wariness about where the Ohio and Texas races were headed.

"We believe we're going to do well, but we just don't know," said David Axelrod, Obama's senior political adviser. Given the many twists and turns of the Democratic race so far, he added, "I don't think anyone at this point feels comfortable making predictions."

Internal polling showed Obama still trailing in both states, although the gap was narrowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The gap is narrowing. That's what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It's all in the trend.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. Yep. The trend signals an Obama win. I can't wait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I hope so, but let's not get too confident
Keep phone banking, or travel to OH or TX if you can. We can't get complacent or overconfident here. We are still about 5 points down in Ohio, and I think that Obama has to win Ohio or at least come close to avoid concerns about his viability there in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. There are only 5 days left...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Everybody "knows him" already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gap is narrowing dramatically and quickly
He's virtually tied in Texas, if not pulling ahead, and is coming up fast in Ohio. Polls have place him somewhere between four and eleven percent behind Hillary in Ohio earlier this week, way up from the twenty one points he was down a month ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. so did the California polls a week before super tuesday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. and what was that you kept on saying about California? OH! That's right, early voting.
Early voting that started when it was name recognition.

Your girl needs to win Texas and Ohio by 15 points. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Something important happens the day before Texas and Ohio.
What was it? I can't remember.

Oh yeah, the Rezko trial.

I wonder if the news will make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yup, and many other polls in states that Obama won
That does indeed seem to be his MO. Sometimes, as in California, he comes up short, however most of the time he's won out:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. are internals more reliable than other polls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Are any polls "reliable"?
Give me any poll taken, internal or external, and I can hit it six ways from Sunday proving that it is "unreliable" Why? Because all polls are based on probabilities arising from various different populations of people polled. That always leaves a large room for error there, who did you poll, what weight did you give them, how many etc. That's always why it's best to consult a wide range of polls hence I gave you the range from 4-11:shrug: I seriously doubt that internal polls are, in all honesty any better than other reputable polls, especially since campaign generally higher reputable pollsters or polling firms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes, they are.
But since this article is second hand information, we don't know if it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. well someone from the campaign said they were down. i guess someone on their campaign
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 11:55 PM by loveangelc
let that slip? I say that because hillary seems rather confident she'll win both states so im guessing her internal polls show the same thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No, I guess somebody on their campaign came up with a reasonable number
And decided to go with it. That's the thing, polling is an inexact science, the best you or anybody else can do is come up with a reasonable number, put a ± on it and go with it, knowing all along it's much more likely than not that it's wrong:shrug:

One thing is known, despite the fuzziness of the numbers, is that Obama is coming up quickly from behind, which has been a trend of his all along, one that he's won with. It's certainly not a trend that the Clinton camp should feel comfortable with at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. Unfortunately negative media cycles is idamaging efforts in both states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. A Tracking Poll that came out yesterday showing Hillary up 3 now has her down 1
He is now ahead there according to early voting, and will probably take the lead in the poll tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Which state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Texas...here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton at risk of losing Latino vote
Commentary: Clinton at risk of losing Latino vote

Now, with the all-important Texas primary approaching on March 4th, Obama is trailing Clinton with Latinos in the Lone Star state but he's making inroads there.

There is even a "Viva Obama" video featuring a group of mariachis singing the candidate's praises. Obama's recent success with Latinos is evidence that Hillary's support in that community is a mile wide and an inch thick.

That's understandable. Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton has done much for Latinos in their public careers, and most of the support they enjoy from that community comes from brand loyalty -- the same thing that keeps Latinos coming back to one kind of laundry detergent keeps them coming back to the Clinton name.

In this election, Hillary has tarnished the brand with mistakes. During a debate in Los Angeles, she answered a question by pitting undocumented Latino immigrants against African-Americans.

She blamed jobs losses on "employers who exploit undocumented workers and drive down wages." And she mentioned an African-American who told her that he used to have construction jobs but now "the only people who get them anymore are people who are here without documentation."

Faced with the same question, Obama pointed out that African-Americans had high unemployment rates long "before the latest round of immigrants showed up" and cautioned against using the immigration issue to divide Americans.

Obama also insisted -- to rousing applause -- that blaming immigrants for unemployment among blacks amounts to "scapegoating" and said he wouldn't tolerate it. Score one for Obama. You can almost hear the mariachis warming up.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/27/navarette.opinion/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yep......
Those in Texas are getting informed on time! Thank goodness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Undocumented workers and their families KNOW they are being exploited
but have no leverage because they are here illegally.

Hillary is going to allow them to get documented, assimilate, pay a small fine as they can afford it and take away the ground upon which the exploitative employers prosper.

Yeah, that is really bad for Latinos. :eyes:

They know the issues in their lives better than a political hack.

Only the great uniter Obama would think of trying to spin Hillary's position on this as pitting one race against another, divisive.

God, I hate this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. But not give them Driver's Licenses
Yeah that makes sense. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I would assume after they became citizens, they could enjoy all
privileges.

The main issue is that she was not pitting race against race and that her policy on this will help raise everyone's take home except the exploiters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. I know who I want to win, I will hope for the best.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. What happens if Hillary wins both states by 5+ % .... Will Obama supporters
still want her to drop out, or will they acknowledge the race continues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. I think with a combo of huge crowds and hard work he should get there. Not taking it for granted...
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 01:50 AM by cooolandrew
taking it for granted though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. Trailing is too strong a word.
More like neck and neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Since you claim intimate knowledge of the Obama internals referred to as "trailing", please share
"Internal polling showed Obama still trailing in both states, although the gap was narrowing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. I doubt very, very much if Axelrod would let on if their internals
show Obama leading. Lowering expectations seems to be something he plays at- as do most campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. Either way, unless Obama tanks, and looses TX and OH by more than 30...
...percentage points, it's a loss for HRC because she'll still loose ground in the Delegate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Intriguing... you claim that if she wins both by exactly 30% she will lose net delegates?
Good to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. Hey Herman....
I think it's the 'negative spin' (like the negative sell). They're lowering expectations to make
the wipe out ever stronger. Thepress just plays along with this crap...forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
36. For obvious reasons, they want to squash the idea of Obama as front runner.
Since being dubbed the presumed candidate, he's been trashed 24/7 by MSM. It goes with the territory, but there are advantages to being the underdog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC