Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's simple: I would have supported Hillary if she voted against the IWR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:20 PM
Original message
It's simple: I would have supported Hillary if she voted against the IWR
Post here if you agree.

That's it, Hillary supporters. That's why I'm not supporting her. No sexism, no "infatuation" with Obama, no concern about her likability. She did not make the right choice when she had a chance to save us from this war.

The fact that she now tries to present herself as some kind of expert on foreign affairs just rubs salt in the wound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then you should read what BO himself said about her vote:
2006 -- Statement by Senator Barack Obama on the subjects of Senator Hillary Clinton and the Iraq War Vote, New Yorker Magazine:

"You know, I think very highly of Hillary. The more I get to know her, the more I admire her. I think she’s the most disciplined—one of the most disciplined people—I’ve ever met. She’s one of the toughest. She’s got an extraordinary intelligence. And she is, she’s somebody who’s in this stuff for the right reasons. She’s passionate about moving the country forward on issues like health care and children. So it’s not clear to me what differences we’ve had since I’ve been in the Senate.

"I think what people might point to is our different assessments of the war in Iraq, although I’m always careful to say that I was not in the Senate, so perhaps the reason I thought it was such a bad idea was that I didn’t have the benefit of U.S. intelligence. And, for those who did, it might have led to a different set of choices. So that might be something that sort of is obvious. But, again, we were in different circumstances at that time: I was running for the U.S. Senate, she had to take a vote, and casting votes is always a difficult test."

read more. . .

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you for the thoughtful response
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:27 PM by senseandsensibility
I had read that quote before, and I am under no illusion that Obama absolutely would have done the right thing. Also, as you can see from my avatar, I support a candidate who voted the same way as Hillary. Unlike her, he apologized and recognized his mistake. In a perfect world, I would choose Kucinich, or someone else with a flawless record on this issue. But now that it is down to these two candidates, I can not select the one that had the power and made the wrong choice, especially since she does not even recognize her mistake. I do not accept her waffling at the last debate as recognition of her mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. He cosponsored the damn thing
I'm sorry, but I have a hard time trusting Edwards' sincerity since he cosponsored the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Sorry you feel that way about Hillary, but she's not a saint, she
doesn't walk on water and she can't please everyone at every minute all the time. She's human. I wouldn't have voted for the war sitting here in my armchair, but I wasn't briefed with the intellicgence reports. How was she and 77 other senators to know that the Pres. and all his people including Colin Powell were lying? For your children's sake I hope they never make a mistake you can't get over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Best and most educated response to original post..retrospect is a great teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. He has changed his tune--now he is using it against her and his supporters are doing the same. Both
are being hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. 22 other Dems and 1 Independent Senator had access to the...
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:38 PM by RiverStone
...same U.S, intelligence, and saw through the smoke and mirrors and voted NO. Obama's words are gracious, but we will never know had he read the same intelligence, if he would have exercised the same wisdom that the 23 Senators (and many more in Congress) had in voting NO.

I suspect Obama would have joined the NO voters who like most DUers, felt at the time it was an authorization for Shrub to war.

In the end, this is all conjecture. What's real is Hillary voted YES - and she has never said it was a mistake. No amount of speculation will change that simple fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Bush violated the "IWR" he didn't follow the law - how is *that* Clinton's fault?
No military person in my family, no military person I know, blames Bush's war on anyone but Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. She was either naive enough to believe Bush or doing it for political reasons...
And she didn't even read the NIE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Yea, Shrub drove the car - but Hillary et. al. gave him the keys...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. so did Kerry, Kennedy and Dodd, it wasn't anybody's fault that he rushed to war and mismanaged, you
act like it was a tied vote and HC cast the tiebreaker....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Kennedy didn't vote for the IWR.
Dodd I don't know about, but Kennedy was against it from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Hillary is no more or less guilty then all the other war enablers...
The only difference is she is (still) running for president and everybody else who voted for it has already dropped out and/or admitted it was a mistake.

This question will not go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. RiverStone, what do the words 'I made a mistake' mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. He is such a liar. He was not running for US Senate in 2002!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kyl-Leiberman did it for me...
I can forgive the IWR vote as much as I disagree with it.

But falling for the same thing on Kyl-Leiberman with Iran was just a total deal breaker since it proved to me that she either was so deluded as to not learn the blatant lesson from the IWR vote, or so craven as to risk other people's lives just so she seemed "strong" on national security.

Yes, I know Obama wasn't there for the vote but to me at worst that displays an agnosticism on the subject which while I don't agree with entirely either is still less craven and offensive than a yes vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. BO's own bill was almost exactly like K/L, but had stronger language.
Didn't know that, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Hillary voted for Kyl-Lieberman, and Obama didn't.
She also voted for the IWR, and Obama ran as an anti-war candidate. Let's stick to the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Obama submitted a bill almost exactly the same as K/l, but with stronger language.
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:52 PM by MethuenProgressive
And then ran awaywhaen K/L came up for a vote. 98 Senators voted on K/L, but BO claimed it was a "surprise" vote? That's sad.

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s970/show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Fine, let's see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. You don't even know Obama's record? wow. Here's the bill he sponsored that was like K/L:
Here's an excerpt from a bill Obama sponsored, that does the same thing as a bill he criticizes HIllary for voting for:

S.970
(8) The Secretary of State should designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) and the Secretary of the Treasury should place the Iranian Revolutionary Guards on the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists under Executive Order 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 186; relating to blocking property and prohibiting transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism).

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s970/show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. "Nothing in this Act should be construed as giving the President the authority
to use military force against Iran." You left that part out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. anyone with eyes should know that Obama is as warmongering and
willing to cater to the aipac crowd as Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. For the record, it was submitted by Sen. Gordon Smith, NOT Obama.
Obama was one of 70 Senate co-sponsors (that's 70 out of 100) including Boxer, Durbin, Kerry, and Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. You've been blinded by BOmainia and wouldn't recognize a
fact from fiction if it jumped out at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. Obama was one of 70 Senate co-sponsors. It was Gordon Smith's bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. and it was stupid as hell. god, when that phone rings at 3 in the morning, i want it
answered by no one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Agreed
She had a chance to redeem herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. at least she had the courage to vote, he didn't and that's the difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. The courage to vote for another blank check....
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll take someone who has some fears about making such a decision rather than one who thinks it's courageous to either fall for the same thing twice or put more more lives at risk to seem "strong" enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tell me....
...have you ever made a wrong choice before? Try as we might to build each candidate into some infallible mythological creature in the end they are only human. Both Senator Obama and Clinton are good candidates, but they are subject to the same frailties as all of us and where Senator Clinton was in a position to make a decision, Senator Obama was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No I have never made a mistake
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:43 PM by senseandsensibility
:sarcasm: :) Seriously, I am more than willing to forgive those that recognize their mistakes. My support of Edwards is proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think almost everyone would have. No other candidate would ever have had a shot at her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Exactly
The nomination would have been hers for the asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
46. Your name doesn't seem to fit you. She admitted she made
a mistake what is she suppose to do get on her knees and grovel. If she did, that still wouldn't satisfy you Republican lite BO supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. Who are you to call me republican light?
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 04:27 PM by senseandsensibility
A Hillary supporter? I have spent my life working the trenches. Your post is only worthy of one response. Hey, everybody! The Hillbot thinks I'm repub lite! now.rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not even so much about the judgement that went behind it.
Maybe it was an honest mistake on Clinton's part. Maybe Obama would have voted the same had he been in the Senate. That's not the point.

The point is that her IWR vote completely destroys any ability to attack McCain on the Iraq issue during the general election. It's the same thing that happened with Kerry. Why do we want to go through that again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Yes that's another consideration
But not the most important one, IMHO. Still, I get your point. We need to win, and anything that keeps us from doing that is a concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. That is a VERY important fact.
It's gonna suck more for the repiggies when the voter are left with a clear choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. you have an Edwards picture --and he sponsored IWR
Did you decide not to vote for him for the same reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I pointed that out myself in two posts above
But thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. suppose Hillary apologized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. At this late date when she's desperate?
I suppose I would have to hear the apology first.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. suppose she apologized at the same time Edwards did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. I'm not sure I get the point of hypotheticals
but if she had done exactly what Edwards did, I would have supported her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I don't understand then your stance
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:51 PM by Evergreen Emerald
Edwards not only voted for it, he was a sponsor of it.

Clinton has said time and again that the vote was a mistake and if she had it to do over again she would not have done it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Edwards sincerely apologized
No waffling. And he did it on his own VERY early in the campaign. No one had to drag it out of him. He volunteered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I see...so hers was not sincere enough for you?
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. did you vote for Kerry in 04?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 12:40 PM by senseandsensibility
I voted for him in the general, and I will vote for Hillary in the general if she is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libbygurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. .
Love the sig pic. I had to do a double-take, though! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Kerry was running against Bush, not Obama.
He also admitted that Bush had misled the country into war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Most likely...
I can't say 100% for sure, because there were so many other cowardly votes in her brief history, No Child Left Behind, Patriot Act, 2001 Bankrupcy bill.

However, there is a large difference between legislation like the above, that can be removed if it doesn't work and sending people off to die for your political future... so I could have forgiven the votes above and most likely would be supporter her now (unless there was a challenger who was more courageous on all votes)... However, sending people off to die for your own political gains is a deal breaker and she will never ever receive my vote because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama's record is even less defensible...He said he was against the war UNTIL he had a Senate vote!!
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 01:31 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
He said he was against the war until he had a Senate vote. Then he voted for each and every pro-war appropriation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. but how come Obama
would have done the same....if he's sincere:

"Samantha Power, one of Senator Obama’s chief foreign policy advisers, strongly criticized the United States in her book “A Problem From Hell” for failing to intervene in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and for the three-year delay in intervening in the Bosnian war, until the 1995 Srebrenica massacre.

Saddam Hussein also committed genocide by killing thousands of Iraqi Kurds with chemical weapons in the late 1980s and massacring thousands of Shiite marsh dwellers in southern Iraq after the first gulf war. How could we have left Mr. Hussein in power? How can Senator Obama say that removing a genocidal killer was a “dumb” war?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. I wouldn't have voted for her anyway
I am like many in this country who have just had enough bush & Clintons in the White House.

Call it fatigue or anything else but it's a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
52. It is that simple. Her vote proves she's part of the cabal.
She will protect the multinational corporations that right now control our government. She will protect B* and all the neocons.

Wishfull thinking doesn't change her votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
53. If she'd voted against IWR and dropped the hawkishness that has accompainied it with stuff like Iran
Yeah, she'd have gotten my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
54. i would have supported Hillary if she also opposed bill Clinton's war against Iraq
bombing and deadly sanctions included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
56. It's not just her vote then
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 03:06 PM by leftofthedial
It is also her unqualified support for king george's illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq after that. If she felt so betrayed by what he did after she wrote him the IWR blank check, why did she KEEP on writing more checks to fund the occupation?

It is also her doubletalk now, trying to justify now what was then an inexcusable lack of either judgment or principle or both. Like king george, she is unable to admit ANY mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
60. I could understand that, though I wouldn't agree
if Obama had been in a position to vote on it. His saying he was against the IWR doesn't impress me any more than Howard Dean or Wes Clark's position in 2004 did. They weren't there, they weren't privy to the same information or the political pressure that a United States Senator is.

Considering his votes since his election I believe that Obama's vote on the IWR would have been exactly the same as Hillary's, not to mention Dodd's, Kerry's, Edwards', Biden's, etc.

ps - Hillary voting one way or the other would not have "saved us from the war". Bush said himself prior to the vote that he didn't need the authorization in order to invade. The idea that the IWR led directly to the invasion of Iraq is simply not true, and my respect for Obama has diminished significantly exactly because he is pushing this lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
62. Early on I ruled out anyone who had voted for it.
Since I wanted someone with experience as a chief executive and of course foreign policy knowhow, I went for Richardson. When he dropped out I wavered between Kuchinich (a great protest vote) or Obama.

I voted for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC