|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:52 PM Original message |
Would this guy be qualified to be Secretary of Defense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why not just tell us who it is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Chuck Hagel (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because it may be a republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. No Republicans in the Cabinet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Bill Clinton's Sec. of Defense was a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. Chuck Hagel for VP? No. For Secretary of Defense possibly? Maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I don't think anyone wants him as our VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. stop messing around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. possibly- as long as he's a democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. What does being a Democrat have to do with qualification for Sec. of Defense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. everyone in the cabinet is in the line of succession to the presidency, for one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. If the number seven guy in the line of succession gets to be President... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. 7th in line is still closer to the big chair than i want any republican getting for now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. One of the stand-out qualities of Hagel is his support of the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. What's Clark? Chopped liver? Why not him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What if Clark is too busy being Vice President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Clark is not eligible to be Sec Def until 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. WTF?!?...supporting Rethuglicans for an Obama WH is way across the line.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Did it lose Bill Clinton any Democratic voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. He would make a fine SecDef. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hell no, read THIS garbage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. But he WANTS TO KILL YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY OMG RUN RUN RUN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It's ridiculous. If Obama wanted Ted Stevens or Denny Hastert, THEN I'd be apoplectic-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
19. A rose, by any other name.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NCarolinawoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
23. A Republican SOD plays into the presumption that ONLY Republicans can do National Security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Bingo. that's a VERY important consideration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pathwalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
27. Eight years of Republican cronyism is ENOUGH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
28. Think "Team of Rivals" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-02-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
29. If it's not a Democrat, then no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC