Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING CSPAN-Reuters/Houston Chronicle poll: Clinton surges in Texas/Obama surges in Ohio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:05 AM
Original message
BREAKING CSPAN-Reuters/Houston Chronicle poll: Clinton surges in Texas/Obama surges in Ohio
Reuters/C-SPAN/Houston Chronicle Poll: Democrats Locked in Tight Races: Clinton Closes on Obama in Texas; Pair Deadlocked in Ohio
Republican John McCain retains wide leads in Ohio and Texas in advance of Tuesday's primaries
UTICA, New York—Democrat Hillary Clinton stemmed her losses and solidified her base in Texas, reversing a slide against rival Barack Obama in the race for their party’s presidential nomination, while Obama continued his thrust to catch her in Ohio as voters in these two big states prepare to vote on Tuesday, the latest Reuters/C-SPAN/Houston Chronicle two-day rolling telephone tracking polls show.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain appears to be continuing his march to the GOP nomination, holding big leads in both states, the surveys show.

Clinton leads by a scant one percent among Texas women, but the race is also close among Texas men, where Obama leads by just 5%, much less than in some earlier states in this epic Democratic Party battle. As has been the case elsewhere, Clinton leads among older voters, but Obama leads big among younger Texas Democrats. Clinton had a big day Friday in the Zogby call center, leading Obama by double-digits in the Texas survey. She retains a significant lead among Hispanic voters there, a key demographic in the Democratic primary.

Texas - Democrats
2-27/29
2-26/28

Clinton
43%
42%

Obama
45%
48%

Gravel
<1%
<1%

Someone else
3%
3%

Not sure
8%
7%


In Ohio, the two Democrats have drawn dead-even to the tenth of a percent (44.8% each), as Clinton continued to show strength in northern Ohio outside Cleveland, but trailed Obama badly in northeast Ohio and in burgeoning central Ohio, where the capital city of Columbus is home to many state government workers. Clinton leads in the more sparsely-populated, less affluent southern Ohio region. She also retains a small lead among Catholics, an important voting bloc in this Rust Belt state.

Ohio - Democrats
2-27/29
2-26/28

Clinton
45%
44%

Obama
45%
42%

Gravel
1%
1%

Someone else
3%
5%

Not sure
6%
9%


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's all about the ground game now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. The bottom line hear is shes not going to win either state by 65% to stop his delegate lead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's Zogby - I don't buy any of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Zogby blows
IM still smarting from his famous OHIO and FLORIDA "trending Kerry" on election night. Christ he got that wrong and has pretty much sucked since. The Poll of the Polls is a better indication as long as you keep in mind the Keith Number
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Every poll is pretty much within the margin of error at this point
In general, that's good for Obama considering of the ground he had to make up. Now, it's really just a question of who wins the beauty pageant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Funny how he doesn't mention the african american vote which is a factor in DELEGATES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Interesting
leading Obama by double-digits in the Texas survey.

Last minute HRC surge back from the dead???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. She went from 42% to 43%--1% is a "surge"?
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 01:12 AM by wienerdoggie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No but see my above post
She had a huge night on Friday, leading by double digits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
45. Obama supporters aren't sitting at home by their phones on a Friday night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Hillary does seem to be surging in TX- the Belo poll showed that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. The Belo poll that was posted wasn't a "surge" either--they are
in a statistical dead heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. That has nothing to do with whether or not a candidate is surging
Surge=sharp rise in support or closing the gap with a combination of a rise in support and a decline for an opponent. Where was she prior to that poll? If she came from behind to make it a dead heat that is arguably a surge. It certainly is real progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. After Zogby fucked up CA i don't know if I trust him from what i hear in TX
young voters are voting in masses he might be under polling the younger voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
43. zogby has been in the middle, if you take out CA they are near the top


The survey found Obama leading 48.2 percent to 41.7 percent over Clinton statewide. The poll, conducted Tuesday through Thursday for the Houston Chronicle, Reuters and C-SPAN by Zogby International, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

I read the numbers this morning and it showed Obama ahead in every demographic but hispanics (including women)

The Zogby poll is almost exactly the same as the average over the last 10 polls which shows O 47.5 and C 44.4


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is this the poll you are talking about?? Poll: McCain and Obama lead in Texas
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5580776.html

Feb. 29, 2008, 2:23AM
Poll: McCain and Obama lead in Texas
Huckabee is still defiant; Clinton maintains hold on Hispanic vote


If so, then the titles don't seem to match, huh?? Wonder why?




Texas is Obama country! VIVA OBAMA!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-MVU4vtU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. she only has 7.5% of the black vote DAMN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sorry but these day-to-day surveys with wildly fluctuating results seem like...
bullshit to me.

If the results are consistent for three days in a row, then I'll believe them.

Big double digit changes over the course of 24 hours suggest a big changing event or (more likely) a questionable survey system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Writes3000
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 01:19 AM by Tropics_Dude83
First to the poster before you, I call it a surge based on the fact that she led by double digits in the Friday portion of the survey.

Now to you, there was a game changer today. It was the "nuclear" Clinton red phone moment ad. Apparently, it worked and it worked big.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. 1%=surge
Yeah. It worked, big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Again read the article
She LED by double digits last night in the Friday portion.

Anyway, this Obama surge in Ohio is awesome news. Two new polls, one U of C, one Zogby, showing him tied or leading now. Sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Oh, I thought you were saying that CLINTON surged.
nvm then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Sorry, I don't believe it.
One commercial is causing such huge double digits changes from Obama leading by double digits to Hillary leading by double digits?

These would have to be the most indecisive, easily influenced voters ever. Don't buy it.

Again, I question the polling methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. where did she lead by double digits?? Not Texas since she is behind Obama
and the only figures I see in the article have it at single digit lead for Hillary.

"The tracking poll in Ohio showed a close race, with Clinton leading 44.1 percent to 41.5 percent over Obama. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.8 percentage points."

Where does it state she lead by double digits in this poll? You have to be using another poll. What is the link to that one.



Texas is Obama country! VIVA OBAMA!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-MVU4vtU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. He/she is saying that the polls for Friday night...
Have Hillary winning by double-digits. It's in the article. Read it closely. It means that tonight's numbers vary significantly from last night's number or the numbers from the day before that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. wow, people are basing surge talk on this type of proof??
"Clinton leads by a scant one percent among Texas women, but the race is also close among Texas men, where Obama leads by just 5%, much less than in some earlier states in this epic Democratic Party battle. As has been the case elsewhere, Clinton leads among older voters, but Obama leads big among younger Texas Democrats. Clinton had a big day Friday in the Zogby call center, leading Obama by double-digits in the Texas survey. She retains a significant lead among Hispanic voters there, a key demographic in the Democratic primary."


I can't wait to see how that one was done.

Thanks for pointing it out too me. I was trying to find some graph to show that!! LOL




Texas is Obama country! VIVA OBAMA!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-MVU4vtU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wonder what the polls are going to look like on Monday with the news of..
this supposed lawsuit Clinton wants to stop the Caucus in TX it seems she doesn't like state rules on how they run there primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. There is no "surge" here
1 percent is not a surge. I'm not denying that HRC is gaining momentum in Texas: it's possible. But this poll is not good evidence of it. All it shows is that there are much more undecideds than there were yesterday.

One day tracking polls are useless without days and days of data to show that there is a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. If you look at the tone of the Zogby article,
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 01:26 AM by Tropics_Dude83
HRC "reconnecting with her voters, expanding leads", etc., there are good signs for her there.

The good news is that if she won Ohio and Obama won TX, she'd say the democrats can't win TX in the GE and can win OH, so TX doesn't matter.

She can't say that about Ohio. I'd take a Obama victory in Ohio even if someone told me it would entail losing TX significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. One day tracking polls are notoriously unreliable
I'd advise for you not to overreact and to wait for two or three more days of data before we say Hillary is surging in Texas.

Likewise for Obama in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Deal n/t:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Where's the link?
I'd like to see the article where you got your info. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. http://www.zogby.com thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
24. remember Zogby had NJ all tied up and Clinton won by about seven points so he's sometimes
off the mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Zogby had Obama with a big lead in CA--was wayyyy off there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
47. He had Mittens winning CA too. That's how I knew it was bogus. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
26. Reflecting the on-the-ground situation in Ohio, finally
Look everyone... northern Ohio is HillaryLand... institutional, hard-core Democratic support.

Gets much more difficult to poll downstate in Central and Southern Ohio. We're in a race to the finish. I'll be canvassing Cincinnati all day Saturday and Sunday, and back to the basics all day Tuesday, Election Day.

Volunteers are flooding in. If Ohio will be won by Obama, it's going to happen Columbus and South. Watch for it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Remember Missouri
If Obama can carry MO, IL and WI, he should be able to carry Ohio albeit extremely narrowly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. He's had less time to organize here than in other states.
That's my only trepidation... Clinton has the party machinery on her side. Obama can only beat her on the ground, and do it from Columbus south, east and west.

It's looking good, if you ask me. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I forgot about the machine:( ugh
Yes, that is an unfortunate advantage of hers:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. The Ohio River counties and the Greater Cleveland area are areas...
where Obama is going to have a tough time. Keeping the margins of defeat down in those areas could be a sign of good things for Obama in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. On election night, watch for Dayton, Cincinnati, Columbus, Athens...
... look at every region outside of Cleveland/Youngstown/Akron/Canton. And I even feel good about those areas... but if we're playing it safe, look at the state south of Columbus to go big for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KLee Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. l
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
38. I'm not sure, but I think "surge" is sexist. n/t
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. good one
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
42. Don't trust daily tracking polls.
Especially just one day sample sizes. I do not think either Clinton or Obama are surging in either Ohio or Texas and it will level out, I guarantee it.

Remember, the Monday before the Wisconsin primary, there was an apparent "surge" to Clinton in the Gallup tracking poll. It proved to be an anomaly. If by Sunday Clinton continues building a lead in this poll, then you can say it's more than an anomaly, but right now it's pointless to use one day of polling as evidence of any type of surge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
46. Everybody seems to be paying attention to the Texas numbers, but...
if HRC is "surging" in Texas it seems like Obama is gaining huge ground in Ohio. He must have had a big day there on Friday too. But the thing is lets see where the trends lead. One day in a tracking poll is not going to tell the story. If it continues over the next few days then there may be a trend, but we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC