Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Electoral Math - Obama vs. Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:23 PM
Original message
Electoral Math - Obama vs. Clinton
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/president/

BO supporters, tell me which states BO is going to win that Kerry did not in order to win this election. For Clinton I would say FL and AR, possibly TN. Tell me how you get to 270 needed for BO.

And let's leave flames out of it, if possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL - apparently BO supporters have NO IDEA how he wins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Perhaps you should wait for more than 4 minutes. n/t
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 05:34 PM by slick8790
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. You folks are slowing up--as most swarm onto a thread to diss it pronto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
74. Same old shtick....different day...gets tiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Wow. Cognitive Dissonance, thy name is MagsDem
You ask that people refrain from flaming and you immediately start flaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. LOL...you ask people to leave the flames out then start flaming on the first post.
Do you do kid's parties also? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. Quite the trick, isn't it?
I think it's a DU first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Surprised Mags didn't pull a muscle.
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:28 PM by Forkboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many possible: VA, WV, CO, IA, OH, NM maybe even MO.
And still possible FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
98. I'd take WV out of that equation.
Seriously. I'm a West Virginian. This state is full of elderly, rural white people who are conservative Democrats. They even have their own term: Republicrats. Ain't no way West Virginia will go for Obama.

The rest of the states you mentioned, I agree. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. IA, NM, OH, VA, NC, SC, GA, MS, LA, AR
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 05:31 PM by sandnsea
With crossover appeal, especially with Jim Webb on the ticket, and an energized minority vote, that's how. Tell me how Hillary is going to keep from losing completely since she has NO crossover appeal, has completely alienated the black vote, and can't fight McCain on Iraq or foreign policy since she basically agrees with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. SC, GA, MS, LA
:wtf;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Agreed.
That makes no sense to me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. They think Obama will cause every black person to turn out and flip those states
Axlerod himself has made this argument. It makes no sense. First, look at turnout for Democratic primaries. Black turnout has risen about as much as turnout for everyone else has. Even if Obama raises it in the general he would need 99.9% turnout to flip those states and that isn't happening. Then there is Obama's weakness among white Democrats in the South, which may more than offset his gains among blacks. In Alabama, for instance, Obama won over 80% of the black vote but only 22% of the white vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. They are so out of touch with reality is utterly stunning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Look at post 19
If you apply the general's demographics to the SC primary Obama's 28 point win over Hill would have been cut to about 6 and his 37 point win over Edwards would become about 8. Then these folks claim with a straight face that race doesn't matter in voting. :eyes: I think many of them are unaware that the general's demographics are far different than that for Democratic primaries, especially in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
99. "Let's leave the flames out, if possible."
Disregard your own advice often? No wonder you're a Hillary supporter!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I think those states
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:14 PM by woolldog
are very much in play, with an energized democratic electorate and depressed republican turnout.

Take a look at the 2004 election in those states:

In Louisiana only about 300,000 votes out of roughly 2 million separated Kerry and Bush.

In Georgia about 600,000 votes out of roughly 3.2 million votes separated Kerry and Bush.

In South Carolina 270,00 votes out of 1.6 million votes separated Kerry and Bush

In Mississippi about 220,000 votes out of 1.1 million votes separated Karry and Bush

Alabama is definitely not in play, whoever wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. No, sorry
Kerry lost GA by 16%
Kerry lost LA by 15%
Kerry lost SC by 17%
Kerry lost MS by 20%

You are kidding yourself. Big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
78. 1,000,000
Georgians voted in the democratic primary.

In the most recent poll I saw Obama trails McCain by 8 in Georgia. With depressed Republican turnout and a surge in democratic turnout consistent with what we saw in the primaries, it's in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. LMAO -- it's so not in play its not even being polled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. I saw a poll as of
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:49 PM by woolldog
February. So you're wrong. McCain 48 Obama 40.

You HRC supporters are so negative. Damn it's depressing. Change your slogan to "no we can't."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
58. There is some weird belief that whites don't vote monolithic and opposite of blacks in the South.
We already get massive black votes in those states. It's not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
89. I have white family in the south
for Obama. McCain is not an appealing candidate at all. Between an energized minority, youth who are not racist at all, and elders who want change, he can win some states in the south. He can sure make the Repubs spend a bunch of money there making it easier to flip some of those closer states, if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. You lose these states by 15-20 as it is. Why is Obama actually going to *win* one of them?
Making the range of loss even 10-15, and that's having him do better than Kerry, and he still gets zero electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. Obama will turn rethugs into Democrats
When he sprinkles the magic fairy dust, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
66. Or Obama may carry many Independent voters.
Most Democrats will still vote for Obama regardless how you feel right now, It will be the new registered voters and the Independents that will swing this election.

It also a possibility that some Republicans, who are just as sick as we are of the NEOCONS, will this one time vote Democratic. Or they may out of protest and nothing better, sit this one out.

Feel that? That is change in the air. Refreshing change. Go with the flow. Vote for a Democrat! I will :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. New Mexico, Iowa, Colorado, Virginia
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 05:32 PM by cali
and possibly Ohio. I suggest you look at more recent electoral maps. RCP has them up. Iowa has 7 EVs. CO has 9 and NM has 5. And they happen to add up to 21. Added to Kerry's 252 that give you 273- and that's without Ohio or Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. IA, NM, NV, OH, VA, CO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. NV, NM, IA and CO are VERY likely

OH and VA quite possible.

On the other hand, Clinton winning TN and FL is a pipedream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico, and possibly Virginia n/t
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 05:36 PM by slick8790
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
87. Obama could take Montana as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think this is a better map,
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 05:37 PM by stop the bleeding


http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/

I think when you look at the colors vs the record numbers as far as DEM turnout so far, either O or H could fair very well in November.

On edit:

I think this map shows that people are over red and blue, we're a purple nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hill doesn't stand a chance in FL. against McCain
not a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. LOL!! Looks like the OP has fled. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. IA, NM, MS, OH, LA, IN, VA, WV, GA, and MO
and KS if he taps Sebelius for Veep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Why do some Obamites think he can win MS and GA?
I know the theory but you guys do realize that cuts both ways in the general. It isn't the same as the Democratic primaries in those states. Let's put it this way, if the demographics for the general were the case for the SC Democratic primary the result would have looked something like Obama 38, Hillary 32, Edwards 30 instead of Obama 55, Hillary 27, Edwards 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. WJC won GA, and nearly won MS
It's doable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Where was WJC from? Chicago, Illinois?
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:17 PM by jackson_dem
WJC won those states for the same reason Carter did. Notice what Humphrey, McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, and Kerry all have in common? The only Democrats to win since 1960 are southerners. Too bad. We had Edwards but now we have a guy from Chicago and another from New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Sorry, you live in the clouds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I don't think any of the deep southern states are going Democratic this year.
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:02 PM by goodgd_yall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. wrong! Obama will win a few.
MCcain is damaged goods, those states that Huckabee performed well in are a good indication of how John will do in November. Obama will take NC, VA, SC and Georgia, the GOP are uninterested in McCain and will not show up meanwhile Democrats will overwhelm polling places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. NC and VA are completely different than SC and GA
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:15 PM by jackson_dem
SC and GA will not turn blue unless it winds up being a 49 state landslide. VA is a possibility, especially with Warner or Webb on the ticket. NC will be tougher (since Edwards is not going to be the nominee) but we would have a shot at winning it but if we win NC we will win big anyway so NC wouldn't have much significance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
67. Warner is the great "could have been"
It's funny that only a year ago the two presumptive candidates were Warner and Allen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
84. Edwards never even carried the primary here, (no offense John)
http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/NCSBE/VR/VR%20Stats/other/party.htm


NC has been gaining Democrats and losing Republicans, all those folks who believed that their vote never counted just might show up this year judging from the swell of people coming out in other states.

Obama will take some southern states, forget everything you used to know and take another look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. Did you click thru to any states on the map?
Apparently not. If you had you would see that every county is red. Very red in fact. You might get IA, but that is it. Oh man, you guys are so naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
60. You guys are out of your minds. Prepare to be massively disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Then there are states Gore won that Obama will lose
Namely Florida and Michigan (Kerry won it too) if he, as expected, disenfranchises them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sorry, I don't see Obama losing MI
not with the economy as bad as it is, and with McCain's positions. Furthermore, the seating of the delegates is not going to be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. If disenfranchising of MI isn't an issue then he should win Michigan
Even Kerry won it and things are more favorable to Democrats now. If it is an issue how many Democrats who were stripped of their voice will simply stay home, or leave the presidential line blank, on election day? It likely would be enough to swing the state to the rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. I disagree, I cannot see either HRC or Obama losing MI
Wayne County (i think that's the name), goes like 80% for the Democrat typically, & there are couple other strong Democratic areas to, I highly doubt that MI would go red......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Kerry won 51-48 and Gore won 51-46
There are very Democratic parts of the state but there are also very rethug parts. Michigan gets lost in the Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio hype but it is a vital swing state that has only three less electoral votes than Michigan and four less than PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. The economic conditions though make it a good Democratic state I think
McCain's straight talk express blew a tire in Michigan. His "brutal honesty" about them not getting their jobs back there will fall flat yet again in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
63. Michigan is not a safe state by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. He wont lose Michigan
McCain's straight talk express will fail miserably there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. states obama can win:
Iowa, Kansas, Virginia, Georgia, Nevada, Colorado, (some say Mississippi and Louisiana), Missouri, and New Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. Maybe IA
I will grant you he COULD win IA. No way in hell he will win a single southern state. And McCain looks good for the southwest states because he is from that area, similarly to the way Clinton took TN, AR, and GA when he won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. Baloney. If Richardson was his VP, he'd have a lock on NM
Even without Richardson he stands a good chance of it. There's a very popular dem running for Senate there, Tom Udall. VA is also a really strong possibility with another very popular dem running for the Senate. Both states have dem governors. Same with CO which has been trending purple. You really need to inform yourself about the trends and elections in the various states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #54
68. You really need to look at the demographics of those states
Oh, but I know -- we aren't allowed to mention that. Shhhhh!!!

Please don't tell me about "trends" and elections in various states. I eat breath and live politics. CO saw Bush win by 5%. And there are about 3 blue counties in the entire state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. I know the demographic of those states
and I'm right way, way more often than you, dear. You seem to be consuming a lot of empty calories. Clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. You sure don't see to.... but let's look at the data we have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. WOW,where can I get this Crystal Ball which everyone is using to predict the future???

The election is still many months away and other things still have to be done before then.

I'm sure Obama knows what he needs to do. After all he has done very well in defeating the vaunted Clinton machine, hasn't he!


Obama will won the required number of states he need to become President, and anything above that will be icing on them cake.


Texas is Obama country! VIVA OBAMA!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-MVU4vtU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. The media has beat the Clinton "machine" not Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
70. you have nothing but excuses. The media was only part of it
most of it is that she ran a historically awful campaign, and he ran a damned good one. She's politically tone deaf. She could weill have been taking advice from the likes of you. Get used to it, Mags, he out strategized her every step of the way. She doesn't deserve the nomination. She blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. repeating ALL of Kerry wins, we need 3 out 4 of CO, IO, NM, NV
and this obviously also assumes that we don't get Ohio or Florida

I AM SEEING MY EYES TURN BLUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. And every damn one of those will go McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. What exactly do you base that on.
Polls are showing him competitive or winning all those states. That's not defninitive of course and opinions can and do change, but it's better than basing an opinion on absolutely nothing....which is what you're doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
62. It's based on industrial strength Obama hate
nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
71. Oh links please -- I gotta see this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #71
85. okay, if you insist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #71
88. Oh and one more thing.
Like I've done, I would like you to support your statements that he won't win those states with some evidence please, instead of the sweeping, baseless guesswork that you're engaging in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. bwahahaha. The great Mags dresses up and plays phony oracle
All those states have been trending bluer. All have dem govs. All have popular dems running for open Senate seats. You really don't know jackshit if you think it's impossible that Obama can win in those states. You're simply fueled by mindless hate and bitterness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Dream on -- all of you
I just wanted to assure myself that you were as out of touch with reality as it appeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Says the person who claims Clinton would win TN and FL

Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I am very confident she would win FL and AR
Less, so about TN, but I think it's possible. As I said in my original post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. She's trailing McLame by almost double digits there.
Florida is a lost cause for democrats. You're delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Which poll are you looking at?
The ones I have seen have us competitive there with Hillary slightly more competitive than Obama in Florida. She also usually does better than him in Ohio and Pennsylvania too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Last poll in Florida I saw had Obama losing by 10, and Hillary losing by 9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. I haven't seen many, honestly.
But I was referring to the one discussed here http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/28/713124.aspx in the second paragraph.

I don't dispute that Obama does worse there, but I think right now Florida is a lost cause for Democrats this years. We're competitive in Ohio, Iowa, Nevada, Colorado, and Virginia, no matter who the nominee is. It's just a matter of how much of a gap we have to make up by November. Florida, sadly, I've lost confidence in. A bunch of crazies in a state known for voting irregularities just ain't good for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. No democrat wins FL
this year. It's just not in the cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
52. "And let's leave flames out of it, if possible. " says MagsDem, LOL
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Your gotta laugh at someone that fucking out of touch
she's a trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. You're the ONE person I am really going to enjoy
laughing my ass off at after November. Truly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. I'm enjoying laughing my ass off at you right now
and I'll be doing it next week and in November as well. It's soo much fun. And you deserve every snicker- and it's not just me laughing at you. Lots of folks here are. In fact, most of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. Don't be any money on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
64. LOL
says the queen of Cognitive Dissonance. No one here is more out of touch than thee, dearie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #64
91. It will be a hard enough road to travel down
in November to defeat the Republican machine - but we will do it with hard work and passion. It's time to start leaving people that just want to sulk, bitch, drag us down, and help the opposition with their apathy and negativity by the curb until such time as they figure out what four more years of Republican leadership in the White House really means. The OP seems to have made a cognitive choice that they will try and drag us all down if they can not have exactly what they want. That's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
100. Congratulations. How does it feel to be the biggest asshole on DU?
You start a thread indicating you want honest, open debate. Then you come in and insult and belittle every single person who supports Sen. Obama.

Classy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. The Real Issue for Hillary Is
She MUST win 65% of TX and OH to catch up to Obama and that ain't going to happen. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. Bingo. Let's look at Tuesday. (Aside: MagsDem says "leave flames out of it"??)
Let's see what happens in the general election once Obama clinches the nomination, shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #72
81. I agree - expect a suspension of the Clinton campaign on Wednesday
I think unless Clinton wins both Ohio AND Texas, she will suspend her campaign. It will be mathematically impossible for her to win the nomination. Pay no attention to the rah rah speeches, if both are not won by Clinton on Tuesday - she's out. By the way, don't expect a withdrawal but a 'suspension' as they hope for a scandal. I hate to say that they would actually hope for that, but I honestly think that for Bill and Hillary Clinton it's all about them - damn the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Yep. This should already be over, but we'll wait it out. I just hope he wins both.
That would absolutely end it. If he wins one, I fear she will try to hang on, and do incalculable damage to the party. But, the superdelegates will peel off like crazy under that scenario.

If he wins both, she will "suspend" on Wednesday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
80. Is it really that much harder to type "Obama" than it is to type "BO"?
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 06:48 PM by jefferson_dem
"Leave the flames out of it." Uh-huh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
86. Impossible! You love to flame far too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #86
94. POT MEET KETTLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
92. Now Obama supporters, redo the math with Condi Rice, or Colin Powell on the ticket
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 10:14 PM by JCMach1
:( as McCain's Veep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. I don't see either happening...
Powell's wife doesn't want any part of it, and Rice is headed to the private sector to cash in.

I think McCain will tap a governor from a state he MUST carry (like Charlie Crist R-FL, who'd been kissing ass with religious fervor of late).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #93
95. We will see, he has a particuliarly difficult task
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 05:45 AM by JCMach1
will post an article as a separate discussion of this....

You will find that discussion here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4842970
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. Thnx for the link*
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
96. You have to give him VA, which is purple-blue at this point. CO, OH, TN, LA, + FL are on the table.
His appeal to independents is the only thing that will compete with McCain's like appeal to independents. Hillary has zero appeal to independents...she'll basically cede every battleground state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC