Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real deal is that want to shut the door and exclude overflow crowds at Texas Caucuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:32 AM
Original message
The real deal is that want to shut the door and exclude overflow crowds at Texas Caucuses
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 10:12 AM by Perky
Apparently they want the abity to close the doors and exclude people who are not in the room even if it is overflowed.....There are rules which allow the caucus leader to move the event outside and they are protesting the rule.

Suing Texas?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/
On a conference call earlier this week, Clinton field director Guy Cecil reportedly took a hard enough line on the Texas caucuses that the Texas Democratic Party sent a letter (.pdf) to both campaigns warning that any lawsuit would be a "tragedy" that could "cripple the momentum of a resurging Texas Democratic Party."

Caucuses in the past have been chaotic and overcrowded. I was told by a participant in the call that Clinton's representative specifically refused to agree in advance to moving elements of the process outdoors if the caucuses sites are over capacity.




Officials: Clinton aides threatened lawsuit over Texas caucuses

BY JAY ROOT
McClatchy Newspapers

The Texas Democratic Party warned Thursday that election night caucuses scheduled for next Tuesday could be delayed or disrupted after aides to Hillary Clinton threatened to sue over the party's complicated delegate selection process.

In a letter sent out late Thursday to both the Clinton and Barack Obama campaigns, Texas Democratic Party lawyer Chad Dunn warned a lawsuit could ruin the Democrats' effort to re-energize voters just as they are turning out in record numbers.

Spokesmen for both campaigns said there were no plans to sue ahead of the March 4 election.

"It has been brought to my attention that one or both of your campaigns may already be planning or intending to pursue litigation against the Texas Democratic Party,'' Dunn wrote in the letter, obtained by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. "Such action could prove to be a tragedy for a reinvigorated Democratic process.''

Democratic sources said both campaigns have made it clear that they might consider legal options over the complicated delegate selection process, which includes both a popular vote and evening caucuses. But the sources made it clear that the Clinton campaign in particular had warned of an impending lawsuit.

"Both campaigns have made it clear that they would go there if they had to, but I think the imminent threat is coming from one campaign,'' said one top Democratic official, referring to the Clinton campaign. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity.

Another Democratic official who was privvy to the discussions confirmed that Clinton representatives made veiled threats in a telephone call this week.

"Officials from Sen. Clinton's campaign at several times throughout the call raised the specter of 'challenging the process,' the official said. "The call consisted of representatives from both campaigns and the Democratic Party.''

The source, who asked not to identified by name because he did not have authorization to speak about the matter, said Clinton 's political director, Guy Cecil, had forcefully raised the possibility of a courtroom battle.

But Adrienne Elrod, Clinton's top Texas spokeswoman, said campaign and party officials had merely discussed election night procedures and that the campaign was merely seeking a written agreement in advance. She could not elaborate on the details of the agreement the Clinton campaign is seeking.

"It is our campaign's standard operating procedure that we need to see what we are agreeing to in writing before we agree to it,'' Elrod said. "No legal action is being taken. We have no reason to take any legal action.''

Obama spokesman Josh Earnest said the Obama campaign had no plans to sue.

"We're confident that by working closely with the Texas Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign we'll have a caucus that Texans can be proud of — because every eligible voter will be allowed to participate and have their vote counted in a timely manner," Earnest said.

The letter to the two campaigns did not specify what procedures or rules might trigger a lawsuit. But one party official said the campaigns were most concerned about the caucus process, or, as the party refers to it, the "precinct conventions.''

Texas has 228 delegates, the biggest single cache remaining. But only 126 delegates are doled out based on the selection voters make at the ballot box. Another 67 delegates — more than in many states — are to be apportioned based on the number of people who participate in the caucuses that begin in over 8,000 precincts once the polls close at 7 p.m. (The remaining 35 are so-called "superdelegates'' free to support whomever they choose).

Clinton campaign aides have argued that caucuses favor Obama, whose campaign organization has turned out overwhelming numbers at caucuses in other states.



Democrats have described the enthusiasm in Texas, as evidenced by the record turnout among early voters in the most populous counties, as a sign that the party is undergoing a revival after years of decline under virtually unchallenged Republican rule.

"If it is true that litigation is imminent between one or both of your campaigns and the (Democratic Party), such action coule prove to be a tragedy for a reinvigorated democratic process that is involving a record number of participants here in Texas and across the nation,'' Dunn, the state party lawyer, wrote.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. The system benefits the candidate with the best ground game -
the candidate who is better able to get their supporters to the polls.

This is the reason they're threating; Clinton's ground game is non-existent here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Texas Officials better FIX their SYSTEM --- or TEXAS WON'T COUNT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why wasn't this an issue a year ago? Oh, that's right, because no
one even knew about it a year ago, because they weren't paying attention. They had it in the bag or so they thought.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=108&topic_id=125768
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. The Texas system worked just fine for BC in 1992.
Previous largess

With the last tones of a mariachi band hanging in the air at a rally in Odessa, he launched into his critique. "Frankly, the party leaders set this up," he said. "They knew nobody else would go to these conventions, and they could make sure they had a fair share of the folks that went to the national convention."

"It was never intended to basically reverse the results of a popular election in the daytime," warned the former president. "But it could happen."

What Clinton fails to mention is that in 1992, when he first ran for the White House, Texas and its hybrid system were very good to him. He captured 66 percent of the primary vote over his leading rival that year, former Sen. Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts, and won 94 of the pledged delegates at stake in the primary while Tsongas took 31 -- a 3-to-1 margin that Sen. Clinton can only dream about today.

And in the caucuses, which allocated another 69 pledged delegates, Clinton ended up walking away with 63. His campaign outperformed Tsongas in large part because he was supported by many of the "party leaders" -- such as the chairman of the Texas Democratic Party at the time, Bob Slagle, and two of Slagle's predecessors, Calvin Guest and Billy Goldberg -- whom Clinton seems to chastise today.


more... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23339362/

Thanks to JustinL for linking this article in another thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. From David Van Os, from his Kos Diary
Yet when it suits her purposes she now claims that the Texas Democratic primary process is completely new to her and is bizarre and incomprehensible. That is such bullshit.


We have had basically the same process of precinct conventions as far back as when she and Bill were the Texas state campaign directors for the McGovern campaign in 1972.


So Hillary, you are familiar with Texas Democrats when it suits you to claim you are one of us to get our votes, then you are unfamiliar with us when it suits you to trash our process.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/29/13757/5999?


David ran for the Texas Attorney General last election cycle. He is very smart and knows TEXAS LAW...

Go read the rest of the article and comments very informative.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. I'm all for fixing a bad system, but you have to wonder about a candidate...
...who suddenly wants to fix something when it benefits him or her, but is AWOL when it comes to the illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation and approving neanderthal Extreme Court Justices.

Just sayin.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Why? We've had this system for a long time, and it benefitted Bill Clinton in 1992.
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 10:31 AM by sparosnare
Hillary's just pissed she doesn't have a ground game here and is playing dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Why don't we just ditch Hillary in the Gulf of Mexico instead!
Sharks are migrating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Clintons ignore process when they think they benefit and sue AFTERWARDS when they realize
it won't.

We wouldn't be having all this party chaos if Clinton was winning - they are treating Dem party the way Bushes treat GOP, as a VEHICLE for them and get pissed when any other Dem gains an advantage using the rule book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Very astute observation.
Apparently they want the abity to close the doors and exlude people who are not in the room even if it is overflowed.....There are rules which allow the cauceus leader to mover the vent outside. and they are protesting the rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "I had no idea how bizarre it is. We have grown men crying over it."
-- Hillary on the Texas voting system.

http://www.caller.com/news/2008/feb/27/pres-_two_step_s...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. If POLITICAL ANIMALS like TeamClinton can't handle a state voting process why trust them with
the handling of serious matters like open government? Besides, the last time we trusted them, they sided with BushInc and its powerful cronies by protecting their secrecy and privilege throughout the 90s. That led directly to Bush2, 9-11 and this Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm a Texas voter, and I hope someone sues. The way it's set up is
absolutely ridiculous. A primary AND a caucus?! I hope they do away with the caucus crap...

And on a different note, I early voted yesterday on our electronic voting machines (we used to have paper ballots up until the last election), and that's another thing I'd like to see them do away with. It's pretty unsettling to push a button and watch the screen go blank & just hope it actually worked & will count with no way to know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Electronic voting is crap. Keep the caucuses.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Turnout for caucuses would be much lower, though. We have
such a big turnout because we have plenty of time for early voting before the actual primary, allowing people to go whenever it's convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Well then, the caucus it's not just about the delegates
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 09:45 PM by MagickMuffin
The Precinct Convention also known as the caucus is where WE the voters can present resolutions to the PC, from there they are presented to the Senate District Convention, and then all the way to the State Convention.

This is where OUR voices are heard.

You should mosey over to the Texas Forum to learn more about the stages of the Precinct Convention. There are some very active DUers there, who can help you better educate yourself on the subject.

On the topic of electronic machines there are resolutions being presented.

The link provided has several good resolutions that you can print out and present at your precinct.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=180x47587


Edit: crappy sentence structure.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. You cannot change the rules after you lose. Where was this outrage when she had Texas as a firewall?
No one ever complained until it looked like she wouldnt win it.

Will Hillary also start complaining about the electoral college and how it is biased for McCain before the general election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yep Electoral College votes don't count either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. If you are "the Clintons," apparently you can
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, goody, more attempted voter suppression in the works
Let's hope this is going nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Voter suppression is right out of the Rovian/Republican playbook. Way to go, Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. I think the Clinton campaign is being hypocritical. On one hand
the want the delegates seated from MI and Fl so as not to disenfranchise the voters in those states and on the other hand want to shut people out of the caucuses (conventions) in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. I suppose it is possible that in some precincts O supporters could so overwhelm C supporter
that they might not even get the 15% viability threshhold. and they could pull anoththe 70/30 split at the caucues and leading to a Texas delegate landlslide even if the Primary vote itself is much closer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. That woman is beginning to chap my ass
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. ROFL ! Best. Comment. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Me too. Well put. I've gone from mild distaste to active dislike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Sigh
Hopefully tuesday we can put this shit to bed once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Texas DNC members Super delegates are listed here
Clinton
Rep. Henry Cuellar
DNC Norma Fisher Flores
Rep. Gene Green
Rep. Ruben Hinojosa
DNC David Holmes
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee
DNC Denise Johnson
DNC Sue Lovell
Rep. Solomon Ortiz
Rep. Silvestre Reyes
DNC Bob Slagle
Ldr. Jim Wright


Obama

Rep. Lloyd Doggett
Rep. Chet Edwards
Rep. Charlie Gonzalez
Rep. Al Green
Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson
DNC Moses Mercado
DNC Senfronia Thompson

Uncommitted

DNC Roy LaVerne Brooks
DNC Linda Chavez-Thompson
DNC Yvonne Davis
DNC Al Edwards
DNC Jaime Gonzalez Jr.
DNC David Hardt
Rep. Nick Lampson
DNC Robert Martinez
DNC John Patrick
DNC Boyd Richie
DNC Betty Richie
Rep. Ciro Rodriguez
Ldr. Bob Strauss

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Call or email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. This is probably what Clinton demanded in the "written agreement". Unfreakinbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. So Veruca Clinton gets her ass kicked, again, and is now bitching about it?
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 10:47 AM by Independent-Voter
No surprises here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hillary won't stop suing till she steals the nomination (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. Talk about bad press: "We're going to change the rules at the last minute..."
"If they hurt our candidate"

That's not gonna get them any sympathy votes. Truly, I don't normally buy into the "Hillary is out to ruin the party" line, but you gotta wonder what she's even thinking about here. This is loony that its even come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. Consistent with Clinton strategy
"Democrats have described the enthusiasm in Texas, as evidenced by the record turnout among early voters in the most populous counties, as a sign that the party is undergoing a revival after years of decline under virtually unchallenged Republican rule."

But it won't revive enough by this general election to swing Texas Blue. Bill Clinton abandoned Red state Democrats in both of his general elections and in his DNC stategy. And Hillary Clinton fought strongly against the DNC's current 50 State Strategy.

So this point, that the suit would hurt the Texas Democratic Party, will have zero influence on the Clintons' decision.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
32. I thought Clinton didn't like caucuses because not enough people showed up.
Now she doesn't like them because too many people show up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
33. Yeah! Enough with the speeches & big rallies!
This is so typical of her messages "in public."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
34. The Clinton's once again trying to change the rules in the fourth quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. How many more ways can Hillary shoot herself in the foot I wonder?
The possibilities now seem endless.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
36. Notice how there is not a single Clintonbot retort on this thread??
This apparently is not even defensible by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. STILL NOT A SINGLE SNIDE COMMENT???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
40. Give the Clinton campaign credit for having mastered at least one thing:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC