Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama considering Chuck Hagel as Defense Secretary, possible VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:00 AM
Original message
Obama considering Chuck Hagel as Defense Secretary, possible VP
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3466823.ece

Senior advisers confirmed that Hagel, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and one of McCain’s closest friends in the Senate, was considered an ideal candidate for defence secretary. Some regard the outspoken Republican as a possible vice-presidential nominee although that might be regarded as a “stretch”.

Asked about his choice of cabinet last week, Obama told The Sunday Times: “Chuck Hagel is a great friend of mine and I respect him very much,” although he was wary of appearing as though he was already choosing the White House curtains. But after winning 11 primary contests in a row after Super Tuesday, he is ready to elbow Clinton off the stage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. O Noz! How skeery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I should add, Hagel is a good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Agree, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Ah...he is republican.
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 04:19 AM by liberalnurse
:scared: :eyes:

You do know that could become President in case Obama was Impeacher or Resigned or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. like your sig....
lol... :thumbsup:

Viva Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. BTW,
I plan on borrowing that after the nomination is set.

Giving you a heads-up. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. demonizer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. His Iraq war stance has been valiant.
He has been on the wrong side of almost every issue when it comes to his vote record, up to and including his IWR vote. He committed political suicide in Nebraska for taking a rhetorical anti-war stance. He won't carry our state and he knows it. He is not running for re-election.

"We must exercise caution," he said. And boots were already on the ground on the borders of Iraq. Who could not have known what the outcome of that vote would be?

I admire Senator Hagel immensely, and far prefer him to Senator-elect Johanns, but I think we can do better from within our own party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. I just had a flashback to Kerry/McCain. Shudder. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. More crap from that timesonline site? Got a reputable site that covers this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. No gerund. He CONSIDERED it during an interview.
Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
42. It's not a gerund
it's a present participle.


"Considering Hegel is dumb." That's a gerund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Thank you
Screw the whales, save the gerund

--Tom Stoppard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
5.  the times has been cranking out the shit
for the last few weeks...i wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. You guys are really desperate, with the misleading headlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. I heard he was grooming George Clooney for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Clooney needs to be "groomed"
I don't think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. First of all....
Hagel can't be a VP because he is a member of the other party...

There is precident for this...

Clinton had William Cohen, a former GOP senator as his third SOD...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. The author, Sarah Baxter, is a Bush supporter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Does Hagel still have some ownership of the Diebold machines?
Sounds like a sure way to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. LOL Well, in that case...
Obama/Hagel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. not quite, but similar - ES&S, then McCarthy Group

He also served as a Chairman and was CEO of American Information Systems Inc. (AIS), a voting machine manufacturer, until its name-change to Election Systems & Software (ES&S) in 1997. He had ownership interest in ES&S through it's parent company The McCarthy Group as of January 29, 2003, when The Hill reported that, due to his ownership interest, “Hagel’s ethics filings pose disclosure issue”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Hagel

But ES&S has not brought any great big old Republican victories, at least not in NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. I could live with him as defense secretary
but as VP I couldn't. Not now, not ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. to neutralise McCain
March 2, 2008

Barnstorming Obama plans to pick Republicans for cabinet

As he jets across two key states whipping up the support that could finish off Hillary Clinton this week, the Democratic frontrunner is already mapping out a government of all the talents. Our writer joins him aboard Obama One

AS Barack Obama enters the final stages of the fight for the Democratic presidential nomination, he is preparing to detach the core voters of John McCain, the likely Republican nominee, with the same ruthless determination with which he has peeled off Hillary Clinton’s supporters

...Obama believes he will be able to neutralise McCain by drawing on the expertise of independent Republicans such as Hagel and Lugar, who is regarded by Obama as a potential secretary of state.

Larry Korb, a defence official under President Ronald Reagan who is backing Obama, said: “By putting a Republican in the Pentagon and the State Department you send a signal to Congress and the American people that issues of national security are above politics.”

Korb recalled that President John F Kennedy appointed Robert McNamara, a Republican, as defence secretary in 1961. “Hagel is not only a Republican but a military veteran who would reassure the troops that there was somebody in the Pentagon who understood their hopes, concerns and fears,” he said...

more at the link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Not uncommon - Bush, Clinton, JFK, etc. have all done the same (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Which Bush, and which Democrat did he appoint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
54. Current Bush, appointed Norman Mineta Transportation Secretary (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. There is nothing in the article that suggests Sen Obama has considered
Hagel for Vice President. and typically you forgot the more interesting part of the article

Bill may tell Hillary to quit on Tuesday

IT is the burning question of the moment: who will have the courage to tell Hillary Clinton it is time to quit? Friends of the couple say the chances are that it will be her husband, and that he will tell her if she loses Texas or Ohio on Tuesday. He has already made it clear she cannot soldier on without a double victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. Chuck Hagel and Dennis Kucinich

In 2007 Senator Hagel attended a meeting organized by the American Iranian Council which brought together numerous national and international policy makers in an attempt to improve their understanding of Iran's role in Iraq and its nuclear enrichment intentions/capabilities.

Others in attendance at this meeting were Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Ambassador Javad Zarif from Iran 's UN Mission, Ambassador Anders Lidén from Sweden , Mr. Nicholas Kristof from the New York Times, and a host of other distinguished academics, businessmen, nonprofit representatives and private citizens.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Hagel#Business_career
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Stop the silliness.
No Democatic president is going to have a republican VP.

It might fly 150 years ago (though to my knowledge it didn't) but today it just won't happen.

No matter how much ANY candidate talks nice about someone of the other party, they WON'T DO IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. Your subject line might be regarded as a stretch too.
But you knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
22. DO NOT TRUST TIMES ONLINE. They're England's version of the NY Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Even when they say this: from the article
Bill may tell Hillary to quit on Tuesday

IT is the burning question of the moment: who will have the courage to tell Hillary Clinton it is time to quit? Friends of the couple say the chances are that it will be her husband, and that he will tell her if she loses Texas or Ohio on Tuesday. He has already made it clear she cannot soldier on without a double victory.

If, however, she wins narrowly in both states but lags significantly behind in the number of delegates needed to clinch the nomination, then who will tell Bill Clinton to tell Hillary the game is up?

It could be Vernon Jordan, the African-American power broker who is so loyal to the Clintons that he arranged a job for the former intern Monica Lewinsky when she was no longer welcome at the White House.

The Clintons believe they could still fight on if Hillary wins the popular vote in Texas but ends up with fewer delegates under the state’s peculiar system, which combines a primary election with caucuses. Hillary’s camp is threatening to sue the local Democratic party if this happens but it could leave her with the reputation of a petulant, sore loser.

Leon Panetta, Bill Clinton’s former White House chief of staff, said: “There comes a point where you can drag this thing on in a way that doesn’t really give you the votes you need and it leaves a bad taste in the mouth.”

BTW Hagel would make a good Ambassador to the UN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. Heck, in '04 didn't Kerry consider McCain for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. Not a good source...it seems to be all speculation
I'm not against Hagel as SecDef...just keep him FAR away from any domestic policy. It's not unusual for a president to have a member of another party in the Cabinet. Personally, I wouldn't want any more than one, though.

And a Republican VP would be a terrible idea. I hope nobody goes there, whoever wins the nomination. (Can't see Hillary doing that; Obama? Possible; I hope unlikely)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hagel is right on the war.
But make NO mistake...he IS a RIGHT WINGER in every other area.
So all of you out there that think that obama WILL pull the SCOTUS back from the hard far right---I wouldn't fucking hold your breath.
obama WILL be a high risk assassination target. You put a winger as his running mate--you can guarantee that that winger WILL finish the term.

And look at what you get with Hagel:
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record.
Voted YES on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions.
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.
Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives.
Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime.
Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life.
Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions.


We will be totally fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. Rupert Murdoch
and the article doesn't say that Obama is considering Hagel- or anyone else. How dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Typical Herman hit and run O.P. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
31. I really like Chuck Hagel
I've met him and regard him as a very smart, sensible man--one of the very few Republicans I can say that about. Obama could do far worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think defence secretay could work if he keeps Susan Rice on board.
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:33 AM by cooolandrew
I doubt he would make this huge a mis-stepwhen he has done everything else liek clock work. I imagine he just wantsto let him down gently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. and, that's a good thing?
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 07:02 AM by bigtree
Last night it was Magic Rat endorsing Powell, now you with this republican. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
38. It's the war, stupid
(Not calling you stupid, just a figure of speech.)

It's the war. Period. It really is. To a lot of us everything else comes second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
40. Why would Obama be naming a Secretary of Defense,
when he hasn't even won the nomination? That doesn't even make sense. Why do people spread such false information?

I too have to question how legitimate the info is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. He's not
He said in an interview that he would consider Hagel.

Cabinet choices are a perfectly valid thing to look at in primary season, incidentally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Ok, I understand
But people twigging out because he may or may not pick a Republican in this cabinet is a little ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Even * picked a Democrat for Dept. of Transportation
It's a tradition that goes back IIRC to Nixon: pick a DINO/RINO from the other party for the cabinet.

I think it's a good idea, honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Yeah I have no problem with it
I think some people are using the information to make Obama look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #40
56. He...and Hillary....should be doing this.
They both should be doing this: selecting for Cabinet appoinments. Quietly vetting them. You don't have all that much time for the transition.

And McCain is doing the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
46. Hagel would be fine as Secretary of Defense.
I would like Samatha Power as Secretary of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
48. B.U.L.L.S.H.I.T.
I happen to personally know several of Obama's advisers and while Hagel is a friend, Obama's veep shortlist doesn't include Chuck Hagel. His short list includes Sen. Jim Webb and Gen. Anthony Zinni.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Yes, the Hagel as VP is a ridiculous part of the piece.
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 07:40 AM by mmonk
The rest of the article is ok. The two you mention for VP are names I've heard bantered about and would be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlotta Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
50. Do you even know who Chuck Hagel is?
* Voted YES on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)
* Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
* Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
* Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
* Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
* Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
* Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
* Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
* Voted YES on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
* Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
* Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance (190 members). (Dec 2006)

* Voted YES on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration. (Jun 2006)
* Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
* Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
* Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
* Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
* Voted YES on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
* Supports anti-flag desecration amendment. (Mar 2001)
* Rated 60% by the ACLU, indicating a mixed civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
* Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
* Rated 11% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)


My God, people, this guy is extremely conservative. Yes, he finally opposed the war, but look at the rest of his record!

http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Chuck_Hagel.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Any Dem who thinks Hagel would be a good choice for Obama
is an idiot. Obama trying to be bipartisan and reaching across the isle is one thing, but putting Republicans in these positions in the White House is dangerous. I thought we were trying to shut out the Repukes this fall. Now we are giving them positions of power. Did we forget what they have done with their power for all these years?? There are actually Obama fans who think this is a good idea??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Obama never, ever said he'd consider Hagel as a VP
He said he'd consider him as a Secretary of defense. I don't care how Republican the guy is, he's right on everything defense-related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. I know for a fact Obama will never ask Hagel to be his veep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. I agree...
Inviting Republicans to join the coalition to put Barack in the WH is one thing, putting them in positions of power is something else entirely ~ that would be a deal breaker for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. Rated 100% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record. (Dec 2003)
For many, it seems as if the past 8 years never happened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
55. I think Hagel in the cabinet would be good but certainly not as VP.
Obama needs to pick from his own party for the #2 slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC