Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A shady land deal or 4,000 dead soldiers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:27 AM
Original message
A shady land deal or 4,000 dead soldiers
I'll risk voting for Obama who possibly did a shady real estate deal rather than Hillary who supported George Bush's war against Iraq. Sorry but priorities first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
if only Clinton had voted no on a resolution, the whole war would've been averted. :eyes:

This is Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's nuts
That's like saying to your kids "OK, I know you're gonna have sex so just go ahead and do it already."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, with Hillary you have
4,000 dead soldiers AND a shady land deal among other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. So you're saying if Hillary would have voted "no" there would be no war? ..
yeah right!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Go ahead kids
I know you're gonna smoke so just go ahead anyway.

That is the logic of your argument. Ever hear of doing something based on principal? Sure Shrub would have gone to war...so endorse it? What type of lame-ass excuse is that for Hillary?

She didn't want to seem "soft on terra" because she subcombed to the Republican media and talking heads. Political calculation. Nothing more, nothing less.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. but by you're logic it's ok to long the other way on a "shady land deal"..
why should either get a pass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You must be kidding me
You are putting 4,000 dead soldiers and a shady land deal as equals in the grand scheme of things? Do I really need to address this question?

Questions

How many families were devastated by a land deal?
How many families were devastated by a loved one killed in Iraq?

How many children are motherless or fatherless because of a land deal?
How many children are motherless or fatherless by a loved one killed in Iraq?


I don't think any type of corruption is good. But show me ONE politician that has made it as far as President without any shady dealings along the way. A random blowjob, land deal, savings and loan...they all have something going on from the past.

But we are talking giving Bush a thumbs up for what will be the longest and most expensive war in the US history. I cannot forgive that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's fun to make shit up.
The ONLY real control Congress has on Bush's ability to mobilize and deploy forces is in providing or denying money for him to operate. Obama voted (along with Clinton) for EVERY Iraq funding bill until 2007. Bush can't hide behind a resolution that he virtually ignored as he exercised assumed authority under the War Powers Act and deployed troops to Iraq. Obama can't hide his neglect to even raise the issue in his official capacity in the Senate until 2005, behind a speech he made while he was a state legislator in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yup
Making stuff up.

Hit the link.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237

For the record if Obama voted for this as Hillary did I would not be voting for him. I am still torn about voting against funding. If one troop died because of a lack of funds then it wouldn't be right. The only way to end this war is an anti-war President. Hillary is no more anti-war than Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Just winging it, aren't you?
"no more anti-war than Bush"

Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. How is she against this war?
Tough talk on the campaign trail? Oh that makes up for the war vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. you must not read much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Like putting words in people's mouths I see, no where did I say they were equals, I said
why should either get a pass? Why should Obama not have to lay it all out there on this? If he's hiding things here what else is he hiding? OR if he gets it out there now it gets it "taken care of" before the GE and the repugs have less fodder. So that seems like a win-win to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I agree with you on that
I think the one good thing for a drawn out primary is that it will be harder for Republicans to drudge stuff up. My original point wasn't about if it is good or not to bring up all skeletons. My point is that if I have to choose between two people my #1 issue is the war in Iraq and our soldiers being killed in an illegal war. Hillary voted to authorize the war therefore I cannot vote for her in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oh - when you said shady land deal, I thought you were going back
in time to Whitewater and the 15 people convicted in that nonevent. Common sense would say, if there was a story behind Rezko it would be out there. What journalist wouldn't want to hang the destruction of a presidential candidate on their belt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. NOTHING illegal about the land deal. Already vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYPat Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hillary had one vote and it passed 77-23
Hillary's vote did not decide the matter. Let's not give her all the blame. Obama says he would not have voted for the Iraq resolution IF he was in the Senate. Hillary's says she would not have started the Iraq War IF she was in the White House. Do we know that Obama is more honest or has a better record of backing up his words with actions? Obama hasn't admitted to a "shady real estate deal" but IF he did participate in one it was solely his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC