|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 08:49 AM Original message |
Now I know why there was no impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. So HRC kept impeachment off the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Spineless Democrats like -- oh, Nancy Pelosi! -- kept it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, but WHO initiated the talks of "Keep it OFF the table?" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. The DLC? Pelosi herself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 08:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. I hate to disagree, but I do. There's some evidence to suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Show me evidence that HRC was for impeachment.......I haven't seen any to date nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Most politicians won't support impeachment because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
5. It's not that simple. Impeachment wasn't possible, and was likely to backfire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
7. THe most likely scenarios wouldn't leave it to Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
8. There was no impeachment becoz Congress was complicit with the crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBushSpokenHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. HELL they both could have been easily locked up nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
11. That's stretching it a bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
12. Point of info: Pelosi would not have become president. Remember Gerald Ford? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
13. This doesn't make sense; Pelosi herself has kept impreachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
14. Pelosi would only get the position if they had been simultaneously convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
15. I think there MIGHT have been a bit of feeling on Nancy's part that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I'd agree with that but think it was stupid for Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC